So Who Went To Jail?
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives

Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2019-10-12 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 167 references Ignore this thread
So Who Went To Jail?
[Comments enabled]

Note two things:

1. Nobody went to jail or was even "outed" publicly and fired.

2. This had to go up on appeal before the original loss was disclosed.

WASHINGTON - Some of the FBI’s electronic surveillance activities violated the constitutional privacy rights of Americans swept up in a controversial foreign intelligence program, a secretive surveillance court has ruled.

....

The intelligence community disclosed Tuesday that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court last year found that the FBI’s efforts to search data about Americans ensnared in a warrantless internet-surveillance program intended to target foreign suspects have violated the law authorizing the program, as well as the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches. The issue was made public by the government only after it lost an appeal of the judgment earlier this year before another secret court.

The actual ruling came in October of 2018, roughly a year ago.  The FBI had no intention of disclosing that loss.  It was only after they lost a second time, this time on appeal, that disclosure occurred.

We the people empower this sort of crap and must put a stop to it.  If you or I did something like this we'd be rotting in a prison cell right now.  They're not.  The reason why not is obvious.

I do not give a wet crap if you support our government's intelligence-gathering and such on a general basis.  This isn't about the "general basis", it's about what's happening right here, right now in the instant set of cases, which was clearly illegal and has been ruled illegal.

We must insist that the specific people responsible for these violations be identified, in person, be fired and prosecuted.

The Constitution is not The 10 Suggestions.  It is the highest law of the land.  Until and unless there are hard, accountable consequences for these sorts of violations they will continue and for as long as they continue there is utterly no reason for the people of this nation to continue to consent to our government's existence as a whole.

Go to responses (registration required to post)
 



 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
User Info So Who Went To Jail? in forum [Market-Ticker]
Captainkidd
Posts: 1543
Incept: 2010-05-25

Houston, Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
So, who went to jail?

Nobody.

----------
A lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a thousand men with guns. --Mario Puzo

It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. -- Henry Ford
Bodhi
Posts: 1330
Incept: 2008-02-23

Canton, GA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
From Edward Snowden's book Permanent Record.

Quote:
The legislative branch, the two houses of Congress, willingly abandoned its supervisory role: even as the number of IC government employees and private contractors was exploding, the number of congresspeople who were kept informed about the ICs capabilities and activities kept dwindling, until only a few special committee members were apprised in closed-door hearings. Even then they were only informed of some, but not all, of the ICs activities. When rare public hearings on the IC were held, the NSAs position was made strikingly clear: The agency would not cooperate, it would not be honest, and, what was worse, through classification and claims of secrecy it would force Americas federal legislatures to collaborate in its deception. In early 2013, for instance, James Clapper, then the director of National Intelligence, testified under oath to the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the NSA did not engage in bulk collection of the communications of American citizens. To the question, Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans? Clapper replied, No, sir, and then added, There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly. That was a witting, bald-faced lie, of course, not just to Congress but to the American people. More than a few of the congresspeople to whom Clapper was testifying knew very well that what he was saying was untrue, yet they refused, or felt legally powerless, to call him out on it.


Snowden came to his decision to whistleblow because he had tried in the past to go through "proper channels" to address security flaws in the computer systems, but actually got dressed down for his efforts. His superiors didn't want to be bothered with upsetting the status quo. When he mentioned to his fellow analysts that the mass data collecting was likely unconstitutional, they just shrugged their shoulders and replied, "What can you do?"

Clapper should be rotting in a prison cell right now, but I'd surmise that he had CON-gress scared ****less of the secret info he had on each of them. The intelligence agencies feel bulletproof and accountable to no one. It would currently appear that they are right.
Dcsleeper
Posts: 513
Incept: 2012-10-11

Northern VA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
drilled in our active duty heads in the 80s as Operation Oversight.
and yet...
Gonewest
Posts: 138
Incept: 2015-02-26

PacificNW
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
That there is a secret court is all you need to know.
Mannfm11
Posts: 5602
Incept: 2009-02-28

DFW, Tx
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
If one thing has been brought out to those who care to pay attention, the prosecution and investigatory sectors of the Federal government could be the most dangerous crime syndicates on Earth. The people now being subpoenaed by the Democrats are likely controlled by Soros and the Clinton gang. I doubt anything will ever be done to expose them. Remember almost no one went to jail for 2008. SDNY.

----------
The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.---John Kenneth Galbraith
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ