MUST-READ Selection(s):
So You Dislike The Prospect Of Civil War?
The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility; author(s) may have positions in any firm or security discussed here, and have no duty to disclose same.
The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)
Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must be complete (NOT a "pitch"), include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. Pitch emails missing the above will be silently deleted. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.
Considering sending spam? Read this first.
One common refrain: They're inflationary.
That's a lie and any economist who says that knows he or she is lying.
This is math, not politics.
Let's definite this: A tariff is a tax on an imported good or service. It thus does indeed raise the price of said good or service by the amount of the tariff. This is easily understood and weaponized by the liars in the media and economic profession. The media may not know the facts but all economists do.
In fact a tariff is exactly neutral to inflation as a whole.
Why?
Let's take an example.
There is a thing that has a price of $1,000 at the dock coming into the US. The US Government slaps a $1,000 tariff (100%) on it, so now the cost at the dock is $2,000. Assuming the business passes that through and neither attempts to profit from or absorb it, that is, they take no deliberate action to attempt to exploit it or be damaged by it, the entire $1,000 shows up on the shelf price.
That sounds inflationary.
It isn't.
Why not?
Because all inflation is caused by the emission of credit, and the US Government is running a fiscal deficit -- that is, emitting credit. This is the infamous (and true) Milton Friedman statement: "Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomena."
So where does the $1,000 go?
It goes directly to the Federal Government and reduces inflation generated by the federal government's deficit spending by the exact same amount the price increase at the consumer increases it.
Right as I write this CNBC is lying to you -- and the Press is about to do it too with their "questions" for Powell.
Again: Tariffs are a zero when it comes to inflation -- they neither help or hurt it as a function of imposing and collecting them because there is exact balance, to the penny, of both inflationary and deflationary forces.
HOWEVER, to the extent a tariff incentivizes jobs and production to come back to the United States they are deflationary and benefit consumers by lowering inflation pressure in that producing a good or service in the United States instead of overseas means all of the tax revenue generated by the activity happens here in the United States and tax revenue of course decreases the deficit and thus drives inflation down.
This is the kick-off in a new category, "47", which is intended to identify the areas that I have spoken of many times before with an emphasis and focus, in all cases, back to economics.
It is my hope that some of these proposals, and they can be done quickly, will permit movement of this area back into the main Market Ticker side -- with ads. To do that will require some of these changes to occur.
To be clear -- that which requires Congressional assent is tough; while it appears the GOP will hold the House, and we know they will have a majority in the Senate (likely by 2 seats when the dust settles) it will remain a relatively-thin majority. Expecting strong pushes from Congress is unwise, and further, insanity among Congress can be even stronger than that from the Executive, so it is extremely important not to have to rely on Congress and further, to use measures where they're available and clearly within the Constitution and existing law to accomplish the goals.
I refuse to play games with the "reach as far as you can, damn the Constitution" nonsense. Trump did this in his first term with bump stocks and got his ass handed to him ultimately. In fact the Supremes required the BATFE to return them to those who they seized them from, and if they destroyed them to pay for them.
There are a number of acts Biden and Harris took that were clearly unlawful. All of them must be unwound. Some will be unpopular but that doesn't matter; you either stand on the Rule of Law or you do not. Further, unlawful and unconstitutional attempts at obstruction, such as the highlighted area here if it occurs must be met with immediate indictment and prosecution along with the immediate yanking of any security clearance of anyone involved, which is an absolute and non-reviewable right of the President.
ttps://x.com/Breaking911/status/1854244852080214103
The next year, and indeed the next four, will either define an American Renaissance after a painful correction of deliberate deception and hiding of economic cycles, or it will lead to ruin. Harris not only didn't have the chops to understand this she had zero intention of fixing it as she was one of the chief protagonists over the last four years involved in causing it. The Federal Deficit last year hit roughly two trillion dollars, which is an approximately 7% forced inflationary emission of credit over the last fiscal year. You have seen the doubling in your grocery bills, wild-eyed spikes in insurance and other necessary purchases, along with a crazy degradation in health care quality and ramps in price. I warned when Obamacare came in that the bill was an attempt to paper over what was an impending disaster rather than deal with the problem and here we are more than 10 years down the road having compounded the damage. We cannot continue to do this without a catastrophe occurring.
The broad outline of what we must accept includes that through no fault of either political party, just the plain reality of economic cycles, the interest rate environment has turned. Almost nobody alive today, save a few such as Warren Buffett, have ever been active in business in the former upward-moving cycle. These cycles usually run 30 or so years -- not one or two -- and should have turned back after the financial crash of 2008. Rather than face that both Bush and Obama tried to paper it over, and I'm sure some folks told them they could do it forevermore. That was flat-out false and whether it was born out of stupidity or intentional misconduct so those giving the advice could make off with a few more billion does not matter. What matters now is that the cycle has turned and will remain so for the next three or so decades, not a couple of years.
The simplest way to explain this in the form of business is that if you can borrow $1 million at 5% the interest cost is $50,000 a year. Companies -- and governments -- almost never pay that borrowing off. Go find the business, school, local, state or federal bond issue that is actually retired and is gone off the books. It essentially never happens and the reason is that if you can roll over that debt at 3% interest 10 years later the $50,000 it used to cost you is now $30,000 and the other $20,000 goes straight to the bottom line of your cash flow sheet. This in turn incents you to either borrow more or simply report the higher "earnings" and thus your stock price goes up. It also makes municipal and state balance sheets, never mind the federal one, look better than they are.
But as with all areas of leverage what helps in one direction screws you in the other.
If you have a $20,000 (because you had a 2% loan) interest payment on that million dollars and now the interest rate offered is 5% when the debt comes due you have to pay an extra $30,000 a year. That comes straight off the bottom line and in government that either means you must raise taxes, cut services or, if the federal government you can force it on the backs of the people through inflation by increasing the debt even further. Doing the latter, which is what we've been doing makes it exponentially worse because that inflation causes people to demand even higher rates of interest.
This is why despite The Fed cutting 50 basis points the longer term bonds have gone up in rate; the market has discerned that (1) the rate environment has turned, (2) that's a multi-decade trend change and (3) "cutting" increases inflation and thus makes rates go higher because nobody intentionally lends money at a loss.
We must take immediate action to reverse the market's beliefs in this regard -- and we can't lie because the market has already figured it out. There is plenty more -- getting rid of mandates unsupported by data, ending legal immunity for all medical products (specifically "vaccines") along with voiding any claim of "trade secret" protection against disclosure in any sort of medical product or device, getting seed oils out of Americans' diets, especially involuntarily-consumed ones and more, but those have payback periods measured in many years or decades and we simply don't have decades to put a dent in things. Yes, those are important too and I'll be writing on them as well but this post is on immediate actions that must take place within days or weeks of Trump being inaugurated if he is serious about actually preventing a foldback-style collapse of the economy, government and markets.
To restate from the point related to the above email from the Harris campaign to its workers, those who have been proved to have intent to obstruct must have their security clearances yanked on a summary basis. This is a plenary right of the Executive and there are no grounds for review nor do you have a due process or other right to obtain and maintain one. Every one of the people who, for example, was involved in the "Russia Russia Russia" scam, which was proved a scam, in the last Trump Administration must have their clearance summarily revoked on Trump's first day in office.
So with that said, here is the broad outline:
If you think we can avoid the impact of the rate cycle turn you are wrong. We cannot. That cycle turn will revalue downward all firms that have debt on, and in the last ten years corporations, despite having clear warning that this cycle was turning, have wildly increased leverage rather than take it down. They will have to deal with that and stock prices will adjust -- and not a little. The same will be true for real estate as it is frequently financed, and many who got in over their heads are going to be bankrupted.
That sounds horrible but in fact it is good -- if you need a building for some purpose, whether a business or a place to live, is it to your benefit to have higher or lower prices? Obviously you want lower prices. For those who own real estate without any mortgage debt on it you lose nothing in real terms because you get less for your current house but you pay commensurately less for the other one, just as was the case on the way up. Those who got in over their heads and refinanced, especially serially or took the funds out and spent them somewhere will go broke but that is unavoidable, just as it is with commercial real estate owners who did the same thing.
If we address the five points above then while the serious downside economic event that Harris and Biden baked into the cake will occur -- that cannot be avoided -- within the first half of Trump's administration the turning point will be reached and just like occurred in 1920/21 while the downturn will be painful the resulting recovery and re-shoring of both manufacturing and all other lines of business into the United States will be prompt, enormous and record-setting.
In other words come the 2026 midterms the result will start to be evident and by 2028 it will be obvious that not only was it the right and sane choice but America will stand alone on the world stage as it once used to in terms of both economic and political achievement.
We must do it now, and do it all, because if we fail then the essential services that everyone believes we should have will not be able to be funded and virtually everyone in the United States will be economically destroyed.
These are the stakes.
Details to follow.