The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [International]

Now that Greece has effectively spoken the real fun begins.

I'm wondering if there's a prosecutor with a set of gonads over in Greece that will issue indictments aimed at the ECB, particularly if they try to "now" apply a haircut to the ELA, or simply aim at Merkel due to what she apparently knew and believed at the time of the first bailout.

Never mind the myriad threats aimed at Greece's population by various officials, all intended to swing a vote that they have no right to interfere in.

You could start right here:

"I hope people say 'yes,'" European Parliament President Martin Schulz told German public radio. "If after the referendum, the majority is a 'no,' they will have to introduce another currency because the euro will no longer be available for a means of payment."

That's blatantly untrue; who's going to make the Euro "unavailable" as a means of payment?  You, Herr Schulz?  If so under what authority?  None, unless you intend to violate sovereignty further, perhaps with a few tanks!

Those who run this sort of crap ought to face sanction for their attempted interference, and a nice indictment or three would be right up the correct pipe in my view.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Oh boy.

If this isn't enough to hand up an indictment and put Merkel in prison for the rest of her natural life, what would be?

Merkel's fear was that Athens would be unable to overcome its problems even with an additional haircut, since it would not be able to handle the remaining debt.

In other words Merkel knew at the time of the original bailout that the terms were not sustainable.  That is, Greece, even with the original haircut that was put in the debt and the bailout loans they would not be able to pay.

But she pushed for it anyway and to this day has not admitted this.

What is knowingly handing someone a noose, claiming that it's a rope to climb out of a hole with?  What is it when the leader of a nation does that intentionally to the people of another nation?

It gets better.  The IMF, which at that time wasn't sure whether Greece could make it work or not, now is of the same opinion.

Coming on top of the very high existing debt, these new financing needs render the debt dynamics unsustainable. This conclusion holds whether one examines the stock of debt under the November 2012 framework or switches the focus to debt servicing or gross financing needs. To ensure that debt is sustainable with high probability, Greek policies will need to come back on track but also, at a minimum, the maturities of existing European loans will need to be extended significantly while new European financing to meet financing needs over the coming years will need to be provided on similar concessional terms. But if the package of reforms under consideration is weakened further—in particular, through a further lowering of primary surplus targets and even weaker structural reforms—haircuts on debt will become necessary

In other words the existing "bailout terms" will not suffice.

Further, this was known in 2014 to be under extremely high risk and the proceeds from privatization efforts, much of which were supposed to come from state holdings in the banking sector, have been derailed due to non-performing loans -- loans that were on the books before the bailout and thus, had they been examined with any sort of dispassionate analysis.... (in other words this was known to be true as well and intentionally ignored.)

What's worse is that even if there is a "third" program of concessionary loans extreme vulnerability to shocks (say, a recession?) will remain.

Assuming official (concessional) financing through end–2018, the debt-to-GDP ratio is projected at about 150 percent in 2020, and close to 140 percent in 2022 (see Figure 4ii). Using the thresholds agreed in November 2012, a haircut that yields a reduction in debt of over 30 percent of GDP would be required to meet the November 2012 debt targets. With debt remaining very high, any further deterioration in growth rates or in the mediumterm primary surplus relative to the revised baseline scenario discussed here would result in significant increases in debt and gross financing needs (see robustness tests in the next section below). This points to the high vulnerability of the debt dynamics.

To be blunt: About €100 billion of the 300 outstanding has to be flushed down the drain.

Guess what?  That's a problem because the ECB has most of it at this point and less than a tenth of that in actual capital, which means that doing so would require direct payments for recapitalization purposes from the remaining EU members to the ECB!

Ouch.

Now take all this together and tell me why the Greeks should vote to continue under the present program.  There is utterly no upside for them to do so; the present program that is in place cannot succeed according to the analysis, which means that a YES vote is a vote for economic suicide with certainty.

This does not mean that a "NO" vote guarantees success, but voting for something certain to fail, overseen by someone who appears to have known it would fail four years agois asinine.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Folks, go back and read this again:

Note that when you start spending in deficit there's a little "belly" between GDP and debt which appears to hold up for the first 20 or so years.  This is why people do it; it feels like you're getting ahead.

But you're not -- just a few years later debt is accelerating away from GDP and it's not that long before it's more than three times your economic output.  Long before it gets there you wind up with negative "growth" because the expense of financing that debt exceeds your economic surplus and you inevitably go bankrupt.

This is math, not politics and it happens every single time.

The IMF just came out and said that Greece has a €50 billion cash deficit from October through 2018.

This means that even if they just try to run on their revenue they're spending more than they're taking in and need to "finance" their operating costs.

This cannot work.

It cannot work there, it cannot work here, it cannot work anywhere.  The only means by which Greece can return to reasonable fiscal health is to default (that is, erase) a large part of the debt they have.  

Period.

There is no -- zero -- justification for "markets" to be anywhere near where they are given that the entire operational structure of virtually all western governments is reliant on continued borrowing of more and more money.  This is not confined to Greece!

The act of ever borrowing more money on an indefinite basis inevitably must eventually collapse all of the parties that do this.

Always.

Why would anyone try to "participate" in a scheme that is guaranteed to fail and blow up in your face?  Do you really think you'll be better and faster than everyone else and will get out in time while everyone else will not?

REALLY?

If the governments involved stop that then what is a realistic value for the markets without all of this phony-baloney nonsense?

And if the governments do not then I'm back to my first question: Do you really think you're smarter than everyone else?

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Well well what do we have here?

Yanis Varoufakis said Greece won’t “extend and pretend” that it can pay its debts, vowing to quit as finance minister if voters don’t support him in Sunday’s referendum.

With banks shuttered and Greece’s economy hobbled by capital controls, Varoufakis said in a Bloomberg Television interview in Athens that he would “rather cut my arm off” than sign a deal that fails to restructure Greece’s debt. The 54-year-old economics professor said he “will not” continue in his post if Greece endorses austerity in the plebiscite.

He's right.

There is no way forward for any of these nations, Greece included, that is both sustainable and does not remove much of the debt allegedly taken on.

The debt in question was contracted by fraud and force on both sides; it is void.  Further, it's mathematically impossible to pay it on the original terms or even on any sort of reasonable renegotiated terms.

But far more important than the debt itself is that the structural changes in the government necessary to prevent accumulating more debt in the future, including a hard bar on refusing to spend more than it can tax, has to take place.  This Varoufakis has not said -- but he must.

This weekend is going to be interesting, but unless reality comes to the table the premise that there will be no more "extending and pretending" (which is just a polite way of saying lying) is just another in a long line of false claims.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

As I have repeatedly pointed out there is no mechanism available to force a nation out of either the Euro or EU.

That simply does not exist.

The rhetoric that if you vote against "austerity" and paying back the debt you are inherently voting to leave the EU is false.  That lie is being promulgated by people who you ought to declare are acting in treason against your nation and issue arrest warrants for them.

However, this does not mean that defaulting is "cost free" or will be easy.  It will not.  Defaulting will force you to deal with the following facts which you cannot avoid whether you default or not:

  • The government cannot spend more than it taxes.  Not now, not ever.  Period.  Deficit spending is exactly identical, mathematically, to a tax of the exact same amount in that when you issue currency to fund a deficit you are diluting the purchasing power of everyone who holds it.  In the EU, however, you cannot employ that mechanism freely because you are not your own currency issuer (as the United States is.)  If you return to the Drachma, however, you still cannot freely spend more than you take in via taxes because doing so is exactly identical to taxing the same amount.  In other words having the Euro means you must honestly deal with your budget issues rather than trying to lie about them.

  • The people of your nation must decide how much government you want, and then you must pay for it in the present tense.  This is the inescapable conclusion of the fact above.  Your nation, like so many others, has lied about this for decades.  You must stop, and you must stop now.  Neither I or anyone else can tell you how much government you "should" have; that's a political decision for all of you to make as Greek citizens.

So what does defaulting do for you?

Simple: It removes from your balance sheet the arguably-illegal debt that was taken on in your name and forces those who hold it to eat it.  This will make the issuance of future debt by anyone else in the EU more expensive, but it should be expensive to borrow; borrowed money is a tool that has as its only legitimate purpose short-term, existential threat-related needs such as repelling an invasion by a foreign power.

Yes, on the 5th you should vote to reject the so-called "program" and deliver to your government a mandate to repudiate all of the debt contracted since you entered into the EU.  All of that was entered into under false pretense with explicit conspiracy between your former government, EU government organs and international banking institutions including the ECB.

You must also pry loose the documentation that Bloomberg, along with others, has requested on these schemes and scams and then issue indictments against those who caused your nation to fall under this burden.  These acts were arguably criminal frauds and must be prosecuted.  It is utterly essential that those who commit such acts not get away with it, as the only deterrence available against future frauds is the certainty of punishment when caught committing them.

This transition will be very difficult for you to stomach, for you have been lied to for a very long time.  You have been told you can spend more than you make on an indefinite basis.  This is a pernicious and outrageous lie but arithmetic cannot be bargained with; it just is.  The fundamental nature of exponents means that any such attempt is doomed to spectacular failure and the only means to prevent it is not to engage in such foolishness.

A "Yes" vote on the 5th will be a vote for economic slavery.  You must not engage in such as your children, grandchildren and those not yet born not only have no obligation to allow you to get away with that you have no right to attempt it.  Instead you must vote NO and then live within your means, holding the political debate on what sort and size of government you wish to have, funding each and every obligation it contracts with current taxes.

Throw off the previous frauds, to be certain, for you must do that in order to recover as a people and economy.

But you must, at the same time, stop lying to both yourself and others.

Godspeed.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection:
If You're Older Than 40 And Reading This...

Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.