.... and an employer?

You do remember your financial rape of people who refused your forced needle rape, right?  You know, surcharging their health care through employers when the employee refused the jabs?

By the way we now know that if you took the jabs you are the ones who have increased risk of cancer and other serious immune-related trouble, so where are the surcharges for those employees and why hasn't the previous one, which was exactly backward, been refunded in full along with 5% compound interest?

Oh, you don't think you should have to do that, and yeah, legally perhaps you don't.

But now you expect employees to be "loyal" and put forward a sincere effort for you?

I don't think so.

Oh, it was someone else's (e.g. an insurance company's) fault?  Who chose the employer's health company?  You did, so go fuck yourself as its your fault, not theirs.

I'm sure you'll also tell me all about how inflation is the employees problem too while you feasted on interest rates below the rate of inflation to pump up your stock or other asset prices and bonused that out to executives -- and employees got none of that or, in some cases, some paltry piece of it like a puny little match on their 401k.  Your cash is safe in your wallet as you've executed your "planned sales" while theirs is confined to your stock price which is now likely to crash and wipe out said funds.

How about all the PPP "loans"?  Even better, how about the program that refunded payroll tax deposits to you which only happened because the person was employed and you took all of that money for yourself despite that effectively being the employees' money which you should have refunded back to them.

Oh, you think not?

So now you get to feast on a government policy that causes, directly, the inflation we have seen and keep it all for yourself even though every penny of it was generated by an employee who dutifully showed up for work and did their job.  Rather than refund that back to them to mitigate the inflationary cost of said program you pocketed it and essentially bent them over the table and financially raped them up the ass.

How about all those who took the shots under your mandate and got fucked?  Have you covered their insurance deductibles and lifetime medical costs that would otherwise not have happened at all?  I've not heard of one company doing that.  Why not?  Is it because you're all assholes?

Now you want people to do more than show up and punch the clock, realigning their work efforts to meet their minimum actual needs and, beyond that, telling you to go fuck goats?

Yeah, good luck with that assholes -- it will be a generation or more before this change in attitude can be reversed other than by you admitting you have been screwing your employees and making full restitution with interest because otherwise all those who you fucked will have to die first.

In my view as a former CEO you deserve every single bit of this.

Here you go folks.

They knew they were worthless in anyone who had previously been infected.  They knew because they tried to infect people who had previously been infected, on purpose, and failed.

The first participants got the same tiny dose of the ‘ancestral’ SARS-CoV-2 strain as did those in the first trial. When nobody developed a sustained infection, the researchers increased the dose by more and more in subsequent groups of participants, until they reached a level 10,000 times the initial dose. A few volunteers developed short-lived infections, but these quickly vanished.

“We were quite surprised,” says Susan Jackson, a study clinician at Oxford and co-author of the latest study. “Moving forward, if you want a COVID challenge study, you’re going to have to find a dose that infects people.”

None of these idiots realized why the size of the dose was irrelevant either but basic mathematics tells you why as I have repeatedly pointed out all the way back to the beginning.  A virus is an exponentially replicating thing.  That is, if the first viron "gets" you (that is, you're successfully infected) then the next "turn" by that viron is now 1,000, 10,000 or even more copies!  So if you go from 10 virons trying to infect someone to 10,000 virons the odds are you get the exact same result.

That is, any dose in excess of the minimum infective dose produces the same result and this, incidentally, is why masks are worthless unless they can prevent the minimum dose from reaching you -- which they cannot in the general population as to be 100% effective proper protocol must be followed 100% of the time.  Once you exceed the minimum dose you are infected and whether its that small dose or a much larger one the outcome is the same.

But what they studies irrefutably proved, and I remind you this is only being published now, is that the jabs were completely worthless in anyone who previously had and recovered from Covid.  If you could not infect any of these participants at a clinical level with even enormous doses that would amount to sucking snot out of an infected person's nose then there was no benefit possible for the person to take such a shot under any set of circumstances.

While someone who had never been infected might have gotten a benefit from said injections anyone previously infected could not benefit because there was nothing to prevent; they were not going to get it again anyway.

To those who now have gotten it two, three or five times and took the shots the bottom line is that you screwed yourself; the evidence is quite-clear that you taking the shot caused you to be able to be infected again which would not have happened if you didn't take them.

This by the way was something I pointed out -- despite licking doorknobs I got the virus exactly once.  Yes, it was bad, but I had just suffered a severe immune challenge due to a yellowjacket swarm (no idea how many stings I took as it was impossible to count them) without which I doubt I would have been seriously ill at all.

But in the years since despite all but licking doorknobs I've not gotten it again and the only thing different is that I also refused all shots.

You fucked yourself if you took them and if you were conned into it and have been repeatedly ill please explain in the comments below why you haven't gone and taken full retribution against every single person who advocated for and dispensed them to you which, we now know by published science, was a completely worthless thing for you to do as even when they deliberately tried to reinfect people with huge doses of the virus they were unable to do so.

Further they knew this in early 2021 and just now published the results so this knowledge -- that if you'd had Covid you were at statistically-zero risk and could not benefit --  was deliberately withheld from you and everyone else.

Its not a theory anymore -- it is now proved scientific fact -- so now, given the facts on the table, your failure to take personal retribution against everyone involved in this crap comes down to you being either a masochist or a sniveling pussy.

Remember asbestos?

It was thought to be miraculous stuff.  It is nearly 100% chemically inert.  It does not burn, evaporate, dissolve in nearly all liquids or undergo material chemical reactions with nearly everything.  The exception is strong acids.

As a result it was believed to be extremely safe around humans and animals, in that it didn't chemically react and thus would not biochemically react.  Of course you could choke on finely-divided powder and similar which would be extremely serious because being that it didn't dissolve in anything your body couldn't eliminate it either, but other than that nobody expected trouble with it.  It was used all over the place for insulation, fireproofing and similar for this reason.

Everyone who believed that was wrong.

The astounding thing is that nobody, after we discovered this, went back and revised their view of cancer in light of that which was then proved.

That is, there are two "cancer" related things: Those that cause cancer and those that promote cancer.  They're not the same.  To cause cancer a thing must be active either at a serious biochemical or nuclear level.  That is, ionizing radiation causes cancer because the radiation literally damages the DNA and, if that occurs during mitosis you can wind up with a cell that has no (or wildly dysfunctional) regulatory growth factors. Likewise a biochemically-active substance can damage the cellular machinery while division is taking place, resulting in a similar outcome.  That makes sense.

But we live in a universe where these causes are always present all around us.  Specifically, our planet is chock full of natural ionizing radiation sources.  The most-damaging of these are alpha emitters; an alpha particle is a helium nucleus and as radiation sources go it is very large (as compared with beta, which is an electron, or gamma, which is more-akin to energy such as light or radio frequencies, but at much higher levels of energy and fundamental frequency.)  Because alpha is so large on a comparative basis it is much more likely to hit and disrupt part of a DNA strand -- and thus cause cancer.  While intact skin is enough to block alpha particles there is no intact layer of dead skin in the lungs as that would prevent gas exchange, nor is such present in the intestines or there would be no nutrient absorption and both of which must happen for life to continue so any alpha-emitter you inhale or ingest can trivially cause cancer.

So why doesn't everything die of cancer shortly after coming into existence?

Because you, and everything living animal around you, have an immune system.  The fundamental job of the immune system is to find anything that is "not self" and destroy it.  This is the miracle of organized multicellular life and without it nothing with a life cycle of significant length would exist.  Yet we do exist, as do birds, mice, cats, dogs, ferrets, cows, elephants and so on.  We exist because the immune system finds these dysregulated cells, realizes they are "not self" and destroys them -- and so long as it successfully does so you do not have "cancer" in a clinical sense -- although in point of fact every one of you do, indeed, have cancer in you.

Oh by the way we have an extraordinarily incomplete view of precisely how the immune system works -- how it determines, for example, what is "self" and what is not and how all the components work together and under what circumstances they do, and don't lead to a correct -- that is healthy -- outcome.

Given this, however, how is it that a chemically inert thing can promote cancer?  That is, by what mechanism can asbestos do that -- because we know it does.

There's only one logical explanation: It causes inflammation in the body, that is, the immune system knows it is "not self" and tries to eliminate it but cannot because the substance is chemically inert.  The attack on it is thus unsuccessful but the immune system does not give up since the "not self" is still there and that eventually leads it to fail to detect other cancerous cells in the vicinity and be unable to destroy them.

That is, asbestos doesn't cause cancer (because an inert thing can't cause something) but it does promote cancer.

The distinction is important.

It has also been ignored.

Well, that was ridiculously and I'd argue criminally stupid.

Additionally, it has been discovered that the mRNA vaccines inhibit essential immunological pathways, thus impairing early interferon signaling. Within the framework of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures an appropriate spike protein synthesis and a reduced immune activation. Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development. 

The mRNA covid jabs deliberately substituted out uridine, an amino acid, for a synthetic pseudo-uridine because without doing that the mRNA material was rapidly and efficiently identified as "not self" and destroyed by the immune system, preventing it from working.  In other words the developers deliberately used a substance that "looked like" (to transcription in the cell) uridine but the immune system was incapable of detecting and destroying it.

Now we have hard evidence that doing this causes the promotion of cancer.

Isn't this exactly what happens with asbestos by the same mechanism?

It is.

The immune system cannot destroy asbestos because it is chemically inert.  Pseudo-uridine was chosen specifically because the immune system did not tag and destroy it; without doing that the mRNA material never got delivered into the cells in sufficient quantity to produce enough spike to elicit a response before the immune system tagged and destroyed it.

What led people to believe that doing this was safe when we had a former example where it definitely was not, and yet the body knew it was "not self" because no such thing as pseudo-uridine exists in the body -- any body, of any animal, anywhere -- in the first place!  Well, of course we didn't look -- looking takes a lot of time, in fact many years, because cancer doesn't show up right away most of the time.

But there was every reason to believe you'd get fucked by doing this given our history with asbestos and oh, by the way, the same thing is true for machine-made seed oils, especially hydrogenated ones that are specifically designed not to break down.

The underlying cause is likely sustained and systemic, artificially-induced inflammation that the immune system cannot clear because the substance in question is not able to be destroyed by the immune system -- or in the case of seed oils in addition to them being engineered to not be destroyed (e.g. so they're "shelf stable" in the store without refrigeration) you keep introducing more of it by eating more and more of it.

Proved?  No, but a hypothesis that fits known facts and both explains the increase of cancers that initiated with ever-larger consumption of seed oils in fast food, fast casual and other dining away from home despite large decreases in smoking and thus smoking-related cancers and at the same time explains the FURTHER cancer increases we are seeing post-covid mRNA shots.

Yeah folks, you did a really fucking stupid thing if you took those shots and if you keep eating seed oils you are increasing your risk even further.

You can't un-take the shots but you can stop eating seed oils.

PS: What mitigates, to at least some degree, this risk?  Increasingly the evidence is...... Vitamin D.  In other words, the sun (in moderate amounts) and during months when you can't get enough that way, which for most of the US or darker-skinned people is at least half the year, reasonable levels of supplementation.  No, its not a panacea, but being deficient has no upside and plenty of potential downside both when it comes to infections and cancer -- and its either entirely free or extremely cheap to make sure you're not.  Oh, and what else are we told?  Stay out of the sun.  Yeah.

Every person engaged in "occupying" or otherwise obstructing lawful access to a university must be identified and blackballed from all future employment consideration until and unless they serve time and make restitution in full, at a 300% penalty rate, for any disruption they were involved in and go five full years without so much as a traffic ticket.

This is perfectly legal and it must be made known to everyone.

I don't care if the employer is McDoanlds.

If you don't do it then you deserve to be held financially responsible when you hire one of these people and they do something illegal while in your employ because they have a demonstrated willingness to break the law without remorse.

Enough of this bullshit.

Make violent protestors, those committing breaking and entering and those committing felony assault and mob action both jobless and homeless.

I'm tired of this crap and you should be too.

A recent report outlining China's direct involvement in fueling the fentanyl crisis in the United States has rightfully sent shockwaves through Congress and communities already reeling from the devastating impact of opioid addiction. The Select Committee on China’s findings uncovered China's subsidization of the production of illicit fentanyl precursors for export, shedding light on the complicity – and in some cases, outright support – of foreign actors in exacerbating this epidemic.   

As I noted several years ago when the fentanyl mess really got out of control China was the source of the precursors and there was no possible way that something at that sort of industrial scale in a communist nation wasn't happening with the full support and sponsorship of the government itself.

Well, now we have it.

You don't simply "find and arrest" the people responsible -- indeed you can't arrest them as there's no jurisdiction.

No, there's only one answer: An embargo, absolute ban on Chinese entry into the United States, ban on ownership of anything in the United States by any Chinese national and a bill to offset on a punitive basis their alleged "holdings" for each and every person who dies of a fentanyl overdose.

I said punitive and I meant it -- such as $1 million per person that is simply seized from their alleged "holdings" and returned to Treasury.

They don't like it?

Then cut off the drugs.

No?

Fine -- fuck 'em.

Enough of this shit folks.  China is literally poisoning Americans and if our government won't stop it then they should be forcibly ejected -- all of them -- and replaced with people who will.