You guys are continuing to miss the entire point (and I'm starting to believe it's intentional).

This is about telling the .gov they can't regulate the source of free speech and news dissemination. The founding principle for the First Amendment was to make political speech as free and unfettered as humanly possible.

If the offending "speech" was in book form, it would not be banned.

This ended the practice of the .gov saying that unions, news corps, PIRGs, 527s, etc having exclusive exemptions to the ban on "non-human" free speech.

I swear we are freebasing stupid pills around here.

----------

Diversity + proximity = WAR

-The facts do not care about your narrative. The "GREAT NOTICING" continues apace.