The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility. Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein. The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)
Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.
Considering sending spam? Read this first.
There is a bill pending in the Senate -- which has passed the House -- that basically eliminates compliance requirements (with federal motor vehicle standards) for a large number of driverless vehicles.
Nader is going ape**** over this, as you'd expect (being that his history goes back to the Corvair, if you remember.)
But so-called "driverless vehicles" are potentially much worse than the Corvair.
At least with a Corvair you had to be an idiot (in how you drove it) and in the case of the Pinto you had to be hit from behind.
In this case neither is true.
The "sales job" for driverless cars is that it will "eliminate" DUI, old-age-related and simple negligence (such as crashing while texting.) Maybe. But that's no panacea, and what Nader is screaming about is only a small part of the problem.
Note that there are reports that Toyota is working with Uber to bring these cars to reality. They're not the only one; the entire premise of Tesla rests there long-term, Lyft is active in the space and so are many others.
While I have no quarrel with the premise of driverless cars they must never be allowed to become mandatory either through market pressure or government mandate of any sort, no matter how it happens -- and this includes privileging them in any way whatsoever over a vehicle with a human operator nor allowing them to collect and transmit data as well. In other words they must not be reliant on "always-on" connections, or even connections to anything outside at all.
Without these protections driverless cars can quickly become effectively mandated even without the government doing so. Such an outcome can be mandated on a quite-effective basis by industries that collude and destroy owner-operated vehicles and since our government utterly refuses to bring charges under 15 USC Chapter 1 in the medical sector what makes you think they'd do so if car insurance carriers made owning a personally-operated vehicle a $20,000 a year mandatory insurance expense? This is in fact the goal of most of the firms working in this space, many of them openly admit it, and it must be stopped right here and now.
Can't happen? The hell it can't. What has happened in Michigan with its "no fault" law and treble, if not more, charges by medical providers for the very same injury in a car accident as opposed to one obtained by walking your dog? That is a 10 year in prison felony along with a $100 million corporate fine in penalties to be imposed on everyone involved including the insurance and medical provider businesses yet there has not been one criminal prosecution, not one person or firm indicted and as a result basic liability coverage, which is mandatory under state law, can cost as much as $2,000 a year or more in that state for someone with a clean driving record!
If you can't afford that then your plates and license get suspended. Get caught driving in that situation and you spend the night in jail. Keep doing it and it becomes a felony. Now you can't get a job, rent an apartment or own a gun -- the latter ever again.
Congratulations; you're now a non-person as a direct result of the illegal collusive conduct of the medical and insurance businesses in the state of Michigan and your inability to comply with their manufactured "mandates" coupled with what you need to do in order to get to work and attempt to survive.
For comparison that same (minimally legal) coverage is roughly one tenth as expensive here in Florida where such outrageous felony collusion and concurrent extortion hasn't (yet) occurred, assuming you're in a "good risk" position from a driving record and age perspective.
The true ugly with driverless cars is what you inextricably get with them and which cannot be accepted or allowed to happen. In fact if such appears to be headed toward any possibility of becoming a mandate I will say it right now even though I'm sure people will call me a nut for doing so -- you had better go grab your guns and kill everyone involved up and down the line, and yes I do mean a shooting revolution aimed at both business and government, as soon as any such movement toward such a state of play takes place.
Let me be clear: There is no such indication today and thus no, this is not a call to commit violence in the present tense but you had better make clear to everyone involved in both industry and government that if they take even one step down that road this will be the result and you damn well better mean it.
This is the real purpose of the 2nd Amendment by the way -- to prevent tyranny by making clear that any attempt to impose same will be met with immediate deadly force and thus preventing the need for such a revolution and the shooting that comes with it.
Why? Because as soon as any attempt to mandate or materially privilege "autonomous cars" happens all freedom of movement and in fact freedom to live -- that is simply to survive -- disappears permanently. Since we all have a right to life and to defend same and such predate any government anything that threatens to extinguish that gives proper authorization for the people to stop it via whatever means are necessary -- including violence.
This is the future you have if you don't make this clear to both lawmakers and industry:
Freedom of association, movement and travel is one of the keys to a society that has some resemblance of freedom remaining. The ability to do so without being tracked inch-by-inch has already nearly been rendered impossible because our nation is collectively too ****ing stupid to demand that we own said data and we have the right to control it, never mind jailing the **********s in government and private businesses that can and do abuse same. Major corporations and governments are colluding to track and identify people in real time, all the time, reaching absolutely everyone -- not just those on a "100 most wanted" list as is often claimed.
Self-driving vehicles take that weaponized information content and add the ability to severely injure, economically destroy or kill any person or group of persons at whim to what we have already given up and there is exactly nothing that will be able to be done about it once it occurs because at that point you will lose the ability to move that is necessary to put a stop to it!
For this reason if it appears that this path is being undertaken it must be stopped by whatever means are necessary or you may as well just commit suicide as at least if you do that you'll get to choose when and how you die instead of some jackass making the decision for you.
Email kairia.rocks@gmail.com now to put this unique piece of art on your wall!
Ok, I know I tweeted that this would be delayed, but I think it needs publication now -- I may have to come back and revisit it, but for the moment... here it is:
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 201,000 in August, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in professional and business services, health care, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, and
mining.
No it didn't.
Note the blue line swan-dive at the end. The Household Survey reported a net loss of 1.465 million jobs, and a net gain of 2.048 million people leaving the labor force!
To find a worse monthly number on the employed figure you have to go back to January of 2011 (January is often a large firing month due to the holiday temporary workers being fired.) To find a worse number on people leaving the labor force you must go back to...... uh.... beyond the limits of my data table.
In other words this is the worst (largest) addition to not-in-labor-force since at least January of 1999!
The employment:population ratio confirms:
Even among the seasonally adjusted numbers (which I don't use) in the household survey the job loss was catastrophic, registering 423,000 jobs lost!
As a note August usually is a negative number by about half of what it was this time, as the seasonal summer workers (amusement parks, etc) leave work to go back to school. Sometimes this winds up in September's numbers to some degree but the majority of it is historically recorded in August, so it's not unusual to get a negative household print. However, to get one this large, confirmed by the seasonally adjusted number, says that the "Establishment" survey figures are complete crap -- or entirely made up, especially when it is confirmed by an addition to those exiting the workforce in record numbers.
Especially ugly as well is the fact that among the educational attainment figures "some college" saw enormous losses -- while the other buckets, including those with no diploma, did not and some even saw gains.
I smell a data problem here folks since the figures don't jive internally. Which part of the data is bad is the open question; if the BLS revises their data, or if I can suss it out, I will post an updated Ticker on this. If the Household Survey is accurate, however, and especially if it confirms next month then we are on the cusp of a material downward economic event and possibly a dislocation.
An illegal alien who previously fled the United States after being accused of sexually assaulting a child is once again been charged with sexual battery of a child after allegedly climbing into bed with an eight-year-old Florida girl and assaulting her.
Wilibaldo Salinas Garcia, a 29-year-old illegal alien, allegedly admitted to sexually assaulting the young girl — whom he is related to — after he “digitally penetrated her and forced her to touch him,” according to the Polk County Sheriff’s Office.
Heh Mr. Tibbetts! You make excuses for these animals.
I am tired of this crap. No, I don't care that people want cheap lawn mowing, cow-milking and fruit-picking services and are willing to break the law to get them. I want both they and the apologists like you in prison as accessories before the fact for every single one of these criminal illegal invaders who commit a crime as their first act in this nation, by doing so demonstrate that they will not follow the law, and then sexually assault or murder Americans.
They all must leave and so must all their apologists - or they can join them on the gurney for the death penalty.
I love how a sperm fountain brands himself a racist by calling other people one.
BROOKLYN, Iowa (AP) — The father of slain Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts in an opinion piece spoke out against using his daughter’s death in support of “views she believed were profoundly racist,” a call that comes after President Donald Trump and others seized on the suspected killer’s immigration status to argue for changes in U.S. immigration laws.
How is it profoundly racist to insist that if you come into this country you do so legally?
I might remind you that illegal invaders are not all Mexicans. Not by a long shot. Nor are all Hispanic descendants illegal invaders -- again, not by a long shot. Indeed there are a hell of a lot of lawful citizens who neither came into being by being pooped out by an illegal invader nor did they come here illegal -- they are citizens of Hispanic descent who were born here to lawful citizens or permanent residents.
Therefore, to equate illegal invaders with Hispanics is the RACIST statement -- on its face.
Good morning Rob Tibbetts, you RACIST piece of trash.
What this debate is in fact about is savages who have no respect for the law, not persons of one heritage or another.
It matters not if they're Cuban, Haitian, Venezuelan, Mexican, Chinese, Canadian, Cambodian, Japanese, Saudi Arabian, French, Aboriginal or Martian.
A person who's first act in this nation is to break the law demonstrates that they have no respect for the rule of law and no intent to assimilate into our nation of laws.
At best they intend to take advantage economically of anything and anyone they can damn the law to Hell.
AT WORST THEY'RE WILLING TO COMMIT RAPE, MURDER OR TERRORISM AND DAMN THE LAW TO HELL.
You, Mr. Tibbetts, are a five-alarm prick. You wish to run cover and make excuses for people that have zero respect for the law irrespective of their race, color, creed or national origin by attempting to label those of us who insist that entry into the United States be done by legal means as "racists", thereby attempting to deny those of us who respect the Rule of Law our right to point out both your hypocrisy and the invaders' savage lawlessness.
Worse, when your own daughter died as a consequence of those very screeds of many over the years you willingly pissed on her life and its loss instead of expressing fully-justified rage that a cadre of politicians and business interests have admitted and allowed to remain myriad savages lacking any respect for the law over a period of decades for the purpose of advancing political careers and, in the case of business interests, profit.
As the father of a daughter of approximately Mollie's age I am outraged that now, when the chickens have come home to roost in your own back yard that you have the temerity to attempt to silence people like myself through maliciously false charges of racism. Those men who are actual fathers rather than sperm fountains consider it our duty to put a stop to the invasion of this nation by lawless savages that have no respect for the Rule of Law and thus raise the risk, by a material amount, that our daughters will be victimized by same.