Probably Materially Less.....
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Display list of topics
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Sarah's Blog Buy Sarah's Pictures
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2019-03-26 13:41 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 290 references Ignore this thread
Probably Materially Less.....
[Comments enabled]

Now comes this....

In flight simulations designed to recreate the problems from a doomed Boeing 737 Max airliner, pilots found that they had less than 40 seconds to override a controversial automated system and prevent a crash, according to The New York Times.

My understanding from talking to pilots of various aircraft (including some military ones) is that even in the event of a jammed trim you can fly, but you'll be doing "arm curls" (if locked in the "down" position) with the yoke to do it.

But I've also been told that the trim authority on the 737 is large enough that it's physically impossible, even if you put your feet on the panel, to pull the yoke back if the trim is jammed against you.

It's also true that the cutoff switches are right on the center pedestal and easily accessible.  But shutting them off shuts off all power trim operation; what you're left with is the handwheels near your knee and it takes a lot of rotations of that wheel to come back from the jackscrew racked one way to neutral.

So this report sounds entirely plausible -- if you don't immediately recognize what's going on you're in big trouble, especially if you're down low and unlike some aircraft which have "hybrid" trim systems (e.g. electric and hydraulic), where you can dump one of them and the other still works on the 737 it's electric-only and the only backup is physical/manual.

The electric motor can run the trim quite rapidly -- materially more-so than you can with hand power, which, if you yank the switches, is all you have left.

And furthermore since the system allegedly involved was not clearly-documented in terms of even being present, say much less what its total authority was (effectively unlimited) one has to wonder whether the intentional lack of disclosure and additional training requirement (which, I remind you, the carriers insisted on to avoid type-rating, training and certification costs)  was enough to lead to a situation where the odds of correctly resolving the problem if it occurred, were poor.

View with responses (opens new window)