Fact: There is no immunity or protection against The Law of Scoreboards.
Did you know: What the media does NOT want you to read is at https://market-ticker.org/nad.
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|The Market Ticker Single Post Display (Show in context)||
User: Not logged on
|User Info||Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory; entered at 2021-11-02 10:55:02|
Registered: 2021-03-24 Atlanta
Several weeks ago during episode 970 of The Daniel Horowitz podcast, he interviewed Dr. Jane Ruby, a scientist with over 20 years of experience with the FDA regulatory process. At one point during the interview she pointed out that the drug companies have been conducting dosing studies simultaneously with a number of other testing phases that are normally separated and sequential rather than being conducted all at the same time. Ruby said this is unprecedented. |
So the obvious question is whether those dosing studies are ongoing. Horowitz wondered aloud whether some people were getting jabbed with very low doses and others with much higher doses as a way to determine tolerance and ideal outcomes.
If we assume that the drug companies actually want their "*******s" to be effective, they would seek to inject the highest possible dose without killing the jabee. Lower doses might not do anything while too high will kill people. The trials were not long enough to determine the proper dosing.
IMO, the "lot problem" could be a QC problem or something related to incompetence. Personally I doubt the drug companies are intentionally trying to kill people - they probably don't want that outcome. Occam's Razor: they are using the global population as test subjects. The FDA dude just admitted this WRT jabbing children.
They don't care if it takes a few broken eggs to make an omelette. They desperately want the mRNA delivery system to work - but they haven't yet figured out how. As such, the testing on the general populace will continue.