A Chinese Communist Party military scientist who got funding from the National Institutes of Health filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine in February last year — raising fears the shot was being studied even before the pandemic became public, according to a new report.
Zhou Yusen, a decorated military scientist for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who worked alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology as well as US scientists, filed a patent on Feb. 24 2020, according to documents obtained by The Australian.
So what do we now know?
- China's military was in fact involved at the Wuhan lab. It was not just a civilian operation. This, by the way, has been repeatedly denied over the last year and change.
- The lab's scientists knew not only the sequencing of the virus but in addition had a patentable way to create an alleged vaccine before the pandemic was public. It takes time to draft patents and figure them out. Quite a lot of time, in fact -- not a couple weeks or months.
- The PLA, China's military, did file said patent with Zhou's name on it.
- It takes time to prove up patent material, including in the case of a vaccine. To patent something you must be able to demonstrate it; you cannot patent ideas, only embodiments of ideas. In that case you would have to prove immunogenicity which isn't instantaneous; it takes weeks or even months to get through original science on this with animals and then humans, which means the date of knowledge was not February 24th it was months or even further before that.
- That means they were working on this even before that time because to work on a vaccine you have to know you must or would want to work on it in the first place. This in turn means they knew damn well there was a virulent virus in the wild prior to that date, or they released it or intended to release it into the wild on purpose. Nobody comes up with a vaccine for a virus you intend to and have confined entirely within a laboratory in animal or cell culture testing; that's worthless. Without an isolate to create a vaccine for and a virus outside of a lab environment where vaccination becomes a "thing" that might be required and thus have value why would you do the work to create one?
What's the timeline on all this? Many, many months or even a couple of years.
That means either the virus was "out" for many months to a couple of years before February of 2020 (not a month or two) or the Chinese intended to release it in the fall of 2019. In either case the evidence is now overwhelming that this was not a virus that "magically appeared" one fine day in late December having come naturally from bats and perhaps pangolins. That is not just improbable anymore -- it is now, on the manifest weight of the evidence, impossible.
Further, the person who filed the patent died under "mysterious circumstances." Gee, I wonder why?
Let me guess -- did he shoot himself in the back of the head twice?
Next up is exactly what sort of vaccine patent we're talking about here?
Specifically how is it that the "stiffened" areas in the viral vector and mRNA shots we're using in the US came to be known and proved up? How did Moderna and Pfizer know they needed to do that? That sort of study takes months if not years too, not days or weeks, to both come up with it and then prove it actually works as expected.
Remember that Covid-19 has a rather-unique site on the spike called the "furin-cleavage" area which it uses to "fold" and get into the cell; the S1 unit attaches, the cleavage area "folds" and then the second part penetrates the cell wall like a spear. SARS and MERS both lack this structure so there was no "prior art" to use and in the first couple of months the characterizing of all of this was pretty darn new.
Yet the "official story" is that these folks had a proposed candidate configuration, including the replacement of encodings to "stiffen" that area within days of the publication of the viral RNA sequence for Covid-19.
Is the completed work in that area what the Chinese "gave" us complete with that part of the work already done? That would explain how it happened that quickly, wouldn't it? I'd sure like to understand how someone -- anyone -- does that sort of work complete with the lab verification in cell cultures and animals, reachig those conclusions in days.
What are the connections there? I'd like a full explanation of that please.
Oh wait -- the manufacturers didn't bother with all of making sure it worked as expected, did they? Nope! It sort of works as expected. Yes, the shots produce antibodies -- lots of them. But they also cluster in multiple organs where we were told it would not; we were told it would remain in the deltoid muscle where the injection was delivered. That it remained in the muscle was false; the science was not done and it appears we were just told it would do so without evidence. Now, due to a leaked document out of Japan we know the shots do not stay where intended and they bioaccumulate in other places, including the ovaries and spleen and yet this, which was a direct contravention of the predicate upon which the EUAs issued did not lead to immediate revocation. Oh no, the FDA doesn't care when claims about where it is contained to in the body turn out to be false!
We further know the spike protein itself is pathogenic via multiple studies despite the CDC claiming otherwise and that said spike also shows up all over the body after vaccination. We were also told that didn't happen; quite clearly that science was not done either as the first hint of trouble was in September of 2020 and then from December forward -- the claim was thus either a lie by omission (heh, "Warp Speed!") and lack of work or it was an intentional and malicious, knowing lie. Again the FDA relied on that representation, we now know it was false and yet the EUAs, once again, were not withdrawn.
Which is it folks -- haste or fraud? And from a standpoint of yanking the EUAs -- does it matter? False is false; why only goes to the issue of punishment for the falsehood, not the required corrective action when discovered. I'm entirely willing to believe haste as opposed to deliberate deception but it doesn't matter in terms of leaving the damned things out there without going back and forcing proof that the contradictions do not turn into harms!
WHERE IS THE CORRECTIVE ACTION?
And further, we now have clinical evidence that the significant adverse event rate (SAR) is wildly higher than being stated, and may be as high as a few percent, or few per hundred, not the few per hundred thousand being claimed. Exactly what is the REAL serious adverse event rate? We do not know because VAERS is a voluntary system and there is no systematic surveillance on people who get jabbed. Without either mandatory reporting or systematic surveillance there is no way to get an accurate number; all you generate is a hypothesis, and boy, has VAERS done that with over 4,000 reports of associated death against 20-odd for the flu vaccine over the last 12 months.
Fauci either knew or should have known that the CCP and his "trusted colleagues" were lying.
Then again lying is all he's done since this started, as his emails have now proved. Hell, he even said directly what I've pointed out for months -- viruses are simply too small to be caught by common masks; they go right through.
Do you believe anything else the CDC, NIH or your state health departments tell you?
Every one of the persons, individually, promulgating these lies must be held to both civil and criminal account.
Even if you have health insurance if you get one of those significant adverse events you are on the hook for your deductible and out-of-pocket maximum, and if the problem continues across more than a year you get to pay it again and again, perhaps forevermore.
This assumes, of course, that the damage isn't permanent -- and it might be.
Once someone lies to your face about something important you're nuts to believe anything else they tell you.
Oh by the way, did Fauxi (sic) know any or all of this? If he did, is that treason? You know, actual treason?
PS: IMHO, a good start -- Revoke China's MFN status and freeze all of the CUSIPs for US Treasuries and all US firms and other US entities owned by any Chinese national, firm or the government. Revoke all student and non-resident visas. Impose full currency, wage and environmental parity tariffs on all products and services coming from China, directly or indirectly. Contemplate derivative sanctions on nations that refuse to follow suit. Do it now and mean it. Whether this was intentional in release is no longer the gating factor; that it was intentionally concealed and the Chinese military was involved is now conclusively demonstrated by that patent filing. That's enough, standing alone. War can be declared in multiple ways; shooting is not always involved and China has done so.