The Market Ticker - Canceled
What 'They' Don't Want Published
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-06-05 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Health Reform , 947 references
[Comments enabled]  

You ought to read this folks.

600,000 Americans, including probably your Grandmother if she died of Covid, are dead because of it.

If the jabs go sideways you might be dead because of it too.

Contemplate the gist of that piece: Race, gender, whatever -- are the alleged foundations of medicine now.

I've seen this in public material from places like Johns Hopkins.  Conform go the "woke" agenda or be cast out.  Consider whatever woke decides today or be ejected, ridiculed, censored.

Higher education has done this for decades now.  If you're of a certain group then you get an "extra bonus" for diversity.  Employers have done it too.  It's wildly unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment but never fear, the Supreme Court is here to say that "addressing something that happened in the past makes it ok."

Except it's not ok; that's claiming that the result of my great-great-grandfather's actions are my sin for which I must pay.

They're not, any more than a black man's great-great grandfather, who perhaps sold his villagers into slavery, is his responsibility and those are his actions.

Nope.

Indeed our Constitution prohibits attainder (corruption of blood) specifically even for an act of actual Treason, the highest offense of all, in Article III Section 3.

I’ve heard from doctors who’ve been reported to their departments for criticizing residents for being late. (It was seen by their trainees as an act of racism.) I’ve heard from doctors who’ve stopped giving trainees honest feedback for fear of retaliation. I’ve spoken to those who have seen clinicians and residents refuse to treat patients based on their race or their perceived conservative politics.

The article goes on to talk about whole areas of research that are considered "off limits."  Where have we seen that in the last year and change?  Oh, fraudulent studies, like the retracted one in The Lancet that condemned hundreds of thousands of Americans to die?  It slammed HCQ as worthless and even dangerous when in fact it was not.  Henry Ford Hospital System, huge and highly-respected medical group in SE Michigan, came under attack for developing and successfully using a HCQ-based protocol for Covid-19.  They reported their results and were instantly slammed by the woke Orange-Man-Bad mob, issuing a press release shortly thereafter saying they would have no further public comment on treatment protocols.

How many died in Michigan because of that?  How many died elsewhere in the nation because of it?  Did Henry Ford look further and use Ivermectin as it became known as both useful and then superior to HCQ, or perhaps investigate synergy between the two?  I have no idea; they never, as far I know, registered or ran another trial, nor publicly reported further results.

HENRY FORD HAS OVER 1,500 PHYSICIANS; the "woke mob" silenced the professional opinions of each and every one of them and almost-certainly led to the deaths of thousands in Michigan alone.

How many of the 175 dead in this county would be alive had that not happened and this debate played out in the medical sphere over the last 15 months?  Would you even want a jab if that debate had played out and 90+% of the time as soon as you got sick you used $30 worth of cheap, off-patent medication and never went to the hospital at all?

We don't know -- but I assure you some of them would be, because that's what the data tells us.

How scared would you have been all last year and would you line up to roll up your sleeve if almost nobody had died?  If, when you started feeling like crap you got a handful of cheap pills and a steroid inhaler at the Urgent Care or doctor's office along with a few pills for everyone in your household, you went home and in a couple of days everything was fine -- and none of your family members got it?  If the care-givers in the nursing homes used same as a preventative, never got it and thus never transmitted it?  If all the old people used it as a preventative and nearly all of them never got sick?

Where was the professional debate on everything in c19early.com?  NOWHERE!

You can't speak of any of that on Facebook, Instragram or Twitter nor on any of the other social media outlets such as Youtube.  You in fact can't cite medical studies on any of these drugs nor can a physician speak to any of it, including their experience with them, either.  Dr. Kory, an actual front-line physician treating patients, had his Senate Testimony removed by Youtube.  But you can sure talk about and advocate Remdesivir, a $3,000 drug which has been shown worthless in a random controlled trial!

Now let's go back and apply the same sort of skepticism to the now-known bogus PCR tests.  How many were counted as "cases" that really weren't?  How many were quarantined and thrown out of work when they weren't sick, stoking fear in the community?  We know this was rampant because Elon Musk proved it conclusively, taking four tests in sequence on the same day with two coming back each of positive and negative.  Obviously an utterly-enormous percentage of the tests we administered were no better than flipping a coin.  Oh by the way our local WalMart is now selling BinaxNOW tests (same technology and possibly identical to the ones Musk took, and the same ones the Trump White House was using) for cheap out of a standing display right near the door.  Come and get it; who knows how accurate they are especially considering you're not a lab tech and might screw it up!

The article above cites the case of Norman Wang, who published a paper arguing that merit is the only thing that should count in cardiology.  Frankly, if you disagree with that you're nuts.  Indeed, merit should be all that counts in any profession, but especially in medicine where the less-capable doctor may well be the one who plays "assembly-line" with your body instead of clinician -- and you die as a consequence.

We didn't see any of that in the last 15 or so months, have we?  Oh wait -- we have; to the tune of about 600,000 corpses.

Do you think that's a singular incident?

I know personally it is not as I know physicians -- including some very good ones in certain specialties -- who have had it happen to them.  In fact they're so good that were I to need that particular specialty I might travel halfway across the country and pay cash to obtain their advice and treatment.

Are there other clinicians who are equally good?  I'm sure there are.  But when you displace people on political ideology and allow corporate medicine and "woke" culture to take the place of merit you run the risk of being dead.

You don't like being dead, right?

Do you want the guy or gal who got straight "A"s in medical school or is the dude who got a "D-" ok?

They're all called the same thing after graduation: "Doctor."

Think about this folks:

In it, the doctors argue that in order to address discrepancies in health-care access and outcomes, hospitals should commit to “preferentially admitting patients historically denied access to certain forms of medical care.” That is, they should admit people to health services based on their skin color. 

Or perhaps we choose "treatments" based solely on who pays the most and deliberately censor and even blackball those who speak of something that costs $2 and might work?

Never mind that racial preferences for referrals and treatment is wild-eyed stupid.  We know, for example, that an enormous percentage of cardiac stents are inappropriately used.  Yes, if you're having a heart attack they will save your life and as such they absolutely have a good and proper place in medicine.  But many cath labs are basically $20,000 check printers, since the specialists in them are paid by the procedure and anyone they can get on the table generates a bill.  Is that the right thing to do?  Not all the time and that's not a entirely safe procedure either; no medical treatment or drug is.  If you stick one in someone who doesn't really need it the best outcome is that he or she is out the $20 large.  The worst is that they die on the table which does happen when their underlying condition wasn't going to kill them at all.

Again: Do you want the guy who got the "A" and will tell you "don't do it" or the dude who got the "D-" and all he cares about is the $20,000 because he either isn't good enough to know the difference or is being directed by some big hospital network to take the money and he's afraid to speak up about the scam as he neither trusts his expertise nor does he believe he'll get another job if he sticks up the middle finger?

Meritocracy is why you have electric lighting.  It's why you have an Internet.  It's why you have automobiles.  It's why you have flush toilets and don't have to go **** in a hole in the back yard, or in the gutter of the street.  It's why dozens of things we take for granted every single day exist.

Much of "woke" culture doesn't really impact all that much of importance to ordinary people.  Do I really care about CPAs being white or black, and is a difference in competence all that important?  Probably not -- right up until someone embezzles a bunch of money and then suddenly it might matter.  The better CPA might catch it where the lesser does not.

But when it comes to medicine its a different story, unless you want the modern "car mechanic" who really isn't one at all.  He plugs in the computer, it tells him that "Sensor X" is bad, and he goes and gets one out of the parts cage and installs it.  He doesn't have to think because the machine does it for him.  He's a parts-swapper, basically.  Perhaps very highly-trained and with a very expensive suite of tools but he doesn't have to think about much and that's exactly how the dealership likes it.  It's McDonalds in the car repair business; the hamburger sort of sucks, but it sucks the same way and is identical everywhere, no matter which store you go into.

That works for a lot of things in our economy.  McDonalds and Starbucks have become utterly enormous on that exact basis.  But if you've ever gone into MAAS in Ft. Walton Beach and ordered an espresso, you got a really good coffee.  If you've ever gone into Intelligentsia in Chicago, well, you have had an outstanding espresso.

Why?

Because in those two places people knew what they were doing.  They were artisans.  In MAAS you had people that knew how to run the machine the old-fashioned way, which beats the automatic push-button coffee you get in Starbucks.  Granted, if the clerk in there is stupid, you get bilge water.  But MAAS trains people and they know what they're doing.  Ditto at Intelligentsia but there they even go further because they not only roast on site they're really picky about it too.

But the Starbucks "barista" couldn't walk in there, go behind the counter, and pull a drinkable espresso shot.  He or she is simply not capable of it; they're not good enough.  They might be able to be trained, but off the street?  Nope.

I could do it, because I have a machine here at the house.  So could Sarah.  But the average schlub st Starbucks?  Nope.

The average repair guy in the car dealer today couldn't disassemble, clean, put back together and re-calibrate a carburetor on a 1970s V8.  He probably couldn't set the points and timing either.  He doesn't know how.  He has no computer for that.  If it doesn't run right he doesn't know where to start because he has to actually be able to think.  Some of those folks in the old shops were really good, and some not-so-good.  That was the time before assembly-line "service."

Unfortunately the human body isn't a computer-assisted car.  It's far more complex, and far more unique than an espresso machine and the beans that go in it, starting with green and being roasted.  The nuances of that are one thing, but in the human body despite the claims of many we understand only a small part of it.

We're really good with assembly-line medicine if you get in a car accident and break your leg, or if you get shot.  Anatomy is pretty simple, after all, and there's really only one way the pieces of your leg bone are supposed to go back together.  If you have holes in your body from a gunshot that ain't so tough either.  We're the best in the world when it comes to trauma, and it's mostly because we do a lot of it and anatomy really isn't all that complex, so "assembly line" medicine is not only ok it has a low error rate.

But when it comes to everything else -- not so much.

Witness Covid-19.  We had clinicians who were canceled because they were trying and using drugs that we'd had for decades in other indications.  Who gives a crap about the color of someone's skin when the bottom line is that the person who got sick does not die?  Are we really going to play cancel culture and essentially toss out on their ear anyone who is making people not die when others are failing to do so?

Your mother, grandfather or other family is dead because you let this go on.

This isn't abstract any more folks.  Now you're being told to get stabbed by the same cretins who killed your grandmother, even if you already had Covid and recovered There is not one scintilla of scientific evidence supporting such a thing for any disease, ever, in the history of mankind.

I had chicken pox -- the old-fashioned way.  That shot is very safe, by the data, which by the way took 20 years to accumulate and trust.  But if someone attempted to tell me that I had to be jabbed with it I'd shove it up their ass sideways.  There is exactly zero scientific justification for that and everyone knows it.  Likewise if you already had the measles before there was a measles shot.  I got the shot when I was a kid, but not long before I got it there was no measles shot.  If you had the measles and then the shot became available nobody ever suggested you get jabbed for that; that would be insane.

We have gone through 15 months of Cancel Medicine.  Physicians who found through their own practice how to keep people from getting seriously ill and dying have been pilloried and canceled because they disagreed in their professional judgement or popped their head up on the wrong TV show.  Think about how stupid that is and then consider that it wasn't just individual physicians; the entire Henry Ford Hospital System was "canceled" for the same reason -- because their protocol happened to include something a politician advocated and that instantly branded a highly respected medical group worthy of being silenced.

How many of the 500,000+ dead died for this exact reason?

How do you advance knowledge if you silence some of the people who are attempting to be in the debate or, in response to their professional opinions, label them for political -- or racial -- reasons? 

What you get when you do that is what we got -- assembly line, computer and large-corporate driven zombies who perform as directed.  There is zero medical expertise required to do that job.  Other than actual surgical procedures computer could take your symptoms and spit out a prescription.  Person "X" shows up with "Y" symptoms, give them "Z" or have someone perform procedure "Z1".  Period.

No learning takes place, nobody advances the science, the "one true way" is all that is done and in this case we now know that was corrupted, you in the American public not only let it happen half the nation actually cheered it on and screamed "Orange Man Bad" instead of demanding that those who wanted to cancel this or that person shut the **** up and let the results speak for themselves.

As a result 500,000+ people are dead.

YOU killed your grandmother by allowing this, America.

You must have really hated her -- and perhaps yourself -- if you're going to remain in your chair and allow this to go unpunished, or even worse, keep advocating and supporting it.

After all the next person who dies as a direct result may well be you -- or your child.

And if you or they do you will deserve that outcome too.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-06-04 12:49 by Karl Denninger
in Covid-19 , 4811 references
[Comments enabled]  

That'll be the game, set and match folks.

A Chinese Communist Party military scientist who got funding from the National Institutes of Health filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine in February last year — raising fears the shot was being studied even before the pandemic became public, according to a new report.

Zhou Yusen, a decorated military scientist for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who worked alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology as well as US scientists, filed a patent on Feb. 24 2020, according to documents obtained by The Australian.

So what do we now know?

  • China's military was in fact involved at the Wuhan lab.  It was not just a civilian operation.  This, by the way, has been repeatedly denied over the last year and change.

  • The lab's scientists knew not only the sequencing of the virus but in addition had a patentable way to create an alleged vaccine before the pandemic was public.  It takes time to draft patents and figure them out.  Quite a lot of time, in fact -- not a couple weeks or months.

  • The PLA, China's military, did file said patent with Zhou's name on it.

  • It takes time to prove up patent material, including in the case of a vaccine.  To patent something you must be able to demonstrate it; you cannot patent ideas, only embodiments of ideas.  In that case you would have to prove immunogenicity which isn't instantaneous; it takes weeks or even months to get through original science on this with animals and then humans, which means the date of knowledge was not February 24th it was months or even further before that.

  • That means they were working on this even before that time because to work on a vaccine you have to know you must or would want to work on it in the first place.  This in turn means they knew damn well there was a virulent virus in the wild prior to that date, or they released it or intended to release it into the wild on purpose.  Nobody comes up with a vaccine for a virus you intend to and have confined entirely within a laboratory in animal or cell culture testing; that's worthless.  Without an isolate to create a vaccine for and a virus outside of a lab environment where vaccination becomes a "thing" that might be required and thus have value why would you do the work to create one?

What's the timeline on all this?  Many, many months or even a couple of years.

That means either the virus was "out" for many months to a couple of years before February of 2020 (not a month or two) or the Chinese intended to release it in the fall of 2019.  In either case the evidence is now overwhelming that this was not a virus that "magically appeared" one fine day in late December having come naturally from bats and perhaps pangolins. That is not just improbable anymore -- it is now, on the manifest weight of the evidence, impossible.

Further, the person who filed the patent died under "mysterious circumstances."  Gee, I wonder why?

Let me guess -- did he shoot himself in the back of the head twice?

Next up is exactly what sort of vaccine patent we're talking about here?

Specifically how is it that the "stiffened" areas in the viral vector and mRNA shots we're using in the US came to be known and proved up?  How did Moderna and Pfizer know they needed to do that?  That sort of study takes months if not years too, not days or weeks, to both come up with it and then prove it actually works as expected.

Remember that Covid-19 has a rather-unique site on the spike called the "furin-cleavage" area which it uses to "fold" and get into the cell; the S1 unit attaches, the cleavage area "folds" and then the second part penetrates the cell wall like a spear.  SARS and MERS both lack this structure so there was no "prior art" to use and in the first couple of months the characterizing of all of this was pretty darn new.

Yet the "official story" is that these folks had a proposed candidate configuration, including the replacement of encodings to "stiffen" that area within days of the publication of the viral RNA sequence for Covid-19.

Is the completed work in that area what the Chinese "gave" us complete with that part of the work already done?  That would explain how it happened that quickly, wouldn't it?  I'd sure like to understand how someone -- anyone -- does that sort of work complete with the lab verification in cell cultures and animals, reachig those conclusions in days.

What are the connections there?  I'd like a full explanation of that please.

Oh wait -- the manufacturers didn't bother with all of making sure it worked as expected, did they?  Nope!  It sort of works as expected.  Yes, the shots produce antibodies -- lots of them.  But they also cluster in multiple organs where we were told it would not; we were told it would remain in the deltoid muscle where the injection was delivered.  That it remained in the muscle was false; the science was not done and it appears we were just told it would do so without evidence.  Now, due to a leaked document out of Japan we know the shots do not stay where intended and they bioaccumulate in other places, including the ovaries and spleen and yet this, which was a direct contravention of the predicate upon which the EUAs issued did not lead to immediate revocation.  Oh no, the FDA doesn't care when claims about where it is contained to in the body turn out to be false!

We further know the spike protein itself is pathogenic via multiple studies despite the CDC claiming otherwise and that said spike also shows up all over the body after vaccination.  We were also told that didn't happen; quite clearly that science was not done either as the first hint of trouble was in September of 2020 and then from December forward -- the claim was thus either a lie by omission (heh, "Warp Speed!") and lack of work or it was an intentional and malicious, knowing lie.  Again the FDA relied on that representation, we now know it was false and yet the EUAs, once again, were not withdrawn.

Which is it folks -- haste or fraud?  And from a standpoint of yanking the EUAs -- does it matter?  False is false; why only goes to the issue of punishment for the falsehood, not the required corrective action when discovered.  I'm entirely willing to believe haste as opposed to deliberate deception but it doesn't matter in terms of leaving the damned things out there without going back and forcing proof that the contradictions do not turn into harms!

WHERE IS THE CORRECTIVE ACTION?

And further, we now have clinical evidence that the significant adverse event rate (SAR) is wildly higher than being stated, and may be as high as a few percent, or few per hundred, not the few per hundred thousand being claimed.  Exactly what is the REAL serious adverse event rate?  We do not know because VAERS is a voluntary system and there is no systematic surveillance on people who get jabbed.  Without either mandatory reporting or systematic surveillance there is no way to get an accurate number; all you generate is a hypothesis, and boy, has VAERS done that with over 4,000 reports of associated death against 20-odd for the flu vaccine over the last 12 months.

Fauci either knew or should have known that the CCP and his "trusted colleagues" were lying.

Then again lying is all he's done since this started, as his emails have now proved.  Hell, he even said directly what I've pointed out for months -- viruses are simply too small to be caught by common masks; they go right through.

Do you believe anything else the CDC, NIH or your state health departments tell you?

Every one of the persons, individually, promulgating these lies must be held to both civil and criminal account.

Even if you have health insurance if you get one of those significant adverse events you are on the hook for your deductible and out-of-pocket maximum, and if the problem continues across more than a year you get to pay it again and again, perhaps forevermore.

This assumes, of course, that the damage isn't permanent -- and it might be.

Once someone lies to your face about something important you're nuts to believe anything else they tell you.

Oh by the way, did Fauxi (sic) know any or all of this?  If he did, is that treason?  You know, actual treason?

PS: IMHO, a good start -- Revoke China's MFN status and freeze all of the CUSIPs for US Treasuries and all US firms and other US entities owned by any Chinese national, firm or the government.  Revoke all student and non-resident visas.  Impose full currency, wage and environmental parity tariffs on all products and services coming from China, directly or indirectly.  Contemplate derivative sanctions on nations that refuse to follow suit.  Do it now and mean it.  Whether this was intentional in release is no longer the gating factor; that it was intentionally concealed and the Chinese military was involved is now conclusively demonstrated by that patent filing.  That's enough, standing alone.  War can be declared in multiple ways; shooting is not always involved and China has done so.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-06-03 14:21 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 444 references
[Comments enabled]  

Hoh hoh listen to this... (the quote is in the video, not the text -- and now I have reports CNN changed the video.  Go figure, but the quote is real.  **** CNN.)

"They're afraid of a big medical bill and that's stopping them from getting vaccinated."

They should be afraid of that.

The shot is "free."  The side effects, including really bad ones that might happen and run up a $100,000+ medical bill, are your problem.

Oh, you have "insurance"?  That's nice.  What's the annual deductible and out-of-pocket maximum?  You pay that.  If it goes on more than through the end of the year?  You pay it again.

What if the bill never ends because whatever it does to you never goes away?  That's your problem too.

Is there a solution to this?  No, other than "don't give people not-fully-tested things" eh?

Now about all those unmentionable and cheap treatments that work just as well and don't have that problem because they have been tested and used for decades.... but oh wait, you scared the living Hell out of the entire nation on a fraud that there were no such treatments, so now what short of admitting the lies and then taking responsibility for a half-million dead Americans?  Oh Fauci and the rest won't do that, will they?

Remember folks, this is CNN, the lefty hive-mind perspective.

Yep.

Go sit on a dildo Joe-n-Ho, and while you're at it stick up one up in the air for Trump too, who is just as responsible for the fear porn if not more-so.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-06-03 09:08 by Karl Denninger
in Covid-19 , 1051 references
[Comments enabled]  

Ok, so now we got it.

All the BS that happened at the start of the pandemic is now clear as to cause and why Fauci went bat****.

He knew he was in this up to his neck due to the NIH grants to Ecohealth.  And he had estimates coming out to him, not being disseminated to the public, of fatality rates in the 2-4% range.  That would mean two hundred million dead worldwide and somewhere around 4-8 million in the United States before the virus burned itself out.

There is also, in that email trove, a claim of exactly how the virus was generated in the Wuhan lab.  I cannot verify that as I don't have the chops, nor can I prove the provenance of the person who sent it to him -- never mind that unless that person had inside knowledge it may be a guess rather than proved fact.

If that CFR had been anywhere near accurate (it wasn't by the way; the IFR is actually around 0.15%, which is very close to a bad seasonal flu, but with a wild skew in risk toward older and more-morbid people) Fauci also had to know that anyone that had anything to do with the Wuhan lab and how it got funded was going to be lucky to get a decent burial; they might be hanged and left for buzzards to eat.

You can't argue with the provenance of the emails as they were officially produced under an FOIA, so the usual screaming of Russia-Russia-Russia and claims of tampered evidence won't work.  It is what it is, and what it shows is a man who was trapped and tried to "mitigate" his way out of a disaster his fingers were all over, and which he knew would be discovered since the grants to Ecohealth produced reported studies with the grant numbers on them.  There was utterly no way to prevent that from becoming public eventually.

This also fully explains the international fear porn game.  Virology is not a uniquely American or Chinese thing.  Research is done all over the place, the researchers hold symposiums and conferences, trade ideas, and as with any other profession there is a close-knit community of experts in the field.  They all knew damn well within days -- in January of 2020, in fact -- that their entire field was about to have an asteroid land on it as it was that early that the whistle was blown on sequencing in the virus that was extraordinarily unlikely to have occurred by chance and thus the probability was that the best possible explanation was an accident in Wuhan and the possibility of a deliberate dissemination could not be ruled out.

As I have pointed out in a discussion in The Bar on my system, just before all this crazy started -- right in front of Christmas, in fact, I witnessed Asian people, likely Chinese, in three separate WalMart stores across two states running their hands all over the laptop computers on display.  At the time I thought it was likely an organized ring attempting to figure out whether the security plugs (that set an alarm off if you try to steal them) were active or if someone had missed one, or if the lockdown bars were all secured.  After all these are high-value things and even in NW FL and TN in December it gets pretty chilly so concealing one under a coat is not hard.  Once this all started I had to wonder -- were those people attempting to deliberately spread virus around and sent over here by the Chinese government?  We'll never know, but it was enough of an oddity that it stuck in my head at the time.  Given the number of cameras in the typical WalMart I'm willing to bet that pattern was noted internally but likely thought of as a loss-prevention issue.  How's that theory looking now folks and gee, you've been awful quiet haven't you WalMart?  Where does a lot of your crap come from?  Uh huh.

But what we do also know from those emails is that Fauci tried to cover up what had apparently happened and he was thanked for "debunking" the lab leak hypothesis on television -- by EcoHealth which was doing work in the Wuhan Lab and thus was aligned with the CCP.  There is also a very odd coincidence between the furin cleavage portion of the virus (without which it would not be very infectious in humans at all) and a patent several years ago taken out by Moderna.  Moderna, for its part, has some interesting ownership connection "coincidences" reported that I cannot easily verify -- right back into China's CCP.  And finally there's the matter of said sequences being extremely unlikely to be random chance simply because they're in a conformation that is very unlikely in other than humans.

As I've said all the way back to the beginning of this thing when I noted those sequences my working hypothesis is that they were attempting to make a viral-vector vaccine of some sort, perhaps against SARS, and it got out "half-baked."  That's a reasonable explanation for the original event but not the cover-up, other than the fact that since this work was shut down by Obama due to this exact risk if it happened and was confirmed the entire profession was likely to get nuked from orbit, and all the people involved worldwide knew it.

The so-called "MSM" isn't even debating these parts of the email dump -- they're playing Ostrich instead, hoping they can bury it by "touting" all the "pressure" that was seen in the trove while ignoring that the archive damns not one man but entire professions including the vaccine/pharma connection.  Yes, there is even evidence that the intentional refusal to look at and use existing drugs and the "decision" on how they were going to deal with this goes back that far, before the first American died.  Bluntly put these people didn't just ignore the evidence that accumulated by the summer months they literally ignored it all the way back to the start and thus it can be reasonably argued they are personally responsible for all of the deaths.

If you want to know how you generate international hysteria you don't need some cabal pulling a puppet string.

All you need is for an entire profession involved in some very dangerous research to realize that they ****ed up and believe that through their ****up one percent or more of the population in their nation is about to die with nothing they can do about it, and if it gets pinned on them as it should since they caused it every one of them deserves to be swinging from a rope.

Oh, incidentally, Fauci also knew that masks in the general population were worthless.  He pointed this out directly; that the virus was too small and would go right though it.  His own words folks, as I've repeatedly pointed out but cannot say as "it's against the consensus of experts", according to Google, Facebook, Twitter and others, without being de-monetized, having videos pulled and risking being banhammered.  Now we know factually that Fauci stated this himself, so now the media and other "tech companies" are enforcing a position that the so-called "expert" generated with an intentional lie and they've maintained and forced that intentional lie for a year and are continuing to do so to this day.

Now you know how the hysteria, cover-ups and outright lying happened.

Now contaminate that with pharma money and you get what we're doing now.

Oh, you think this is not simply explained by fear (on their part) and corruption?

Do you believe they're telling the truth now about jabs when we now know, factually, they were lying all the way back to January of 2020?

Sorry folks, Occam's Razor says you're wrong if you buy into their bull****.  You were wrong then and you're wrong now; there is zero reason to believe they told the truth about anything, including early treatment, masks, distancing and the origin of the virus.

Put the so-called "research and public heath" institutions on this list too.  Vanderbilt, Johns Hopkins, Mayo, all of them.  They're all in this up to their necks as they are all "feeders" into the CDC, NIH and FDA, they all run on grant money and all three of them and more knew damn well what was going on.  Every one of these institutions must be held criminally accountable, along with all the corporate "health" organizations that banned the use of early therapeutics and heavily-pushed both population level constraints (e.g. lockdowns, capacity restrictions, business closures and similar) along with known useless masks and now stabs.  That Fauci was involved in that up to his neck with regard to therapeutics was known originally; he himself was involved in a paper stating that chloroquine was a "near cure" for the original SARS!

There was no "evolution" in the thinking as time went on; these emails evidence an intentional coverup and the number of people he corresponded with make clear it was organized and intentionally spread through both public health and the entire virology and infectious disease line of work and were not the act of one man alone.

The real question is whether you will demand justice, and if the governments of the world will not organize and provide said justice ala Nuremberg up and down the line for everyone involved from so-called "scientists" to private-sector actors to government stooges then will you sit for that or not?

If not, and your loved one died as a result, where are your nuts?

View this entry with comments (opens new window)
 

2021-06-02 14:41 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 8691 references
[Comments enabled]  

So Biden wants to try to bribe, cajole and even canvass people to take the potential-death stab?

One word: No.

Four more: Get Off My Lawn

Why?  Because the evidence is that effective drugs were deliberately withheld and the safety of these shots is being overstated.  Between the two the risk:reward calculation for healthy persons cannot be established to clearly be on the "do it" side.  If you're old and morbid then it's tougher, but especially for young, healthy adolescents and adults the odds are minuscule of trouble if you get infected, they're even smaller if you immediately use medical countermeasures we know work and, in addition, because natural immunity is broad and includes the nucleocapsid portion of the virus (the vaccines do notit is much more-likely to be effective against any variations that may arise where the shots may either not work or worse, damage or destroy any existing natural immunity you have in favor of their "solution."

Since I'm in that group -- I'm a healthy adult and I have access to and will immediately use countermeasures if I think I'm infected, and have been successfully engaged in the use of prophylaxis for more than a year now my answer to such a solicitation is NO.  I have not lived in fear or apprehension since this started and I still don't.  Simply put the shot scares me more than the virus does.

This is not broad-based when it comes to vaccines in general; for most the data is in and the risk:reward benefit is clear, convincing and with the exception of extraordinary circumstances comes down on the side of taking the shot.  I've had 'em and so has my daughter, with damn good reason.

But specific to this shot and this virus it is not established and on the evidence never will be because I and everyone else have been lied to for over a year and we're still being lied to.  Under the basic rules of evidence once lied to every other thing that person says can, and probably should, be disregarded.  Ask anyone who's sat on a jury.  You cannot convince me the lies have ceased until and unless every single person responsible for withholding those treatments and drugs from the 500,000+ Americans who died, including the 175 here in my county, pay for those deaths with appropriate punishment for mass-manslaughter and all the data on all sides is out in the open.  In the case of the shots even if the lies are punished, and you know damn well they won't be to get the data on the shots will take many years.

Given the Fauci FOIA email release it is now conclusively proved that rat bastard has been lying since this whole thing started on masks, on transmission, on all of it.

That's bad enough but now we have something much worse -- now we're talking origins and intent, which China itself just put on the table.

China has recently said in their state media that the country must prepare for nuclear war following multiple calls, including out of Biden, for a Covid probe into the Wuhan lab.

Newsweek isn't exactly a "right wing" magazine you know.

Why would you be concerned about nuclear war unless you know damned well the probe, if you can't obstruct it, will prove you unleashed the virus -- not on accident by being stupid but on purpose?

An accident doesn't get you nuked.  It might get you sanctioned, it might get all your Treasuries incinerated, it might even get you embargoed with every firm in the US forced to pull out of there and return manufacturing and development to the US.  It might mean a cut-off of agricultural exports to China.  It could lead to any or all of those not just by the US but by other nations too.

It other words it might mean a lot of things and some of them you definitely would not like but it would not get you nuked.

But an intentional biological attack?

THAT might get you nuked.

And maybe it should.

What do you think China just admitted to folks?

There's this in the Fauci archives, which appears to describe exactly how Covid-19 was constructed.  Valid?  I don't have the chops to know but the apparent author is on Twitter and has authenticated it.

 

Oh, you think it's a good idea we have Biden in office?  Is that so.  He's not compromised with his son and their shady dealings over there, is he?  What if Xi told him to get people jabbed "or else" and the shots are the primer for the weapon?  Fanciful?  I would rate this tinfoil garbage and likely banhammer anyone raising it on my forum except for the fact of the Biden family being compromised with previous China issues, including billion dollar deals that Hunter made with no logical purpose other than bribery within our government.  Let me guess -- you think Trump isn't compromised by the CCP as well?  Then explain why he didn't actually pull a single bit of production back from China over the three years before the pandemic hit -- including, specifically, medical devices (e.g. masks) and drugs.

Maybe that will keep you up at night.

Still glad you got jabbed?

View this entry with comments (opens new window)