Blackcrow has the bead.
Tickerguy called the 3% long ago based upon walking up to--but not beyond--the line demarcating provable versus conjecture. Respectable, highly so, given the wild west of claims in every regard. In essence, TG sets the floor for expectations going forward. Good insight, good call, evidence based.
Blackcrow comes at this from the practitioner's point of view with a novel skepticism. "Novel" is indeed odd, since a layperson would expect a physician practitioner to actually practice deductive and inductive logic when encountering the inexplicable. An entire generation of physicians not only allowed but EXACERBATED covid's extensive damage to the world population.
Skepticism should have been the order of the day when control mechanisms were employed early in covid.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/2021....Pretty darn good guarded skepticism there with an open mind to all possibilities.
Unfortunately for the world, in this opinion, Blackcrow is acutely dialed in on what will unfold for the following reasons, from the lay perspective:
The human body is a remarkably adaptive mechanism, highly optimized for life in its dirty, risky environment. It has a SYSTEM in place which regulates and experiments with responses to stimuli with an implied purpose of destroying or neutralizing the harms but not going overboard on the harmless, all while attempting to steer clear of self harm (i.e., the body's adviso to always know what's down range).
Life throws everything at the body, and the system works within its algorithmic constraints to deal with it. However, when the system itself is corrupted, the algorithm changes. That means, simply, that the recipe long tailored for the environment, and an actively evolving environment at that, no longer is intact.
Unless there is some identified exception, damage to the body does not result in improved prospects for longevity. Rather, damage reduces the longevity to something less than proscribed at birth. As a result, life expectancy will be reduced to some degree, material or otherwise, but reduced nonetheless.
To the matter of degree, one has to look at the mechanisms involved. If damage is to the heart, what does medicine predict for the nature of the damage? Does it imply reduction of years from normal life expectancy, or does it classify more severely in terms of life remaining from diagnosis? Whatever the answer, apply to the cardio-damaged. If severe, then massive loss of life in the next decade. If not, then foreshortened but not extremely so life expectancies. Split the difference, marked reduction in population life expectancy on cardio basis alone.
Add to that the vascular damage, the neurological damage, the possibility that prion-like formations are underway on a schedule that matches or exceeds CJD timeframe, reproductive damage.
If that weren't enough, the immune system, that amazing system, has been corrupted. It has been taught to tolerate invaders, something that no entity, biological or societal, can survive at length. The cancer hazard is a phenomenal risk. The evolving viruses that have been serially passed through a world-wide population of evolutionary filters are boresighted on the vaxxed physiology. Alone, that has the power to wipe out the vaxxed population half way to their natural life expectancies.
Perhaps a mechanistic way of looking at this will better encapsulate what is ahead. Imagine that sand of varying grits, from 60 grit to 2000 grit is mixed in randomized batches with motor oil and that the batches are sent into the fleet depot. Every vehicle that leaves the depot does so with a random stock of sand in its motor oil. Those that got dealt 60 grit don't make it very far at all. Those that got 2000 grit exclusively, perhaps they seem to run just fine, honing their bores nicely it may appear. Either way, there is no statistical support which would allow anyone to proclaim that the fleet average mileage will exceed that of a non-sanded fleet. The only question left is how drastically will it be reduced.
That can be answered with statistics. Knowing at least that the contamination was 60-2000 grit, one can see at the left that the high 60-grits collapse immediately and that there is an increase that persists. The mechanics and scientists can be queried to learn what prognosis is in store for the 2000-grits based upon wear mechanisms. That would peg the outlier class, at least from a predictive standpoint. In between, there would be some distribution curve.
Thus, a mathematical assessment in regards to the vaxx would likely present a shape quality that would begin to firm up quantitatively as the early data comes in. That may be in the form of a classic gauss curve of some shape or another based upon the variety of the mechanisms of harm and their time constants. Suffice it say, though, that the vaxxed population will reside within the curve.
Indications and empirical suppositions are that the above are, collectively, aggressive and destructive in an order of magnitude worthy of biblical proportions. That curve will peak--that's a future event, but it is a certainty--and it will be both a humanitarian disaster with orphans and extensive poverty and disease with a marked reduction in physician population (way to go medical profession mandaters), catastrophic to economies world wide.
Reason: sp.
RSS available
