As for Trump and Senators: Stop defending this **** right now you ****ing ghouls.

Yeah, its that clear you chuckle****s.

• Pfizer vaccine safety data from the three-month post-authorization trial was alarming.
o 1,223 deaths attributed to the vaccine.
o 42,086 people injured within 4 days of vaccination.
o 45% of these were between the ages of 18-50 (who were at negligible risk from COVID-19 infection).

page 189

I warned people about the history of this technology before it was rolled out in 2020 because it was not new technology and the prior science on it, along with results, was available to anyone who cared to look.  mRNA had repeatedly failed on safety for cancer, where we tolerate ridiculously high risk.  Very, very high risks are acceptable when you're going to die with scientific certainty if you do nothing and that, by the way, is the reason that drug companies target this condition: Not only is certain death a motivator for someone to spend (or demand someone else spend) an unlimited amount of money but in addition ridiculous levels of risk no healthy person would EVER take are reasonable when you are literally staring at Brother Grim with his scythe pointed at your neck.

Oh it gets better.... well, ok, it gets worse for you.  You see, the paper claiming HCQ was killing people -- which was used as part of  retrospective justification for the EUAs -- was retracted.

That's right, it was a lie.  I pointed this out and so did Henry Ford Hospital System in Michigan during the first months since they were using it and had ZERO such incidents; if it was anywhere near as dangerous as claimed the bodies would have hit the floor in size from it and they clearly did not, never mind the million or so people using it off-label daily for Lupus over the previous decades.....

But now we have the cherry on top of the sundae which, while a preprint at this point, is sourced out of Yale by some very high-powered people.

Let me just cite the findings and dig in a tiny little bit because this is the worst possible thing you could find.

To explore potential pathobiological features associated with PVS, we conducted a decentralized, cross46 sectional study involving VS participants and 22 healthy controls enrolled in the Yale LISTEN study. Compared with controls, PVS participants exhibited  differences in immune profiles, including reduced circulating memory and effector CD4 T cells (type 1 and type 2) and an increase in TNFα+ CD8 T cells. PVS participants also had lower anti-spike antibody titers, primarily due to fewer vaccine doses.

They of course repeat in the first line the absolute lie that the shots "prevented millions of deaths"; there is no evidence for this whatsoever.  In fact we know that the shots in fact potentiate transmission to other people and thus are beyond stupid and into the realm of Typhoid Mary screwing every man she could find on a deliberate basis to spread disease, but I'm sure that sentence has to be put in there in order to get the study into the preprint server and ultimately published at all, despite its blatant falsity.

No, its here where you ought to be have your hair standing straight up if you took these shots:

Secondly, it has been shown that the S protein expressed following BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination circulates in the plasma as early as one day after vaccination16,17

Wait.... what?  Oh, that admission?  You know, the one we were all told didn't happen at all?  Yes, the Spike stayed in the muscle, remember?  And what did the Salk paper document prior to the rollout?

Do you remember?

The spike, alone absent the rest of the virus, does direct physiological damage to the endothelium of blood vessels.

We were all told that didn't get into the circulation (the plasma is part of your blood, of course.)  Now its admitted that was a lie, quite quietly but admitted nonetheless.  In other words what I pointed out before the shots were rolled out -- that everyone who took even one of them was going to take cardiovascular damage which I remind you is PERMANENT -- is now admitted to be true.

While the amount of damage is of course highly-variable from person-to-person every single person who took even one shot did take some amount of damage and the more shots you take the more damage you accrue.

I wish that was all the bad news in that paper.

It isn't.

In fact its nowhere the worst part of the news.

To further investigate prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infections, plasma specimens were analyzed using the EUA-cleared Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays, which measure the presence of high affinity IgM, IgA, and IgG anti-N antibodies.

Good.  They spent the money (and it wasn't cheap) to be certain what they found was not from Covid infections, whether "silent" (asymptomatic) or otherwise.  Yes, you can determine that along with whether the infection, if it occurred, is current, recent or in the past.  They did and thus were able to eliminate the virus itself as the cause.

Significant differences in subsets of circulating immune cell populations were observed across T cell lineages. Upon assessment of the T cell populations, notably higher proportions of effector memory CD4 T cell subsets (CD4+Tem; CD45RA-/CD127+/CCR7- ; p= 0.01) and resting natural CD4+ Treg; CD45RA+/CD25+/CD127-/HLA-DR- ; p= 0.05) were observed among the controls (Figure 2D). However, the PVS cohort had significantly higher proportions of exhausted CD8 T cell (CD8+ Tex; PD-1+/TIM3+ 210 ; p=0.02) (Figure 2F) with no observed differences in the CD4+ central memory (CD4+ cm;CD45RA-/CD127+/CCR7-) and exhausted (CD4+Tex; PD-1+/TIM3+ 212 ) CD4 T cell populations (Figure 2D). 

Oh oh.  Let me translate: Those who got hit by this are immune impaired as a direct consequence of taking the shots.  Those people's immune system cells are degraded exactly as occurs in AIDS.  This is not caused by HIV, of course (since they don't have that) but the impairment is essentially the same, albeit -- at this point -- less-severe.

The bad news gets much worse:

This timeline was organized for both the PVS-I and PVS+I groups (Figure 5G). Notably, we observed that the highest levels of detectable S1 in the PVS-I group were the furthest away from the last known exposure and ranging between greater than 600-700 days (NI-1 & NI-5; Figure 5G).

In other words if you got hit by this you're ****ed on a progressive basis and there is likely nothing you can do about it because the spike is still being produced in your body.  It doesn't go away over time, as you might assume -- instead it gets worse over time.

Contrary to what we were all told, and which I warned was quite likely to happen in some percentage of the people, assuming this finding is true it is hard proof that the shots were integrated into your genome and your cells have taken it up and it survived cellular replication; that is, you are now permanently, ending only with your death, going to produce more and more of this spike and it will **** you progressively on an ever-increasing basis including but not limited to destroying your immune system.

In other words, AIDS - and that is if the direct endothelial damage doesn't kill you via cardiovascular damage (e.g. heart attack, stroke and similar) or cancer first.

And no, there is no way to "undo" what happened either.

YOU ARE STUCK WITH IT IF THIS HAPPENED.

What percentage of people have this damage but no knowledge of it?  At least not so far, because the immune damage is not significant enough to produce symptoms?

We don't know.

But everyone that had it happen, by the evidence in this paper, will be progressively harmed over time and thus all of them WILL develop those symptoms unless something else kills them first.

Oh by the way if you've not noticed huge percentages of the population who took it are getting sick more often with "routine" things they have trouble shaking.  Common flus, colds and similar -- and if you claim not you're lying as its all around you and probably you personally.  That is almost-certainly a lower-level set of damage such as this as we are now wildly beyond where people were taking these jabs as a matter of routine and since we now know the damage is both permanent and progressive yes, it will progress and if you're being impacted by more-frequent illness now it will almost-certainly get worse for you personally over time.

Incidentally the immune system is what prevents cancerous cells, which are present in every person all the time from well before birth forward, from turning into fulminant cancer.  Have we seen wild-eyed increases in extremely-aggressive cancers?  Yep.  Now you know why that's happening too and once again if you're in the "lucky" group that too may be in your future and once again there's no way to stop it.

Welcome to Hell and let me know if and when you're going to make every single ********** involved in this **** pay for it with their lives, exactly as they screwed a huge number of others out of theirs.

PS: All future uses of mRNA are likely to do the same thing.  That may be an acceptable risk if you have active cancer but I'd argue not even then because if it happens you're finished -- your immune system is responsible for keeping cancer in check in all cases thus taking something that is likely to promote cancer is ****ing stupid beyond words.  But in any other context this must be not only banned everyone every entity that promoted it must be destroyed.