Let's get to the bottom of it.
I don't give a crap what the CDC or FDA defines something as retrospectively.
A drug is a substance you introduce into the body that modifies a biochemical process with the intent of producing a specific result.
A vaccine is a substance you introduce into the body that is part or a modified whole of an infectious agent modified to not be harmful, and which causes the immune system to believe (falsely) that it is being invaded by the actual infectious agent and respond in kind. By doing so the immune system gains knowledge of the invader so a subsequent actual invasion is met with an appropriate response (and thus you do not get sick.)
A substance that is designed to cause the body to produce a thing via its cellular machinery rather than by inhibiting or accelerating a chemical reaction is neither a vaccine or a drug. It is a genetic modification of the body's cellular processes.
In 2018 I wrote on a Chinese bio-engineer who had done exactly this to two embryos which were then implanted into a woman and resulted in two live births. The intent of this modification was to produce resistance to HIV. The condemnation of that act was swift and universal; China's government in fact went after the people responsible and the international scientific and medical community reacted with horror.
With good reason.
Now Scott Gottlieb, aka "Monstrous Asshole who ought to be in prison", has compared the upcoming Covid "refactored" boosters to a software upgrade.
This of course is an admission the original was a "software load" -- that is genetic modification which is exactly what that "bio-engineer" in China did.
There is no such thing as a safe means of performing this act. None.
There may never be such an act that is safe. In fact, absent strict proof one must presume its not.
You are reprogramming the cellular machinery on purpose with such an action. To do this safely you must know all of the following:
- Exactly where the reprogramming will take place. In other words, which cells? Since the intent is to cause a cell to produce a protein that the body will identify as foreign it must be presumed the immune system will destroy all such cells that take up that programming. That's the immune system's job. Therefore you must know where, in specific terms, the cells will be that take up the substance or the body will damage itself with no way for you to to control where that damage occurs. There is no possible way to guarantee this in the body; an injected substance will travel through the entire body although concentrations will vary from place to place.
- That the reprogramming cannot become integrated into the cellular machinery; it will, with 100% certainty, be "one and done." If you cannot guarantee this with 100% certainty then a person who you give it to may never clear it entirely from their body. We already know this is a very real risk with some viruses to begin with -- varicella (Chicken Pox), for example, is not fully cleared in many cases and can and will come back as shingles later in life. That is, we know viruses do this in the wild; it is not speculation. If the introduced agent does not clear it can produce durable, even permanent immune system damage. This is essentially (yes, I know, this is a simplified explanation) the mechanism by which HIV eventually kills you; it overloads the immune system and ultimately destroys it, leaving you open to attack by and death from things that in an uninfected person with a competent immune system are easily controlled.
- That the uptake which does take place will not result in serious or fatal damage to body systems from those cells that are, by design, hijacked to produce the protein. This is an extremely tough thing to prove but prove it you must because otherwise you risk killing the person due to the body's own immune reaction to the insult that happens to concentrate in the "wrong" place. This is of particular concern with anything injected because we know the body has myriad defensive systems to prevent invading things (viruses, bacteria, etc.) from getting into the circulatory system and its machinery and when those defenses fail the resulting illness is almost-always either extremely serious or fatal.
A "traditional" whole-or-part protein vaccine does not implicate any of this because the substance itself is introduced into the body. The cellular machinery is not tampered with because the attenuation or destruction of the agent's replication capacity is why it's a vaccine and not an infection; it is incapable of getting into the cells and reprogramming the cellular machinery as an active, live virus does because it was intentionally damaged to prevent that from happening.
"Vector" injections irrespective of the mechanism violate all three of the above constraints. By design they enter the cells of the person injected and cause reprogramming of the cellular machinery. This means that by design whatever cells take up that set of instructions will be targeted and destroyed by the immune system.
We now know this occurs in a very large percentage of the population who took these shots and we are seeing that show up in non-Covid mortality that has accelerated materially starting exactly with the widespread introduction of these jabs. It has occurred reliably across the world since the beginning and middle of 2021.
We also know that viruses do occasionally integrate into the host's DNA. We know this because a significant part of our DNA is traceable to viral genomes. There is no other possible way for that to have happened over hundreds of thousands or millions of years (before man was man) than for it to occur when an organism gets infected. In addition we know that viruses frequently do not completely clear in an infected person which means their cellular reprogramming remains available to be executed and thus we must presume anything that reprograms the cellular machinery also may not clear until and unless proved otherwise.
To make this worse we knew in December of 2020, before the shots rolled out that the "spike" protein standing alone was dangerous; no less than The Salk Institute published a paper on this that was then peer reviewed and released early in 2021. That's a direct violation of the third bullet point and it stands as fact.
What's even worse is that there is evidence the second bullet point required for safety is violated as well because circulating spike protein has been detected months after being jabbed. This is extremely strong evidence that the jab is not cleared but rather has become integrated into the person's cellular machinery in some part of the body.
And finally we have evidence at this point that the damage from the immune system attacking the "factory" cells which are induced to make the protein via reprogramming is, in fact, dangerous and in some cases fatal.
Now this sort of risk might be worth it if you have an otherwise-fatal condition. If you have clinically-active cancer, for example, then if left untreated you will die. Therefore attempting to reprogram your cellular machinery to target and destroy said tumor(s) might well be worth the above three concerns because the alternative is that you're dead for certain and thus you can only make your personal situation better. I will note that Moderna has been trying for over a decade to do exactly this for cancer and has never succeeded because the toxicity of the therapy was unacceptable even in someone who was going to die for sure if they did nothing. Let that sink into your head for a bit.
These idiots are now talking about using this technology for flu shots!
Covid, like the flu, is not dangerous to most people. It's damned inconvenient and, occasionally, kills. If you're seriously compromised medically then the odds go up that the virus will flatten you. If you're healthy (for real, not the "healthy at any size" bullcrap) the odds of it putting you in the hospital or killing you are statistically tiny and we know how to treat it too if we stop acting like we can't and don't.
As a partial aside may I note that one of the things we know potentiates heart attacks and strokes is poor glucose control. We know why it happens too; excessive glucose damages the endothelial layer of the blood vessels (the inside wall) and the cilia inside said wall that form part of that layer's defensive function against damage, both physical and via infectious agent. This makes it more-likely for inflammatory reactions to occur and not be reabsorbed back into the body and if a piece of one of those gets through the wall and breaks off it will block the circulation and cause a heart attack, stroke or pulmonary embolism. It is not cholesterol per-se which does this despite common claims of those who ought to know better because they've looked at either diseased arteries themselves or images thereof; the damage is clearly inside the arterial wall, not a "clump" stuck inside such as with a clogged up drain.
Folks, there is no -- and I do mean no, as in zero -- injection that can control to the last bit of material where whatever is injected goes in the body. If you inject under the skin into the dermal layer, into a muscle, into adipose tissue (fat) or otherwise some of what you inject will inevitably wind up in the circulation and thus go everywhere. It cannot be otherwise. Muscle tissue in particular is some of the best-perfused (that is, imbued with capillaries, arteries and veins) of all tissue in the body because muscles require that circulation in order to obtain the ATP (energy) they use to produce output and to remove the metabolic byproducts of doing so.
There is no such thing as an injection that hijacks the cellular machinery to produce a thing that is safe in either man or beast and that cannot be changed because the very character of what you're intending to do is dangerous unless it can be 100% confined to the desired tissue and you can prove with 100% certainty that the cellular reprogramming you cause is "one and done" and never, in any person, becomes integrated and thus continuous.
An injection by its nature can never guarantee said confinement and in this case we have evidence that integration does, in at least some people, occur.
This crap and ALL future attempts to use such "vector" methods UNLESS hard scientific proof is presented that ALL THREE of the above bullet points are met, with the penalty for fraud being death for every single person involved in said fraud, must be banned except in persons who have an otherwise-terminal condition or disease, in which case with informed consent it is of course acceptable because the alternative is certain death.
Anyone attempting to promote, sell, mandate or inject someone with such a substance under any other set of conditions is in fact acting with depraved indifference, that is the legal definition of murder.
What's worse is that if we keep this crap up we will eventually wind up with a modification that is passed to the next generation and once that happens the only way to "take it back" will be to literally hunt down and kill every person genetically polluted in that fashion. With such a thing in mass-distribution if such is passed down through even a single generation eradicating it will lead to a very-literal catastrophic collapse in human society.
THIS RISK MUST NOT BE ALLOWED.
Nobody has any reason to trust any medical practitioner in any respect who does not recognize, proclaim and enforce the above, and nobody has any reason to allow any political, commercial or social entity to attempt to violate same.
PS: When it comes to the "new formula" its even worse then all of the above; all the data we have came from eight mice. Not one human, eight mice. This, by the way, would never pass regular approval but as we now know under "EUA" literally anything goes. That would be bad enough, but what's worse is that those eight mice produced wildly different outcomes. Yet there is no explanation as to why, or to what it means. Nobody knows yet 170 million such doses were ordered and will be "offered" to people anyway. If you allow that crap to go into you or anyone you love or care about then you're stupid beyond words, and if you or they get severely screwed or die, given these facts -- you deserve it.