The Market Ticker
Rss Icon RSS available
Fact: There is no immunity or protection against The Law of Scoreboards.
Did you know: What the media does NOT want you to read is at
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
The Market Ticker Single Post Display (Show in context)
Top Login FAQ Register Clear Cookie
User Info There's An Off Ramp - But It Has A Price; entered at 2021-08-31 09:06:35
Posts: 215
Registered: 2021-04-04 Texas
Yet, our major hospital chain that was first to mandate the jab is now "measuring" antibody titers to "guide" who "needs" a booster.

My eyeballs just rolled outta my head at that.

Meanwhile, I am seeing 1-2 of their employees or patients jabbed by this hospital's employed doctors PER WEEK with blood clots post jab. These patient have zero other clinical risk factors for blood clots and their testing for an inherited predisposition to clots is negative.

This is extremely worrying. We are taught that the coagulation system functions in a delicate and dynamic balance, a million reactions with positive and negative feedback loops occurring every second to keep you from clotting or bleeding. (It is such an amazing systen, like your immune system, you might start believing in a Creator.)

With the exception of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with or without thrombosis (HIT-T), which occurs when you introduce heparin and trigger an immune response to form uncontrolled clotting, your coagulation system stays in balance and you don't get uncontrolled clotting or bleeding in the course of everyday living.

BTW, the vaccine induced clots are exactly the same mechanism - antibodies to PF4.

Now we have an intervention, the jab, that completely tips this balance to the clotting side, blowing through your bodies natural anticlot defenses. And this response, since it is immunologically based, SETS THE PERSON UP FOR INCREASED RISK WITH FUTURE JABS.

That is what happens with HIT. If you have the HIT antibodies, a subsequent exposure to heparin triggers a catastrophic clotting cascade within several days due to an amnestic response. (This is one if the things that gets a hematologist out if bed at 2 am.) Usually these antibodies wane after 100 days, presumably the B cells arw tamped down as well, and you can rechallenge with heparin, if you really really must, with low risk for clot.

Who knows how long the jab associated immune response lasts and if there is a feedback loop to suppress it?

Will the "booster" jabs, like heparin rechallenge, potentiate this immune response to clot or will the B cells be subject to a natural negative feedback loop?? Who the hell knows and NO ONE IS PUBLISHING on this!!!!

The increasing potential mortality from repeated jabs may not be ADE - it may be to increasing catastrophic clotting.

Of note, not one of the referring docs of this system admit the jab was responsible for their patient's clot. Not one.

In fact, they want my "clearance" to give the patient......a booster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, my head just exploded a bit there.

2021-08-31 09:06:35