I'm talking about the jabs, of course.
It's neither rare -- or certain.
This much is clear: There are a lot of people lying up and down the line on this.
Severe and fatal reactions are being called "unrelated" when statistically-speaking they almost-certainly are caused. The rate of myocarditis being seen in young people, especially males, is wildly off-the-rack compared with the "natural" rate of those incidents. Myocarditis is never a benign condition and claims that "this time" it won't have lasting effects, including fatal ones, is unproved and will not be proved or disproved for three to five years. The rate of all-cause death being seen in younger cohorts, where death is extremely uncommon to begin with, is very concerning. Dead is dead; why (and whether people lie about the cause) is immaterial to the person who is dead.
Oh, and as for cause on myocarditis? Possibly bad procedure. Of course nobody is using proper IM procedure in the first place, and we've immunized the health care sector with regards to these jabs. Want evidence of that? Here you go -- this was published in Clinical Infectious Diseases in August. When do we hold financially and legally accountable those evil bastards who have known that you first attempt to aspirate with an IM injection so as to know you did not hit a blood vessel, turning your intended IM injection into an IV one! It can be reasonably argued that any health provider who did this wrong committed attempted manslaughter. Want to know how those who got myocarditis got ****ed? Here's clean scientific evidence as to how it may have happened and it sure looks like pure gross negligence caused it.
But while the problems for someone who dies are over, those for people with long-term or permanent compromise as a result of the jabs are another matter. There's a lot of hiding going on here folks. I cannot put data on this as the data is being intentionally concealed and even denied by the people who have it happen to them but what I can tell you is that plenty of people have had it happen, and by now I bet you have someone in your personal circle of acquaintances who has had it happen to them, whether they're admitting it or not.
The list of serious impairments and changes is not limited to myocarditis. There is material evidence of at least short-term immune impairment that may be profound and damned dangerous. In virtually everyone there are latent conditions and infections your body keeps in check. We've known this forever; it is why PCP got people with leukemia and AIDS but almost-never gets a healthy individual. Even temporary suppression of immune response in an apparently-healthy individual may allow those latent conditions to come to the forefront and become severely or even lethally pathological. Zero investigation -- and thus exclusion -- of this possibility was done before these jabs were stuffed in millions of American's arms.
I'm not talking about someone who feels like crap for a day or two or has a sore arm -- I'm talking about serious events that take people out of the game for a week or more, approximately equal to a real Covid-19 infection if it doesn't "get" you, or worse, leave you with permanent impairments.
The reports all over social media and among people who have been jabbed strongly implies that the long-term or even permanent impairment rate is likely somewhere around one in a hundred persons jabbed. That's an utterly ridiculous adverse event rate and in any normal set of circumstances would never be acceptable for anyone with other than a condition that would be terminal if not treated, such as cancer. We already know (because its been leaked by whistleblowers) that hospital and other medical staff are being directly told not to file VAERS reports and, in some cases, threatened with disciplinary action or termination should they violate that mandate. There are also those who refuse to seek medical attention as doing so would conclusively blow up their mental belief, part of the Stockholm Syndrome-style insanity that has gripped the world in the era of Covid, that what they did was "safe and effective."
Never mind the write-up out of Israel that has now proved quite-conclusively that vaccination is worthless to prevent acquisition and propagation of the virus and that personal protection in terms of severe and fatal outcomes has a high probability of being seriously attenuated or even entirely absent within six months. An attack rate of more than 20% of the patients where 95.2% of them were fully vaccinated makes quite clear that even nearly-100% coverage, which can never be achieved, does nothing of value from a standpoint of cutting off infection. It may provide some personal protection against severe infection outcomes, but whether this is a "good bargain" when measured against the risk of permanent impairment from the jab itself is a much tougher call.
The other problem that the Israeli study presents is that one of these cases was a person who had Covid and recovered but then took a single jab. Did that jab destroy their resistance from previous infection? Nobody knows and the data set is too small to draw conclusions, since only one person was in this circumstance. But this is absolutely on the table given the fact that it happened, and if true jabbing people who recovered may well have been a big part of the surge we just took in the summer by turning recovered and immune people back into susceptible ones! What's even worse is that in such a person a severe outcome was astronomically-unlikely in the first place so the "personal protection" argument for getting jabbed appears to have been voided.
What's worse is that of the attacked patients five died including the index, who was vaccinated. These were all older, fairly-morbid people -- but the fact of the matter is that both masking and jabs failed to protect them from a fatal outcome.
all transmissions between patients and staff occurred between masked and vaccinated individuals, as experienced in an outbreak from Finland .
In addition all of the transmission happened with people both wearing PPE and being vaccinated, so the presumption has to be that neither masking or jabs are effective to provide protection and using both in combination does nothing either.
Finally, and perhaps most-damningly, is the presence of evidence, albeit not convincing due to small sample size, in this write-up of severe immune compromise from the jabs that promoted infection severity in the people who got attacked. Why? Right here:
Infection advanced rapidly (many cases became symptomatic within 2 days of exposure), and viral load was high.
This is consistent with other anecdotal reports of jabbed people who get a severe alleged "breakthrough" case go from being entirely-fine to screwed almost-immediately, which is an extreme outlier among the general population exposed, including when exposed to Delta but unvaccinated. I can speak to that with personal knowledge since I and two others were infected by a known index during a time that Delta was the only statistically-important variant circulating and none of us had that sort of "2 days from exposure to you're ****ed" experience.
Between these two -- long-term impairment and the potential to exacerbate the infection if you get hit post-jab there's significant evidence of trouble afoot. Suppression of this data, given the number of people jabbed in the US and the screaming mandate-crazy administration is flat-out nuts, especially with fall and winter coming.
It's entirely possible that we've seen Delta burn through and those who can get it have gotten it for the most part -- in which case fall and winter will be no big deal no matter what we do. But ignoring the signal from what happened in Israel in this situation is unwise as while it may indeed be a one-off if it's not then there's real trouble inbound and our policies and jabfest will have directly caused it. If that turns out to be the case the political and medical people involved, along with all their advocates and "influencers" in the media must all hang for what they will have done.