The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Editorial]
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection(s):
Don't Do It Lennar -- Talk To Me Instead

Display list of topics

Sarah's Resources You Should See
Sarah's Blog Buy Sarah's Pictures
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2018-05-27 11:32 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 90 references
[Comments enabled]  

It's time to put a stop to this crap by the left, including one specific grand-standing politician wannabe, Dylan Ratigan.

Yes, I'm calling you out specifically, *******.

One of the latest lefty horsecrap arguments is that it's "terrible" that we separate parents from their children who enter the United States illegally.  This is an "outrage", supposedly, because there is some argument that one should never separate a child from their parents.

Oh really?  You mean an abusive jackass who, for instance, sexually assaults their child should not be separated from said child?

Ah, you don't really believe that, right?

Well then we are now arguing over where the line is, not whether there is a line.

So here's my point to all you grandstanding politicians, all of whom should be debarred from public life forever along with all of those who are benefiting from their bull**** which includes their entire family.

It's simply this:

Someone who intentionally commits a criminal offense while using their child or children as props is a monster.

They are by definition an unfit parent.  They are by definition a child abuser and worse, they are abusing their children to generate political and social sympathy for their criminal act.

Those "homo sapiens" are unfit to have custody of a hamster, say much less children.  

They have forfeited any claim to humanity by using a child as a human shield in a bid to avoid prosecution and deportation for knowingly and intentionally entering the United States illegally.

With that said there are a small number of individuals who have legitimately presented themselves at a border checkpoint which is the first safe nation they reached after leaving their homeland, with children, and requested asylum -- yet have been separated from their kids.  This is a legitimate issue but it has arisen due to overcrowding in our intake facilities resulting from the vast number of illegal invaders who have used children as shields and clogged up the facilities intended for legitimate asylum seekers traveling with children who's first point of contact with a safe nation is the United States.

Rather than demand that all of those illegal invaders be prosecuted and deported, and that those who preferentially skip international protocol on purpose, intentionally failing to apply for asylum in the first safe nation they reach for the express purpose of sucking off American taxpayer money (that is, their "asylum" request is false; what they are actually seeking is money) be immediately denied and returned to said first safe nation they entered, which would free up the space necessary to hold those who are legitimate seekers of asylum in the United States, we instead have politicians and wannabes screaming about protecting criminals who use children as props.

May you all burn in Hell for your outrageous pronouncements and intentional twisting of the truth.

If any of said politicians had trouble parsing the above let me boil it down for you into something you should be able to understand:

smiley

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2018-05-27 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 112 references
[Comments enabled]  

Let me see if I get this right.

"Mr. Weinstein has always maintained that any sexual activity he engaged in was consensual," his lawyer said adding that bad behavior is not on trial. "Mr. Weinstein did not invent the casting couch in Hollywood."

Sex in exchange for money (a job, in other words) is commonly called prostitution.  I seem to remember that while it is legal in much of Nevada it is also regulated for damn good reason -- STD control being one of the damn good reasons.

Sex through coercion or force is commonly called rape.

It is rape to demand sex in return for a job?  I would say no, that's prostitution provided that the person you proposition can leave of their own free will (that is, they can turn you down.)  The question then becomes was that the case or was the person or persons involved here not free to leave?

In other words did the line get crossed between sex for money and sex by means of force?

I guess that's what a jury is going to get to figure out, and that's how it should be.

In the meantime can we keep talking about this general theme for a minute?

Who came up with the idea for Show Dogs?

You know, the movie, a nice kid-friendly movie, right -- in which dogs that can talk are subjected to unwilling fondling of their genitals?

This is a movie aimed at kids in which humanized dogs are groomed to be "ok" with being fondled.

But it doesn't end there; we also have an act of submission by a victim toward their abuser when the opportunity to not be nice certainly exists.  Gee, that doesn't send a nice message too, right?

This is what Hollyweird is folks -- twisted, sick crap.  Yeah, I'm sure there are plenty of kids who would find the original scene (which apparently has now been edited out and the movie re-released) but that's not the point -- who the hell wrote that trash in the first place?  And who thinks it's also worthy to take a humanized animal and make same conciliatory toward someone who was abusive toward them -- specifically by injecting them with illegal drugs?

Do you think we have a wee culture problem here in America folks?

Incidentally I bet all those nice "immigrants" over in Europe will be thrilled with the original Show Dogs cut.  After all they don't believe women have the right to say "no" -- or to have a clitoris, for that matter.

More on that soon, along with England jailing someone for mere reporting on those very same "believers" grooming kids just like the dog is groomed.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2018-05-23 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 224 references
[Comments enabled]  

Gee, fraud isn't a business model eh?  It sure is a public union model.

Here's how the math breaks down. Thompson, like all firefighters in Los Angeles, works 2,912 hours every year. With a base salary of $92,000, that comes to an hourly rate of $31.60. That means Thompson would earn overtime pay at a rate of $47.40 per hour—that's one and a half times the base rate. But earning $302,000 at a rate of $47.40 per hour would require working more than 6,370 hours. Add that to the 2,912 hours he worked as a salaried employee, and you get more than 9,280 hours worked, despite the fact that there are only 8,760 hours in a year.

So he not only worked more hours than there are, he didn't sleep either.

Yeah.

Pull the other one.

Where are the damned handcuffs?

We can love our firefighters, but these deals are destroying localities.

That's not a "deal", it's fraud.

And I don't love fraudsters -- I want to see them all locked up -- or hung by the neck until dead, in their skivvies, with all of their "fortune" confiscated and returned to those from whom they stole.

I don't give a crap if they're firefighters or cops -- run a scam like this, die broke hanging from a rope.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2018-05-22 09:58 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 260 references
[Comments enabled]  

Hmmmm....

At least one additional government "informant" attempted to infiltrate the Trump campaign under President Barack Obama, former Trump campaign aide Michael Caputo revealed exclusively on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" Monday night.

"Let me tell you something that I know for a fact," Caputo told host Laura Ingraham. "This informant, this person that they tried to plant into the campaign -- and even into the administration, if you believe Axios -- he's not the only person who came at the campaign. And the FBI is not the only Obama agency who came at the campaign.

This is what you get when you allow Eric Holder to run guns to Mexican drug lords -- and he doesn't go to prison.

It's what you get when your "black Jesus" can literally ship pallets of cash to Iran -- without a bit of Congressional consultation or approval.

It's what you get when over 8 years we run a clean double in federal debt, which lifts the stock market (of course) but builds a welfare state that utterly nobody will or does take on.

And this isn't about Democrats, Republicans, Whites, Blacks, Yellows, Greens (Martians, for those who can't figure out the slur-of-the-day) or anything of the sort.

It's about Pajama Boys and Girls who refuse to pick up a pitchfork and torch, get bought off for a few bucks, allow an entire industry to screw them blind (health "care") for decades and nearly quintuple its size in the "economy", along with excusing whatever felony someone wants to commit so long as they have the right political party letter next to their name.

I remember Nixon's resignation like it happened yesterday.  I was ten -- literally by a few days.  I also remember the election campaign prior to it.  Nixon, Nixon is our man.  Throw McGovern in the garbage can! was the rallying cry on the grade school playground just a few months before and grade-school age kids who weren't "on board", and this was in a decidedly blue, union state even then were subjected to assaults on said playground that would be considered felonies if committed by adults.  And by the way, the number of suspensions or expulsions for such felony assaults, say much less teacher intervention to stop it?  Zero.  So cut the crap about our political system having gotten "more poisonous" in recent years as I lived this.

Yet despite "support" that strong -- support that reached all the way down to the first four grades of school Nixon's political support and ability to survive as President went to zero within months.

So where's your pitchfork folks?  Your torch?  I'm stunned at all the Pajama Boys and Girls who shake their fists about "gun control" and which bathroom you can use while outright Nazi and Stalinist tactics are ignored instead of resulting in an immediate political revolt -- at minimum.

The Constitution is toilet paper if you will not protect and defend it by whatever means are necessary and there's no reason for any politician to give a damn if you don't and won't force them to do so.

And don't run this "MAGA" horse**** either; Trump could fire every one of them and refuse to have anything to do with Congress, vetoing every single thing they send to his desk until this crap stops.

He has not and reason why is simple: He just wants control of it so he can use it himself!

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2018-05-19 12:52 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 756 references
[Comments enabled]  

I'll have much more to say on the Texas shooting when more facts are in.

But until then, let me make one point to all you on social media and in in the MSM who are whining like two year olds that had their candy taken away for someone to "DO SOMETHING!"

GROW THE **** UP.

Specifically, deal with the fact that being an adult means you, and only you, are responsible for your safety and self-defense.

If you have children then you have voluntarily taken upon yourself the responsibility for the safety of others, specifically, those children.  You choose where they go and who they go with.  You choose the school.  You choose the Principal, the teachers, the staff members and whatever security measures are there.

You are responsible because that is your child and you choose where that kid goes -- or doesn't.

We have friends who just recently yanked a kid out of school and are homeschooling same because they did not like the answers they got to questions about how said kid was being treated by both the school and other kids.  The school would not correct the problem immediately so the kid isn't there any more.

That's called being a responsible parent.

It's called being an adult.

If you can't or won't be an adult then sit down and shut the **** up.

A demand that someone else take care of your adult responsibilities is the act of a child.  A petulant, temper-tantrum throwing child.  If you are doing that whether you're someone from Parkland, a governor, or a teen you are making clear that you are incompetent to accept the responsibilities of adulthood, you have no right to the privileges of adulthood including voting or holding public office, you have no ability to contract as you are mentally incompetent, you are unemployable since as a business owner I cannot trust you with the key to the bathroom say much less the building and I assure you that your temper tantrum is far more-disgusting when it spews forth from a 16, 18, 20 or 40-year old than when a 2-year old has a meltdown in the grocery store.

The bottom line is that if you have some (good) reason to go to or live in an unsafe place then be armed as you, and only you, deem appropriate for the level of threat you perceive.  You don't need any ******ned permit either; your right to self-defense preexists all government.  Our founders not only understood that they wrote it into our Constitution in black letters for exactly that reason.  Every one of the 50,000+ so-called "common-sense" gun laws on the books now are unconstitutional and, far more-important are in direct contravention of your right to defend your own life and those you love which cannot be conditioned on a "license" because you, and only you, ever had that right to begin with.  You can't give someone a license to do something you don't first have a legitimate right of control over.

If you do not understand this go read the Declaration of Independence and recognize what happened when the British Crown responded "Bull****!to those who signed it.  To suborn, support or demand any such similar garbage is to explicitly support and in fact demand that the very same thing happen again.

If you still don't understand and respect this fact you're unfit to call yourself human, say much less American.

If you are sending your children to an unsafe place without the presence of armed resistance, whether that constitutes you personally or someone else in your stead you are an unfit parent as you are intentionally and knowingly putting those who you willfully accepted responsibility for in danger.

If you think there is risk at places you send your children then either arm the damn teachers and staff so someone can shoot back, go there yourself and stand guard so you can shoot back or get your kid(s) the hell out of there.

I'll repeat what I said before: There is a 27% chance that during your adult life, in America, you will need military-grade arms.  Not "scary looking" black rifles, actual machine guns, stacks of full-capacity magazines designed for same and a case or more (meaning thousands of rounds) of ammunition.  Why?  Because that's the cumulative odds of the unthinkable over an adult life (assuming you live to be 85) based on the two instances of severe, everyone in the way dies war-like events on this landmass since 1620ish which does not include all the lesser times of need like the LA riots -- where if you didn't have a gun and were both willing and able to use it to defend your property your business got burned to the ground, quite-possibly with you inside it.  All the cops left and it was either you holding off a mob with effective firearms or nobody did so at all!

And by the way, if your school is full of part-time felons, including bullies who think assault and worse is part and parcel of "going to school" your "school" is in fact worse than a prison yard in that at least in the prison yard the other crooks need to make their shivs out of stolen plastic cutlery.

A hell of a lot of so-called "schools", and yes that includes schools in so-called "nice places", are full of exactly that and I have a suspicion we're about to discover that had a big part to play in what just happened.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)