The Screaming Baby States
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives

Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2019-10-03 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in States , 209 references Ignore this thread
The Screaming Baby States
[Comments enabled]

Whah whah whah!  The big bad feds made us charge insane amounts of state tax and then when we tried to shove that up other state resident's ass via the federal tax code we got spanked.  MAKE IT STOP MR. JUDGE!


The lawsuit asked U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken to block the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's limit on how much people can deduct in state and local taxes (SALT). The provision effectively raised the tax burden on citizens of high-tax states.

New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Maryland brought the suit in July 2018, claiming the tax deduction limit was a way for the Trump administration to stick it to blue states. The judge ruled that the limit did not violate the 10th Amendment, which says that powers not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution are left to the states.

Nothing forced any state to put forward a revenue-and-spending model that was wildly outside of what other states did.

Further, nothing gave a state the right to try to shift that tax burden to others outside their state via the Federal Tax code.  In fact it can be cleanly argued that such an attempted shift is flat-out theft for which the proper response is a full-on blockade by the other states, since the principle of Federalism is that you can't do that and if you're not going to adhere to the parts of the Constitution you don't like then you don't get the protection of the parts you do like.

But, we didn't have to go there because the ruling came as I expected it would: If you don't like the implications then change your state tax code and stop spending so damn much money.

New York is getting ass-pounded by this; their tax receipts are something on the order of two billion below where they forecast, mostly because those who make a lot of money have up and left for other states.

This is exactly how it's supposed to work: If you put together a crappy state people can and will leave.

The problem -- and one of the reasons I'm leaving Florida -- is that many of these people from Naw Yawk come here and then try to bring their political bull**** with them, including their government spending demands.  That collides with the tax system, of course -- so I'll go where they don't want to be before they can further ruin this state -- they've already done a hell of a lot of damage.

View with responses (opens new window)