The study itself: Instead, the mRNA, but not the adenovirus-based vaccines induced long-term IgG4 responses – the IgG subclass with inhibitory effector functions.
I already wrote on this when the first paper showed up. But Alex highlighted a really ugly element of this one -- one of the editors:
Shikha Shrivastava, Pfizer, United States
The paper was received on 10 August last year, which means Pfizer knew about this at least back to that time and likely well-before.
Yet nobody has said a thing officially about this, never mind that IgG4 is implicated in all sorts of bad things, the least of which is causing your body to ignore the antagonist in question (in this case, the virus) allowing it to range freely through your body instead of attacking and destroying it.
That would tend to make the jabs useless and in fact we're seeing that in the data from Cleveland Clinic; the more jabs the more likely you are to be infected. This is an entirely reasonable explanation as to why.
But it doesn't end there.
Since we know the spike protein is directly harmful without the rest of the virus its quite clear that allowing that to happen (that is, for your immune system to not destroy the virus but rather to let it run around your system uninhibited) has serious potential to cause cumulative, slow harm until it finally nails you. Since we know that one of the primary areas of such harm (from the original Salk paper in December of 2020) is the endothelium, that is the lining of every blood vessel in the body a reasonable expectation from this would be materially-elevated rates of embolisms, strokes and heart attacks, since any disruption to the endothelial layer in those areas can produce that sort of catastrophic outcome.
That doesn't appear to be happening, right? Oh wait -- it does.
Is this proof that the jabs are potentiating these outcomes? No, its not.
But is it a reasonable hypothesis that should have been investigated and run to the ground before we stabbed 150+ million Americans (never mind all those in other countries) with this crap?