RSS available
Fact: There is no immunity or protection against The Law of Scoreboards. Did you know: What the media does NOT want you to read is at https://market-ticker.org/nad. You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account! |
The Market Ticker Single Post Display (Show in context) |
|
Top | Login | FAQ | Register | Clear Cookie |
User Info | Amnesty? Absolutely NOT; entered at 2022-11-01 16:52:46 | |||
Heartlander Posts: 3792 Registered: 2021-02-25 Kansas |
@TickerguyQuote:@Heartlander - The problem with the aborted fetus cell-line argument is that an utterly enormous percentage of all drugs currently out there are similarly "polluted" in this fashion, yet nobody has done a goddamn thing about it for the last 50+ years. Yes indeed I do, you are absolutely right. And any insight from you or others would be welcome. For all I know, it may come down to something very instinctive and visceral about needles -- the idea of actually injecting into yourself something derived from a murder. (Although I have long boycotted PepsiCo products because of their use of flavorings tested on taste-bud sensors harvested from aborted babies.) I did not keep a journal, so I have a hard time reconstructing exactly what was going through my mind in late 2020. I remember the fetal-cell-line aspect most clearly because that decision was so slam-dunk for me. But I think I also remember being amazed at how over-the-top all the hype for the vaxx was. It was wildly enthusiastic and it was everywhere, non-stop. (Talk about mass formation.) And, here's the key, the vaxx was being hyped by the SAME PEOPLE who were denying, suppressing, trashing, and prohibiting the early treatments that worked against Covid. That was before I knew about ivermectin, but Fauci et al.'s war against hydroxychloroquine, starting in March or April 2020, was the first thing that alerted me that something was rotten. If Covid was so deadly and dangerous, why were they DENYING people access to treatments that actually cure the disease? Obviously, these people could not be trusted, so why should I trust their hype about these "vaccines"? I also remember watching on YouTube some "expert" with a name I have never forgotten: a Dr. Shane Croddy. He assured viewers that the normal 5 to 10 year process for approving a new vaccine could be shortcutted by enrolling 10 times the usual number of volunteers in trials, and doing all the steps simultaneously so the results would be ready in only 6 months! I couldn't believe my eyes and ears. I remember thinking: "HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK WE ARE?" This Croddy creep even had this smirky smile on his face -- as if he were really having fun pulling one over on the rubes and just couldn't help himself. (I've since found out there's a term for this smirk -- "duper's delight"-- and we've all seen it on the faces of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci many times.) I remember looking at this young, full-of-himself, smug, smirking little Croddy jerk in a white coat and thinking to myself, ah, now I know what people mean when they say someone has "a punchable face." I remember it distinctly because it was the first time I had ever actually thought that about someone. 2022-11-01 16:52:46
|