Quote:

If members of a corporation would like to speak out in favor of a candidate they may do so - as individuals. Nobody's free speech rights are violated by limiting corporate speech.

Why should groups of people who believe in a particular issue be prevented from pooling their resources in order to get a bigger megaphone?

Why should a corporation owned by a single shareholder be prevented from using its resource to promote a particular issue or candidate? How is this different than a corporation owned by multiple shareholders?