The Market Ticker - Canceled
What 'They' Don't Want Published
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-09-15 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Other Voices , 189 references
[Comments enabled]  

Note the right side (category) -- this is a guest post, again from Ishmael.

“Embrace your extremists.”  --Vox Day

Shooting a bunch of kids is something only a monster would do!  

“Before this is all over, they’ll be building statues to St. Breivik.”  --paraphrased Vox Day

Two years ago, the thought of shooting any children was awful.  Anyone who didn’t immediately disavow such was jumped on by a shocked audience. Now after nineteen months of clown world abuse, talk of BBQing entire families elicits grim smiles, dread, and resignation along with the shock.  

No one has made any medical “expert” the guest of honor at Sunday dinner. No one has firebombed a politician’s house.  No one has shot a hospital administrator’s wife while she walks the dog.  I hope we never come to that point in America, that is what a civil war looks like.

The only way to prevent politicians from getting regularly BBQed is to embrace the current extremists.  The ones that cuss about coof bull**** in public and make others uncomfortable. The people who refuse to wear masks and make a huge stink about it.  The terminated employee who sabotages the company on his way out.

Not so bad compared to living through a civil war.

If you don’t want to join in, embrace an extremist by staying out of their way.  Don’t tone police someone who says something distasteful which furthers your side’s goals.  Clap when someone screams, “**** you and **** your mask ****,” in a quiet shop.  I’d say smile, but your face is hidden.

Don’t give a half ass apology about language used in a blog post or video when you’re sharing it. The apology says you don’t really believe what you just shared. If you really want to win, who the **** cares about proper language?  

Is this fight worth winning?  

We didn’t love freedom enough.” --Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

Read the whole quote.  A few supported extremists, and Solzhenitsyn would have never written The Gulag Archipelago. 

Extremists save your ass if you let them.  Ponder this: What comes after? What if words are ignored and action comes?  Is that a world you want to live in?

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-09-13 08:14 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 10955 references
[Comments enabled]  

So CamelToe is nuts too.

“By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end the pandemic. That’s exactly what we are committed to doing.” - Kamala Harris

Never before in history has there been a need to "protect the vaccinated."

There isn't one now unless the jabs not only don't work, in some percentage of people who took them they make infection worse -- and they know it.

What do they know and aren't telling you?

The point of a vaccine is to gain personal protection.  I have written about this many time; the premise of "herd immunity" is in fact why epidemic spread of any pathogen stops being a material concern but the decision to take a vaccine is a personal one, despite all the screaming over the decades by various idiots.

Yes, I've had most of the "ordinary" vaccines.  So has my daughter; the risk:benefit analysis was clear and there was plenty of longitudinal, long-term data to back that analysis up.  With these jabs for Covid-19 there is zero long-term data and there won't be for a couple more years, but the short and intermediate term data we do have says that in many people the jabs are more-dangerous than the disease, and this is particularly true now that we know they do not provide lasting protection and fade off or even make you more likely to get infected after six or so months have passed.

I got into this with back when the HPV vaccine was attempted to be "mandated" for teens.  HPV is a viral disease that in men is usually "silent" but in women it can cause cervical cancer.  It is spread by sexual contact.  Schools were talking about mandating it.

Now think about this for a minute: Is not a school that mandates such a shot saying that sexual contact is perfectly ok on their campus?  Yes indeed they are, since what happens off campus is none of their ******ned business.  I reminded them that promoting underage persons having sex is, in many cases, a felony.

That argument shut them up fast.

So why not take it anyway, you might ask?

Because occasionally it causes Guillain-Barre syndrome, and in some percentage of people who have that happen the damage is permanent or even lethal.

There is no way to predict in advance who will have that happen to them and as such this is a personal, adult choice.  It comes with extreme (even if uncommon) risks and therefore is only reasonable if the actual recipient gives informed consent and at the same time has full, personal responsibility for the consequences if said "adverse events" occur.

And here's the other part of it: Since HPV is a sexually-transmitted disease, other than by rape there are in fact people who are at zero risk.  A celibate person is the obvious example.  So is a monogamous, virginal couple right up until one of them violates monogamy.  While virginal couples are basically unheard of as you get older among teens they're not uncommon at all and some percentage of them go on to be monogamous for life.

Yes, I know, that's a quaint and "old fashioned" notion.  It is nonetheless true and exposure to risk for no benefit is stupid.

Further, beyond the burden of permanent lifetime support for a son or daughter who I had injected with something that caused a lifetime disability there is also the mental burden that would come with it when I knew the balance of harms was stupid and did it anyway.  That would be suicide-inducing for me and should be for any other parent who actually gives a crap about their kids.

Of course many so-called parents don't give a crap that their kids are whoring (or "studding") around -- or worse.

Even more-damning is that (at the time) it only covered one strain of HPV; all the others could still screw you, and there was more than one circulating strain.  This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation because believing you're safe when you're not alters behavior in negative ways, even if only at the margin.  If you must contemplate the fact that ****ing that cute boy might lead to permanent sterility in the best case, and could kill you (cervical cancer, if you get it, means no more kids from that point forward, obviously since they have to remove it and if it spreads before being caught you're ****ed) then maybe your "willing to screw" rate goes down just a bit, especially if the guy in question has a reputation of poking anything that walks on two legs.  Since sex comes with a myriad of potential adult consequences promoting wise choices, as I see it, outweighed the nebulous benefits and potential serious harms.

Therefore it was my decision that when my daughter reached the age of 18 years she was free to make that decision on her own.  While there was certainly the risk of infection prior to that point it was outweighed by the fact that this is an adult decision with adult consequences and, other than by******there is nothing to fear beyond the consequences of personal, voluntary choice.

Incidentally this situation has in many ways gotten worse.  The serious adverse event rate has risen dramatically as they've included more strains in the jab and is now estimated at about 1 in 140.  May I remind you that the cervical cancer rate on a US national basis, which is the bad outcome this shot allegedly mitigates, is about 6/100,000 women per year?  That means the NNT/NNH ratio (number necessary to treat to prevent one bad outcome .vs. number necessary to treat that causes harm) is upside down (more-likely to harm you than help you) for a huge percentage of the population.  While this jab is arguably worth it for a sex worker it is not for virtually everyone else as even over a lifetime your risk of serious harm from the jab exceeds the probability of benefit.  Yet this particular vaccine is still pushed -- hard -- by all manner of medical jackasses who can't be bothered to do basic four-function arithmetic!

[Sidebar: Back when I was of that age the fact that you could not get birth control beyond condoms until you were 18 -- no physician would write a script for chemical birth control for an adolescent.  Since rubbers are both nowhere near effective enough to be reasonable "proof" against pregnancy and at the same time provide some value against STDs that was quite the deterrent to wildly screw around while at the same time providing some protection against STD spread if you did it anyway.  If you knocked up your girlfriend her father might well shove a shotgun in your face and demand you marry her, but even if it didn't go that far it was going to be a very bad time for both of you, and you both knew it.  Yeah, I had fun -- but that possibility was always in the back of both my mind and hers.  While at the time I certainly didn't like it in retrospect that was a good thing, not a bad one.]

How does this all apply to what's going on now?

Actually, quite a lot of it applies.

Let's start with this: The data on the Covid jabs say they offer more harm than benefit in young healthy boys.  Heh -- that sounds like the HPV shot, doesn't it?  That's because it is.  Mandating them is thus not just malpractice and negligence it's manslaughter.

It doesn't end there.

While you can excuse Biden for being a demented old coot and unable to think before his mouth opens you can't make that argument for Kamala.  Her statement above is proof that what Biden said the other day was not an accident.  Indeed, he was likely reading off a teleprompter and it is an official position of the US Federal Government at all levels.

This in turn implies they know the vaccines not only have failed they are potentiating infections instead of protecting against them.  Why else would you "protect the vaccinated"?  But wait: Who caused all these people to be put in the position where they are more likely to get ****ed?  That would be the CDC, NIH, Fauci personally and both the Trump and Biden Administrations.

What might be scaring the crap out of them?  Perhaps data like this:

 

Add to that anecdotal reports in the US so far about people who were fully vaccinated not only winding up in the hospital and dying but crashing very rapidly -- somethin that hasn't happened throughout the time we've had Covid-19 here in the United States and which isn't happening in unvaccinated persons.

Gee, isn't that something -- especially when on the data we also know, and even Fauci has admitted it, that being previously infected and recovered is extraordinarily good protection -- far better than that afforded by these vaccines.  He refused to answer said question in a presser the other day.

In other words for the previously-infected the jabs only offer risk, no benefit, exactly as does a HPV shot for a nun, who is in fact celibate and virginal, in a convent.

Now that "potential risk" from not collecting the data before jabbing a huge number of Americans appears to be on the verge of turning into very real and lethal risk!  There is no way to know whether those currently-anecdotal reports will turn into an unavoidable cascade of cases that absolutely nobody will be able to ignore.

Don't you think we should have figured all of this out before we went on a stabby spree with lightly tested technology that you cannot turn around and undo if it goes badly?  We would have found out and halted what may well be an incipient disaster if we didn't proceed with "Warp Speed" and instead went through the regular process of gathering that long-term data while allowing the use of these jabs only by those at the highest degree of individual "bad outcome" infection risk (such as residents of nursing homes who have, on average, six months of remaining life and thus long-term risks are, for most of them, irrelevant.)

They tried to kill you and got jabs into 200 million American arms -- although whether it was intentional or simply stupidity and greed that drove what happened is up for debate -- and now they're trying to cover it up.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-09-12 10:20 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 253 references
[Comments enabled]  

I just drew a seven day suspension for commenting to the Chinese mouthpiece (in other words, the actual CCP official mouthpiece on Twitter) who threatened Taiwan if they renamed their consulate with the US with the following:

"Get nuked, *******."

This was considered "targeted harassment" and drew a 7-day ban.

That's right -- a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL MOUTHPIECE threatened economic destruction and worse (military action!) for the mere name of an institution (which is not "targeted harassment") but a mere prole telling said government (since that's an official account) to "get nuked" is.

So here's the deal -- if you want to see this area (/nad) continue, and maybe the entire Ticker, it is now up to you as readers of this area to promulgate the posts made on The Market Ticker via Twitter.

If that is not satisfactory in my sole judgement the Ticker closes in the next week.

No bull**** folks.  I'm not kidding.

I spend a lot of time running this place, and my patience with this bull**** is gone.  Where is the ****ing Rwanda Machete party? (Yes, I stole that from another blogger.)  Either ****ing stand up or quit expecting someone else to carry your ****ing water for you.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-09-12 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Covid-19 , 3254 references
[Comments enabled]  

There are times that the "F" word is absolutely appropriate.  For example on August 6th, 1945, by the Mayor of Hiroshima in the instant of time just before he was BBQ'd: What the **** was that?

This is one of those and so I'll use it without reservation: ****.

A drive-by parade outside of Methodist Mansfield Medical Center last April was supposed to be Corey Ripe's happy ending. The 47-year-old was headed home after a week on a ventilator battling COVID-19.

Ok, he got Covid, he got it bad in March/April 2020 before we knew what we were doing -- but he lived.

Then, January.

Three days later, they got confirmation that, in addition to pneumonia, Ripe had once again contracted the virus that had already nearly claimed his life.

Really?  What was the Ct on that test?  You see, I read that linked article and it describes symptoms that don't make a lot of sense for Covid-19.  Certainly anything's possible but the article does make sense for a whole bunch of other infections particularly if he had secondary bacterial pneumonia.  What did the hospital give him?  Nobody has said.  There wasn't an antibiotic in there by chance, was there?

He then gets vaccinated post-recovery.  Remember, the vaccine prevents severe disease and death, we're currently told.  We were previously told it prevented getting the virus (that was a lie), that it prevented symptoms (that was a lie), that it prevented giving the virus to others (that was a wild-eyed, entirely-unscientific claim with zero evidence and proved to be a crazy-faced lie as is now showing up everywhere including at all-vaccinated colleges) and now it's "you won't go to the hospital or die."

OH REALLY?  WHERE IS THIS GUY RIGHT NOW?

Still, Saturday night, though he’d shown no prior symptoms, Parris knew it had to be COVID-19 again when she heard the fluid in his lungs.

She rushed him to the ER. And an hour later, Parris got a familiar call.

Ripe was intubated and waiting for an available ICU bed.

I see.

So here are my questions, since this is so wildly improbable that I find it impossible to believe unless something really, really ugly is going on with these jabs.

  • At his second alleged infection did the hospital check for both "S" and "N" antibodies at admission?  They should have been present.  You know they didn't look.  But let's assume, for the sake of argument, the first infection really was Covid (it's entirely plausible) and not the flu with a secondary bacterial infection that got him.  I'm not sold on this because H1N1 was going around at that time, I got what I presume was that in January 2020, it did get into my lungs and it flattened me for a week with serious hanging-on symptoms, notably a nasty non-productive cough, that kept hanging on for a month and material cardio impairment for several more (it was worse than Covid-19 which I got first days of August of this year.)  It was bad and I thought, after Covid-19 became known to be a "thing", I might have had it.  But it was not Covid-19; I know scientifically it was not because a few months later I sourced IgG antibody tests and I was negative.

  • After the second alleged infection but before he got vaccinated did anyone check for both "S" and "N" antibodies?  You know the answer to that one too.  Of course not.  "If you're recovered you should still get vaccinated" is what every ******* in the medical and political field has said even though there is zero evidence you get any benefit from doing so and, post-infection, the data is that your protection is many times (13x or more, to be exact) better than getting jabbed.

  • In any event being an alleged "two-time winner" of the Covid-19 sweepstakes, a statistically unlikely thing to the extreme unless one of the two wasn't actually Covid, he takes the (bad) advice and gets vaccinated.  Ok, so now he should have both "N" antibodies (from previous infection) and a bunch of "S" ones.

  • Now a few months later he gets hammered.  Again they say "Covid-19."  Did they look at admission time for those antibodies this time?  You know damn well they did not and, much worse, this time was extremely rapid onset which strongly implies that VEI may be in the game here.  Yet I'll bet $1,000 they did not pull antibody titers for both "S" and "N" proteins on admission and given the history I'll argue that's not only personal malpractice it's public-health malpractice and gross negligence.

Here's why those antibody titers are important especially this time around.

Natural infection provides a higher (by quite a lot) "N" protein titer than "S".  Why is that?  Because coronaviruses have evolved so their "S" proteins can evade the immune system.  If this was not the case they couldn't infect you, but obviously they do.  Thus natural infection will produce both but the "N" titer will be higher.

Vaccination produces NO "N" antibodies at all because they're not encoded in the vaccine.  That's intentional; the hypothesis that all the vaccine makers in the US used (and in Europe and many other places) operated under was informed by work that was done when SARS was going around.  Vaccines were attempted and they all failed due to ADE-style problems during animal trials.  The belief was that they failed because of the "N" protein in the vaccine.  This was supported by mechanistic (not in-body) work and sounds plausible (I've read the work) but the problem is that many times what appears to be "correct" on a mechanistic or test-tube basis doesn't work that way in the human body.  Since SARS disappeared we never tested this theory on people before Covid-19 showed up because we couldn't; there was no virus against which to risk natural infections and challenge trials with something like SARS are flat-out nutso given its fatality rate.  The short trials we did do this time around before EUAs issued accounted only for the wild strain that was in circulation at the time; all these other "letters and numbers" mutations were not known as they didn't exist and thus couldn't be tested against.  All looked ok, and away we went without any long-term data to back up the claims.  Then we licensed one of them with less than a year's worth of data to back up the belief that enhancement was off the table.

If this guy has a significant "S" titer, particularly if he has one that is higher than his "N" titer then when he was injected he did produce the expected antibody response.  In other words the expectation is that he had "protection."  If he has no titer then he is the one dude out of millions that both got nothing in the way of immunity from either infection or vaccination.

But assuming he does have antibodies given his extremely-rapid deterioration this time -- from no symptoms to insane deterioration to the point of requiring intubation within a day this time around that implicates VEI in an extremely serious way and in fact until disproved that has to be the presumed reason he got hit that hard, that fast.

This is exactly what VEI (ADE is a subset of VEI, "Vaccine Enhanced Infection") looks like when it happens folks.  People go from being asymptomatic or only mildly ill to crashing within hours.  The presumption when someone who is vaccinated and has an antibody titer has this sort of thing happen is that is, until conclusively excluded, what you're dealing with is VEI and it's a pull the damned alarm right now because the risk of people being imminently ****ed en-masse is on the table sort of event.

If that is what happened then the odds are extremely high that a mutational strain that can tear through the vaccinated population like a wrecking ball is here in the United States -- right here, right now.

No bull**** folks.

The only "out" from this scenario if that's what happened to this individual is that whatever strain he has is disadvantaged on an evolutionary basis and thus will not widely spread and become a material part of the mix.  That is not and cannot be brought under our control.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-09-11 09:12 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 6465 references
[Comments enabled]  

I told you a few weeks ago I was seeing very disturbing data that strongly suggested the jabs were, in some form or fashion, destroying existing immunity or otherwise potentiating more-severe disease.  I didn't have the hard data to quantify it, but I've mentioned the drift in the data streams for some time now.  It was clear and convincing, but not quantifiable.  Until now.

I didn't then (and still don't) know the mechanism; I don't have billions of dollars of lab laying around I can play with.  But on the data it was happening; it was not conclusive but the evidence shift was clear in the data pattern; what had been protection from being harmed if you were jabbed was trending toward neutral in the aggregate and anecdotes suggested harm.

Well, now we have it, and yeah, it's harm.

 

Note the right two columns.  They adjust for per-100,000, which is the only accurate way to do it -- you must adjust raw rates for the population prevalence of the specific condition under test.

This data shows conclusively that for anyone between 40 and 79 being vaccinated makes it more-likely for you to get Covid-19.

That means what you think it does: If you took the jabs you are the plague rat; you are more-likely to get (and thus transmit) the disease than an unvaccinated person.

Britain had studiously avoided publishing the ranged data like this in their updates until now.  I don't know why they did it this time but it doesn't matter.  Their data continues to claim that the jabs are effective in preventing hospitalization and death but the exact opposite is true when it comes to getting Covid-19 which means those who are vaccinated may acquire personal protection but in doing so become Angels of Death to others.

If you have trouble with numerical tables here it is in bar charts:

 

In addition this is arguably one of the most-immune populations -- or should I say allegedly immune -- on the planet.  

n this report, we present the results using a 4-weekly average, of testing samples up to 27 August 2021, which takes account of the age and geographical distribution of the English population. Overall, the proportion of the population with antibodies using the Roche N and Roche S assays respectively were 18.1% and 97.7% for the period 2 August to 27 August (weeks 31 to 34) (Figure 3). This compares with 18.2% Roche N seropositivity and 97.0% Roche S seropositivity for the period of 5 July to 30 July (weeks 27 to 30).

In other words 97% of the population has either infection-acquired immunity or vaccination-acquired "alleged" immunity.  That is so close to 100% it is indistinguishable and makes clear that Biden's actions not only won't work they can't because even with effectively 100% coverage Delta continues to go straight through vaccinated individual's immunity and, as the above data shows, the vaccinated are the ones spreading the virus.  They are literal plague rats killing the unvaccinated who have not seroconverted.

Let me be perfectly-clear: The vaccines are worthless in stopping the acquisition and transmission of disease.  With nearly 100% antibody coverage if the jabs worked at all Britain would be a literal dead-end for anyone who got the virus and it would be gone there.  Cases would be as common as measles; onsie-twosie here and there.  It isn't gone which is hard, scientific proof that the jabs do not work to stop Covid-19 from circulating in the population and this data proves that in fact it makes infection and transmission more-likely rather than less in very large swaths of the population as a whole.

The seroconversion prevalence by prior infection is very close to the NEJM numbers for the United States.  As such we can expect the same outcome here; if you are seroconverted you are safe and sterile immune but if you are vaccinated and between 40 and 79 you are not only getting Covid you are infecting and killing those who have not seroconverted via infection and in fact are driving both unvaccinated and vaccine-failure infections leading to serious disease and death.

Also, as expected young people are over-represented in having had Covid-19 and thus being presumptively immune.  In the UK for those under 30 that number stands at 27.7%, greater than one in four.  These people have no reason whatsoever to take the jabs as all they offer is personal risk.

The data is clear:

  • The jabs are destroying existing immunity in that they have negative effectiveness in preventing infection among a wide swath of the population.  If you get (or have been) vaccinated and are between 40 and 79 you are more-likely to acquire a Covid-19 infection and thus be able to spread it than an unvaccinated individual.

  • The jabs do appear to continue to confer protection against hospitalization and death however this must be, on a public-health basis, compared with what they do to others.  For those who cannot be vaccinated (e.g. immune compromised where the jabs will not "take", for example) creating a mass of walking plague rats will kill those individuals at a materially higher rate.  Public health is about the aggregate impact on the population.  We made the decision to change the DTP vaccine in children to DTaP because, even though as the latter is non-sterilizing and thus occasionally caused an infant to get infected by his sibling and get very sick or die the aggregate harm was lower than that caused by the DTP vaccine across everyone, including those who needed tetanus boosters and could not get a stand-alone tetanus shot as they are not produced.

  • The trend toward failure in preventing death is one of deterioration.  While this has not yet accelerated greatly it likely will.  This is due to two problems; the sequencing in public databanks which suggests VEI is just a matter of time and waning antibody titers over time.  These two are are very likely to combine in the months ahead and the probability of them doing so into the maw of flu season this winter is, by my estimation and previous timelines for mutation (e.g. Delta's emergence in said databanks to it becoming prevalent) is likely odds-on.  If it happens those not previously infected but vaccinated are going to get slaughtered this winter given the above data.  If this is done intentionally by some nation that just-coincidentally doesn't allow the vaccines that exhibit this problem as we do in in the US, the UK, Israel and similar.....

Let me point out that recombination, which is how someone with a lab would create said "oh crap!" strain, is easy.  It is one of the natural mechanisms by which new strains emerge.  For this reason and because no manual tampering with the virus is necessary to do it proving someone did it and it was a natural event when it happens will be, other than by direct capture and testimony of the persons responsible will be impossible.

There is an argument for those who are specifically-morbid, which is correlated (but not caused) by age to take the jabs.  But for those who are not morbid the data continues to show that while there is no such thing as a risk-free existence and this virus can and occasionally does get people without morbidity it almost-never kills or hospitalizes you.  Mass-vaccinating the healthy, however, winds up killing those who cannot (not by choice, but by medical necessity) take said jabs.

To be blunt: I acquired sterilizing immunity to infection by taking personal risk in that I got Covid-19.  I did not do that intentionally (that would be stupid) but I did prepare for what I considered inevitable, and it occurred.  What I did not do was put others at enhanced risk, which the data now says occurs if you are not previously infected and get jabbed for the benefit of my own protection against severe disease.  I also did not take the risk of the next mutation killing me, a risk that, if vaccinated you cannot un-do once you do it.

The evidence is clear: While we should continue to make available said jabs any form of compulsion is in fact manslaughter since there is a reasonable contingent of persons who, for medical reasons, cannot be vaccinated and thus cannot avail themselves of the option to be protected against hospitalization and death.  In non-morbid people this protection is of little value since the base rate of harm is extremely low.

To repeat: Mass-vaccinating non-morbid people kills the unable-to-be-vaccinated through intentional increase of their risk which exceeds the benefit to the non-morbid vaccinated person.  It is thus not only contrary to public health it can legitimately be considered maliciously so and thus intentional manslaughter or worse.

Joe Biden and your employer, if they go along with it, are trying to kill your immune-compromised child, mother, father or grandparent.

That's the data and it is likely to get even worse in the weeks and months ahead.

One final thought: If you took the jabs before now, not knowing the above then it is what it is; you were deceived, told this wouldn't happen and thus are the victim of a bunch of murderous pricks who knew damn well that there was every reason to believe this might happen due to previous attempts to create coronavirus vaccines.  As I said above if you're materially morbid I can understand the choice, even today, although I think you're going to seriously regret it, possibly within months.  But if you, as a non-morbid person, irrespective of age, take those jabs now whether of your own free will or a mandate you're a five-alarm *******, a minion of the Devil, you're willing to kill others for alleged "protection" that is statistically worth zero to you, I want nothing to do with you as you a monster and I hope you get what you deserve for doing so in this life or the next and it hurts.  That goes double if you give it to your children; they are at statistical zero risk and thus you're intentionally killing other people and deserve to hang for it.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)