Thanks For The Labels
The Market Ticker - Canceled - What 'They' Don't Want Published
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-05-31 10:08 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 918 references Ignore this thread
Thanks For The Labels
[Comments enabled]

One of the latest bits of insanity: Dating apps are allegedly asking if you've taken the Covid stab and displaying a "badge" if you have.

I haven't verified this personally since I have no use for such things, but it's allegedly either there or being rolled out.

To which, if I was single and younger, especially of potential child-siring age, I'd say "thanks for the warning."

Indeed, the malicious (or shall we say, "predatory") men out there just got fair warning of who is a **** 'em and leave "fun" date.  Took the stab?  You're off the marriage-potential list permanently.  Why?  Potential life-long medical complications, that's why.  Do I want to marry someone who may have given themselves an auto-immune disease three or five years down the road?  Oh Hell No.  But if she's cute, well, the bed awaits -- for now.  When Lupus or similar "screw you" lifetime medical issues make their appearance she can enjoy the company of her cats -- that wasn't a random chance thing we all are forced to face as adults and is always part of the deal it was self-inflicted stupidity and her other half didn't get a vote.

Never mind the rather clear problem that is presented to anyone (of either sex) contemplating a permanent relationship with someone who is willing to stab themselves with an experimental drug.  There's a legitimate reason to do it, by the way: You already know you're at very high risk of a respiratory virus killing you, so despite the unknowns the math pencils out.  Ok, thanks for the warning again; you aren't in good health and don't expect to remain that way.  Is that person marriage and child-raising material?  Naw, but a **** is all good.

Then there's those who can be bribed cheap -- you know, with a donut, or a lottery ticket?  That's great marriage material too, right?  I mean, let's face facts: A healthy 20-something person has a statistical zero risk of being killed by Covid and half of them probably already had it and may not even know so they didn't take the shot to protect their own health after careful deliberation and an antibody test first, right?  How does this relate to long-term relationships?  Simple: There's always some ******* who is richer, no matter how much you have and she just branded herself as willing to sell her future cheap.  VERY cheap.  Thanks for the warning; it's a hell of a lot better for a guy to conclusively find this out before he needs a divorce lawyer!  Make sure the rubbers stay in your wallet so she can't "pin" them before use and for the love of God flush the damn thing after you're done so she can't fish it out of the trash can!

It's even worse from the male future family evaluation side.  Some guys do want families.  Was there permanent damage done to that capability in terms of bearing kids?  We know that those nice mRNA shots show up in the ovaries.  Oh, chick-a-dee didn't know that before rolling up her sleeve?  Well, that's what haste gets you -- not bothering to wait for the science to figure it out.  I have no idea and neither does she if that's a problem but she took the stab voluntarily.  So about that willingness to have said family and put your relationship in front of preening around virtue-signaling on Instabitch and Facesucker, eh?  Maybe that will all work out ok, but it seems to me that by the time we will know with reasonable certainty the window will be closed on the baby factory as only high-risk (for both woman and child) and maybe even IVF, if any, pregnancies will be possible.  Again: No thanks; I'll take the woman who didn't deliberately risk permanent compromise of her reproductive capacity so she could get into Lollapalooza.

But -- that doesn't mean that when the "hot" is there you can't enjoy it for a while.

I don't think young women have any idea what they did to themselves here and the "social ****ing" apps just made the selection process even easier.  Yeah, advertising you got stabbed will get you plenty of dick but none of it will want to stick around.  Have fun on the cock rollercoaster ladies.

By the time they figure it out their sexual market value will be in the toilet and their hole will look like someone ran a train through it -- because they will have basically allowed a whole bunch of men to do exactly that.

Congratulations, fools, and the best part of it is that some of you actually pay to use those apps.

Happy ****ing.

Go to responses (registration required to post)
 

 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 2  First12Last
User Info Thanks For The Labels in forum [Market-Ticker-Nad]
Maurevel
Posts: 834
Incept: 2009-06-14

Canada
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This site was already my first read of the day and the best info & commentary around. Then it got even better with this section.

Cmoledor
Posts: 67
Incept: 2021-04-13

Akron Ohio
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Lmao!!!!! The cock roller coaster!!! You are a master of words good sir!!!! Im dying here!!!

----------
The whole world is one big ****ing scam
Shadowmask
Posts: 36
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tard shot status is a boon to online dating. First of all, assuming everyone is honest, there will be no mixed-tard couples. What a great way to sort out the losers!

Women should NEVER date a tard. Never ever. All of the reasons listed above are valid for women too: chronic health problems are expensive, mentally draining, and guess who gets to pick up all the slack? It's hard to mow the grass and repair the house after a stroke or when half of his lung capacity is shot. Fun retirement travel? Forget it. Taking the grandkids to the beach? Hell no.

The economic argument tracks for women too. Sticking yourself to a financial idiot is volunteering to eat cat food and work until noon the day of your funeral.

Here's where the difference between men and women comes into play: Women want a man who will protect them (and their children). Tard shot status advertises this is NOT a man who will. He is a physical and moral coward. He's such a ****ing pussy he's scared of a virus with a 99.97% survival rate! These are the same *******s who wore masks outside.

Think a cuck like this will protect you, ladies? He's more likely to shove you between him and danger and leave you to die. Date a tard and deal with a sick, soy, manbaby.
Abelardlindsey
Posts: 225
Incept: 2021-03-26

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
It's called riding the cock carousal.
Tickerguy
Posts: 174310
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
If it's a carousel instead of a rollercoaster then whoever has the cock sucks at using it.

If you're gonna ride one at least make it worthwhile. smiley

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Susanlauren
Posts: 152
Incept: 2021-05-01

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Umm Karl. You are forgetting something.

Vaccine shedding (or more accurately, spiked protein shedding) No one knows if the vaxxed shed spiked protein - how much and for how long and the consequences. There are a considerable number of ancedotes of women who have not been vaccinated developing abnormal bleeding and menstrual cycle issues just by being around women who have been vaxxed.

For the men here (which I think is a good percentage of the posters): is a roll in the hay and a night out on the town really worth finding out if the spiked protein in a vaxxed woman can adversely affect your fertility?

Some friendly advice: If I were you, I would be very careful about where I put my penis. Just saying. And if I were married and my husband went off and got jabbed, well that would be the end of sex as we once knew it and it would probably be the basis for an upcoming divorce.
Tickerguy
Posts: 174310
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
That's true -- as far as I know we do not have animal studies on whether it has affinity for the testes, as we know it does for the ovaries. It is probably reasonable to assume it does.

This is not particularly novel either; mumps, if you got it after puberty, had a nasty habit of rendering you sterile which is actually the best argument for vaccinating kids against it since mumps ITSELF isn't really all that dangerous of a disease.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Abelardlindsey
Posts: 225
Incept: 2021-03-26

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
For the men here (which I think is a good percentage of the posters): is a roll in the hay and a night out on the town really worth finding out if the spiked protein in a vaxxed woman can adversely affect your fertility?

Some friendly advice: If I were you, I would be very careful about where I put my penis. Just saying. And if I were married and my husband went off and got jabbed, well that would be the end of sex as we once knew it and it would probably be the basis for an upcoming divorce.


Not to mention all of the STD's out there these days. Of course any STD will be worse in immune compromised individuals. So you get both the spike protein and an STD. What a combo!
Asimov
Posts: 127002
Incept: 2007-08-26

East Tennessee
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
as far as I know we do not have animal studies on whether it has affinity for the testes, as we know it does for the ovaries.


There was concern and reports out of china early on that covid was affecting the testes. There was even concern that it would cause sterility. Then the reports went away and we've not heard anything since. I bring this up every time the chance presents itself.

----------
It's justifiably immoral to deal morally with an immoral entity.

Festina lente.
Early_retirement
Posts: 4168
Incept: 2007-06-26

New England
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Hopefully the vaccine makes everyone who takes it sterile - true Darwin Award ****
Tsherry
Posts: 5882
Incept: 2008-12-09

Spokane WA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Own-goal actions result in a hat trick for MGTOW.
Jc3
Posts: 146
Incept: 2020-03-02

South Texas 93 miles from Houston
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Shadowmask: thanks for the Quote of the Day:

"Sticking yourself to a financial idiot is volunteering to eat cat food and work until noon the day of your funeral."

JP nails it. Do not consume beverages while watching. You can skip his sales pitch at the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_kwFKAm....

Reason: Added missed content
Susanlauren
Posts: 152
Incept: 2021-05-01

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Jc3. That UTube video posting was beyond hilarious. Thank you for sharing. The "do not consume beverages while watching" alert is well advised. Are we taking bets as to how long this remains posted before being taken down?

@Abelardlindsey. At this point, sexually transmitted diseases are the least of the worry. Yes, a compromised immune system will make things worse but at least there are treatments available for STDs You can't undo the death jab (that we know).
Heartlander
Posts: 178
Incept: 2021-02-25

Kansas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I love this site, DEPEND on it, link it everywhere, and even have a custom-made bumper sticker advertising it on the back of my car.

But the idea of having sex with someone you have zero intention of committing to -- when even the most effective contraception (including tubal ligation, yes, that is a fact) can fail to prevent pregnancy, so ANY act of heterosexual intercourse has the POTENTIAL to create a new human being, an individual with all the same human rights as you, including the right to know his/her own mother and father -- is sad and ugly.
Heartlander
Posts: 178
Incept: 2021-02-25

Kansas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Tickerguy

Dr. Roger Hodgkinson, a very solid guy, says that the testes are exceptionally rich in ACE-2 receptors, therefore if spike protein gets in there, it means permanent male sterility.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/23/an-....
Tickerguy
Posts: 174310
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
There's a worse nightmare scenario but it requires two highly-improbable (but not impossible, and one of them was just proved possible) events in a row to happen. Let's hope it doesn't.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Heartlander
Posts: 178
Incept: 2021-02-25

Kansas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Tickerguy

OK, you've got me curious now. I must've missed something earlier. What two improbable events are you referring to?
Asimov
Posts: 127002
Incept: 2007-08-26

East Tennessee
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Infectious sterility.

----------
It's justifiably immoral to deal morally with an immoral entity.

Festina lente.
Heartlander
Posts: 178
Incept: 2021-02-25

Kansas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
So, to sum up, we have three things that together could give us a "Children of Men" scenario:

Infertilty, part 1: PLACENTA
https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/h....

Infertility, part 2: TESTES
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/23/an-....

Infertility, part 3: OVARIES
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3963....

We are so completely, utterly screwed. They are ghouls, the people who did this to us.

And I just have to point out: Not everyone who got the vax did it for selfish reasons. Many, many people got it because they were lied to and believed that they were doing it to protect their vulnerable loved ones, friends, clients and coworkers. The ghouls pushing this on us KNOW that most people are decent and caring, and they USED that against us.
Shadowmask
Posts: 36
Incept: 2021-05-24

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Infertility only for the productive class. Those are the folks getting the jab because they're SUPPOSED to.

The parasites will continue to breed unabated.
Tickerguy
Posts: 174310
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
No, it's worse.

There was a theory on this I was aware of but had discarded as extraordinarily (like hit by astroid-level) unlikely. Unfortunately that has now been upgraded in probability to just very unlikely by the publication of a new paper.

If the mRNA was to integrate into a man's germ cells then it's conceivable that said encoding in at least some of his sperm could, depending on exactly how it's integrated, code for spike production in any embryo produced (a woman starts with all the eggs she's going to have at birth, so it won't happen the other way around.) This is very improbable, but now we know, with a new paper, said integration into human cells generally is not impossible. It may be the explanation for testing PCR-positive even long after recovery; the mRNA got taken up permanently in a few places and thus produces, at a low level (but not disease-causing) enough nucleotides to produce a PCR+ test if the Ct is cranked up high enough, possibly permanently.

There are two possibilities if this happens, one FAR more likely than the other.

1. Any egg fertilized by that man dies long before birth, as the spike is directly pathogenic in the embryo. It thus causes the embryo, likely before it can implant but possibly afterward during pregnancy as the immune system starts to form and react, to inevitably kill the fetus. That doesn't make the man "infertile" per-se, but it makes his siring offspring biologically impossible. This is the FAR more probable outcome. Due to the placental barrier it PROBABLY does not screw the woman involved.

2. The embryo's cells produce the spikes but it is not killed by them as the new human's immune system ignores them in the circulation and thus they don't produce pathology. This is a nightmare scenario as said human would be a literal "Rogue" from X-Men since he or she would be emitting them from literally everywhere; anyone that person comes close to or in contact with might be seriously injured or die. The mother would probably be able to carry said child but the infant would be directly dangerous to everyone in the delivery room when it took its first breath, and there'd be no reasonable way (other than by amniotic sampling, which is very dangerous and can cause a miscarriage) to know it in advance either. You'd have to kill that kid as there would nothing you could do since the production capacity would literally be encoded into the DNA in every cell in that human's body and said child would continually emit spike protein from ever orifice on a continual basis -- and be directly biologically dangerous to essentially all other humans. The reverse of "bubble boy", basically.

#2 is WILDLY improbable but using "vaccine" technology that can potentially integrate into the DNA, which we were told is impossible, is flat out crazyland nuts. The claim that integration from RNA was impossible was always bull**** because a huge part of our DNA is in fact of viral origin and we've known that for a long time. Yeah, it took millions of years but so what -- it happened, repeatedly and reasonably often. Simply put proving that the mRNA is not taken up and potentially integrated by germ cells was something that was not categorically proved up via animal testing and very limited human testing before we started doing this crap. It is one thing to permanently damage the recipient -- to potentially encode things into offspring is another matter entirely. That's wild-eyed Frankenstein crap and unbelievably dangerous. The only good news is that in virtually every case this sort of thing confers not hazard to others but certain death in the human that winds up with it. Mother Nature is a bitch that way.

The presumption underlying the safety of this approach was that even if the germ cells DID take up the mRNA the spike produced is harmless. Unfortunately we now know, categorically, that is NOT TRUE and it is in fact directly pathogenic both on an intact basis and for the S1 subunit alone. As soon as we discovered this ANY METHOD TO CAUSE PRODUCTION OF THE SPIKE ARTIFICIALLY IN THE BODY VIA RNA, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE METHOD OF DELIVERY, HAD TO BE STOPPED because IF the second event was possible (reverse-transcription into the DNA), and we KNEW it was due to our genomic history, then the door was open to VERY, VERY BAD THINGS. Very unlikely, but suddenly entirely possible.

Direct inoculation with KILLED (but NOT attenuated) virus will not present this risk since uptake of the RNA in the killed virus is impossible as it cannot undergo cellular fusion. However, and unfortunately, it appears that coronavirus vaccination via such routes does not work (e.g. the Chinese vaccines which are inactivated, and it appears they don't work well if it at all.)

The odds of this going bad are not very high and I can't handicap it as probabilities on this sort of thing are virtually impossible without quite a lot of animal study, none of which we did, but if it does happen it is REALLY going to suck.

I do not like the legs of the stool on which protection from very, very bad outcomes rest being sawed off one at a time, and that's what we keep seeing, at least on a "can happen" basis, as time goes on.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Susanlauren
Posts: 152
Incept: 2021-05-01

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I am chilled to the bone. We are living the days of Noah. None of this will end well.
Bodhi
Posts: 3824
Incept: 2008-02-23

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This discussion is reminding me of the movie Children of Men.

----------
Nobody can be saved from anything, unless they save themselves.
It is hopeless doing things for people, it is often very dangerous
indeed to do things at all, and the only thing worth doing for
the race is to increase its stock of ideas. ~T.H. White
Heartlander
Posts: 178
Incept: 2021-02-25

Kansas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
OH. MY. GOD. HELP. US. ALL.

Every time I think it can't possibly get any worse.
...

The people pushing this WHO KNOW BETTER (as opposed to the great masses of unknowing, propagandized drones) are the minions of Satan himself, who HATES human beings with a fiery passion and who delights in suicide, especially mass suicide.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 2  First12Last