The Market Ticker - Canceled
What 'They' Don't Want Published
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-07-27 07:50 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 4375 references
[Comments enabled]  

Time to decide folks.

There are plenty of reasons to both take and refuse the Covid jabs.

Among other things you're being lied to, deliberately on their effectiveness.  State governments, along with various "health agencies", are provably lying -- and trivially so.  You're being told, for example, that "99%", "98%" or "97%" (depending on where you are) of people that are getting seriously ill with Covid are "unvaccinated."

Let's take Tennessee.  Look at their "unified command" dashboard and set the date to June 22th, one month ago by their data's reports.  They show 22,432 ever hospitalized with Covid on that date.

Now set it to 7/22, the latest for which it is updated.  They show 22,737 ever hospitalized, a difference of 305.

They now say that almost 200 have been hospitalized recently as breakthrough -- that is, vaccinated -- cases (out of about 1,000 breakthroughs they claim in total.)

Well, when did the breakthroughs happen?  They don't say, exactly, but over the last month only 305 people, by them, were hospitalized with Covid in total.

That's about 10 a day across the entire state.

There's also roughly 3 deaths a day across the entire state.

But then, as now, we're still funny-gaming the numbers.  If you go into the hospital for any reason they test you.  Why?  Because if you're positive they want their magic $13,000 Biden Money (formerly Trump money) if you're on Medicare and Medicaid for treating a "Covid case."  Biden is still continuing this bull**** no matter why you're there.  Chest pain?  Covid!  Oh, never mind the heart attack.

So are the "hospitalized" actually hospitalized for Covid or is Tennessee counting anyone in the hospital who tested positive irrespective of the reason for their admission?  This particular game has been run since March of 2020 and nobody has put a stop to it because they're making money from it -- lots of money.

Never mind that these jabs are not behaving like a vaccine.  US Code: "The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."

The data is that these jabs do not prevent disease.  They also do not prevent transmission of disease.  In fact they appear to, if you get a breakthrough case, make transmission more likely in that the Ct data from these miners shows equal or lower values on balance in the vaccinated cohort with one sample at Ct22!  Reminder: The lower the Ct the more virus you have in your body.

Now granted this is a small group -- very small.  But it is extremely concerning that the lowest Ct recorded among these cases was a fully-vaccinated person.  Where is the data from the state labs and CDC on these "breakthroughs" and their Ct numbers generally?  It's not being reported.  I bet you can guess why not without needing more than one guess.

This appears to be confirmed as something that does indeed happen by the reported "super-spreading" person who (1) was fully-vaccinated, (2) infected more than 60 other people and (3) most of those whom he gave it to were also vaccinated.  He obviously was an extremely-efficient emitter of virus!

The only remaining argument for the jabs is that they make a personal severe outcome less likely.  Here the data is somewhat more-reassuring but the adverse effect profile of the shots is not reassuring at all, it is being deliberately glossed over, and as a result the question as to whether or not to take them is a deeply personal decision that must be informed by your personal medical status coupled with intentional deception on those advocating for the jabs.  How in the hell do you make an informed decision under those circumstances?

Unfortunately the so-called "public health" authorities have destroyed -- not just damaged, but destroyed -- their own credibility.  Tennessee's Department of Health proved themselves liars with nothing more than public data.  So have others.  I have multiple reported sets of data from individual practices where the percentage of unvaccinated people presenting with Covid-19 symptoms is lower than the percentage of unvaccinated people in the population of that specific area.  In other words the data is that the jabs not only do not prevent you from getting the virus at all but in fact may ENHANCE the risk of infection and this, incidentally, voids the argument that the jabs are a vaccine from a LEGAL standpoint.

It may well be true that originally, over the first couple of months, you have some level of protection -- perhaps even very good protection.  But on the data that protection appears to rapidly wane and it appears that within six months it can turn into potentiating infection instead via OAS, ADE or both.  In other words the data suggests you get protection originally but then get screwed compared against where you were when you started, which would suit the makers of the jabs just fine, yes?  How will you like it if you wind up dependent on continuous "boosters" at whatever price they want to charge forever lest you be screwed instead of helped.

If you want to know why that would be hidden, other than the obvious -- that they simply will never admit they failed and you're being cajoled or coerced into taking a dangerous drug that in the intermediate term has damaged your immune system -- that should be obvious as it opens up a legal attack avenue against any such mandate, in health care or otherwise, that you can drive a truck through.  Oh, and the makers of said jabs were given legal immunity from this outcome too; if accepting the first of the jabs turns you into a junkie permanently dependent on repeated jabs to stave off disease which otherwise becomes more likely as a direct result of accepting the original shots you cannot sue Pfizer, Moderna or J&J.

Further, however, and far more importantly, is the fact that with the emerging evidence on Ct reports from so-called "breakthrough" cases it is becoming very clear that vaccinated people in health care settings are actively dangerous as if and when they get a breakthrough case they will be more likely to spread the virus to others as their infected state will not be known as rapidly and reliably as with someone who has not been vaccinated, and by the point of detection their viral load will be materially higher.

This is exactly what occurred in the early months where health care workers were the vector into vulnerable people and killed themWe knew this was a risk and refused to isolate health care workers from the general population.  It is now clear that this is very likely to happen again but this time is being "boosted" by the jabs.  Indeed there is a clean argument that being jabbed against this virus should be banned among those working in a health care environment since an infected person with a lower Ct number is much more-infectious than someone with a higher one.  The viral load and thus capacity to transmit the virus doubles with each lower Ct!  If the jabs make it more-likely that you will not develop symptoms until you have a lower Ct value then they make you more-dangerous to others irrespective of whether they prevent your mortality.

Among those who conclude that the balance of risks and benefits for them does not favor the jab, and who are being coerced, there is one final point to consider: You are not alone.  Further, we have an extremely tight labor market, so you have all the power in this debate.

USE IT!

If even 10%, say much less 20% of an organization refuses such a mandate and any "penalty" (e.g. "test daily or get jabbed") and your employer decides to fire you all for your refusal they collapse.  I don't care if this is the VA health system, a local hospital or other organization.  You may or may not, in the fullness of time, also be able to successfully sue but in the meantime if 1 in 5 employees is removed there is no way the firm survives that event without severe or even critical damage that collapses the enterprise.

Collective action -- that is, a strike -- is how gross abuses were dealt with in the past and is a non-violent and entirely-legal act.

Simply put: REFUSE.

Let them try to get your 20% of the output from the other 80% of the remaining staff.  They will fail; a decent percentage of the remainder will blow up medically due to stress and similar and suddenly they're not down 20% on their labor they're down by half.

WHEN they blow up and come crying to you to come back to work you demand double your previous pay -- permanently -- and no, you still will NOT take the jab nor be discriminated against on masks and tests.

Collapse all entities that attempt to enforce mandates.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-07-25 12:35 by Karl Denninger
in Health Reform , 1667 references
[Comments enabled]  

Work in health care?  I don't care if you are in direct patient-care or not; if you work in a medical facility of any sort this applies to you if you took the jab.

We now know if you become infected with Covid, and you had the jab, you will have a higher viral titer before becoming symptomatic, if you become symptomatic at all.

That is, you, compared against someone who did not take the jab where you are both infected, are much more likely to transmit the virus to someone else before knowing if you get infected. Since viral replication occurs in hours per cycle, not days, testing, unless on an every day basis, is not sufficient to detect the risk.

Nearly everyone coming into a medical facility is at heightened risk of one sort or another; people do not, generally-speaking, go into medical facilities if all is well.  This is certainly true for hospitals and "urgent care" facilities.

Masks cannot mitigate this risk as the virus is in aerosols and when you exhale you will thus project it into the environment if it is present.  It does not matter if you use an N95 or surgical mask; an N95 will still break the seal around your face when you exhale to some extent and thus you will exhale virus if you are infected.

Therefore if you work in such a facility and you took the jab, given what we now know, you are hereby obligated from now until forever into the future, until Covid and any future mutation of it is no longer of material concern, obligated to use both Ivermectin on an every 3-day basis, and Budesonide on an every day basis, both as prophylaxis.

This obligation is now attached and permanent so long as you remain employed.

Since people believe that there is nothing wrong with mandating people take non-sterilizing shots to work in health care then, given that you ****ed up and are now putting people at grossly-enhanced risk there is also nothing wrong with this mandate either.  Said prophylaxis is to take place on video and be recorded each day for the Budesonide and every three days for Ivermectin.

If you refuse you are fired and your medical credentials are stripped.

If you infect someone without documented proof that you have taken this prophylaxis as a medical worker and have been jabbed you are charged with felony assault and if they die you are charged with depraved indifference homicide, which in most jurisdictions is Murder 2.  If law enforcement will not bring these charges then the relatives of said person who is impacted has every moral and ethical right to personally enforce the appropriate penalties.

This was entirely foreseeable as we knew health care workers were the largest vectors originally into vulnerable people.  It is not a mistake when you do something knowing it will place others at wildly-enhanced risk.

We all must accept the inherent risk of humanity from various viruses.  That is unavoidable.

But you, as a medical worker who ****ed up and radically increased the risk of transmission to others, plus your chosen position and claim of professional competence inherently puts you in the situation of being around and working with medically vulnerable people and since you represent yourself as a professional in the field you are held to a much higher standard.  That makes this not only just but necessary as your introduction of the vaccine into your body was a purely voluntary act.

You willingly and intentionally put everyone around you at wildly elevated risk by using a non-sterilizing vaccine if you happen to get infected with Covid.  As someone employed in a profession that claims expert status you cannot argue ignorance.

You are thus legally responsible for mitigating the consequence of your mistake to the extent you are able.

This obligation attaches NOW.

Since this enhancement of risk is, as best we can determine, permanent so is your obligation for as long as you remain employed in any position that involves the risk of transmission to others in a medical setting, whether directly or indirectly.

You ****ed yourself and are not entitled to **** others -- so now you get to pay for your arrogance or suffer the consequences when the vulnerable people you infect get sick or die.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-07-25 10:39 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 1334 references
[Comments enabled]  

The pattern here is one you ought to pay very close attention to.

The Ct numbers being seen in vaccinated "breakthrough" cases are materially lower than that seen in unvaccinated.

This makes sense and it is pure mechanistic proof of why using non-sterilizing vaccines in an active outbreak is stupid, even leaving mutational pressure and evasion aside (which we also know happens.)

A person who has a low Ct (higher infectiveness) without becoming symptomatic is a super-spreader because they have no idea they're infected.  If a non-sterilizing vaccine causes you to delay becoming symptomatic by as little as one Ct point you are twice as infective to others before you know you're dangerous and thus decide to stay home.

If "on average" you would become symptomatic at Ct30 but if vaccinated you get to Ct25 now you will be 32 times as infectious before you know you're sick.

The person who took the shot needs a label on them because they are far more dangerous to others if they become infected -- vaccinated or not.  In point of fact using a non-sterilizing vaccine during an outbreak, or accepting one, is criminal negligence for which those who are jabbed, if an infection is traced to them, should be prosecuted because they have deliberately made themselves unable to distinguish that they are dangerous until they are far more likely to infect others.

hospital or other medical facility that employs jabbed people thus is committing gross malpractice in that the institution is deliberately causing their employees to be unaware of an infection they contract until they are far more-dangerous in terms of viral spread to others.  This, standing alone, is depraved indifference to human life since these institutions are allegedly professionals and thus should be held to a professional standard of conduct.

Just as with the original outbreak last spring in which I was able to trivially identify medical workers as the largest single vector and, I remind you, successfully predicted a huge explosion of civilian cases in Minnesota on that basis (which subsequently verified) I believe it is going to happen again and once again it will be the health care workers, who have all been "urged" or even "mandated" to take the jabs that will be the vectors into the general population and will end up killing people by the score.

If and when it does occur, and I bet it's evident within the next month or two, every single hospital administrator and public health official must be criminally charged with depraved homicide.

What's even worse is that we know the spike protein is the cause of basically all the pathology that this virus causes.  This in turn means that the lower the Ct you ultimately develop before you beat the virus, assuming you survive, the more-likely you are to have taken permanent damage from the infection.

In other words the vaccinated, if they a "breakthrough" case, not only are more-likely to infect others they're more-likely to wind up with long-term or even permanent physical harm, and since such people go much further down the Ct scale before becoming symptomatic they also have no idea they're dangerous nor that they should be hitting the infection with early treatment.

This explains why those who have had the stab often do not respond to said "early" treatment; it's not early anymore because it's now a couple of or even five or more days further onward in the infection process before you know you're sick and thus need to use said meds.

In another month or so all of this will be wildly-evident and I suspect by then the so-called "medical professionals" who were coerced into taking the jab, including those being threatened now are going to be in full-on spazz mode as instead of people presenting to the ER with Ct numbers around 28 or 30 they're going to be coming in with Ct numbers closer to or even below 20 at which point anyone within 50' of them will be infected simply by their breath -- vaccinated or not.

We ****ed up letting these ghouls get away with this for other than highly at-risk people and, if the patterns I'm seeing in the data verify, which look to be quite-likely, we're going to pay for it.

PS: Natural infection, assuming you do not attempt to "boost" it with a jab, still looks highly protective.  No guarantees, but the immunity you generate from that is much more-broad and harder for the virus to evade.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-07-22 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Covid-19 , 5459 references
[Comments enabled]  

I hate it when I'm right.

This is about it when it comes to the jabs for me, since we're now at the point that you can pull a Hillary Clinton: "At this point, what difference does it make?"

For those who took it out of stupidity, coercion, to belong or whatever: Too bad, so sad.

To those who used their heads and deduced that between the lack of long-term longitudinal data (zero) and known, documented risks along with deliberate sandbagging by the our government and media of all sorts in reporting the bad effects that rapidly showed up, including deaths, they've made up their minds.  All we have left there is whether, if attempted to be coerced instead of cajoled, they will consider that attempted murder and destroy not only the person coercing them but everything that individual loves as well, living or not.

You can only die once and only be damned once too.  Once either happens its a very liberating thing; you now are simply evaluating whether you're going to let some SOB get away with it or whether he or she is going to Hell in front of you, even if only by a few minutes.

I am not linking source papers in this treatise, so don't ask -- go do the looking yourself this time.  I've done it for a year and a half and, frankly, you still let these ghouls mask your kids, demand you stay home and then con you into taking jabs they lied about, let them lie about "no effective treatments" and deliberately not make reasonable inquiry as regard adverse effects of the jabs despite there being plenty of scientific evidence published before they were rolled out.  I'm laying out facts here; the science is, at this point, old enough and visible enough that if you gave a crap there would have been a revolt months ago.

A real one, not some LARPers crap.  If 500,000 corpses aren't enough what is?

If you remember very early on we knew that ventilators didn't work.  In fact we knew before Trump's HHS issued their order that paid (and still pays; the Biden administration just extended the "emergency" authorizing it) hospitals nearly $40,000 to shove a tube down your throat.  Trump then upped the ante by ordering tens of thousands of them under the DPA, despite the data being on the table that they were worthless.  That was a deliberate act that was all about the money -- damn those who were killed.  This nation sat back and allowed that to happen, and still is allowing it 18 months later.

Not long after, when the first few dead were autopsied, we found out why: Covid-19, when it goes badly, is not just a viral, inflammatory disease.  It causes thrombosis (clotting) in various organs, most-particularly the lungs.  That's what kills you most of the time.

The "spike unit" that the jabs are all constructed around, it has developed, something known to the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies before Covid-19 was claimed to exist in January of 2020.  There is a transfer agreement from the NIH to a university dated prior to that time, and some evidence that the exact spike configuration found in Covid-19 was being discussed in scientific papers long before that.  How can you have a scientific discussion, write papers on and transfer technology related to something that isn't known to exist yet?  Fauci was grilled on this the other day by Congress, asked directly if the spike in Covid-19 was identical to that in said paper, and refused to answer with a yes or no.  He knows damn well what the answer is and if he lied that would be proved perjury and a criminal offense.  If he tells the truth then the etiology of Covid-19 is conclusively known to wildly pre-date the so-called "discovery" and now we must start asking all sorts of other questions; said questions degenerate very rapidly into criminal culpability on the part of many including a whole bunch of people right here in the US.  Fauci looked very nervous in that hearing -- exactly like a man who has been caught bull****ting since the start, there's a half-million bodies piled up as a result and his neck is itching.

When the jab trials started, in short, we knew that severe disease from Covid-19 was primarily a thrombotic event.  We also knew that roughly 80% of the population had decent if not excellent resistance and would get nothing more than a mild or moderate cold or flu from it.  That proof goes all the way back to Diamond Princess.  Hell, a couple reasonably well-known to me got hit by the 'Ro in the early months, both elderly and quite morbid.  He was dead in five days while she never even sneezed, a flat impossibility for two people who are married and sleeping with each other if everyone is susceptible as we were told.  We investigated and learned why that has repeatedly happened; the science was published in June, peer-reviewed by September and published in Nature -- long before the first jab went into the first arm.  These are facts.

We also knew, from decades of trying, that coronavirus vaccines had always failed in the past.

We deliberately did not look at the thrombotic profile of the trial participants in the vaccines; specifically, we did not pull d-Dimer and troponin tests (both cheap) on the participants before the jab, and then sequentially on intervals (e.g. 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks) to detect whether we were in fact inducing damage similar to the disease.  The drugmakers did not look because quite-obviously they did not want to know; if that showed up in the trials in any sort of statistically relevant percentage of the enrollees it would have instantly shut down the trials and freaked out the thousands in said trials who put themselves at riskI remind you that in September of 2020 the first scientific paper was published indicating that the "Spike" was quite possibly the direct cause of the serious damage and virtually all Covid-19 deaths.  Several papers followed starting in December of 2020, prior to mass-distribution of the jabs, confirming that the spike was directly capable of causing pathology -- that is, severe damage -- without the rest of the virus being present at all.

Failing to halt the roll-out to prove that the vaccines, which all cause production of said spike in your body, would not cause the same effects was criminally insane and grossly negligent given the science at the time.  This was not an "accident" since the studies were published and known -- it was deliberate blindness undertaken in the interest of speed and money before human safety and indeed human life.

We also were told that the jabs produced a "robust" antibody response, which, on the data, is true.  What either wasn't looked at, or was known and intentionally not discussed is that the sequencing of IgA/IgM/IgG in a vaccinated person was wrong for someone who had no immune system knowledge prior to vaccination.  This is now out in the public, at least on a preliminary basis, and it shows that the jab adverse effects may in fact be a form of ADE!  If so that's extremely bad.  The original studies either developed this information and it was hidden or they deliberately did not look; what we do know is that it was not run down.

Now there's potentially worse evidence showing up that the jabs may be destroying existing coronavirus T-cell recognition.  That, if confirmed, is profound because natural infection preferentially builds "N" protein T-cell reactivity.  The spike on a coronavirus evades immune recognition; that's how you get infected in the first place.  That more-severe infections had higher IgG antibody titers to the spike would appear counter-intuitive (after all, you'd think the more-severe the infection the less your immune system was able to respond) but it makes sense once you realize what's going on with a severe infection; you are in fact having a thrombotic problem caused by the spike, and thus you get the higher titer.

That should have raised all sorts of eyebrows and alarms in that it strongly implies that all the vaccine formulations were at best backward and at worst directly harmful but, again, it didn't.

So what we have at this point appears to be the following:

  • The jabs are quite worthless in preventing either infection or transmission.  We knew that after Diamond Princess 80% of the population, approximately, was resistant before Covid showed up and either couldn't get infected at all or if they did had almost no ill effects.  There were multiple instances of couples where one person got a symptomatic case and the other did not get infected at all despite being quarantined together in a 10x10 room for a month.  That means if you have 10% of a vaccinated population that gets symptomatically infected when the base risk of symptomatic infection is 20% at best the jabs are 50% effective in preventing infection and transmission, and perhaps less than that.  So much for the "95%+" claims; that was always bull**** and now we have widely-diverse proof from all over the world that the jabs are non-sterilizing and thus effectively worthless in preventing infection and transmission of Covid.  The entire premise of "protecting others" by getting vaccinated against Covid-19 is now scientifically known to be complete and utter bull****.

  • There is now emerging evidence of another mutation against which the jabs are almost entirely worthless.  Expect the fear porn to get cranked on that soon even though for infected and recovered persons who are not vaccinated they remain almost entirely immune to that mutation just like all the others.  Even worse is that the data includes some people who recovered and then were stupid enough to take the jab anyway and it increased their risk of symptomatic disease over the other cohort which recovered and did not get vaccinated.  In other words they didn't get more protection by taking the shot after recovery they destroyed a large part of their existing protection, specifically, existing nucleocapsid recognition.  I have warned people repeatedly of this exact risk; there was never any scientific evidence that the jabs were useful if you had previously been infected and now we factually know they're harmful.  This is a very strong marker of what is called "OAS" ("Original Antigenic Sin") or ADE as described scientifically above as to mechanism.  It looks to be very real and accelerating as mutation continues.  The "vaccinated" symptomatic case line should be expected to cross over the "unvaccinated" line soon as mutation never stops and if it does all Hell will break loose as the shots will actually make symptomatic infection and thus transmission more likely compared against unvaccinated persons.

  • The jabs may continue to provide some protection against severe and fatal disease from Covid-19 specifically but the duration of that protection is unknown.  If you're at severe risk then on this basis they may be a good bargain.  I say may rather than "is" for the below reasons which, if they turn out to be true in your case means on balance you got ****ed more than protected, and now they're a bad deal for basically everyone.  We do not yet know the answers to the other questions but they are on the table and were deliberately not investigated before we jabbed 150 million Americans.  Some if not all of this was discoverable if anyone cared to look during the summer and fall 2020 trials, but nobody looked on purpose.

  • There is evidence that roughly half of all persons jabbed may show evidence of clotting disorders caused by the jabs.  Whether this is temporary or does permanent damage is not known.  It explains, however, the heart attacks, cardiomylitis, strokes and cognitive changes (e.g. microclotting in the brain) shortly after being jabbed.  I remind you that the "associated but not proved cause" death rate from these jabs is running roughly four hundred times on a per-million-persons jabbed that of the flu shot -- and climbing.  The bad news is that endothelial damage of this sort may well be permanent.  It also raises the very real risk of PAH if some of that damage is in the lungs; there is no non-invasive way to know and by the time you become symptomatic for that your heart has been critically damaged.  To be fair some small percentage of people naturally infected get the same sort of damage but to risk same from infection which is not certain is different than taking that risk on a certain basis from being jabbed.  This could have been quantified before the EUAs were granted as a trivial test would have disclosed the problem in the Phase 1 and 2 trials and was not done or explored.  Given that by summer of 2020 we knew how Covid killed people that failure is only reasonably characterized as intentional.

  • There is now evidence that the jabs destroy some part of your existing immune system T-cell recognition, replacing it with "spike" recognition.  The scope and impact of that is not yet known but the potential impact is horrifying.  The induced spike recognition is Covid-19 specific and, we now know, mutationally specific at least in part.  What is destroyed is not specific to either Covid or mutation and therefore what you destroyed was almost-certainly worth more than what you gained.  This looks very much like "OAS" and the bad news is that it may well impact across other coronaviruses such as OC43.  If that proves up then the increase in susceptibility to severe disease on balance and in whole from circulating viruses has been increased rather than decreased by getting jabbed.

All of this has come to light in about a year from the first trials of these vaccines.

I remind you that it usually takes 10 years or so to qualify a vaccine.  These sort of risks are why it takes 10 years and, let us not forget, coronavirus vaccines have been tried in the past and have universally failed, either due to adverse effects (including OAS and ADE) or they simply proved to be worthless over time with the virus evading them.  That was the history against which these jabs were developed and that we had the arrogance to believe we had magically overcome that which nature had previously thwarted without multi-year evidence may well wind up proving to be one of the most stupid undertakings ever in medicine and public health.

Yet even with this data now on the table the manufacturers are demanding "expedited" full approval reviews!

Oh, and don't start with "well, its knocking down the incidence of infections."  Is it really?

How is it that India has seen a 90% collapse in case rates with only 6% of their population vaccinated?

It clearly wasn't the vaccine over there, was it?  Gee, maybe its Farr's Law that caused that.  Just like the infection rate here in the US peaked and was falling before we had any meaningful vaccinated immunity.  That which happens before you do something cannot have been caused by the something.

This also bears on the current case rate.  Look at last summer; seasonality is real.

We'll see how bad #JabbersRemorse gets in the coming months, and whether the 150 million Americans who took the jab thus far decide they made a good decision or a critically bad one that winds up blowing up in their face -- and if the latter, what those who get screwed, which is about half the adult population at this point, decide to do about it when it comes to those who deliberately failed to investigate what we knew were serious risks that needed to be excluded.

Those who are true believers cannot be reached at this point since they've already committed to their course of action.  As a result I see no further point in writing on this in the general sense, and thus probably won't.

Right up until I wave the "Told You So" flag sometime around late fall, assuming the pattern holds.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-07-21 18:12 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 7342 references
[Comments enabled]  

Ok, enough folks.

“I’m admitting young healthy people to the hospital with very serious COVID infections. One of the last things they do before they’re intubated is beg me for the vaccine. I hold their hand and tell them that I’m sorry, but it’s too late," she wrote.

"A few days later when I call time of death, I hug their family members and I tell them the best way to honor their loved one is to go get vaccinated and encourage everyone they know to do the same.”

This sort of lie should cost Ms. LIAR her license and everyone who ran this bull**** should be ruined.

Her "hospital" -- any agency or entity that allows her to infest their premises should be flat-out destroyed along with every single person who works in any such place and gives her credibility by doing so.

Why?

This story is from Alabama.

Now I want you to look very carefully at this table.

 

Here's the source link, complete with four separate copies of the same bull**** story in different "news" outlets.

According to that table not one person has died since the end of April in Alabama from Covid-19 according to that graph which goes through 7/20 -- yesterday.

What is "99% (unvaccinated) of ZERO (all people who died of Covid in Alabama SINCE APRIL)"?

ZERO!

But yes, Ms. Smiling Crazy Bitch is imploring people to get jabbed for what, she says, will stop becoming part of a wave of death that is happening right now.

If someone died today, well, that's one.  Where are all the others?  Oh, and the story?  It's not, allegedly, from today.  It references a viral Facebook post from the weekend.

AGAIN:  Where is the pile of bodies in the above graph that Ms. Crazy claims are stacking up?

If you look elsewhere you will find that perhaps Statista gave up.  Why?  Too small to matter.  Here's another link that says there are a few deaths here and there.  Let's put perspective on this, assuming it's accurate:

The 7-day average according to that second site state-wide has been at or under 10 since April.  Ok, Alabama has approximately 5 million people in it, or 1.52% of the total of the nation.  Roughly 8,200 people die daily in the US of all causes, so in Alabama that would be 124 dead bodies.

Do you really think three, four, five on a 7-day average state-wide -- with lots of zeros -- is material in the whole?  How many of those are people who are seriously ill with other things?  Most of them, as has always been the case with Covid.  And has also always been the case if you're positive at death or within 30 days of it you count and Biden just extended the hospital toe tag bounties for both admissions and ventilator use.

People need to go straight to prison for this bull****.  10 years for Ms. Ex-Preggers tossing her new kid (along with any others she has) in an orphanage should wake her ass up for lying and threatening people that they will surely die in order coerce them to do something they do not otherwise want to do.

If the jabs work so well why are both Malta and Israel, two of the highest-vaccinated percentage populations in the world, both taking huge case spikes?  In addition explain India which has 6% of their population vaccinated (one of the lowest among the world) and their case rate has collapsed by 90%.  

How is that possible if the jab is the only way forward and the only way we can defeat this horrible virus?  Is it not more likely that the jabs are nearly worthless in terms of infections and the virus is, in fact, following Farr's Law -- as places release lockdowns and strictures the infections which were delayed occur anyway?  How many times has Australia breathed an "all clear!" sign of relief and then oops -- guess not!

Then there's this lie:

Health authorities have warned that even though the COVID-19 vaccines are incredibly effective -- the Pfizer and Moderna ones about 95% against symptomatic infection in studies -- they’re not perfect. 

Reminder: 6 of ~50 is not 5%, it's more than double that.  This is the count of TX Democrats who got symptomatically infected and, presumably, were contagious. Further, how many White House and Pelosi aids met with them?  If the count is one each that's a 100% failure rate for those two fully-vaccinated people, both of whom are symptomatic.

I remind you that on Diamond Princess the total attack rate, including asymptomatic but tested positive, was 20%.  If in vaccinated people the symptomatic attack rate is 10% then the shots are at best 50% effective, not 95%, at preventing symptomatic disease.  We shall see how well they work over time when it comes to ADE and OAS, never mind the immediate adverse effects which include such wonderful events like strokes, heart attacks and myocarditis.

Are you done yet or are you still listening to the cryfests purveyors trying to scare you to death?

Oh, and **** you Mitch McConnell.  More lockdowns as a threat, as you tried to run today?

With all due disrespect -- up your ass, Senator.  Go ahead and try it; the first thing we will lock down if you do is your food, water, and sewer service.  Let's see you go **** in the street ******* -- oh, and we'll buy up all the toilet paper too.  You can wipe with your filthy hand.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)