We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males.
VAERS is known to materially under-report adverse events. We do not know what the multiplication factor for these findings is as a consequence of that.
Note that in the context of all prior years this basically never happens statistically. The average over the three previous years associated with any vaccination is four.
Further, an extraordinary level of cardiac adverse events are associated with these jabs. This is not uncommon or "rare" as claimed; there are in fact, as of July 9th, nearly 130,000 such reports for Covid-19 jabs. If we accept the CDC's numbers for the number of Americans jabbed this puts the rate of cardiac adverse events are right around one in a hundred!
What's nasty is that while the myocarditis incidence is skewed heavily toward males under 30 the cardiac incidence is not; it is centered in the 20-70 range, or roughly "right up the middle" for the people in the nation as a whole.
Indeed, given the known under-reporting in VAERS a 1-in-100 incidence for a category of serious adverse events is extraordinarily significant. There is every reason to believe we may be causing cardiac injury to as many as one in 25 people who get these shots!
Whether those injuries spontaneously resolve without permanent compromise or worse, degenerate progression is completely unknown as nobody is following up these individual cases to measure blood levels (e.g. troponins, EKGs, etc.) in an attempt to determine whether these events are transient or result in permanent impairment or worse.
The only way to understand how common myocarditis is after COVID-19 vaccination, is to perform a prospective cohort study where all vaccinated individuals undergo clinical assessment, ECG, and troponin measurement at regular intervals post-administration.
Which is not being done, on purpose.
Incidentally the markers indicating potential trouble were present in the original studies. They were not followed up and the reason for not doing is obvious: It would have prevented issuance of the EUAs on the original desired schedule. As a result the firms involved and the FDA deliberately ignored that signal in the original studies and we have now jabbed somewhere around 200 million Americans -- and may have screwed as many as several million of them with irreversible, or even worse degenerate cardiac damage.
We do not know because we intentionally did not look.
COVID-19 injectable products are novel and have a genetic, pathogenic mechanism of action causing uncontrolled expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells. When you combine this fact with the temporal relationship of AE occurrence and reporting, biological plausibility of cause and effect, and the fact that these data are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical data, it supports a conclusion that the COVID-19 biological products are deterministic for the myocarditis cases observed after injection.
Again, as we knew and as I have documented before these jabs were first released for widespread use -- and again, deliberately ignored.
While this paper describes a specific risk with regard to myocarditis in young people the larger issue of cardiac events must not be ignored. While it is certainly true that it in healthy young people the risk from Covid-19 infection itself is minuscule and thus appears on the data to be outweighed by the risks of the jab even without accounting for incomplete reporting in my opinion the 900lb Gorilla in the china shop does not simply lie there.
Do recall that Vioxx killed 60,000 Americans before we yanked it off the market. There was indication of trouble in the original studies but it was not followed up upon just as it has not been here. It was five years after full approval before that lack of follow-up and study broke through and resulted in the drug being yanked off the market. Cardiac compromise is often "silent" from a symptomatic perspective but usually can be detected through directed lab work if you bother to look. We didn't look with Vioxx and we're not doing it now with these jabs either -- in both cases the data was in the original pre-approval studies.
Many people in their 40s and 50s have incipient, severe cardiac compromise. Decades of eating fast carbohydrates and listening to the talking heads from the FDA and elsewhere on "what to eat" has many such people 50 or more pounds overweight, hypertensive, in many cases Type II diabetic and at serious risk of a heart attack over the next 10 or 20 years. I remind you that cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and kills about 650,000 people every year.
Even a 5% increase in that rate as a result of Covid-19 jabs will kill over 32,000 people annually. If the increase in risk is 10% then we're talking over 60,000 Americans. Given the now-evident requirement to boost every six months or so this means that 60,000 additional deaths is not a one-off; it will occur every single year for as long as we keep doing this stupid thing.
Yes, stupid. The history of every respiratory pandemic is that it turns into an endemic flu and cold-causer within a year or two even without any intervention of any sort. The 1918 pandemic did so, the 1890s pandemic believed to be caused by a beta coronavirus (of the same general family as Covid) did so and so have many, many others. There have been no exceptions recorded.
I am not against vaccination on general principle. Indeed with damn few exceptions they all have decades-long and well-documented safety records. I am very much against a jab that carries this sort of outsized and apparent risk except on a truly-voluntary, fully-informed consent basis which, on the evidence to date, would lead anyone not at specific and identified very high risk to NOT take it.
Allegedly HHS claims we've "avoided" 30,000 deaths by vaccination. What if we have in fact killed just as many -- or even twice as many -- through elevated cardiac disease risk, and will keep doing so every six months to a year into the future for as long as we jam needles full of this crap into arms?
Far-fetched? Hardly. The data supports this possibility now and while infection is not certain the risk, once you take a jab, is.
Stop the slaughter and the mandates that, on the data, are profoundly dangerous.
PS: Want to talk about how the government can materially cut Medicare (and Medicaid, for people in nursing homes with no money) expenses? Give the above some thought.... you have to make it to 65 to collect anything, you know...
PPS: How's that dive looking $MRNA bulls? That's a black hole you're staring into; at least Pfizer has other products.... you don't.