Stop This NOW
The Market Ticker - Canceled - What 'They' Don't Want Published
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-10-07 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Covid-19 , 13596 references Ignore this thread
Stop This NOW
[Comments enabled]

Parents: If you allow this you're monsters.

We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males.

VAERS is known to materially under-report adverse events.  We do not know what the multiplication factor for these findings is as a consequence of that.  

Note that in the context of all prior years this basically never happens statistically.  The average over the three previous years associated with any vaccination is four.

Further, an extraordinary level of cardiac adverse events are associated with these jabs.  This is not uncommon or "rare" as claimed; there are in fact, as of July 9th, nearly 130,000 such reports for Covid-19 jabs.  If we accept the CDC's numbers for the number of Americans jabbed this puts the rate of cardiac adverse events are right around one in a hundred!

What's nasty is that while the myocarditis incidence is skewed heavily toward males under 30 the cardiac incidence is not; it is centered in the 20-70 range, or roughly "right up the middle" for the people in the nation as a whole.

Indeed, given the known under-reporting in VAERS a 1-in-100 incidence for a category of serious adverse events is extraordinarily significant.  There is every reason to believe we may be causing cardiac injury to as many as one in 25 people who get these shots!

Whether those injuries spontaneously resolve without permanent compromise or worse, degenerate progression is completely unknown as nobody is following up these individual cases to measure blood levels (e.g. troponins, EKGs, etc.) in an attempt to determine whether these events are transient or result in permanent impairment or worse.

 The only way to understand how common myocarditis is after COVID-19 vaccination, is to perform a prospective cohort study where all vaccinated individuals undergo clinical assessment, ECG, and troponin measurement at regular intervals post-administration.

Which is not being done, on purpose.

Incidentally the markers indicating potential trouble were present in the original studies.  They were not followed up and the reason for not doing is obvious: It would have prevented issuance of the EUAs on the original desired schedule.  As a result the firms involved and the FDA deliberately ignored that signal in the original studies and we have now jabbed somewhere around 200 million Americans -- and may have screwed as many as several million of them with irreversible, or even worse degenerate cardiac damage.

We do not know because we intentionally did not look.

COVID-19 injectable products are novel and have a genetic, pathogenic mechanism of action causing uncontrolled expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells. When you combine this fact with the temporal relationship of AE occurrence and reporting, biological plausibility of cause and effect, and the fact that these data are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical data, it supports a conclusion that the COVID-19 biological products are deterministic for the myocarditis cases observed after injection.

Again, as we knew and as I have documented before these jabs were first released for widespread use -- and again, deliberately ignored.

While this paper describes a specific risk with regard to myocarditis in young people the larger issue of cardiac events must not be ignored.  While it is certainly true that it in healthy young people the risk from Covid-19 infection itself is minuscule and thus appears on the data to be outweighed by the risks of the jab even without accounting for incomplete reporting in my opinion the 900lb Gorilla in the china shop does not simply lie there.

Do recall that Vioxx killed 60,000 Americans before we yanked it off the market.  There was indication of trouble in the original studies but it was not followed up upon just as it has not been here.  It was five years after full approval before that lack of follow-up and study broke through and resulted in the drug being yanked off the market.  Cardiac compromise is often "silent" from a symptomatic perspective but usually can be detected through directed lab work if you bother to look.  We didn't look with Vioxx and we're not doing it now with these jabs either -- in both cases the data was in the original pre-approval studies.

Many people in their 40s and 50s have incipient, severe cardiac compromise.  Decades of eating fast carbohydrates and listening to the talking heads from the FDA and elsewhere on "what to eat" has many such people 50 or more pounds overweight, hypertensive, in many cases Type II diabetic and at serious risk of a heart attack over the next 10 or 20 years.  I remind you that cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and kills about 650,000 people every year.

Even a 5% increase in that rate as a result of Covid-19 jabs will kill over 32,000 people annually.  If the increase in risk is 10% then we're talking over 60,000 Americans.  Given the now-evident requirement to boost every six months or so this means that 60,000 additional deaths is not a one-off; it will occur every single year for as long as we keep doing this stupid thing.

Yes, stupid.  The history of every respiratory pandemic is that it turns into an endemic flu and cold-causer within a year or two even without any intervention of any sort.  The 1918 pandemic did so, the 1890s pandemic believed to be caused by a beta coronavirus (of the same general family as Covid) did so and so have many, many others.  There have been no exceptions recorded.

I am not against vaccination on general principle.  Indeed with damn few exceptions they all have decades-long and well-documented safety records.  I am very much against a jab that carries this sort of outsized and apparent risk except on a truly-voluntary, fully-informed consent basis which, on the evidence to date, would lead anyone not at specific and identified very high risk to NOT take it.

Allegedly HHS claims we've "avoided" 30,000 deaths by vaccination.  What if we have in fact killed just as many -- or even twice as many -- through elevated cardiac disease risk, and will keep doing so every six months to a year into the future for as long as we jam needles full of this crap into arms?

Far-fetched?  Hardly.  The data supports this possibility now and while infection is not certain the risk, once you take a jab, is.

Stop the slaughter and the mandates that, on the data, are profoundly dangerous.

PS: Want to talk about how the government can materially cut Medicare (and Medicaid, for people in nursing homes with no money) expenses?  Give the above some thought.... you have to make it to 65 to collect anything, you know...

PPS: How's that dive looking $MRNA bulls?  That's a black hole you're staring into; at least Pfizer has other products.... you don't.

Go to responses (registration required to post)
 

 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 5  First12345Last
User Info Stop This NOW in forum [Market-Ticker-Nad]
Shadowmask
Posts: 910
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Most people in America base their diets around wheat, a very inflammatory food. Chronic inflammation makes any disease worse.
Mikeyinfl
Posts: 126
Incept: 2021-08-02

FL
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
You may know this person whom I don't believe is a poser.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/peter....

The article is pretty damming as well.

Dr Mike Yeadon 2 hr ago

VAERS shows

1. 60X higher rate of deaths following covid19 vaccination than any other vaccine.

2. More than 400-fold the rate of pulmonary embolism compared with any prior vaccine.

3. A very tight temporal relationship between vaccination & adverse events including death.

4. A clear dose-response relationship.

5. Approximately 70% of adverse effects in the database have underlying thromboembolic toxicity.

Why is this all running at such a frenetic pace?
Likesbeer
Posts: 21
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I think you may mean 1 in 1000 rather than 1 in 100 for the cardiac AEs?
Likesbeer
Posts: 21
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Steve Kirsch has been using an Underreporting Factor (URF) of 41 to scale up reported incident rates from VAERS to actual incident rates. See https://rumble.com/vnezfw-call-to-john-s.... - he has been trying to get an updated URF estimate for some time.
Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Likesbeer - No. If the under-reporting rate is 10:1 then we're screwing about 1 in 100.

A HUGE amount of cardiac damage is sub-clinical for a very, very long time. Most people in their 40s and 50s who are severely compromised do not know it as it generates no symptoms. By the time they become symptomatic they're ****ed, and often the first symptom is an actual heart attack.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Matt300
Posts: 1
Incept: 2021-09-12

NC
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The deadline to be fully-jabbed just came in from the major airline I work for. I have 34 years in aviation, 22 years at this company, which means I'm halfway up the seniority list. I finally made captain this year. I should have had 16 years to go until retirement. Amazing they have no compunction putting pilots (or anyone for that matter) under this kind of stress.

Thank you so much for all the good information Karl. I found your site from a Freereublic posting that linked to "The West's Obituary". I've been reading them daily ever since then and sharing them on the union forum, trying to educate my co-workers.

Hopefully the airline will allow a religious accommodation or better yet something else derails this mandate train in the next 6 weeks.
Imhotep
Posts: 127
Incept: 2013-07-18

United States
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
my neighbor, 16, was somewhat coerced to get the jabs so he could go on a cruise with his dad (mom and dad are split...mom didn't want him to get it. Mom has had issues post jab, too, which I've shared before). In casual conversation a few weeks back, he said he had a tight chest for a few days after 2nd jab. I told him about what I knew, but he's 16 and thinks he's invincible. He is very active and plays football/baseball and works out every day.

So far, one couldn't tell any adverse effects happened (other than what you and I know probably occurred).
Motorelay
Posts: 23
Incept: 2021-09-20

Connecticut
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The cure is worse than the disease.

We should be more like the Guatemalan villagerx, and sabotage the medical teams coming with vsccines! Wreck their cars, block the off ramps, destroy the freezers, and threaten to kill those who would inject us!

We need to get off our comfy asses and go stir up some trouble for these arrogant bastards who would harm us. Its US against THEM! Screw polite behavior!
Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Matt300 - Jabbing pilots is the most-stupid thing EVER. At the DOCUMENTED cardiac compromise rate, and as you know detected cardiac compromise punches your ticket permanently as an airline pilot and unlike the general public you are actually looked at for this every time you renew your medical they're going to **** about 1 in a 100, and maybe as many as 1 in 25 within the next couple of years.

Worse is that ON THE DATA it is not age-skewed either! If it WAS then you could potentially argue its a way to get rid of the more-senior and better-paid people, but nope -- the DATA is that it ****s people right up the middle in the 30-60 year band on a pretty-much equal basis, which is REALLY NASTY since cardiac compromise usually is an age-related condition. That standing alone is very solid evidence that the jab is directly responsible for it.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Engineertype
Posts: 40
Incept: 2020-03-20

Granville NY
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
mikeyinfl, your link is gone. Gosh, how could that ever happen in today's high tech world?
Txdg00
Posts: 220
Incept: 2020-08-10

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This article is perfect.

And even if it doesn't cause leaders to change their policies, it clearly shows the damage they've done and are continuing to do. If they don't change their ways, they'll have to figure out a way to live with themselves.
Publius
Posts: 1626
Incept: 2009-03-08

Greenville, SC.
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List

Karl, just wanted to say thank you for all the work and time you've put into this. Thank you. You and this forum have provided a valuable resource for me and my friends.
Aphron
Posts: 1
Incept: 2021-08-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Sadly, we have to go outside of the US to get good data on the jab:
https://tinyurl.com/c56j7mep

4 out 5 counties of the highest vaxxed in US also have the highest COVID. Stop the madness.
Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Do remember @Aphron that so long as your definition of "Covid" is based on a PCR test without the Ct being published (so one can derate the "cases" based on the probability of a false positive) you're STILL buying into the bull****.

At Ct35 the probability of a true, culturable positive (that is, ACTUAL LIVE VIRUS in you) is only about 3%. At Ct40 it is a statistical zero.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Kiwiapsa
Posts: 5
Incept: 2021-09-12

michigan
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Wife came down with Coof and now so have I. It's a nasty virus to deal with. But, we made the decision to avoid the gene therapy injection and prepare beforehand for the time when it hits. Quite frankly, the known odds of surviving this vs the odds of adverse reactions (some life-altering even leading to death) made the decision for us. Thanks again to TG and commentators for making known to us the facts concerning this virus and ancillary issues associated the injection. I don't think I would have been as well prepared without your insights.
Frat
Posts: 7421
Incept: 2009-07-15

NKY
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Jeez, Frat Junior just might have his pick of women if/when he waltzes into college. That's a helluva adverse event rate, and if they DON'T resolve... lots of dead, vaxed kids. Criminal doesn't cut it, hell, the word EVIL doesn't even come close. We need a new word for what the **** is being done to an entire generation.

----------
We're ****ed. There will be no happy ending here; there is no going back to 'normal.'. There are only bad outcomes and worse outcomes. And we don't get to choose those, either.
Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Frat yeah but the issue with cardiac compromise is that it often does not show up in clinical form for a decade or more.

We killed 60,000 people with Vioxx years ago and it was FIVE YEARS before enough of the compromise (which started with the FIRST DOSE) escalated to the point that we yanked the drug off the market.

Beware thinking that if you don't feel anything at the time you're ok. You might not be and without significant investigatory lab work you will not know. Most of these instances ARE detectable with that work but nobody is doing it at present -- and nobody was during the original trials. That's extremely serious.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Frat
Posts: 7421
Incept: 2009-07-15

NKY
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Yep.

I'm still surprised (but thankful) that I've not seen any kids go down this season on any of the fields yet. Granted, only 1 of 3 of mine are in high school, and Daughter-of-Frat's cohort is right on the age that could previously get the jab. I only know of one of her teammates that got it for sure, and that's sad enough. From the data, though, she might get luckier because she's female. The 80% is downright ****ing scary for boys 12-23. Unconscionable.

----------
We're ****ed. There will be no happy ending here; there is no going back to 'normal.'. There are only bad outcomes and worse outcomes. And we don't get to choose those, either.
Blairkiel
Posts: 1983
Incept: 2009-08-25

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Do I have this right..?

A bunch of folks get the shot and get myocarditis right out of the box,

But....

A bunch more got myocarditis right out of the box and wont know about it for a few years?

Sucks to be my best friend who was proud enough to text me that his family was vaxxed up with three, 23 year old ASU law student being the youngest,..listening to his dad.

Hes a high dollar estate planning attorney with athletes names you would very very much recognize as clients. I keep telling him he needs to get his own affairs in order.
Cynicdeluxe
Posts: 38
Incept: 2020-02-07


Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Frat,

Yeah, he might, but that might not be that great given the potential reproductive organ cancers from them (females) taking the jab.

Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Blairkiel - Not just myocarditis; the AE event rate for cardiac-related is not just one thing, it is all of them.

Endothelial damage to the cardiac arteries could quite-easily turn into a heart attack 5 or 10 years down the road. We do not know but the data was present in the original trials -- there were materially more cardiac events in the drug arm than the placebo arm during the trial, and the trials were very-heavily skewed to healthy people (e.g. neither kids or seniors with known serious pre-existing conditions.)

While that original data was not statistically significant enough to halt the trial standing alone the rate of cardiac events in healthy younger-skewed adults is extremely low to start with. That there was a SKEW in those outcomes during the trial was the SAME sort of data point seen with Vioxx originally in the pre-approval studies.

They did not follow up in either case. IMHO the CORRECT thing to do would have been to extend the trial, enroll a few thousand more people and, before EACH OF THEM got jabbed with either placebo or the drug, pull blood work and check cardiac markers, then do so again a few days after each jab, at two weeks and at one month. If you find anything abnormal in that data you extend the blood work until it either returns to baseline or evidently will not. From this you can quantify what you're seeing.

You will never find what you intentionally do not look for until it kills people.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Jethrodull
Posts: 159
Incept: 2008-02-25

North Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@TG - you indicate that "cardiac damage is sub-clinical for a very, very long time".....are there any tests that one can take to see this damage and give yourself a chance to correct it? Hear a lot about the "full body scans" to detect issues...are these valid?
Mikeyinfl
Posts: 126
Incept: 2021-08-02

FL
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Engineertype

Works for me??? I checked the one above and here's the one directly to the article.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/-daszak....

btw, I saw that Malone posted this morning that NEJM blocked his IP address. First thought - vpn. I mentioned this as I got IP blocked from NIH.gov for "traffic abuse" this past weekend. Odd, since I didn't think I pinged them that much. Was ready to vpn a couple days later, but has since cleared????
Tickerguy
Posts: 177821
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Jethrodull - During the actual stimulating event (e.g. shortly after the jabs), yes. BUT you need a baseline BEFORE the jab to know if the jab was causative for the change in any specific person. If you have no baseline then that you have troponins out of range (for example), which denotes cardiac damage, tells you it happened / is happening but not WHY.

If you have a BASELINE just prior to the jab you now have both the "what" and the "why."

Full-body scans (e.g. CTs) are NOT without risk. That's a radiation exposure and a fairly sizeable one too. I do NOT like the folks who solicit for those on a routine basis (I've gotten those in the mail before); I cannot quantify how the risk stratifies (e.g. for cancer) on those .vs. what may be detected, generating follow-up procedures (at additional significant risk) that turn out to be bull****.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 5  First12345Last