When you're being stupid, there is only more and less stupid -- that is, it's a matter of degree.
AKRON, Ohio - FirstEnergy will close six older coal-fired power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland by September 1 due to environmental regulations.
Bay Shore Plant, Units 2-4, in Oregon, Ohio; Eastlake Plant; Ashtabula Plant; Lake Shore Plant, Cleveland; Armstrong Power Station, Pennsylvania; and R. Paul Smith Power Station, Maryland are the six plants that will be retired.
529 employees will lose their jobs, and in addition there will be further tax losses occasioned by the shuttering as well, along with all the pass-through economic activity (everything from lubricants to cleaning supplies to the paper for the copiers) that disappears as well.
Why? Because we're stuck on stupid.
We have an intelligent way to use coal for energy production. We can use it to power our cars and make electricity at the same time.
But not how we use coal today.
Instead, we should be using nuclear energy from thorium for our electrical generation in liquid salt technology reactors. These run at a convenient temperature to provide process heat to convert coal to liquids. And the best part of it is that coal contains thorium itself, so we get multiple benefits:
But heh, we instead want to remain stuck on stupid, and then "crack down" on emissions from these coal plants, driving them offline.
That's just fine provided you don't mind when there's not enough energy to sustain economic progress.
There's a better way folks.
Ps: Pickens was bloviating this morning on CNBC again. Please do look at a long-term natural gas price chart before believing that crap. Yes, it's cheap now compared to diesel, but now is not always the future, and in addition while we have quite a bit of natural gas (as we have quite a bit of oil) the question is why we would build an entire new infrastructure for something that will again become scarce and thus expensive in another 10, 20 or 50 years, when we can have 500 years or more of energy security. Pickens' self-interest in this is amusing, but it's bad policy.
On Wednesday the Federal Reserve shared its thoughts on the course of interest rates—but not on the implications for the value of the dollar. The two can't be disconnected. The Fed's rationale on interest rates determines the stability of the dollar, which is the economic bedrock for price stability, capital inflows, growth and jobs.
Obfuscation on the dollar works fine for Wall Street, which reaps billions in profits from the Fed's unstable dollar policy. It trades currencies and volatility, and makes a bundle protecting investors from the Fed by selling complex derivatives, interest-rate swaps, even triple-leveraged gold and currency funds pitched on television.
But stable means stable. It does not mean 2% inflation, as Bernanke asserts. And stable is actually written into The Fed mandate -- that is, the law allegedly governing Bernanke's operations.
He just ignores it.
By the way, this is not an academic exercise. 2% inflation is a cumulative 144% over a working man's 45 years of economic earning. This effectively forces said man to stick his money into various schemes and scams lest it be eroded. While the erosion over 10 years is not all that large (~22% over ten years) over his entire working life it's outrageous.
When the currency weakens, the prices of staples rise faster than wages, hurting all but the rich who buy protection.
And when the protection doesn't work everyone loses.
Incidentally the hedges can't work for everyone; on balance a hedge is a negative-sum game. I suspect Malpass knows this and doesn't vote it on purpose.
Americans know this is a big problem but can't stop it. Texas Congressman Ron Paul has created an intensely popular presidential campaign around the need for stable money and limitations on the size (the Fed employs 22,000 people) and power of the Fed.
Actually they can stop it. The people can withdraw their consent for the two-party jackass system by voting for others. Then there are less-lawful (and far more disruptive) options, all of which are available. The simple truth is that the American Sheeple are consenting to this serial financial rape, as they have been for the last 30 years, because the politicians keep promising them "free stuff."
There is, of course, no such thing. That Unicorn does not exist and those are not pretty colored candies, despite their appearance. They're poison and that's a horse with a horn glued on its head.
Let me simply observe that Congress is well-named.
Near-zero interest rates penalize savers and channel artificially cheap capital to government, big corporations and foreign countries.
No again. Loans are not capital, especially unbacked loans. Capital formation requires excess production, otherwise known as savings. The common canard that a stable monetary policy would inhibit capital deployment is also false; one should not deploy their capital unless they're convinced that the potential return outweighs the risk of the venture, and no component of that risk should theft by the government due to deficit spending and thus dilution of the currency.
Make no mistake, the problem does not lie with The Fed per-se. The Fed's "low interest rates" are there to permit the profligacy of the government, yet the longer it goes on and the more the government abuses this deadly embrace the further into the coffin corner The Fed and Congress go. As the debt accumulation rises the maximum interest rate that can be absorbed goes down until finally you reach the boundary where even a slight increase in rates results in instantaneous bankruptcy.
This, of course, means you are (and have been) broke -- you're just trying to avoid admitting it.
We the people are the ones in charge and we must stop acting like children. There is simply no other option; we cannot continue down the path we are on, and we've reached the point of either admitting it and absorbing the adjustment that must come, or driving straight off the cliff.
Choose wisely.
http://bloom.bg/xgodaA#ooid=t4ZHFkMzrZt31yFO5Bkve12fzKFATcUM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnDyXrSwJnA

One has to wonder, considering this...
That's quite a nice little drop, considering that the broad market is only off a quarter of a percent and the DOW is actually up a few points.
There are, however, two factors that are quite bad for banks:
This, of course, is not good for the stock market. But I want everyone to remember why it's a problem, not just that it's a problem.
The problem is here. If the banksters and government cannot find a way to run another geometric debt scam then the entire ponzi scheme that has held up asset prices for the last 30 years will collapse.
Not "might collapse", or "could collapse."
Will collapse.
Someone smells something, and the stench appears to be originating in Europe -- but do not be fooled into believing that it will remain there, because it will not.
It's coming here.

Discuss The Capital Markets along with daily technical analysis with our Gold Donor program.
Where We Are, Where We're Heading (2012) - The annual 2012 Ticker
The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.
Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out Ticker Classics.
Visit the forum to discuss this and other investing-related topics; see the FAQ on the forum for information about Gold Donor status including access to our technical analysis video server.
Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.
Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media.