The Market Ticker
Rss Icon RSS available
Fact: There is no immunity or protection against The Law of Scoreboards.
Did you know: What the media does NOT want you to read is at https://market-ticker.org/nad.
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Comments on The Lie Of 'All Unvaccinated'
User: Not logged on
Top Forum Top Login FAQ Register Clear Cookie
Showing Page 3 of 9  First123456789Last
User Info The Lie Of 'All Unvaccinated' in forum [Market-Ticker-Nad]
Punch_rockgroin
Posts: 3188
Incept: 2008-12-31

Pacific NW USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
nutrivitashop looks like they still have it. I picked up a 1kg bag last month. Think I'm set for a while...

----------
I want to see teeth flying as someone is beaten with a cast iron dildo hidden in a sock.
Ugrev
Posts: 557
Incept: 2010-03-08

Freer state of NC
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
ElI5? I feel out of the loop on what thus means.
Brewmaster
Posts: 53
Incept: 2008-09-08

California
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
NAC?
Ugrev
Posts: 557
Incept: 2010-03-08

Freer state of NC
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Nvm..brain fart.
Had to refer to this and it clicked...
https://www.houstonmethodist.org/coronav....

Frat
Posts: 6924
Incept: 2009-07-15

NKY
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I don't usually send Mrs. Frat the Tickers because she worries enough for all of us, even without the extra knowledge. THIS one... This one she got with the message to just read it. I am extremely concerned for not only her, but all of her coworkers come the *real* cold and flu season. And that means being doubly concerned for those that are vaxed. They're well and truly ****ed.

----------
We're ****ed. Where's Henry Bowman Kyle Rittenhouse when you need him?
Invisiblesun
Posts: 287
Incept: 2020-04-08

Maryland
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Anecdotal, but mother-in-law has been dealing with vasculitis for six months, since when she got jabbed. Covid would likely have done the same damage. The medical community is quick to associate Covid with vascular damage. But not so quick to associate the spike proteins in the vaccine with vascular damage.

The lie that the vaccine is safe and effective is going to hurt a lot of people.
Printlife
Posts: 95
Incept: 2018-05-22

CA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Brewmaster NAC = N Acetyl Cysteine. Recommended for treatment. Recently suppressed by FDA(?) no longer available at Amazon. Trying to make it prescription only. Precursor to glutathione.

Watch medcram #69. Watch medcram in general.
Susanlauren
Posts: 611
Incept: 2021-05-01

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I watched the Cliff High video on USA Watchdog. This man has been correct about a number of things. I now hope he is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG - because he speaks a chilling forecast for the future. Unfortunately, he may be right. And time will tell. These are all kissing cousins and none of them are good news - Antibody Dependent Enhancement, Original Antigen Sin and Viral Enhanced Infection. Cliff is forecasting 2022 as a year of mass die off - tens of millions among those who have been vaxxed soon to be deceased in the United States alone. 1.2 billion around the world. Lord have mercy. I hope this man is wrong in his projections
Rickylc
Posts: 1847
Incept: 2009-02-09

Is Everywhere
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
double-steroid-enhanced fear porn, lol.
Tickerguy
Posts: 177007
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tens of millions would imply a 10-30% fatality rate among those who got jabbed.

Unfortunately that's not crazy when one looks at previous coronavirus vaccination attempts.

I can't put numbers on the risk, although I'd like to be able to -- there's just not enough data to definitively peg VEI as in play at this point. There's a very, very strong suggestion it is, but that doesn't mean its universal in all recipients either, nor does it disprove it.

If dependent not on Covid-19 exposure to be triggered but rather other coronaviruses then its especially nasty as those tend to run in 4-year cycles in the population and typically produce colds. Your BEST CASE scenario there is that as is strongly suggested B-cell induction does not happen, and if that's the case then if you STOP with the damned shots after a year or two your excess risk likely mostly bleeds off.

But evading any possible respiratory virus, lest it kill you, for a year or two? Good luck with that.

My "base case", assuming VEI is in play, isn't as pessimistic as his, simply because you have to get infected with the VEI-causing virus; it's not a certainty by any means. After a year only something like 20% of the US managed to "get" Covid-19, so what's that -- 1 in 5 on an annual basis? The other side of it is that I also can't put a CFR rate on it if you DO get nailed.

Too many plates in the air to even come up with a reasonable guess that I can rationally defend.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Shadowmask
Posts: 669
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The rational play would be to stop all shots now. Instead Pfizer's new formulation will be available in 3 months in time to save the Christmas shopping season!
Erroldo
Posts: 376
Incept: 2013-09-12


Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I did not know about Cliff High until posted here.
Don't know of his credibility, but some truth spoken and some forecasts made.
Forecasts are reallY DAMNING, and should be soon, but listened with open mind and grains of salt to go with it. Vaccines death likely will pile up too high to ignore. Financial issues brewing now to pop, Digital wealth such as stocks, massive fall. mmm. Don t like what he is saying...
It would make Karl's outlook that having physical useful assets(real $$$ in a safe, not numbers in a bank, land, tools and hot=w to use them) the things of real value.
Riceday
Posts: 828
Incept: 2009-10-30

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
While 20% may have gotten actual COVID, a much larger percentage got vaxxed with the potential for enhanced spread given delayed onset of symptoms at a minimum. Not a good situation.
Smooth
Posts: 80
Incept: 2020-03-26

USA
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Karl, You wrote: "Yep @Whossane.

In fact, that's the data thus far. Why? Because in the first 2-4 months it appeared the jabs WERE extremely effective in preventing severe disease. We KNEW they were not sterilizing early on, but then..... oops."
**********************************************************


When I reviewed the Pfizer study that was the basis for the EUA, the only significant findings were that the drug reduced (very modestly) the rate of disease with mild or moderate symptoms -- no significant effect on severe symptoms, hospitalization, or death was observed. Where did you get the info that these drugs were effective in preventing severe disease?

Also, for the law passed in '88 that provided a liability shield for vaccine-makers, shouldn't the vaccines that are shielded be limited to those that would fall under the definition of a "vaccine" AT THE TIME THE LAW WAS PASSED????

IOW one shouldn't be able to retroactively change what a law shields by messing around with definitions after the fact. Otherwise a creative entity could change the definition of******to mean grabbing a woman's breast or other body part, and start charging people accordingly (an extreme analogy but you get the point).
Tickerguy
Posts: 177007
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Smooth - PRE-EUA the "studies" that were submitted, approved and run had as their endpoint symptomatic disease. That's it. Of course severe outcome is A SUBSET of "symptomatic disease"; if you never get the former you don't get a severe outcome or death either.

So yes, the EUA studies said it did that. For four months.

What the studies DIDN'T say, because they never powered it sufficiently to do it NOR did they do surveillance testing on BOTH GROUPS, was whether it had ANY statistical impact on getting Covid-19 or being able to give it to others, that is, shed it. That COULD have been determined. Further, if they had not unblinded the study the decay and subsequent failure of the vaccines to deliver protection two months later would have been uncovered BY FEBURARY, BEFORE WE MASS-JABBED THE PUBLIC!

But -- they didn't do that, did they?

All of that was intentional.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Maddmaxx
Posts: 234
Incept: 2021-05-31


Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Smooth in the criminal law arena there are constitutional protections against ex post facto laws (you can't pass a law making prior conduct illegal). As for the liability shield, that's an interesting argument. If this goes bad, I wouldn't be surprised to see that argument raised.
Kareninca
Posts: 389
Incept: 2011-08-23

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
My husband was vaccined (Moderna) in April. I gave him information about the hazards, but he thought it was the best choice for him. To be honest it probably was the best choice at that time, since he is obese and sedentary and has no intention of changing either condition. He had no apparent reaction to it, but of course that doesn't mean much in the long term.

Anyway, he was raised by an Italian-Polish American mother who never let a single germ into the house. So he always, always catches everything. He gets something like the flu at least once a month and has for many years. He has great genes, otherwise he'd probably be dead already.

The vaccination did not increase or decrease the frequency of his flu experiences (which aren't covid; he's had several tests since the pandemic started). But starting in mid-July I have been giving him prophylactic Ivermectin. He hasn't been sick since!!! I know that six weeks doesn't sound like a long time, but it is for him for not getting sick.

I wonder, since Ivermectin is an antiviral, if it might help people who are getting other viral ailments. If I were paranoid I would say that that is an additional reason why they are now making it hard to get Ivermectin.
Cosmicpatriot
Posts: 3
Incept: 2021-07-30

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The lying bunch of liars at my company actually had the audacity to claim that it is perfectly clear that natural immunity isn't enough to protect you and that you must get vaccinated to experience full protection. I'm looking for the exit.
Gonavybeatarmy
Posts: 30
Incept: 2021-05-21

Calgary, Alberta
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
She called me on the phone a few minutes ago and threatened to kick me out of the house if I didn't get a third jab when the time comes.


Why would you want to stay married to a shrew like this? Tell her to get out instead. Continue to sleep in the same bed, make her adjust.
Gonavybeatarmy
Posts: 30
Incept: 2021-05-21

Calgary, Alberta
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Also, looks like Israel is going to be the bellwether for this. Winter is coming, kids.

https://voxday.net/2021/09/08/a-pandemic....
Tickerguy
Posts: 177007
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The Federal Government and the vaccine makers deliberately destroyed the ability to detect the failure that is now evident by unblinding the original study groups as soon as the EUAs were issued, giving all the placebo people jabs.

Had they not done that, since most of the people in the study were young and reasonably healthy we would have known, conclusively, since by February a ****-ton of vaccinated people in said group would have been infected, and the delta between vaccinated and placebo would have been closing in a statistically-valid manner.

By unblinding the study they destroyed the ability to detect the failure BEFORE we mass-vaccinated people -- the only people who had been jabbed by that time were the very old and morbid.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Wayiwalk
Posts: 207
Incept: 2016-11-09

New Yersey
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Faux-she is telling another one of his patented half truths/half lies when he comments about the football stadiums "I don't think it's smart".

The ****er knows that college populations are mostly all vaccinated because colleges require it, and they make up a huge part of the stadium attendees. Face-crap, Insta**** and Snapcrap took all the propaganda to those kids and they are went with it willingly. "Vaccinated or no attendance".

So, looking at a stadium filled with people all on top of each other, he is sharing the half truth on what he already is aware of - the people who are vaccinated are at grave risks due to being vaccinated and now being vulnerable to other coronaviruses.

Anyway, that is the way crazy me looks at it. The guy has been telling lies better than Goebbels, while playing doctor advisor in a way that would make Mengele blush.

He knows it.

The guy is sick.

He's a Half Truther.

----------
The Lockdowns Will Continue Until the Morale Improves!

I keep thinking, "it can't get any worse" and then it does!
Wayiwalk
Posts: 207
Incept: 2016-11-09

New Yersey
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I meant to add to my post - I am deeply disturbed by this....because this is really truly disturbing. Talk about getting lead to a boxcar for a train ride to a camp.

As I shared with a friend - I now have something completely in common with Joe Biden. We are both thinking the same thought:

"I don't know what to do"

----------
The Lockdowns Will Continue Until the Morale Improves!

I keep thinking, "it can't get any worse" and then it does!
Inspectrcalahan
Posts: 76
Incept: 2021-01-15

East Central MS.
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Ok , looked on Amazon and they had NAC in at least 3 different formulations. What is best to use ? NAC is about the only thing I dont have inventory on. But maybe it is time.
Imhotep
Posts: 106
Incept: 2013-07-18

United States
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Inspectrcalahan

I believe Amazon took NAC off their site months ago...not sure what you are seeing, but last I looked, they didn't sell it any longer.

Luckily, I bought a good bit middle of last year. Other sites on the www offer it, but many places are out of stock from what I just saw earlier today.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 3 of 9  First123456789Last