Demolishing Lies On Low Carb Eating
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives

Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2016-04-25 05:00 by Karl Denninger
in Personal Health , 11154 references Ignore this thread
Demolishing Lies On Low Carb Eating*
[Comments enabled]

The medical industry doesn't want you to read this.

Nor does the food industry.

But you should read it, and let it sink in.

There is a lot of BeeEss flying around about low-carb eating.  Here are some common myths and truths related to this lifestyle.

  • Myth: It's a "fad diet."  Eating low-carb is a lifestyle, not a diet and it is not a fad.  In fact humans, prior to the discovery of high-density agriculture, almost-exclusively ate in this fashion.  A "fad" is an unproved and new way of doing something without examination as to validity.  It is in fact the modern mania with vegetable oils, nearly none of which exist in nature, along with other highly processed foods such as cereals and sugar-laden things, driven by literal billions of advertising dollars, that is the fad.  Nobody spends a billion dollars advertising broccoli crowns on TeeVee!

  • Myth: Low-carb eating means not eating vegetables and fruits.  Nonsense.  For nearly everyone who decides to eat low-carb their consumption of vegetables greatly increases, especially when it comes to green vegetables.  There is no restriction whatsoever in the consumption of things such as spinach, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cucumbers and its soaked-in-vinegar friend the dill pickle, various forms of peppers and similar.  Small, nutrient-dense fruits and berries, along with nuts, are also compatible in amounts comparable to that which would be found "in season" naturally.

  • Myth: Low-carb eating means not getting enough fiber.  Oh really?  All those vegetables are an insufficient source of fiber?  Like hell; what's missing is the artificially-added back fiber that people love to crow about in things like bread, which wasn't there in the first place due to all the processing.  I suppose if you want to eat what amounts to cardboard (cellulose) that has been put back into a processed food so it can claim to be "high fiber" then yes, it means "not getting enough" but the last time I checked cardboard wasn't a naturally-occurring thing nor would you find it tasty -- unless it was slathered with sugar.  Guess what gets added to these "foods" to make all that added-back fiber palatable?  Yep.

  • Myth: Low-carb eating means not having enough energy since you don't have carbohydrates.  Fact: Your body, even if you're very slender with zero perceptible fat on you, has enough fat in storage to run ten marathons without eating, yet you can't even run one with a maximum load of stored carbohydrate.  Your stores of glycogen, which is what carbohydrate is metabolized into in the body, are limited to about 2,000 calories at most.  Even the leanest person has five to ten pounds of fat stored on them (and most have a lot more) with each pound being 3,500 calories.  You do the math.

  • Myth: You need carbohydrates.  Fact: There are no essential carbohydrates.  There are essential fatty acids and protein complexes, along with ascorbate (vitamin C) that your body cannot synthesize, but no such thing exists for carbohydrates.  The exact amount of carbohydrate your body requires is zero.

  • Myth: You can't perform athletically without carbohydrates.  Fact: Athletic performance, especially for endurance events such as running at double-digit mileages, is not only possible without carbohydrates it in many ways can be superior.  During heavy exertion the digestive system is effectively shut down because the body shunts its energy resources to the skeletal muscles to drive that performance.  Since carbohydrate stores are limited to about 2,000 calories and a mile of running requires somewhere between 100 - 120 calories to sustain plus your base energy requirement (another 150 calories/hour or so) during longer endurance events you're constantly "dancing with the devil" in attempting to consume carbohydrates and digest them while your digestive system is barely functional.  If you lose this dance you either vomit or have an immediate need to relieve yourself out the other end -- and both of those events come with dehydration, which is very dangerous when exerting yourself heavily.  By contrast when running on lipids (fats) even the leanest athlete has more than enough fat in their body to run several ultra marathons back-to-back and thus need consume nothing in the way of food, requiring only hydration and electrolytes that can be immediately absorbed by the intestines.  Further, studies have shown that those who are low-carb adapted burn much more fat during exercise than those who run into glycogen-deficit due to lack of carbs during a workout.  In other words if part of your fitness goals include losing or maintaining body mass then being keto-adapted, that is, eating low-carb, will make your exercise far more productive in terms of losing weight -- 2.3x as much, to be precise.

  • Myth: There's nothing to eat, it gets boring fast, and nutrient quality is poor.  Fact: See the below list; virtually everything available to eat before the introduction of cheap international transport and "factory" foods is compatible with low-carb eating.  Any form of animal flesh, eggs, cheeses, most vegetables and modest amounts of fruit and nuts are what make up a low-carb dietary intake.  In addition virtually all spices are zero-carbohydrate and can be used without concern as to quantity.  When you eat a lot of carbohydrate you're targeting caloric intake since high-carbohydrate foods have very low nutrient levels.  The poster child for this is of course sugar, which other than carbohydrate has essentially zero nutrients, but it doesn't end there.  Most high-carb starchy foods have very low vitamin and other nutrient loads compared against foods such as broccoli, kale and similar.  Broccoli, for example, has your entire Vitamin C and K requirements in one serving along with a very high nutrient and protein balance score yet nets only 31 calories per serving and 6 grams of carbs, 2 of which are indigestible (fiber.)  Rice, on the other hand, has a very low nutrient balance score, a decent protein balance, 205 calories/serving (6.6x as much!) and 45g of carbs yet only one gram of fiber (1/4 as much.)  It also fails to provide any material amount of your vitamin requirements; the only related item that measures reasonably-well is folate.  On the other hand when you eat low-carb your nutrient levels are naturally very high since those non-animal-source foods compatible with low-carb eating are sparse in calories.  In short, assuming you consume the same caloric intake, what you "crowd out" when eating high-carb is nutrition while what you "crowd out" when eating low-carb is junk.

  • Myth: Low-carb means eating a very high amount of protein.  Fact: Low-carb eating contains moderate protein levels.  Very high amounts of protein in fact are not "low-carb" since protein, when taken in beyond metabolic needs, is converted to glucose in the body.  That would be the opposite of what you're intending.  Don't trim the fat off your steak, consume it instead.

  • Myth: Your cholesterol balance will go to hell on a low-carb diet and you'll have a heart attack.  Fact: HDL typically goes up and LDL typically goes down, which is good, not bad.  However, there are several flies in the ointment of the common rubric regarding cholesterol, dietary fat and heart disease, not the least of which is that the correlation in several studies, including recent studies, has been backwardThat is, increased carbohydrate and PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids -- read, vegetable oils) intake is associated with increased, not decreased, ischemic heart disease.  Want to have a heart attack?  Eat carbs and vegetable oils.  Seriously, I'm not kidding.

  • Myth: You won't stick with it even if you try it.  Fact: If you really do keto-adapt it is unlikely you'll ever return to eating high-carb foods en-masse.  Why?  Because you'll find them to be too sweet and no longer tasty.  Sugar and its analogues are quite-addictive, and like most addictive things their "dose response" goes down the more you use them.  That is, after a while a given amount of sugar doesn't taste "sweet" any more, so you add more to get the same "sweetness."  Stop consuming sugars for a few months and suddenly even a tiny amount tastes too sweet, and is no longer pleasant.  In addition once you become keto-adapted you are no longer a slave to food.  People are utterly shocked to find that I often wake up in the morning and have no desire to eat anything until somewhere around lunchtime!  They wake up famished every morning and immediately hit the pancakes, cereals and breads.  I did too, until I went keto-adapted and that all disappeared.  If you've ever been "hangry" it's because you're actually experiencing withdrawal from the addictive nature of fast carbohydrates.  If you enjoy being a slave then may the chains rest lightly on your back, but just remember that this form of slavery comes with greatly-increased risks of heart disease, obesity and diabetes.  Are you sure it's worth it?

Once again, for those who missed it the last time, here's the "don't eat" list:

  • Anything with added sugars on the label irrespective of amount.  If a word ending in "-ose" is on the label, it's a sugar.  Maltrose, dextrose, sucrose, fructose, etc.  All are sugars.  Go through your cupboard and throw all those packages and cans out, and don't buy any more of them.

  • Anything with man-made PUFAs in it.  There are two basic types of PUFAs -- Omega-3 and Omega-6.  Omega-3 is good for you in reasonable amounts and is almost-exclusively found in the flesh of animals, including most-especially fish.  Omega-6, on the other hand, is found naturally in most plant material.  The problem is that the amount found in plants you eat whole is tiny but when concentrated into man-extracted oils from vegetable sources you wind up consuming thousands of times more of it than you ever could by eating the actual plant.  Cottonseed oil, for example, is full of this stuff, yet you'd never sit down and eat a bowl of cotton seeds!  Likewise, you'd have to eat something like two bushels of corn in a single sitting to get the amount of PUFA found in one tablespoon of corn oil, but it is utterly trivial to consume that amount in baked goods.  This is true for all vegetable oils.  The only exception?  Small amounts of olive oil are reasonable used as a salad dressing.  But you should never, ever, cook with vegetable oils including sauteeing, frying, basting or similar because the fact that they're unsaturated means they oxidize rapidly and heat makes them oxidize more and faster.  The "switch" to vegetable-based oils in fryers has probably killed more Americans in the last 40 years than all other causes of death combined.  By the way, if you want the worst of the worst they come in the form of anything that has the word "hydrogenated" on the label.  Those are PUFAs that have been chemically stabilized so they are a solid and don't spoil while on the shelf in the store.   Let me be crystal-clear: The amount of PUFA you can safely ingest, and thus should ingest, is zero, with the exception of room-temperature olive oil used as a salad dressing or similar.  That section in your grocery store is IMHO "heart attack in a bottle."

  • "White", starchy vegetables and plants.  This means rice, potatoes and similar.  Rice and potatoes are peasant food.  If you'd otherwise die they're acceptable, I guess, but I'd hardly call them my first choice. Rice I've already covered but potatoes aren't far behind.  Their nutrient balance is severely skewed and, frankly, sucks.  With 63g of carbs and 278 calories in one large (300gm) potato, while they have a decent amount of fiber (7g) and a good protein balance the rest is lacking.  Of the vitamin complex only C and B6 are well-represented, and only half of your needs (compare against Broccoli.)  The real problem with starchy foods is that they're carb-dense but nutrient-poor on balance which means they're not only incompatible with low-carb eating they will probably crowd out the nutrient-dense vegetables you should eat.  Since these tend to digest quickly they also provoke a large insulin response.  Note that any of these fried in PUFAs, such as french fries, dramatically multiply the trouble.  These "foods" are served in restaurants (e.g. xxx "over rice" or xxx "with fries") because on a per-calorie basis they cost almost nothing.

  • Grains (especially wheat) and anything made with them.  Cereals and similar are even worse than starchy vegetables in that the fiber is nearly-all absent as processed and thus has to be added back.  Whole-wheat bread has a horrible protein quality score, is very high in carbs with 2 slices having 24g all on its own (20 of which "count" as there are 4 of fiber) and a modest nutrient balance.  Store-bought breads and cereals, however, almost all contain hydrogenated oils -- that is, the worst sort of PUFAs.  In terms of insulin response grains are almost-indistinguishable from table sugar and some are actually worse.  Yes, this means no pizzas, pastas and similar.  Again, the reason that hamburger comes on a bun at the restaurant or drive-thru is because on a per-calorie basis it costs pennies; to get the same calories with that burger wrapped in lettuce you'd need another patty that contains actual food.

So what do you eat?

  • Green vegetables such as spinach, kale, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cucumbers, etc.  All are high in nutrients, low in calories, very low in carbohydrate and glycemic load and most have a good amount of fiber as well, all of it being naturally-occurring (not "added back.")  Frozen is fine; fresh is ok if you prefer it but there's no nutritional difference that's material.

  • Modest amounts of fruits are fine, eaten whole, approximating what you could obtain in season.  Note that neither fruits or vegetables should be "juiced" or otherwise processed; doing so grossly speeds up the absorption of the sugars and destroys much of the fiber value!  Eat your strawberries, in other words, as strawberries, not as a component in a "smoothie."

  • Full-fat cheeses are perfectly ok; they have a near-perfect (75-80/20-25) balance of fat:protein.  Do not buy the "reduced fat", "2%" or similar cheeses.

  • Eggs likewise have a decent balance of proteins and fats, eaten whole, although they are a bit protein-heavy.  Eschew the "eggwhite" and "eggbeaters" nonsense; break actual eggs and prepare them as you wish (it's perfectly ok to cook them first if you want them hard-boiled!)  On mass eggs have about 6 grams of both fat and protein, but since fat is 9 cal/gm the energy balance (which is what you care about) is 1.5:1 in favor of fat.  This means about 40% protein, 60% fat when you do the math; the goal for a non-athlete is around 20-25% of intake from protein, so they can't be your primary source but they're good overall.

  • Full-fat meats and fish.  Pork, chicken, beef and similar are all fine but do not trim or remove the fat portions.  This means you eat your chicken skin-on, eschew the "skinless" chicken breast in favor of the complete version and eat it all.  For steak, consume the fat and do not trim it; same with pork.  For fish prefer fatty fish such as salmon and tuna.

  • Reserve your excess fat, especially from bacon and sausage cooked for breakfast, and use it for cooking purposes -- such as sauteeing or even microwaving vegetables.  If poured into a coffee mug it will keep for several months in the refrigerator without a problem.  If you're older than 40 your mother probably did this and she knew what she was doing.  For other cooking purposes (e.g. if you want to have an omelet and don't happen to have handy reserved bacon fat) use butter.   Coconut oil, incidentally, if you can find it without extra crap in it, is mostly saturated fat and is one of the very few exceptions to the "no vegetable oil" rule that can be used reasonably-liberally.  Be careful buying it however as much of it is stuffed full of hydrogenated crap which turns it into one of the worst instead of being in the "acceptable" column.  READ THE LABEL.

  • Use all the spices you wish.  Virtually all of them are zero-carb and zero-calorie.  The same is true for hot sauces and such, but check the labels to make sure they're not stuffed full of sugars or hydrogenated oils.  Most are not but there are exceptions.

If you eat this way it is very hard to exceed 50g/carb a day.  As an example a cup of brussels sprouts has eight grams of carbs, only five of which count (3 are fiber and don't digest.)  If you eat a cup of those, two cups of broccoli flowers during the day in various snacks (8g more), one cup of green sweet pepper chopped up as a component of a main course or side for dinner (4g net) you'll have eaten quite a decent amount of vegetables yet you only consumed 17g of carbs net all day; you'd also have consumed just 108 calories.  You could triple that and still be ok on the carbs and yet have consumed just about 1/6th of your caloric intake requirement!

It then becomes a matter of choosing protein sources without trying to limit fats and, in fact, buying the cheaper sources tends to work better because the stores charge more to trim or otherwise remove the fats!  Between eggs, cheeses and animal products while intentionally leaving the fat content present you'll wind up with a low-carb diet that is very rich in nutrients and almost-completely absent in insulin-spiking carbs that also happens to be free of PUFAs that are associated with heart disease.

Oh, and you won't be hungry either; your body knows how to regulate its food intake all on its own if you simply stop poisoning the signalling pathways (largely mediated by leptin) that tell you whether you're hungry or not.

Welcome to waking up and not really wanting anything to eat until the middle of the day; a nice side effect of living this way is that your pants will fall off.

Go to responses (registration required to post)

User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
User Info Demolishing Lies On Low Carb Eating in forum [Market-Ticker] *
Posts: 6
Incept: 2018-08-06

w texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Most of what you post about eating is God's own truth especially about vegetable oils. That **** is poison.

We part ways at your recommendations for eating animal flesh. When you eat animal fats they are digested and dumped into your bloodstream causing both the lining of your arterial walls(endothelial cells) and blood itself to become "sticky" This results in an accumulation of what is described as plaque. This plaque wrecks havoc on our circulatory system in a number of ways.

The plaque itself can damage the endothelial lining, it's only 1 cell thick, making the blood vessel far less able to expand when additional blood(nutrients) are called for by various organs.

The blood vessel dilates over time which forces the heart to work harder 24/7.

The functions these cells perform include fluid filtration, such as in the glomerulus of the kidney, blood vessel tone, hemostasis, neutrophil recruitment, and hormone trafficking(from wikipedia)

Eventually the blood vessels are occluded and in the case of heart blood vessels necessitate coronary bypass surgery.(350,000/year!)

Every study I've read or read about flat out says that a people that eat a plant based diet suffer no CHD and in fact, those that are literally scheduled for bypass surgery have reversed their disease when changing their diet.

Most meat(chicken, beef and pork) is raised in deplorable conditions and are fed diets high in soy and crammed full of antibiotics. Yuck****ingo. But even grass finished beef will elicit the same results to your blood vessels.

Further(and I'll stop here) there are causation studies linking an animal flesh/dairy diet to a high incidence of prostate cancer(as well as others). Our molars were meant to grind out nutrients and our intestines are much longer then a carnivores' for the same reason.
Posts: 161148
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Mminlamesa - That's flat-out lefty, vegan-pushing bull****.

Animal fats in fact do nothing of the sort that you cite. In fact it is carbohydrates and especially PUFAs that promote all of these things.

The root of virtually all of these maladies in fact impaired glucose control. Worse, the medical industry knows this and intentionally publishes bull**** that allegedly "shows" arterial plaques building on the inside wall.

That's not what actually happens.

If you look at actual images of dissected arteries that have been removed from diseased persons -- or for that matter medical texts with actual images in them -- you'll see the truth. The build-up is inside the aterial wall, not on the inside surface!


Obviously the blood did NOT get "sticky" and "deposit" things on the inside wall of the artery. Nope. What you see in that image is in fact inflammation and the body's response to it.

Stick yourself with a thorn and you'll see the exact same process but in a place where you want it rather than where you don't.

This has been known for MORE THAN 50 YEARS -- about when we started cutting people open and doing arterial bypass surgery.

What are the top six things you can eat that will cause low-level systemic inflammation?

1. Sugar and HFCS.

2. PUFAs, that is, machine-processed vegetable oils and especially trans-fats (almost NONE of which exist in any material amount in nature)

3. Natural vegetable and seed oils. These are the ones that people claim are "good for you." No they're not! They CAUSE CHD.

4. Refined carbs. ALL of them. The actual cause of the damage, however, is likely insulin-modulation related; many people with allegedly "normal" blood sugar have badly-elevated insulin levels (that is, they're not yet diabetic but their insulin response is abnormal.) This is not a cheap test thus it's not usually done. By the time you have actual blood sugar control problems you've been hosed for a LONG time. The reason people who historically eat rice, for example, didn't have trouble was that their intake was modulated by lack of money -- they ate a lot of it, but very little at one time. Now add money and they blow up like balloons and start having heart attacks.

5. Excessive alcohol consumption.

And far down the list, but in the game, is highly-processed meats -- specifically those with lots of added crap in them. The problem isn't the meat -- it's the crap.

If you get rid of 1-5 you won't have to worry about the rest.

Oh, but that's not compatible with a "vegan" lifestyle at all, since it's ******ned near impossible to get your caloric needs without eating (1) fast carbs or (2) PUFAs and other vegetable oils if you eschew animal flesh.

How many heart attacks did Old McDonald's family have? Nearly zero. When did Old McDonalds' progeny start having heart attacks? When they stopped eating chickens, cows and pigs, using the oils from those being cooked for their eggs and bacon in the morning, and instead started using Crisco, eating Rice Crispies, Wheaties and mass-produced pancake syrup full of HFCS.

They also blew up in size like the Goodyear Blimp.

The Inuit had a thousand year history of consumption of a near 100% animal fat-and-protein diet. Not exactly by choice, mind you -- they live on a part of the planet where organized agriculture is for all intents and purposes impossible. They also had an effective ZERO cardiovascular disease and diabetes rate. Then they got access to carbohydrates -- and now have one of the highest rates of both disorders in the world, along with outrageous obesity. If you eat almost-exclusively animal flesh and fat for 1,000 years and nobody has a heart attack the case is closed; that's NOT the cause.

Oh, and on your last two claims (both also false): We have a MODERATE length gut, not a long or short one. We're not obligate carnivores (as is a feline) but we do not have the metabolic structure to process exclusively vegetable sources of nutrition. In addition unlike a horse or cow our molars cannot be used to grind vegetable matter in the same sort of fashion; they would be destroyed in a very short period of time were we to attempt that. Our dentition is in fact designed for MIXED consumption but the majority of our caloric intake simply cannot come from green vegetative matter; not only would you be eating all the time (go look up the caloric content of broccoli and then compute out what 1,800 kcal of that is in mass and volume) but in addition our digestive system lacks the ability to handle that sort of volume and extract the nutrients from same. Incidentally our requirement for environmental Vitamin C is a genetic error but that does implicate mandatory consumption of citrus (obviously impossible in many parts of the globe without modern transport); most green vegetables have far more of it than do oranges, as just one example.

Winding it down.

Posts: 31
Incept: 2009-12-28

Desert Southwest
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I enjoy watching the old TV shows from the 50s-70s. One thing is strikingly clear: people back then were much, much thinner. Unlike today, where there is an abundance of overweight characters (normalizing the condition, the shows back then featured very few obese folks, thus demonstrating the results of a healthier diet. I truly believe that government shills, along with Big Pharma, the AMA, and the insurance companies, are willingly turning a blind eye on this matter. They pay lip service to it, but until they attack problem with the ferocity as they did with smoking, it's simply an insincere gesture. Perhaps this is all part of the plan of TPTB.

Trust but verify except if the government is involved then just verify.
Posts: 161148
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Seadog -- Insurance companies (ALL of them) WANT higher flow-through costs. It's the only way for them to make more money as their margin is capped by law.

So if you're an insurance company and currently have $1 million in claims passing through you, and you can only make a 10% margin because that's all the regulators will allow, it is not possible to grow your firm EXCEPT by making that $1 million into $2, $5 or $10.

It's not complicated -- it's just math.

Winding it down.
Posts: 6
Incept: 2018-08-06

w texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Thanks for the additional info. I guess my excellent health is due to avoiding your steps 1-4 pretty much all my life. My meat eating was infrequent and I enjoy some 1/2 & 1/2 and some parmesan in my pesto. If you want to eat meat that is raised on soy and packed with antibiotics, knock yourself out. Fact is that world class athletes including the world's strongest man are vegans.

I've seen blood taken 2 hours after eating meat and taken the next day but this time 2 hours after a meatless meal and the plasma from the meat meal is cloudy with fat that has been dumped in the bloodstream. This animal fat wrecks havoc on the lining in your CV system.

The life expectancy for Old McDonald in the 00s was ~45. This means that CHD, which takes decades to do it's thing, wasn't a cause of death like it is now. I told you you're correct about cooking oils so why do you skip over the much higher rates of prostate cancer in men that eat animal flesh?
Posts: 161148
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Mminlamesa -
I told you you're correct about cooking oils so why do you skip over the much higher rates of prostate cancer in men that eat animal flesh?

They also tend to eat insane amounts of fast carbs and mass 300+lbs.
NIH wrote..
Consumption of more red meat was associated with being married, being non-Hispanic white, being less educated, being a current smoker, having a higher body mass index, being less physically active, and not having undergone a PSA test in the past 3 years.

In other words your ASSOCIATIONS are broken as they're contaminated with a host of known morbidity-enhancing (including cancer) factors, with the biggest one of all likely being smoking.

In fact the smoking percentage differential ALONE is likely enough to contain the ENTIRE hazard ratio increase! So much for your bull****.

I've seen blood taken 2 hours after eating meat and taken the next day but this time 2 hours after a meatless meal and the plasma from the meat meal is cloudy with fat that has been dumped in the bloodstream.

Oh please.

It has been known for FIFTY YEARS that eating a high animal fat and low carb diet produces materially higher HDL (protective) and the larger, non-harmful LDL types along with LOWER triglyceride levels. This has been further repeatedly demonstrated by people who have chosen to go down this road with "before and after" blood work. Of course the "medical industry" doesn't run an actual TEST for the different subtypes of LDL and HDL. They instead use what is called a "lipid panel" that measures HDL and triglycerides -- and ASSUMES a ratiometric measurement for LDL from those two numbers which is often wrong and worse fails to make ANY distinction between the harmless and harmful types of LDL -- because it can't. There IS a test available that is actually diagnostic rather than designed to push potentially-harmful medication but it's a LOT more expensive and, unless you pay for it out of pocket, generally not going to be used.

Again as I noted above the known issue which has been known since we started actually cutting people open and grafting in pieces of artery from the leg -- and thus had samples of blocked arteries to dissect and look at in volume -- is systemic inflammation. Guess what -- all those co-morbidities noted above, ESPECIALLY smoking -- are insanely systemic inflammation-promoting.

If you want to eat meat that is raised on soy and packed with antibiotics, knock yourself out. Fact is that world class athletes including the world's strongest man are vegans.

Fact is that the world's strongest men roid themselves and wind up dead. Most of them have been caught at least once and the best of the best have typically been caught multiple times. If you want to jam your body with testosterone be my guest; incidentally Lance Armstrong pulled that **** (proved, since he got caught too) and now has one nut left, with the cancer that forced him to have the other one cut off likely as a direct result.

I WILL note that as a distance runner I find it MUCH easier to perform consistently at longer distances on a low-carb diet. It entirely removes the "wall" situation and thus the "dance on the head of a pin" nonsense you usually have to engage in with GU's and other bull**** to avoid hitting it; a dance that, if you get it wrong, leads to you ****ting yourself.

Finally, when it comes to what makes animals fat, how many Old McDonalds' do you know? I ask because every one of them knows how to make a cow or pig fat -- you feed it grains. Gee, I wonder what happens when humans -- who are animals, I remind you -- eat the same thing? Every ******ned farmer with livestock knows this. Isn't it funny how wild game ISN'T fattened up like that? Never hunted either, I bet....

If you wish to argue against meat consumption because you're some sort of animal rights nutjob be my guest, PROVIDED you present your argument predicated on that and NOT a bunch of horse**** ladled up because you're concerned people won't accept as worth listening to the ACTUAL reason for your opposition.

What you're not going to do is run a bunch of bull**** ginned up from said "animal activism", which, it appears, is the true motivation for your "position" on my property.


Winding it down.

Posts: 15997
Incept: 2007-07-05
A True American Patriot!
N 47.72/ W 122.55
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I'm pretty sure the vegan diet Is pretty dangerous.

Granted, this is anecdotal, but here is a recent experience I've had with it.

I coach HS volleyball, and we go to a residence summer camp. It literally is EAT-SLEEP-VOLLEYBALL. We stay in the dorms and eat at the cafe. This gives me a great opportunity to see just how horrid the diets are. For now, forget the high-carb stuff. That is plentiful, and I am working on it.

I had two players on the varsity that were some version of vegan. One was a "pescatarian," which apparently is a vegan that eats fish. Her weight has yo-yoed in three years.

Another was a straight "vegan." I've known this girl since she was a toddler (now 16). She is very athletic and has a normal, slender build. Both parents are thin and healthy, and her older sister is the same. She wouldn't eat any meat or eggs. Why? Nobody knows, including the parents. She does love animals.

I've been razzing her about her diet for two years, and finally, she starts eating meat. It wasn't because of me, but there was some form of health scare that was larger than a "concern." Apparently, the doctor told her to start eating meat and ditching the whole vegan thing, and this was going to fix whatever is wrong.

I dont know the specifics, but if something happens (health wise) to a 15yo girl that abruptly moves her from years of no meat to suddenly trying to eat like Ron Swanson, it must have been fairly big. Again, it was larger than a concern, but probably less than an emergency.

I do advocate HFMPLC to the team. I tell them they can get away with playing 5 sets in a night, possibly...but there is no way they are going to be able to play three matches (9-15 sets) in a day at Districts, or two (6-10) at STATE. Even in a regular season night, where they are limited by regulation to 5 sets, they are going to start to fade in the 4th, unless they are burning fat.

I also tell them that I am 52, and the same size I was in HS. I can run as fast, jump as high, and go longer than they can, when they are in their best years. They know I dont do carbs. Most men over 45 can't do that, and are grossly overweight.

I fail to see how the vegan diet could have been sustainable in antiquity, since the diversity of foods was nothing like we have today. If you had plant food, it was likely seasonal and grain based, both of which we know are not going to work for optimal health.

As for the "Strongest man in the world" being a vegan, I would highly suspect he is on some form of supplement, as the caloric needs for a body that big that is putting out that much power is flatly impossible to obtain from anything other than almost pure starch and sugar, and even then, I doubt the body can keep rebuilding on the low density veggies.

I am trying to picture John Metuzak or Howie Long eating nothing but plants...not happening.

"Me and my homies woulda been stackin' bodies by now."
-George Washington

Jeffery Epstein didn't kill himself.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ