The Market Ticker ®
Commentary on The Capital Markets
Login or register to improve your experience
Main Navigation
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Full-Text Search & Archives
Leverage, the book
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility; author(s) may have positions in securities or firms mentioned and have no duty to disclose same.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must be complete (NOT a "pitch"; those get you blocked as a spammer), include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

230 years ago men with the names of Jefferson, Hamilton, Madison and more pledged their "lives, wealth and sacred honor" to give us a nation.

Over the last few months I have heard every possible excuse in the world as to why "we're doomed" from this or that from an economic (or physical) threat, and why nobody thinks that getting off their butts will make a difference.

I've even had a couple of dozen people I've sent tickers or other calls to direct action (letter writing, petition signing, etc) turn around and tell me they're afraid of ending up on some "list" if they make noise.

People are afraid of going to Washington DC or even sending a petition or picking up the phone to call their Congressman because they'll end up on some sort of "list"?

Are you kidding me?

The markets over the last month have rallied because...... corporations are lying and our government sits by while quasi-government organizations, including and especially The Fed, act outside of their legal mandates.

Yes, really.

Goldman and other banks increase "Level 3" assets by 50% and take profits from the degradation in their credit book (!) and this is met with huge market rallies.

Let's dissect Google for a second - note that I have Google's "Adsense" on this blog, and its also on my forum.

Last fall I noted that the "eCPM" that I was earning dropped precipitously (by 30%!) just before earnings were released. They then "blew out estimates" and the stock soared.

A few months later Comscore started bleating about bad numbers and they stuttered, then tanked.

Well, guess what? The last week of March it happened again. The eCPM dropped here once more, this time by about 40%. And once again Google reports a "blow out" quarter.

But is there any transparency in how they're hitting those numbers? Oh hell no. What do I see here? A nine-month pattern that has repeated twice, where the company has "hit the numbers" by, as far as I can tell, by simply changing how much it pays the people who display their ads, pocketing far more than they used to.

Now this is very profitable for them up to now, but here's the problem - my eCPM is down some 70% in the last six months. I am now getting a small enough return from being a Google "Adwords" placement target that I may drop it entirely, as there's not much point given what they're giving me, and I have little reason to let these folks effectively have placement on my sites for free!

And if I and lots of other display ad places do exactly that, how much is their "placement" worth to an advertiser? As people like me leave their ability to sell that space plummets.

A bit of careful analysis would disclose that when you go from 50 cents eCPM to fourteen over the space of nine months (and no, the click rate hasn't materially changed) that there's not much more room for that game to be run, is there?

What happens when the game ends?

Can I validate that this is how they've hit their numbers? No, because they don't give us enough color in their reports to be able to do that. But does it make sense? Yes it does, and that's a bit of a problem going forward for those who are Google (and tech in general) Bulls.

(By the way, if you're a potential advertiser in this space, your opportunity to get exclusive placement on both the forum and the blog just got a lot cheaper. Talk to me if you're interested in displacing Google for this site. Yes, I'm serious.)

Is this sort of thing common? Absolutely. Look at the financial "earnings" this quarter. Regional banks nearly all hit their numbers from profits on the Visa IPO - which was not part of the estimates, because it wasn't known when those estimates were published. That's the mother and father of all "one time" gains but boy, you wouldn't see that featured prominently in the press release, would you? Nope!

Or how about the "Level 3" asset moves? The last two quarters have seen absolutely enormous gains in "Level 3" assets - which came from "Level 2" assets, not new production.

Crooked? You decide - is it crooked accounting when a bank or other institution simply doesn't like the price its being quoted, so it stops asking and makes up a number?

Or how about all these "REO" houses that banks are sending to auction with a reserve, the reserve is not hit and they get 'em back. How are those homes "valued"? Are they counting the "value" as the high bid that they refused to accept? Hell no.

Is that crooked? You decide, but keep in mind while you're thinking about it that 97% of all homes sent out to auction in California are coming back unsold!

Our government says it is (we are) $9 trillion in debt but ignores the forward liability of Social Security and Medicare, which totals, at present, $53 trillion dollars in the mother and father of all "SIV"s.

Oh, and David Walker, Comptroller General of the GAO, the nation's "chief accountant" resigned in February of this year, after screaming for years about the accounting that our nation practices and what it will lead to. He was ignored.

Crooked? You decide.

We have $4/gas in some parts of our nation, diesel is over $4 virtually everywhere, and this is likely to continue to escalate. Why?

Because our accounting is crooked - not only corporately but nationally.

We have sat back while Morton Grove effectively banned firearms and the City of Chicago banned handguns. Never mind that the 2nd Amendment was given to us by those very same "balls that clank" men 230 years ago not so you can shoot some thug who is trying to invade your home, but precisely so that if the government goes so far out of the boundaries of reasonable conduct that no human should have to tolerate it, you can shoot them. If you disagree with this interpretation of The Second Amendment, by the way, I suggest that you spend a few hours reading The Federalist.

The intent of the Second Amendment really is rather clear if you bother to read the material.

And don't start with "the army has more guns than I do, therefore it doesn't matter." Of course the military and police have more guns than you do! They're also better trained. So what? The purpose of the Second Amendment isn't to allow you to "go postal" against the government, it is so that you and all 299,999,999 if your neighbors in this great nation can do so all at once if it ever becomes necessary.

It is this very fact that the people can exercise the ultimate check and balance on government that will keep it from ever needing to occur. Government should be afraid of the people, not the other way around, because this is how government is forced to act within the boundaries of reason, proper conduct, and the law.

But you, each and every one of you, have allowed this rampant lawlessness to go on.

You're the frog put in a pot with the water slowly being heated, boiling in the pot, and you refuse to act because you're afraid.

Or, you say, it doesn't matter what I say or do.

This is where we've gotten to as a nation?

Every time we pull into the gas station and insert the nozzle into our tanks we siphon the money out of our wallets and into the pockets of people like Lord Blankfein, Vickram Pandit and the CEOs of Wall Street banks, who have demolished transparency of accounting and caused our dollar to crater.

You will sit still for this and have another beer?

People blame "Cheney" for the high price of oil and invading Iraq to "boost his buddies" but in point of fact the remaining reason we have high oil prices that are squeezing you like a turnip is that our nation's accounting is fraudulent, corporately and nationally, and other nations have had enough of it, driving down the value of our currency. The consequence is served up upon you as a consumer in the form of higher costs for food and energy as the price of everything we import translates directly into your wallet.

You will sit still for this and have another beer?

When the Japanese attacked us on a Sunday morning in 1941 the nation was outraged. Our boys suddenly grew balls that clanked and soldiered off to kill the evil people who had done that to us. We did so without fear or favor. Doolittle's Raiders took off on a suicide mission just to prove that we could bomb Tokyo with aggregate bomb loads that they knew full well would not make a strategic difference - knowing full well they didn't have the fuel to get home, and counting on the possibility of being able to land in China. Most of those brave men either died outright or were captured and tortured mercilessly. They did it, willingly, because they had balls that clanked and wanted to tell the Japanese - you screwed up and now you're going to pay.

A few years later we dropped an atomic weapon - twice - on Japanese cities. Many today claim it was an "unpardonable act of cruelty." Oh really?

Perhaps the Japanese should have thought about the consequences of their actions before they bombed Pearl Harbor!

Fast-forward to 2001.

Evil men commandeered a few aircraft and killed more people than died on December 7th, 1941. Worse, nearly all of the people they killed were not soldiers nor were the places they attacked "military targets" - they were civilians just like you and I. Two friends of mine worked at Cantor-Fitzgerald and one of them was on one of the impact floors - I assume he was instantly vaporized in a 4500F fireball, as there never was a body recovered. A third friend of mine caught a plane out of NY the night before it happened; she missed being vaporized by less than eight hours.

Our nation once again grew balls that clank but instead of five years, these balls lasted about a month, then they turned into nerfballs that smush.

We went into Afghanistan and kicked some ass but then the panzies got their panties in a wad (as has happened since WWII - see Vietnam, Korea, etc) and we started caring more about the bad guys than our own boys. We handcuffed - again - our military. As a consequence we once again proved that America has turned into a nation of panzies - we will neither defend ourselves nor conduct our business in an honorable fashion.

Over the last 15 years insider trading has become a game that is played relentlessly to the point that people don't only trade on inside baseball they actually create fake news after trading it so to to make absolutely certain that they are right.

We have hedge funds and others who have, for example, placed huge CALL buys and then started rumors that "Buffett is going to buy X" and cashed in. Number of prosecutions or even investigations for this? Zero, up until they did the same thing in reverse with Bear Stearns and suddenly the SEC shows up.

Once.

So we have 100 scams run on Wall Street in the last year fleecing you and I and out of those 100 there's one time that the cops take a look. Gee, that's effective police work. The other 99 times they not only don't prosecute they don't even investigate!

You, at the same time, sit on your ass and swill beer. You watch CNBC and cheer. You watch CNBC anchors of both genders have an orgasm on national television when the market goes up, keeping the camera clean only because they have pants on, and cry when it goes down.

Are you pissed off enough to to grow some steel between your legs and clank when you walk? Or will you wait until you are out of a job, your home has been foreclosed on and your job shipped off to India?

Will those balls of steel last more than 15 minutes if you do grow them?

Here's what you can do, right here, right now. No, its not "signing a petition"; its more direct, more personal, and more "real". It will also put a fork into the fuel for the fraud - money - and send a very strong signal to both Wall Street and Congress.
  • Call your Congressperson. Tell them that you have had enough, and you're going to organize your neighborhood and city to throw them out of office come November, irrespective of their political party and yours, unless they act to stop the fraud right now, both at the corporate and national level. You tell them clearly - you don't care what other issues are being run in the election - you're voting this issue, and this issue alone. Period.
  • Next, take direct action. Go to Sam's Club and buy a safe. Go to Lowes and buy a hammerdrill and 4 lead anchors plus bolts. These two items will cost you less than $200. Go home and mount your new safe to the floor. You now have your own "bank" and while it pays no interest, neither does your bank right now anyway, does it?
  • Now, on each and every payday, go directly to your bank and withdraw the entire direct deposited amount of your paycheck less $100, just to keep your account open. Put the money in your safe. By doing this you are depriving the system of the money to keep playing their game. You are staging a strike against the fraud and corruption in our financial system in a way that hurts them, but not you. Every dollar you pull out of the system like this deprives the very same system of $10 to play its fraudulent games with due to the way fractional reserve banking works. Its your money, and you're fueling the fraud. Grow a pair and take away the gas can from the arsonists who are burning up your 401k and wallet!
  • Spend within your means. Not one penny more. Pay your debts off as you can, but take no new debt. Yes, this means you have to be responsible. Fewer meals at O'Charlies or Outback, and when you do go, you pay in CASH. Tell those businesses when you do go in there WHY you're doing it - and that you will not be back with your credit card until the fraud across both Wall and Main street stops. Enlist THEM in the fight the best way possible - by threatening THEIR pocketbooks.
  • Stop playing the credit game. Stop giving financial institutions the ability to******you. Your credit card company can and will raise your interest rate on existing balances any time they want. This is documented fact. Why are you consenting to this? Stop consenting by paying cash and living within your means. Wanting a new IPOD is not an emergency. Put the card in the Bank you installed in your closet and leave it there.
  • Need a car? Buy a used one - with cash. Do you need a new car? No. Instead of a payment, pay yourself. Buy a cheap used car and when it breaks, throw it away. Drop your collision coverage - you don't need it on a cheap car - and pocket that money too. This will literally save you thousands of dollars a year.

Now let me make a prediction.

None of this will happen. Not one person in 1,000 that reads this Ticker will do it, and not one of the 50 that do take this step will enlist their neighbors to do it too.

Why not?

Because you have to actually get off your ass and go to Sam's Club to buy the safe. You have to spend 15 minutes to drill the holes and anchor it. You have to spend the 10 minutes every Friday to get the money. You have to live within your means. You have to spend the time to educate your neighbors.

You will not grow balls that clank.

You will instead sit back and whine about $4, then $5, then $6 gasoline. You will continue to whine when your job is lost just as you did when your last job was eliminated and sent overseas. You will whine when your credit card interest rate goes up and when, as the bond market sells off, mortgage rates skyrocket. 10 years from now you will whine when Medicare is dramatically cut back. 20 years from now you will whine some more when your 401k is shredded and Social Security is magically "redone" to either tax the hell out of your benefit checks or worse, simply repudiated.

You can stop it, but you have to stop it now. 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 years from now the damage will be done and we will be living with the consequences - as will our children and grandchildren.

America is a bunch of softies and we are going to get creamed as a consequence.

Don't read the Asian papers.

They "get it" and they're going to tattoo us. In fact, they've been running articles for the last two days that strongly suggest that they intend to******us standing up without a reach-around for our pleasure.

They don't need us - we need them. We need $2 billion of foreign money each and every day to keep our government running. Those nations are tired of the games and the chatter level is going up dramatically about their intent to give us a very painful economic lesson.

Its YOUR fault when - not if - it happens.

Enjoy this "rally"; when markets trade against fundamentals it does not last, so you have to ask yourself, since we're a credit-driven economy - where do consumers get the ability to take on more debt, say much less buy a house, when we're back to needing 20% down in most markets - which is where we should have been all along?

Think this is over do you? Better not read this:

"Just got off the phone with three of my top contacts at three of the nations leading mortgage lenders/banks. These programs are not selling at all. The volumes are very low. Banks are highly disappointed. The difference between a standard Fannie/Freddie (Agency) is roughly 75 to 100bps depending on the lender. Agency 30-yr fixed are roughly 6.25% with no points and Agency Jumbos are roughly 7 to 7.25%. Mortgage rates have gone up about .375% in the past few days.

For refi's, nobody wants out of their 5/1 ARM, ALT-A interest only or Pay Option ARM into a 30-yr fixed at 7.25% where their payments increase substantially. Also, in over 50% of cases appraisal are not coming in at value. For example, the loan application is taken with an estimate of $600k and the loan is an 80% loan-to-value (LTV). When appraisal comes in, the value is actually $500k making the loan a 100% LTV and there are no programs available. This is happening on a vast amount the $417k conforming loans as well.

For the purchase money folk, rates are also too high for current property values. Plus, a down payment required is 10%+. Debt to income ratios have tightened, further reducing buying power. A household wanting to take advantage of a $700k Agency loan at 7.25% must earn about $175k per year at current rates. And that only buys a $770k home, which is low to moderate in most areas in CA. Surely not the first-pick neighborhood of some earning $175k per year. That same person could have purchase a $1.5 million home with little to no down payment nine short months ago."

Any questions? Ignore this at your considerable peril - California is an absolutely enormous part of our national economy and if people can't afford to get their housing act together there, the economy will NOT recover.

Oh, and get your butt over to Sam's.

If you care about this country.

Prove to me that America still has what made this a great nation.

I dare you.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

.... in one easy step.

I've mentioned it before in passing (and so have a couple of other people on the forum, Boz being one), but this deserves its own Ticker, along with the rest of the day's news.

Its really quite simple.

Mandate that property tax appraisals are a "PUT" option written by the taxing authority.

That is, you can "PUT" your house on the county for the amount of the assessed value, and they are obligated to buy it for same, at any given point in time.

This brings the two competing forces behind assessments into immediate balance and arrives instantaneously at true market value.

The County, of course, wants to generate tax revenue. They therefore want to assess your house for as much as they possibly can.

However, they also don't want to own your house, and they certainly don't want to sell it back off at a loss. Therefore, they will not assess the property for more than it is worth in the free market, and in fact will assess it for very slightly under true market value to avoid this potential.
Bingo - end of problem.

This value is then the "fair market value" for all transactions. If you wish to pay more as a buyer you are free to do so, of course, but that doesn't change the assessed value - unless the country agrees with you and comes back in to reassess - at which point they run the risk of you PUTting the house on them.

In addition we now have a centralized (by county) database of all the homes and their market prices. This means that banks who have REOs can no longer maintain a fictitious "mark to market", as they can PUT the home on the county for that price as well. Since there is now a market at all times for these properties, they cannot escape true valuation.

If this was to be done we would have instant clarity on true value in the housing market and that clarity would change with actual market conditions.

Simple, elegant, and further, we now have a guaranteed buyer (albeit at some haircut) for the property at any given point in time.

Locales would be free, of course, to underasses by enough to insure that they did not get stuck holding a bag in the event of a significant market decline before their "normal" assessment cycle came back around, as well as any deferred and thus unrecognized in the assessment maintenance issues.

In the News Carlyle appears to be in the process of blowing up after failing to meet a margin call. The rumors about huge liquidations of agencies appear to be true:

"The collapse of the subprime mortgage market has prompted investors to flee all but the safest forms of debt, leading to the failure of hedge funds including Peloton Partners LLP. The Carlyle fund raised $300 million in July and used loans to buy about $22 billion of AAA rated so-called agency mortgage securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
Well, now we know where the supply that magically appeared came from....

Ambac gets the headline "sells half of company, plan may not work" from Bloomberg:

"March 6 (Bloomberg) -- Ambac Financial Group Inc., the bond insurer seeking capital to salvage its AAA credit rating, will sell half the company in a bet some investors say won't pay off.

Ambac said yesterday it plans to issue $1 billion of common stock, more than doubling the number of shares outstanding. The New York-based company will also offer $500 million of units that convert to shares in 2011."

No kidding? You've got a $10 billion+ problem according to Egan Jones and you think $1.5 billion will fix it eh? Uh huh. I believe in the Easter Bunny, but if I want to eat Wabbit I'm still going to have to walk out the door and shoot the little bugger.

Both the Brits and Eurofolks held rates steady in their regularly-scheduled rate meeting.

Bernanke's dilemma is starting to get some play in the mainstream press, with CNBC noting that while The Fed has been "slashing rates" and flooding the market with "liquidity" the market hasn't recovered (and in fact has cratered) and the credit markets are in worse shape than in August, with the malaise now spreading into virtually every corner including supposedly-"safe" instruments such as Auction Rate municipals. And Bloomberg said the following today:

"March 6 (Bloomberg) -- Credit trading models used by Wall Street have gone haywire, raising company borrowing costs even as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke cuts interest rates."
Well duh. As I've said repeatedly you cannot fix a junkie's problem by offering him heroin! Bernanke needs to decide whether he is going to address the willful regulatory ignorance emanating from The Fed and other banking system regulators or whether he prefers to have the credit markets seize up piece by piece, margin call by margin call, until we finally force into the open the institutions that are insolvent - the hard way.

Down the latter road lies a rerun of the 1930s or a Japan-like situation, with both being brought about by precisely the same sort of regulatory refusal to force market participants to face reality.

The bad news is that I fear that Bernanke has very little time left to get off his kiester as the market is choosing for him. He's wasted the last six months running the old Greenspam playbook but unfortunately this is not LTCM where you literally have one institution that got in trouble - this is much more serious as the we quite literally have all areas of the credit markets seizing up because trust has been destroyed.

What's worse, Bernanke and his Fed have destroyed confidence in our currency by willfully refusing to address the root cause of the problem and that is being reflected in the DX.

The irony of this is that the longer Bernanke fiddles with his bullcrap "rate cut" nonsense trying to shove more heroin at the junkie, the worse the dollar craters and the more inflationary pressure this puts back into the economy through higher import costs, with the most important of those being the energy complex! The Dollar broke 73 today - south!

Bluntly: Bernanke cannot control this situation with more "liquidity" or "rate cuts", and the more he jawbones the more the dollar reacts by sinking further into the quicksand, taking back - with interest - what he is attempting to "give."

This morning the IRX is trading at 13.05, or 1.3%. With the FFT at 3% this is clearly in "emergency rate cut" territory but should Ben do this it will simply roach the dollar further, which will drive even more people into Treasuries and push the IRX down more, while ramping import costs even more quickly!

If you've been following the technicals you know that I've been calling for a "10" handle on the IRX for a while entirely on technicals, but the backstory on this is that as the IRX continues to fall it is an indication of lack of trust, not a need for more liquidity.

This problem cannot be solved with "rate cuts." In fact, what is required right now is a draining of systemic liquidity to force up market rates and thereby force market participants to stop hiding things, acclerating the margin call monster so that we can clear all this bad paper and find out who's broke and who's not!

Now consider this - the "short dollar" trade has become one of the new "hot money" trades out on the street. This is extremely dangerous to play here - its been tremendously profitable, but at some point someone is going to call Ben and tell him to cut that crap out.

Consider what happens to you if he does - if he were to drain liquidity and RAISE the target to compensate by 25 bips.

Just for a month, just for now, but with a statement that "we must be mindful of inflation risks."

Do you want to be short dollars if that happens?

By the way, I rate the odds of such a blatant manipulation in the currency markets as very low - perhaps 1 in 100.

But were I Chairman of The Fed, I'd do it, because (1) it would have almost no real effect on the economy as a whole, (2) it would force the deleveraging to accelerate and (3) it would instantaneously reverse the slide in the dollar.

Something to think about.....

Unemployment came in at 359k initial claims, but the continuing claims number is trouble, continuing to rise; a mixed picture.

Unfortunately delinquent mortgages are now at 5.82% of ALL mortgages outstanding and foreclosures now stand at more than 2% of all outstanding as of the 4th quarter of '07.

That is more than 1 in 20 of ALL mortgages delinquent; this is no longer a "subprime" problem, it has now infested THE ENTIRE HOUSING STOCK.

A rumor started flying around the pits this morning that Fannie and Freddie would receive a "formal" full-faith-and-credit guarantee from Treasury. In a first to stomp on these sorts of rumors, Treasury almost immediately piped up and said there was zero truth to it.

What they didn't say, but should have, is that they CAN'T step in and do this even if they wanted to - any attempt to do so would result in an instantaneous rocket shot in the Treasury Complex yields and seal the fate not only of Fannie and Freddie but of the government as well!

In addition we have two more pieces of data today; The Federal Reserve said today that for the first time on record going back to the 1940s, when they started tracking it, American's home equity fell below 50%. NOT GOOD.

Worse, American household net worth fell at a 3.6% annual rate in the 4th quarter, and remember that this was BEFORE the big market swoon in January! That number is much worse today.

Now add to this that the dislocation in the credit markets is causing a full on ramp in real mortgage rates for buyers even though The Fed has the FFT at 3%! Hedge funds are forcibly being deleveraged and having to sell into the market in tremendous volume, causing yields to shoot up and prices to fall.

There are many commentators who say that comparisons to the 1970s "stagflation" situation are invalid. They're right - this is much worse. The '70s were primarily a result of energy price shocks caused by external events. This situation has been brought about by our own malfeasance and the continuing willful blindness among regulators, including Bernanke and his Fed, the SEC, OTS, OCC, Hanky Paulson and Congress.

All have reasons to not want to put their jackboot on the neck of the bad actors, but all need to do it, right here and now, if we are to avoid an economic catastrophe.

You can't force people to lend and you can't create the ability to borrow when it doesn't exist, and without a functioning credit market the capacity for economic growth disappears.

And that, folks, is the bottom line.

We either restore trust right here and now or our capital markets - and our economy - are toast.

Today we broke critical support levels on all primary indices. The break is not yet "convincing", which means it may - and can - retrace. But any material sort of down day tomorrow puts us at severe risk a DOW in the nine thousand range, a SPX around 1000, a NDX around 1200 and a Russell in the 400s.

Time's up Ben and Hank - act now, and no, your famous "sticksave" games won't work. Further damage to the dollar is the last thing we can afford with our dependence on imports; we will see $150 oil if you don't cut that crap out!
View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

I keep getting people asking me why I am so against companies like Washington Mutual (WM) booking back capitalized interest as income - basically, the deficiency on "Pay Option" ARM mortgages.

Rather than keep explaining on message boards, I'll post it here - then I can just link it back.

Let's use WaMu as an example, because they make a particularly good - or ugly, depending on your perspective - example of this.

In March of 2006, Washington Mutual recorded net income of $985 million dollars. 4Q06 they booked $1,058 mln. This last quarter, they booked $784mln.

But in those three quarters they booked $194mln, $333mln and $361 million, respectively, in PayOption ARM "Capitalized Interest." This was booked and recognized as EARNINGS.

Now here's the problem: In 1Q 06, 194 million out of $985 is 19.7%. In December, it was 31%. But this last quarter, it was FORTY SIX PERCENT, more than a DOUBLE over the year ago levels.

And what's worse, not one dime of that "income" can be spent! It is entirely phantom.

This is the same sort of crap that sunk Lucent and Enron - booking "income" that is not in fact spendable, as it has an impairment associated with it (the LTV is INCREASED by this negative amortization) AND it is not CASH!

There is a legitimate argument to be made for booking this as a net increase in the bank's assets, offset with a loss reserve due to the increase in LTV on the property (this is the most likely part of the principle to be unrecoverable in the event of a default.) In effect this is a capital asset that is drawn down in value over some period of time - up to 30 years for most mortgages.

But now the bank has elected to pay 55 cents of dividend, yet the single largest contributor to their "86 cents of net income" this last quarter was in fact capitalized interest that cannot be spent!

So if you take that out you find that the bank actually made 46 cents - less than the dividend! (Oh, and let's not forget the preferred either)

WaMu had better hope that the housing market markedly improves out there in Californicated. I doubt it will though. And as more and more people get squeezed and have to pay those minimum payments, that "back cap" will grow - up until all those loans hit hard recast.

Then the **** hits the fan as the payments will double and, if market values have in fact declined, the "owners" won't be able to refinance.

Guess what happens next to those "earnings" that weren't real in the first place?

As I mentioned, Lucent did the same thing with their "capital leases" during the tech bubble. It made for great earnings and drove the stock price to the sky during the salad years of the bubble.

When the tech bubble came apart it also nearly bankrupted the company.

All you had to do to know that all this "income" Lucent was posting during that time was bogus was to read the footnotes. Wasn't it nice of them - just like WaMu - to put that little ditty in the footnotes instead of featuring it "front and center" in the earnings report?

I wonder why WaMu didn't proudly trumpet that 46% of their "earnings" were in fact capitalized interest in their latest release - and not spendable money?

Ref: http://edgar.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933136/000115752307003679/a5377269ex991.htm
View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

What a wild ride the last week or so in the markets.

Up 100, down 100. Up 200, down 200. 300 point swings in a day.

This is all blamed on the "Subprime" mortgage market. And that, my friends, is a lie.

Quick education here - "Subprime" loans are made to people who have spotty credit. If you made a few late payments on your credit cards, have a lot of debt on them and little assets, or simply have next to nothing on your credit report, you're "Subprime." These folks have over representation in the minorities and the working poor, but this isn't really about race.

Its about credit quality, and with risk comes higher potential rewards.

But here's the 900lb gorilla in the room. Its what is called "Alt-A" mortgages, and you know what they are. They're advertised on the radio every day. "Quicken Loans, a rate around 5%" (as just one example.) You listen to the radio, you've heard 'em. And at the end is the disclaimer (APR 7.5%) - buried in the quick speak.

The underlying problem here is that starting with the 00/01 crash in the tech stocks the Fed got very aggressive in cutting rates - down to levels that had never been seen before. 1% Fed Funds. Unheard of. This created an explosion of liquidity, because bankers could borrow money short-term for 1%, lend it to you at 4 or 5%, and make an incredible amount of money.

And lend it they did - but they didn't take any long-term bets at that price. Why not? Because the Fed Funds rate is an overnight deal - it can change any time.

So what mortgage bankers do is write your loan, hold the loan for a short period of time, package up those loans into what are called "tranches" and sell them on the marketplace. Hedge funds and big investment banks - Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch - they're the buyers. This is how the mortgage originators manage THEIR risk - that of a big hike in interest rates that puts their investment underwater.

Now here's the problem.

The ALT-A market is in fact more risky than the Subprime! Why? Because the percentage of these loans is huge compared to the Subprime. Countrywide Mortgage, widely thought of as a "prime" mortgage lender, in fact did nearly half of their business in these "Alt-A" products last year. They push these products hard because they're very, very profitable - when things work out.

What's worse is that these products have been pushed as "debt consolidation" loans. "Pay off those high-priced credit cards" scream the ads. Yeah, right, and risk your house!

But now we've got a problem. House prices are stagnant or actually declining in many places in this country. And these "Option ARMs" have a bomb built into them - they capitalize the unpaid interest back into the loan, raising its principle value. When the interest rate resets, and this is just starting to happen, the effective rate (when computed on the original loan balance) of many of these loans will reach 12%!

TWELVE percent guys. Interest rates last seen when Jimmy Carter was President.

You remember those days, don't you? I sure do. The market - and the economy - were in the TANK! Why? Because borrowing money was insanely expensive and inflation was high too.

Now here's the REALLY bad news. All of these mortgage companies book profits when you carry back "option interest" as additional principle! How's that, you ask?

Well, its actually quite legal, even if tricky. See, your balance went up, and they expect you'll pay it. Since you originally borrowed $X, but now owe $Y in principle, they book that as "free money" - profit - on the deal.

This of course assumes you actually pay it back! If you don't.......

There is no good news here folks. In fact, its all bad news.

And what do the "Talking Heads" say on CNBC and the other "news" outlets? The same thing they said as the Tech Crash was about to get underway, but the first companies were just starting to get in trouble.

"Its contained."
"There is no underlying problem."
"This is just a short-term correction (in the housing market)."
"We are 'untroubled' by our exposure to subprime."

Yeah. Anyone remember 1999?

Here's the deal folks.

All those folks who took out HELOCs (home equity lines of credit) did not cut up their credit cards. They just paid them off using the HELOC, but kept spending. This was ok when your house value went up faster than the interest that you imputed back into the loan using those "option loans".

But now the price appreciation in the house has gone to zero, and that imputed principle is actually additional debt!

In many places these loans are actually underwater right now. That is, you owe more on your house, all up, than its worth. And some of those states are "zero recourse" - that is, you can walk off and hand the mortgage company the keys, and while they will trash your credit rating they can't sue you.

People know this, and they're exploiting it. How? Well that's cute too. Many folks, facing a crushing blow of debt via an impending reset they KNOW is coming, are doing the following:

Let's say you have a $750,000 house. You took a first mortgage as a "2/1 10%" ARM, which is a common ALT-A product. Its cheap because the interest rate is only locked for two years, then it floats at LIBOR (a commonly used interest rate benchmark) plus some percentage. You then took an "option interest" loan for the rest (down payment, what's that?) or even better, you borrowed the downstroke somewhere, then paid it back using a "silent second" - a Home Equity line (HELOC) that had an "option interest" feature.

Well, now the chickens are coming home. Your house has actually depreciated in value by 10% because, well, nobody's buying right now. So you have a $750,000 house with a $750,000 mortgage but the house is only worth $675,000! What's worse is that the interest rate is about to reset 2% up from your "teaser rate", and you know you can't make the payments three months from now.

So you shop for a $500,000 house (remember, its a down market!) You qual for that mortgage (your FICO score is still quite good, as you haven't blown a payment yet) on the basis of selling the OTHER house. You get the loan on THAT house, but its an ALT-A product too; you simply lie about your income, and since its a no-DOC loan and your FICO is in the 650 range, it goes right through.

You move in, then default on the original $750,000 loan!

This is happening all over California, and the bank is left holding the bag!

Note that NONE of this is happening in the Subprime space - its all in ALT-A!

And virtually ALL of the lenders are exposed to the ALT-A mess.

This hasn't gotten any press at all, but it will in the coming months. Mark my words. The resets from 2005's "peak of the bubble" are just starting on these loans - close to 20 percent of all mortgages out there are ALT-A products right now, and 50% of those written in the last two years! Essentially ALL Home Equity lines fall into this category!

Now sure, not all of the HELOCs are going to default. But historically, less than 1% of all mortgages ever go into default. Right now we have the highest rate of defaults in history, and we haven't even started with the ALT-A products yet.

This is the story that hasn't been covered folks.

Come back here in six months - I'll remind you right here - when the true pain begins. This fall and especially this coming winter, its going to be a big story, and the REAL risk to the economy is going to come from this angle, with no real way for the Fed - or anyone else - to bail it out.

Mark my words.

What can you do about it? Be careful. If you're invested, you need to be paying attention. If your time horizon is 20 years or more, then none of this matters much to you, because this, like all other business cycles, will work its way out.

But if you're within 5 years of retirement I'd be thinking about a very strong bias towards fixed income. There is a serious risk of a 20% to 30% decline in the market - similar to what happened in 2000-2003 - and once it starts it will accelerate in a huge hurry. When the losses begin to be realized you're going to have a lot of people who will suddenly get religion, and the selloff is likely to be extreme and protracted.

Now of course I could be completely full of it.

But I don't think so.

Statistics supporting the above:

1. Conbined "loan to value" on ALT-A purchases in 2006 was 88% on average, with 55% of buyers taking out a second at the same time as the purchase.
2. Low or no-documentation (stated income) loans were 81% of total originations.
3. Interest only and option ARMs were 62% of purchase originations in 2006.
4. 1-year hybrid ARMs were 28% of ALT-A originations in 2006 (these loans reset in just one year!)
5. Investors and second home buyers were 22% of ALT-A purchase originations in the last year.
6. Approximately 40% of purchases in 2006 involved second mortgages taken at the same time as the purchase. This is important because these "piggybacks" are how you get around loan-to-value restrictions! While the industry has tried to say that this is primarily a subprime thing, THAT IS A LIE - 55% of ALT-As had piggypacks in 2006!
7. TWENTY FOUR PERCENT OF ALL NEW ALT-A ORIGINATIONS WERE INTEREST ONLY OR NEGATIVE AMORTIZATION IN 2006!

View this entry with comments (opens new window)