Plenty of people have tried to discredit "hesitancy" with the Covid shots.
Calling people "uneducated hicks" and similar slurs is unlikely to lead anyone to believe those pushing the shots, of course.
Never mind the other lies.
Oh yes, lies.
The CDC famously testified before Congress that a mask was better than a vaccine in September of 2020. Had that been true there would have been no winter surge; compliance rates were higher than vaccine herd immunity requirements by far in basically every part of the nation. Yet the surge happened. The claim was false and there was zero accountability for that lie despite being an act of perjury and the hundreds of thousands of corpses generated by it.
That wasn't the only false claim. Psaki falsely claimed the other day the shots were "approved" by the FDA. Nope. They have EUAs, but not approvals. Yes, the makers want approvals (obviously) but the President, through his spokesperson, directly lied.
How about Remdesivir? Claimed to help. Debunked in a very large trial ("RECOVERY"), peer-reviewed, found worthless. Then another study that found it worse than worthless; this one found it actually doubled the time in-hospital and provided no survival benefit. Gee, you don't think the hospitals would love that, do you? No wonder it hasn't been pulled off the market by the FDA and Biden hasn't demanded it be thrown in the trash! Never mind the $3,000 price tag. In any honest world continuing to use a drug that doubled the time during which you were seriously ill and was worthless toward enhancing survival would get the drugmaker and everyone involved in using it thrown in prison for both felony assault and grand theft!
We've been told everyone is highly-susceptible to Covid. False. We knew this conclusively in March of 2020 after Diamond Princess. We discovered why in June, scientifically, and it was peer reviewed a couple of months later and published in Nature. 80% of the population never was highly susceptible. That's why the entire crew and passenger manifest on Diamond Princess didn't get deathly ill. This doesn't mean you can't get it, any more than it means you can't get a coronavirus-caused cold if you had one before. You can because the virus mutates and your immunity is not perfect. But it does mean that only a small percentage of the population was ever highly-susceptible to severe disease. The bad news is that there's no reasonable way to know if you're in the 20% or the 80% as a "starting point" for personal risk assessment since testing for is slow, expensive and nobody has been doing it on a mass basis -- nor will they.
Incidentally if you take the alleged "SEIR" models published all over the place which claimed 2 million corpses would occur in the US, all of which presume everyone is 100% susceptible with no pre-existing resistance and divide by five you get..... just about the number of people who got turned into corpses. This is a very inconvenient mathematical fact because it proves all the mitigations were either worthless or harmful. Isn't it interesting that elementary school arithmetic is studiously ignored? Gee, I wonder why?
We've been told the shots were fully and extensively tested. That's a lie. There's a slide in the FDA slide deck that was "fast-skipped" through, on the screen for less than 2 seconds. It lays forth a whole plethora of risks that are unknowns and the studies were underpowered on both time and people to catch them. Again, we've been lied to.
It is a fact that a coronavirus has never been successfully vaccinated against in the past. This is not singular in terms of viral family. RSV has never been successfully vaccinated against and neither has HIV. Infamously, fraud was committed in a study of the latter; gp41. A prison sentence resulted from that. This isn't the only failure; another trial blew up in 2020. Do remember that Fauci has promised us an HIV vaccine for nearly 40 years. None has been forthcoming; the either didn't work or caused serious problems.
These trials have taken years to detonate in people's faces. Not all cause harm; some just prove worthless.
But some have caused harm and it has frequently taken years to find out.
This isn't just limited to vaccines. As I pointed out Vioxx was given full approval. It took five years beyond that point before the fact it was killing people in size was recognized and it was pulled from the market. 60,000 additional Americans had fatal heart attacks.
A drug is typically designed to have a relatively short half-life in the human body before it is broken down and eliminated. A vaccine, on the other hand, is designed to produce a durable response that remains in the body for years, decades or a lifetime. The reason it takes 10 to 20 years to qualify a vaccine is that once you take it you can't un-take it and the risk is, in many cases, life-long. As such you need to follow trial subjects for a very long time, and in detail, to make sure you didn't screw them up. In short mistakes are intolerable in the realm of vaccines, far more-so than with common drugs.
From the data we had prior to the rollout I pointed out that there were very serious concerns of not only failure due to viral mutation, making the shots basically worthless or even enhancing a future infection, but in addition there were markers of serious harm that were not being looked into. The most-serious of these was the fact that the spike protein standing alone, along with the S1 subunit standing alone, were identified as likely to be harmful in humans -- yet all the vaccines being developed at the time caused your body to produce exactly that. Rather than investigate this fully before proceeding it was glossed over.
As just one example show me the data in a small group for d-Dimer and troponins in vaccine recipients both before and after the shot. That's a pair of markers for the very-specific risk of clotting disorders and cardiomylitis. 200 people, 100 controls and 100 get jabbed, d-Dimer and troponins pulled before and then on one-week intervals for two months. Simple lab blood test; they run about $10 each at retail; the cost to run them between reagents and staff time is typically $5-6. Where is it, given the reported cardiomylitis incidents and the allegedly "not connected" heart attacks and strokes? This association could be moved into the "extremely unlikely to be caused" bin very easily and at low cost -- it hasn't been. It is only reasonable to conclude that they're not looking on purpose; they know damn well that if you find a statistically-valid signal in a small group like that the game is over and the shots not only have to be pulled a whole lot of people's heads get served up on plates.
Given that do you believe the adverse effects are rare -- and less-likely than the virus is to seriously injure or kill you? That depends on how morbid you are. But if you're healthy then even on the data that is trivially available to the public the answer is conclusively no -- remember that if you get take the stab you're guaranteed the risk where you are not guaranteed to be infected. I was personally exposed well over a dozen times during the last year and didn't get the 'Ro; I know I didn't get it, even with a low or no-symptom infection because I had antibody tests and checked every couple of months. I did use nutritional prophylaxis -- and will continue to. Why not, when it's zero risk and nearly zero cost?
There was also a mechanistic concern raised early on with potential protein "misfolding" and the possibility, however remote, of causing prion-type disease. There's no good way to conclusively eliminate that risk other than moderate-sized samples of volunteers and a year or more of time with close study of all of them. Finding volunteers with true and full disclosure could be problematic; who would volunteer if they knew one of the risks being excluded are Parkinson's, ALS and Alzheimer's, never mind CJD which is invariably fatal. How strong is this evidence? Not very at this point but any risk of this sort is unacceptable and the burden of proof is on the person proposing the mass-use therapy or prophylaxis, not the other way around.
Oh, on that note -- what changed in a part of Canada that suddenly, starting in March, a cluster of cases of this sort showed up? We didn't change anything in how people live starting early this year both in the US and Canada, did we? Is not the reasonable first-level presumption that this may well be the cause?
Now we have a new chorus in the media -- those who got the shot won't get seriously sick and die, the rest will.
That's bull**** and everyone with more than 2 firing neurons in their head knows it.
Never mind the evidence from other nations with very high vaccination rates -- and vertical Covid-19 case counts that occurred after vaccination and in many cases are still occurring. The evidence is especially damning in Israel and England because both are socialist medical systems and thus have all the data on everyone. But it's not confined to those two nations; Malta has taken a monster spike, and, sadly -- so has India shortly after they started mass-stabbing people. Except..... notice how India disappeared out of the press? Why? Their case rate has collapsed by nearly 90% yet they have managed to vaccinate only 6% of their population! Oops -- looks like jabs don't actually do anything to change the trajectory; there are other factors involved.
In short the evidence is piling up fast that the jabs don't work and, if that becomes evident here (and odds are it will; witness the "fully vaccinated" Texas delegation that just got hit) what little remains of the CDC's, FDA's and NIH's reputation, never mind all the local medical folks and screaming harpies in the media, will almost-certainly be binned and the dumpster into which they're deposited set on fire.
If you believe the CDC then 33 million, roughly, Americans have been confirmed infected with Covid-19. More to the point the CDC says that somewhere between 6 and 24 people (best guess 11) have had the virus for each reported case. The median, of course, means everyone had it and we know that's false. But even at the lower boundary 200 million Americans are presumed previously infected. The data coming from both the NHS and Israel is that prior infection is 6-7 times as good at preventing a new infection as a vaccine; ergo, giving a vaccine to someone who has previously been infected is stupid, and that applies to the majority of people in the US whether they know they had the virus or not.
Then there's the fact that if you have no underlying illness, and we know what they are -- they're listed on the NYC Coroner's pages -- you are not at material risk at all. The variation is astounding.
What is the most-common morbidity? Obesity.
You've had 16 months to get rid of the extra 100 lbs. A 500 calorie deficit a day would do it, and that is entirely within anyone's capability.
If you didn't do it, who's fault and responsibility is that?
You've known damn well that this virus is dangerous if you've got these conditions and most of them occur due to personal choice. Not all, to be sure, but most. That's a fact. It's also a fact that you can alleviate or even remove many of them given a year's time, which you had.
So what's the answer instead?
Take a potentially-dangerous jab instead of not eating pasta and bread so you can continue to be a fat-ass?
Well, time's up folks. Yeah, it's summer. But I see data that tells me that you've likely been had with these stabs. You've also been told there's no means available to interdict an infection and mitigate it; that's a lie. Virtually everyone, for example, that has died of this virus and was tested was severely Vitamin D deficient. Does this mean not being so would have prevented it? No. But it's cheap, it's easy, and it has no real risk to resolve that via nothing more than a soft-gel with your morning coffee.
So why didn't we strongly recommend that when it had no potential for harm and plenty of potential for good? There are other possibly-effective personal mitigations -- some nutritional and some in the pharmaceutical cabinet which we've all been told are "misinformation" despite dozens of scientific studies showing that they do, in fact, work.
Let's not kid ourselves. If the media and "public health" people are telling the truth about Delta being as transmissible as claimed there is no way to reach a vaccination level that will suppress it. There are actually people claiming it has an R0 equal or even greater than measles. This is probably a lie, but the problem with lies such as this is that they preclude solutions you then put forward as you'll never get there. In short we have what I pointed out originally: You either had Covid now or will get it, like it or not. It is as certain as winter.
Further, if Delta arose it won't be the last one. Worse, we now know, conclusively that these vaccines are not sterilizing, which means every vaccinated person is a viral mutation factory and won't know they have it in many cases. We also know it does not block transmission, as was just demonstrated on the HMS Queen Elizabeth and in the Texas Delegation.
You cannot out-vaccinate a mutating virus; the reason is quite simple as the virus passes through people and mutates faster than you can modify vaccination formulas. I warned early on that the use of non-sterilizing vaccines was known dangerous back when IPV came out for Polio and is why Sabin's OPV formula, which is sterilizing, was universally used in conjunction with IPV in the US until polio was no longer circulating here. In fact we kept using OPV in the United States for another 20 years after the nation was declared polio-free. Why? Because not doing so -- using non-sterilizing IPV alone when polio was still circulating in the population -- was damned dangerous as it placed evolutionary pressure on the virus that could cause more disease rather than less and we knew it.
There are no sterilizing Covid-19 vaccines and no evidence we can develop one. The manufacturers admitted their trials were not intended to prove that originally but now we have the data and zero of the shots produce sterilizing immunity. That's scientific fact at this point.
Every single one of these jackasses at the CDC, NIH and FDA knew what they were doing was dangerous as Hell and did it anyway. All of it was and remains intentional. What is likely to come from that stupidity, which you sat back and not only allowed but in many cases cheered on, you deserve. You could have told every single one of the jackwads involved to stuff it and meant it but you didn't. That was stupid and if you win a stupid prize for your acts of stupidity then so be it.
In short we have no choice but to drop the bull**** and accept that we have to live with Covid-19. It will never go away. It has become an endemic virus like the cold or flu viruses and will be with us forever. In addition eradication was always doomed to fail because it has animal reservoirs, specifically at least cats and ferrets.
We have no choice in this matter.
Within a very short period of time if Delta is what they claim in terms of infectivity you're going to see a dramatic shift here as we have in Britain and Israel. The data from Israel says natural infection is 6-7x as effective in preventing a future infection as the jab. The virus will shortly run out of non-jabbed people to infect and the vax-vs-nonvax numbers showing up in the ER will shift dramatically. The bad news is that those who got a "hidden" adverse effect, especially thrombosis of any sort, are at a very high risk of getting monkey-hammered if and when their immunity fails and they get infected anyway because that pre-existing damage will be synergistic with the virus effects.
Lockdowns, masks and mass-jabs will not solve the problem and in fact will make it worse due to the adverse effects. For the healthy 18 year old who is screwed by cardiomylitis what do you tell him or her? They were at an effective zero risk of death in the first place; the number harmed by the shots in that cohort exceeds the number saved. Jabbing such people is an unconscionable evil, and this presumes the risks are confined to what we know which is almost certainly not the case, and that evasion by the virus never occurs, which is ridiculously improbable.
Good luck folks.
Oh, yeah, that flag I was talking about.
No, not the American one you burned when you didn't' revolt immediately as soon as they started with their lockdown bull**** which, I remind you, did nothing.
This one. The one I hope I'm wrong with this time because if I'm right hundreds of thousands or even a few million Americans are going to be severely and permanently harmed or die, and many of them will be young and otherwise healthy. It won't be Covid that gets them either -- it will be their own or their parent's stupidity.