Manafort: Toast
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Display list of topics
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Sarah's Blog Buy Sarah's Pictures
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2018-08-08 09:00 by Karl Denninger
in Musings , 131 references Ignore this thread
Manafort: Toast
[Comments enabled]

There are many making a big deal out of the Manafort trial in which the judge is being rather snarky with the prosecution.

Well, that may well be true, but Manafort is, in my opinion, burnt toast at this point.


Because the prosecution has introduced firm, hard-to-refute evidence that Manafort specifically lied about having offshore bank accounts -- he checked the box "no" several times, sequentially, when in fact he did have such accounts.

That's a crime (perjury.)

It's not against the law to have offshore accounts.  But it is illegal to lie about their existence.

That alone won't nail him for much time but it's an ugly fact because now if they can demonstrate the funds came from an overseas source, which ought to be pretty easy, then he's really ****ed since he was obligated to declare those funds and pay taxes on them -- and apparently did not.

What they might not be able to get him on is conspiracy.  But in terms of proving that he lied in the filings for a criminal purpose (remember, with few exceptions you need a criminal purpose to your act for it to be punishable) they're better than half-way there at this point from what I can see outside the courtroom.

I think this dude is cooked.

Whether he should be able to be cooked, given the premise on which the investigation was launched, is another matter.  But that will ultimately be a function of appeals, the first of which attempts (to quash the investigation as the fruit of a poison tree) he's already lost.

Go to responses (registration required to post)

User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
User Info Manafort: Toast in forum [Market-Ticker]
Posts: 17
Incept: 2010-08-20

San Diego, CA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Bringing these charges as a result of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia in that process. Of all charges, and during all testimony, there is not one mention of any election, not one mention of Russia (Ukraine, yes, but not Russia), and not one mention of Donald Trump. Yet the media is all over this in connection with the impeachment of Donald Trump.

No, I am not apologizing for Trump or anyone else. I am commenting on the state of justice in this nation. Yes, he is cooked, but to what end? What purpose is served?
Posts: 153849
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
It looks like they're after Cohen on tax charges too.

Playing with the IRS like this dangerous, but plenty of rich people do it. It looks damn tempting, especially if you have foreign income as it's sort of easy to do - - but if you get caught you're royally and truly ****ed.

Winding it down.
Posts: 10742
Incept: 2007-12-17

saint louis
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Manafort's best hope is that the jury or just a jury member sees an opportunity to stick it to Mueller. Jury nullification. I'd probably be that jury member if I was on the jury. I'm not sure.

It's almost like the judge is looking for someone to do that.

Honestly I'm not sure why they put Gates on the stand??? It seemed a pretty cut and dry case.

I think its time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that our founding fathers intended for us. Ronald Reagan 1964
Posts: 153849
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
They want him on the conspiracy charges, which is a hell of a lot more serious in terms of years.

Winding it down.
Posts: 627
Incept: 2017-06-27

The People's Republic of New York
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
his attorneys will advise him to plead out or make a deal with a plea. a super high percentage of federal cases that go to trial end in conviction. even innocent defendants are encouraged to enter a plea to avoid a worse outcome; it kind of sucks. surprised that it is going down this way given the way things work.

There are two ways to be rich: One is by acquiring much, and the other is by desiring little.
snow, seasons, distance and dirt roads: SSDD
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap" (Gal. 6:7)
Posts: 623
Incept: 2015-05-03

Vancouver WA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
"They want him on the conspiracy charges, which is a hell of a lot more serious in terms of years."

Without knowing exactly the case they will be presenting in court, it seems the conspiracy charges should be brought against the prosecution.

I get that when investigating a crime it can lead to other more serious crimes. But it appears the initial charge was brought with the sole intent to do an investigation on him. If that is the case than the entire prosecution rests on their ability to conspire.

How many of us could withstand a team of investigators looking into all of our activities? Most everyone of us would/could be found prosecutable on some crime if they could dig deep enuff.

I am not saying he is not a sleaze bag and did no wrong, but if Trump did not run for president, if Manafort was not a close ally of Trump and Trump did not win the election; Would they have even cared to give this guy a first let alone a second look? It seems doubtful.

All those people who are openly and willingly giving their personal information to the likes of Facebook should take heed. When or if they decide to come after you for a real or perceived crime, you just gave them a magazine fully loaded with ammunition.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ