The Market Ticker
Rss Icon RSS available
Fact: There is no immunity or protection against The Law of Scoreboards.
Did you know: What the media does NOT want you to read is at https://market-ticker.org/nad.
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
The Market Ticker Read Message in The Market Ticker - Cancelled
Top Forum Top Login FAQ Register Clear Cookie Logout
Page 3 of 3  First123Last
 More Doom Porn, Election Edition
Nelstomlinson 778 posts, incept 2011-12-21
2022-11-13 18:06:58

Quote:
I prefer to be left alone.

Tsherry, that has never been an option. Either we have a government that controls the evil, or the evil controls our government.
Fumei 3k posts, incept 2019-01-08
2022-11-13 18:07:22

I do not think we will have to contend with an Austrian. More likely Americunts will get our own Kampuchean or Kartvelian.
Nelstomlinson 778 posts, incept 2011-12-21
2022-11-13 18:07:34

If I were going to try to straighten out the mess our American nation is in, I would definitely study the Austrian corporal. One could emulate the strategies that put him in power, and one could avoid the strategic mistakes he made once in power.
Dwva68 21 posts, incept 2022-03-27
2022-11-13 18:21:09

I'm with JDough. This doesn't appear headed to Hitler, it appears headed to Lenin. They are called Globalists, but really they are elitist totalitarians seeking global control. That seems closer to political (but not economic) communism than nationalism, and much more dangerous because of its global scope. I think the crazy immigration in Europe/UK and the open border in the US are a deliberate attempt to mix up the races and destroy national cohesion - that's how much the communists fear nationalism.

By the numbers alone, it seems to me that Hitler gets a bad rap. Leninism and Maoism killed an order of magnitude more than Hitler managed. I suspect the West stacks up pretty well against Hitler on the death scoreboard, though over a longer time period. But no one kills en masse like the Commies.

Nationalism is inherently self-limiting in its scope. Communists are playing for all the marbles.

Best case scenario for the US is that States start taking back power from the Federal govt, especially as it collapses financially, and then the US splits into a handful of regions.
Tsherry 10k posts, incept 2008-12-09
2022-11-13 20:56:08

Quote:
If I were going to try to straighten out the mess our American nation is in, I would definitely study the Austrian corporal. One could emulate the strategies that put him in power, and one could avoid the strategic mistakes he made once in power.


Might as well try to fuck around with the Ring of Power.

Quote:
Tsherry, that has never been an option. Either we have a government that controls the evil, or the evil controls our government.


Sure it was, a hundred and twenty five years ago or more. It was pretty easy to disappear. Now that the government has taken the role of evil incarnate, no, it's less easy to be left alone.

Time's comin' when we'll have to do something about that; .gov has an unbridled thirst for power, and the only power left that they've not already taken is their desire to put their boots on your neck forever, steal everything you have, force you to worship at their feet, and support them with unreserved enthusiasm.

Everything else, they've taken without a fight.


----------
This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it. - The Hunt for Red October
Jazen 4k posts, incept 2007-07-17
2022-11-13 20:56:28

They will be coming for the purebloods.
But I believe many of them will be riddled with cancer in the coming years.

----------
I hate our Government, but I still love America.
Eleua 21k posts, incept 2007-07-05
2022-11-13 21:14:17

@Billhrny

Quote:
The irony is I recall overhearing more than one conversation in the work lunch room by uber-leftoids about how those refusing the jab should be put in "camps" until they comply - and in each conversation at least have[half] the people were Jewish. I guess history teaches us nothing.


Actually, if you look at the history, rather than what is shoved to us as propaganda, it would teach you just about everything about the situation you describe, and it would make perfect sense.

@Tappedout

Quote:
If we go down rabbit hole anything like what the author fantasizes, it will be more like the what history shows us. The first objective will be to seal the border. Then, the "enemy of the people" will be illegals. First, every illegal who gets arrested for a crime will be dumped over the wall. Next, proof of citizenship will be more frequently required. Illegals will be marginalized and their ability to live a "normal life" compromised.

Get pulled over for no tail light? Papers, please. No proof of citizenship? Over the wall.

License plate not valid/no insurance because you cannot buy it without proof of citizenship? Over the wall.

Then maybe the vitriol expands to other minorities. We all know the usual targets.


That's a fantasy that belongs in the same category as getting blown by the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders.

We should be so lucky. Granted, I think if that was put to a referendum (once the economy collapses) it passes overwhelmingly. We don't have a referendum process.

Right now, we have a government that outright hates White people and isn't afraid to show it. BIG SHIT has to change to get anywhere near your scenario. As it stands now, it would be the illegals that have more standing than Heritage Americans, and would be the ones doing the tossing. They wouldn't toss you, but put a bullet in the back of your head.

@Abelardlindsey

Quote:
No one right in the head wants a civil war. But I gotta tell you I prefer a Balkans style civil war to this scenario.


We are already in a civil war. One side hasn't figured it out yet. They are still "voting harder."

Here is what a Balkans style civil war looks like. This is where we are headed, and it is going to last generations.



@Fumei

Quote:
I do not think we will have to contend with an Austrian. More likely Americunts will get our own Kampuchean or Kartvelian.


No more phone calls, please. We have a winner.

@Nelstomlinson

Quote:
If I were going to try to straighten out the mess our American nation is in, I would definitely study the Austrian corporal. One could emulate the strategies that put him in power, and one could avoid the strategic mistakes he made once in power.


What put "the Austrian" in power?

The speech he used as his basic stump speech was called "Versailles." Look that up. That is what resonated.

Look at the conditions of the Weimar Republic. It was a degenerate mess that directly (purposefully, I believe) offended the morality of most of the German nation. Berlin in the 1920s was San Francisco, Bangkok, New Orleans, and Subic Bay all rolled into one. Communist (ANTIFA) agitators were everywhere, and doing EXACTLY what they are doing in the US today.

By expelling the element that the NatSocs believed were responsible for the condition of Germany, they got a new banking system that didnt use their foreign exchange. Result? Highest (by far) standard of living in Europe by the mid-1930s. Not bad for starting from absolute zero, just a few years before.

That couldn't be allowed to stand, for fear the idea would catch on.

We are taught that Hitler was a crazed anti-Semite bent on world conquest, and he had to be stopped, or we would all be speaking German. The reality is a bit different. Yes, he and his didnt care for the Jews, and they were up front as to why. What Hitler wanted was to unite the ethnic/linguistic German people, much of which was severed unjustly in Versailles (see above reference). He also did not want a chaotic border to his Southeast, so when Czechoslovakia disintegrated along ethnic lines, he occupied it for fear the communists would enter the chaos and power vacuum. We would have done the exact same thing (at the time) if Mexico flew apart and the communists threatened to organize Mexico. Don't think for a second we would not.

As for Poland, that was taking back the ethnic German portion. The Allies essentially moved Poland Westward, and overlapped what was former Germany.

Barbarossa was a mixed bag of motivation. Yes, there was the entire lebensraum concept, but that was secondary to fearing the Bolsheviks (mainly Jewish) would do to the Germans under Hitler's reign what they did to the ethic German Kulaks a decade prior - starve them out by the millions. This was a very real threat, not merely paranoia.

What related conditions exist in the US, or are pending?

Certainly the entire concept of humiliation of the primary ethnic population (heritage Americans) is front and center. Our borders are being overrun. Our entire nation is ablaze with crime from all the diversity. We are in debt beyond our ability to pay, and then some. Our foreign policy has no recognizable attachment to interests of the US population.

The primary ethnic population is being systematically deplatformed and economically isolated. Think affirmative action and income transfers.

Could we get an "Austrian?" Perhaps, but we have much further to travel down this path. Economic collapse is a definite prerequisite, otherwise Whites will try to run out the clock and leave a smoldering mess to their children.

Can it be jab based? I see the jab as being the means, not the motivation, although I could be wrong.

@Dwva68

Quote:
Best case scenario for the US is that States start taking back power from the Federal govt, especially as it collapses financially, and then the US splits into a handful of regions.


The primary problem with this is nuclear weapons. Who gets them? (someone will, and they won't want to share).

Does anyone think for a second that ANYONE would give the African Quarter of the former US nukes? smiley. You think the YOUTUBE video of a chimp with an AK-47 is funny, this is the same thing, writ large.

Does anyone think that, just because nukes are in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming, they get to keep the control of them? How about the commie-libs and the ballistic missile submarine fleet in Washington and Georgia?

Nope. It won't take long for people to realize that the nukes are the grand prize, and it will be an "all or nothing" proposition. Just about everyone will rightly conclude they would rather die than give their enemies (those people they cannot live with) the ability to destroy them in an hour's time.

Also, "going our separate ways" isn't going to work. What is to stop the non-productive quarters from having massive amount of economic refugees to the productive (White) quarter? That's the nexus of the larger problems, as we speak. The non-productive parts of the world (most of it) are migrating to Europe, OZ/NZ, and North America, purely for economic reasons.

Suddenly, now that we have given up more than half of what our grandparents had, we will enforce the border? Pull the other one.

Additionally, how do we separate? Is it where people currently are? Just about every state hates itself. In Washington, we all hate Seattle/Tacoma, and they hate all of us. Same for Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, etc.

Are we going to tell everyone in the White Quarter, GTFO, if they are not White? If we don't have that courage now, how will we have it later?


Nope. This is going to devolve into a constant civil war of attrition and terror, fighting for control of who runs the nukes and navy.

----------
Diversity + proximity = WAR

-They wanted camps; I want ropes.
Bluto 1k posts, incept 2021-07-10
2022-11-13 21:22:07

None of this had to happen.

If people had simply refused to wear face diapers 30 months ago, it would have ended there.

Give the devil an inch, and he will take a mile. Every time.

----------
"One man with courage makes a majority" Andrew Jackson
Mjsmith 558 posts, incept 2011-12-08
2022-11-14 07:44:01

As long as we're dabbling in a particular tin pool, if you're concerned about forced pureblood organ harvesting, the imminent warning flag to be looking out for is the appearance in the popular media of the phrase "organ horder" (or any variation that carries that connotation).

The day that happens, is your unambiguous signal that the day to hoist the jolly roger and go full [Henry Bowman | Clyde Sheldon | Paul Kersey] has arrived.


Heartlander 2k posts, incept 2021-02-25
2022-11-14 07:44:15

Did you know there are Americans moving to Russia? There have been for years, but it is accelerating lately, as America circles the drain. Russia has some major issues, but APPEARS to at least be moving in the right direction in many ways -- as opposed to the USA, where we seem determined to drive the car right over the cliff and indeed are mashing the gas pedal.

Of course, Russia may very well get its own "Austrian" after its current president is gone. All bets are off as to what will happen in Russia after the death or resignation of the eminently sane and rational Putin, the best leader Russia has had since... well, maybe ever.

Since I cannot be induced to cross an ocean, it may be Mexico for me if things get as bad as what Ishmael warns of. Things would have to get bad indeed to take one's chances in the land run by narcoterroriats... but it is not outside the realm of possibility that things in the USA really could get that bad.
Guerin 130 posts, incept 2021-09-26
2022-11-14 07:44:29

I don't know that the Austrian scenario means the Austrian will turn on the purebloods at some point - it depends on whether the Austrian himself is one and how much loss of family or livelihood he endured at the hands of the Covidians. It also depends just how screwed the jabbed are. Minorities can rule over majorities, especially if said majority happens to be a more sickly group of people in general.

The Austrian is one scenario, but even there, the institutions of government were but reoriented. Bureaucracy seems amazingly hard to kill or reform - administrations come and go across the West, but it hardly seems to affect the governing institutions. Even China is kind of stuck with a Confucian system developed over 2000 years ago despite all the turnover at the top.

The Augustan scenario might be the least damaging, a strong ruler restoring order without too much hot war internally, although it's hard to see where that figure comes up with the present state of affairs. On the other hand there's always the Atillan scenario, in which case things get very spicy when the institutions of government collapse.
Takewhatyoucan64 85 posts, incept 2022-08-30
2022-11-14 07:44:43

You better live in the right state as this all progresses......slowly at first............and now its about to be the......all at once. Scary times but very exciting.
Aspnaz 76 posts, incept 2021-06-22
2022-11-14 07:44:49

Trying to take out 20% of the population would never work if that 20% decided to fight back. Historically it takes about 5% of the population to take over the government, so taking out 20% is completely out there. Once the purebloods knew they were going to be killed, there would be mass carnage as the government would be destroyed, as would the government workers, the military would be destroyed (USA military is less than 3 million) ... what chance do any of these groups have against 70 million purebloods, many of whom are very well armed?

But, that said, this is a great ticker because in crazy times, crazy shit happens and we all need to be on the lookout and keep each other informed.
44dave 81 posts, incept 2021-09-16
2022-11-14 07:45:03

Bluto wrote..
If people had simply refused to wear face diapers 30 months ago, it would have ended there.


*buzzer sound* - wrong again. If they had refused, it would have "simply" been something else.
Evil is evil. The only way to deal with it is to wipe it out - completely. Not say I won't be a part, or I'll just not comply.
Traelin0 533 posts, incept 2021-01-28
2022-11-14 09:12:26

Ishmael, your premise is so far beyond potential reality, but likely not for the reasons one thinks.

Austrians arise after attempted Communist revolutions and/or devastating losses in war followed by harsh reparations. Germany was totally defeated in every way, shape, and form. Now, what I'm about to say may seem like I am agreeing with you at first, but I'm not. See the following:

1. We are a totally defeated people. Conservatives conserved absolutely nothing and didn't want to risk a solid middle class existence to secure liberty. It's over, but humans tend to fall back on creature comforts while they can. Denial is a powerful motivating force for the illusion of sanity in dark times. Denis Leary said it best: Happiness comes in little nuggets of chocolate.

And liberals? Don't get me started.

2. Many/most conservatives would give up their arms if it meant a little bit of food. They have never known hunger like the rest of the world has. Doubt me on this? Just wait a couple of years after some bad winters, rampant inflation in things we need, and said inflation caused primarily by the supply side of the equation. Liberals already gave up liberty for a little bit of food security.

How many times have I said this? Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Brass is useless if your son is hungry and those who saw it coming prepared accordingly.

Keeping the above in mind:

1. We are a Tower of Babel, not a homogeneous society by any means. Diversity rather than conformity is oftentimes what kills the greatest of civilizations. Austrians are able to unite a demographically, culturally, and spiritually uniform country through words, or at least words backed by Rentenmarks for the "in crowd".

2. We are on the verge of getting nuked back to the Stone Age. I'd call that a devastating loss, but to a degree that the residents of Dresden would've blushed. There's no tinfoil necessary in projecting an 80% dieoff in this country within a year in such a scenario. And I'm being generous. There'd be little to nothing to rebuild.

3. The nation is split squarely down the middle, regardless what the alleged voting results and exit polls say.

We're due for a civil war, not an Austrian tinpot. But we're also due for a total war. Which comes first? I have no idea, but this is a doozy of a Fourth Turning. I could speculate and say that we'll split up like the Romans did into 3 separate entities. There will be ZERO reunification within my lifetime with liberal run regions of the country, i.e. the Northeast and West.

As for people thinking we're going to get a Lenin? Please. We're witnessing the collapse of socialism, not the birth of it. All of the woke kneejerk reactions are to the dying of a secular humanist cult. It's one massive Heaven's Gate and they're trying to take everyone else down with them. Russia gave birth to the Bolsheviks due to a uniquely poor hand of cards.

They never knew post-serfdom until what, the time we were fighting the Civil War? That wasn't a total coincidence BTW, as Tsar "Alexander the Liberator" was spending $$$ assisting the Union.

(For the history buffs out there, I find it quite fascinating, perhaps even on a spiritual level, how Russia has been intimately tied at the hip to every one of our Fourth Turnings. Wanna know why England hates Russia and vice versa? Goes back centuries and many times involved us squarely in the middle of a war between empires.)

We're due for a regional Caesar *at best*. Will he be the antagonist in The Postman, or will he be a Clovis? No idea. But worrying about Austrians when we already have a Black Jesus who sure has acted like a dictator in his third term, but who can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again, is just not worth the time.

One thing I believe we CAN agree on: Republicanism is a dead letter. I'd be shocked if we even had an election in 2024. Then again, a government that sends Pathfinders to Mars but can convince its subjects that our elections are free and fair may not need to suspend anything.
Radiosity 1k posts, incept 2009-03-05
2022-11-14 11:06:14

@Whitehat "good to hear from you again."

Thanks. Can't really say I felt welcome to stick around after a certain thread in the Bar, been mostly reading passively since.


@Dwva68 "By the numbers alone, it seems to me that Hitler gets a bad rap"

Kinda, considering Hitler wasn't directly (or hell, even indirectly) responsible for most of the deaths. The Allies STARTED the war in the first place, so Churchill, Roosevelt, and especially Stalin are mostly to blame for all the death.

And the allies were responsible for an incredible number of atrocities during and AFTER the war, starving and otherwise intentionally killing MILLIONS of German people who'd done nothing to deserve it. Roosevelt alone is responsible for more deaths than Hitler ever was. And don't even get me started on Churchill's decision to firebomb German cities in order to provoke a response so he could pretend it was unprovoked and get the British people to support the war. Fuck Churchill sideways with Karl's rusty chainsaw, seriously.
Boredfree 905 posts, incept 2021-09-15
2022-11-14 11:38:21

@radiosity,

It's good you're posting again.

All the nationality crap is another way to drive wedges between human beings.

You're absolutely right about Allied atrocities during WWII.

Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five about the horrific firebombing of Dresden was a real eye-opener after I read it in the mid Nineties.

Funny, by 2000 my eyes began feeling like Alex's did during his Adversion Therapy treatment from Clockwork Orange

Yeah, it was awful for a bit. Fortunately, I discovered I have a another protective eyelid; the I-no-longer-give-a-fucklid.

Keeps the bullshit out of my eyeballs.

----------
The problem is most people want to point a finger rather than their thumb when dealing with challenges.
Heartlander 2k posts, incept 2021-02-25
2022-11-14 13:30:42

@Takewhatyoucan64
Quote:
You better live in the right state as this all progresses......slowly at first............and now its about to be the......all at once.

And here I am in a state whose map is a sea of red with a few blue dots... and a fucking Democrat bitch for governor -- RE-elected last week despite her Covid totalitarianism. She considers it a BRAGGING point that she was rhe first governor in the U.S. to shut down all the schools.

In the 32 years I've lived in Kansas, though Kansas goes loopy every once in a while and, just to be ornery, elects a Democrat as governor, this is the FIRST time it's ever RE-elected one to a second term.

I had always hoped Kansas would join our southern neighbors Oklahoma and Texas if they seceded... but I'm afraid Kansas may go with the tyrants. We seem to have reached some kind if critical mass of crazy -- at least in the three CITIES that rule over the rest of the state.
Heartlander 2k posts, incept 2021-02-25
2022-11-14 13:31:00

@Traelin0
Quote:
It's one massive Heaven's Gate and they're trying to take everyone else down with them.

NAILED IT.
Whitehat 11k posts, incept 2017-06-27
2022-11-14 13:42:40

@Aspnaz -- problem is that people probably including you are waiting for that 5%-20% to do the job for them. Then one has the problem when that percentage who does have a problem with the people who did not. Some of us, if alive (trust me, you will not get me as in your other comment), will be more that willing to keep reminding those who did the work of who did not and offer suggestions for addressing this within whatever law survives or emerges.

Since you libeled me with your other comment, this is worthy of response since it is germane to the conversation. You might not be aware that a while back here i proposed (do not index all of my comments as there are so many) that we create a system of humane custody for people so injured by our national and local neglect, bad policies and mistakes over the latter half of the twentieth century forward. This is my concept of it being necessary at times to do something completely different and face honestly what will work, including spending money, and if necessary to employ this correct logic, admit that the cost is actually less than what it actually costs us now under the unworkable situation. My proposal for those who do not remember, or whatever is the following:

A farm/colony system where problematic people are allowed to live out their existence if cure for their issues does not allow total inoffensive existence in the general society. Notice that i said "total". No more placing borderline mentally ill where the community has to know that they are there and deal with them. You cannot live totally like normal, answer is no. This applies to even dysfunctional welfare communities. The rules of the farm/colony community are as follows:

No cruelty with more than adequate supervision to ensure regardless of the cost. Severe penalties, usually death, for any abuse or substandard care. Medical treatments which is not merely control but attempting cure and mitigation of situation. This medical care is not to be static but constantly investigated as to better methods. Ethical study of the population in these situations to learn more, prevent future and help the current population of them. Productive existence as much as possible to give meaning and purpose. Enriching activities. An open system to allow contact with the outside citizenry as much as possible which never compromises the citizenry or offends their existence. A way out with lifetime supervision if an individual can be affected total cure or control of issues. Total security by geography and/or technical methods which do not accept failure above death of the escapee. Yes, harsh in this, however they are not escaping a prison where they are abused, quite the opposite, or predated by other members of the population which will never be tolerated. This will not be a prison.

The population of said units will include various mental illness, problems like sexual predators, welfare classes who cannot break the cycle, etc. Consequently, various forms of these will exist. Note too that members of these populations might develop to the point where they desire to go to other situation within these units to participate in occupations where they develop competency.

While totally respecting the dignity of the populations in these places, there will be open observance by the greater public. People will know what life is like in all ways in these situations. Prevents bad stuff, and encourages innovation.

Next is that some who can never live on their own due to their own issues might, as many have proven that they are totally not dangerous or offensive, be able to work in useful service, trade and care giving situations as a commuter class. Yes, in the later as i have personally seen that many of the subsets of these individuals have a humility, good nature and sensitivity towards others with phenomenal work ethic when they are not themselves victimized in all sorts of ways due to their own vulnerabilities. Currently, many very sensitive and gentle people live terrible lives of abuse and addiction as self-medication while they are left vulnerable to predators of all classes including our own system of law which does not have the options to help them. I have personally worked with these people as a volunteer which i hate to discuss since my way is that one should do these things without getting praised to them. However, i have a more accurate perception from direct contact. Those of us who choose to help essentially require a much better sorting system and set of resources which is the origin of this suggestion. May the gods help any one reading this who assumes that this is more liberal social spending push or related in any way to the same. It is a totally different approach originating from a different set of intentions, morals and respect for human dignity and not wanting a fucked-up society or one that considers such horrific solutions that it becomes the poster-child for fucked-up evil.

Here is a good takeaway. Occasionally people here give insights into various matters, Karl is one, as have i. Mostly we have better insight as we were/are insiders. Hence, things like some stuff i can propose to fix the real estate industry that people here would not even think of or consider as they have an outsider's view. Not that these outsider views would be completely wrong as they could be quite useful without certain prejudices. However, what i believe that Karl, myself and many others here have is an insider/outsider perspective where highly developed personal core competency (sometimes plural) have also been brought into other things with direct hands-on work. In RE as my example, i was seriously competent and accomplished in other related professions and some unrelated and had an outsider's perspective as a user of RE services. When i entered the profession all of these came together. I am sure that Karl would agree that this is how it works for many people, but they cannot put it to words.

In the current discussion of dealing with intractable problems, one needs this to get away from the tunnel vision of those in the fog of the current battle so to say. Those who want to execute street people and other problems are in the fog, and this is where societies go feral once the restrictions drop in some way. Those of us with more intimate knowledge are also mixing in superior moral application, knowing why our legal system does not allow certain things and then our ability to see the economic arguments. People in the fog only see the actual and total costs of the current situation. Dysfunction costs in so many ways as we would all admit. Just look at the residential and commuting decisions which people make to simply avoid "bad" areas. These are actually hard costs. How many businesses are not opened in areas due to them being overrun with dysfunction when they could be affordable locations which actually have even more useful points wasted, thus more cost in terms of opportunity.

In the end, those of us who can see and calculate can present an argument that near instantly the country will have a net lower cost of existence for itself upon implementation of this plan. Imagine an entire area subject to homeless encampment instantly and permanently not having any of said and no future threat ever again. Massive drug abuse, GONE. Children not being born into horrible situations, instantly. And all of the other vulture problems not having a source.

And, the best part, done in a moral, ethical and kind way which shows the world that we truly value life and will not compromise our principles to achieve a result which we demand: that these problems are ended in totality with innovation and the old ways which we have sadly forgotten.

I find it very interesting in a supposedly Christian country is not demanding this and tolerates poverty pimps many claiming to be Christian organizations perpetuating misery and not calling for a better way.

Here is my warning. If we do not do this, if things get bad for some outside occurrence and the society falls in many regards, a lot of people will be thrilled to embrace expedient solutions to these problems. I will merely state this consequence, not the long term damage to us (which i have mentioned before) if they are successful. It will be a great moral wrong in and of itself the most terrible. And, you will be dealing with something else. People like me will declaring war on those who would attempt to exterminate and abuse people for their problems, and will do everything possible to bring punishment at any later date to those who would have attempted such a thing no matter the cost. If one will not stand against something morally wrong, what will he stand for?

Funny how i need to remind people who overall consider themselves Christian that the One Whom (caps out of respect for other people's sacred beliefs) you consider your savior cautioned regarding what one does to the least of the brethren. And, do not forget that He was angry regarding some lesser matter with the translated words, "How dare you ...," and action.

You would let this happen when we are at out worst? And you have the balls to consider other people's beliefs evil in that old story of our country's history?

In the end you will lose as people think as they are, and they are as they do. Your resume will be for all the world to see as it is now.

Look inside yourselves and determine what you would never do regardless of the reason or need, even if it cost in the most severe way imaginable.

A man who cannot stop himself from doing something terrible which he desires is capable of anything terrible.

Have never said this before. Karl, if in some part this would be effective or useful to you, please feel free to do anything which you deem appropriate with it.

----------
smiley Je souhaite

Quod tu es, ego fui, quod ego sum, tu eris
Abelardlindsey 1k posts, incept 2021-03-26
2022-11-14 18:34:20

In history, republics end in massive corruption. Then it becomes an empire because an emperor arises to clean out the corruption.

----------
Its all in the mitochondria
Querant 388 posts, incept 2021-09-19
2022-11-15 14:24:03


Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

― C. S. Lewis
Maudite 753 posts, incept 2009-01-21
2022-11-17 15:09:23

The doomer porn might not be so far fetched.. This dropped in my mailbox

Demand for Unvaccinated Blood is Real -- Doctors Acknowledge Grumpily

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/demand....

We may be able to make some coin selling blood or worse case kept on a "transfusion farm".

----------
It's been a bad year the next one will probably be worse.
Is there not one thing in your life that is worth losing everything for?
تبا تويتر
Reformedhippy 3k posts, incept 2020-07-01
2022-11-18 08:27:17

I was pressured today to sign up for the local blood drive.
By a vaxtard.
I said nope, it's mine and I'm keeping it.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Page 3 of 3  First123Last