![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2012 In Review) Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here. BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda) RSS available
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|
||
| MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context) |
User: Not logged on
|
| Top | Login | Control Panel | FAQ | Register | Logout |
| User Info | Louisiana Has Had Enough (MERS); entered at 2012-04-19 11:08:03 | |||
|
Leicestersq Posts: 225 Registered: 2009-10-12 UK
|
Just had a more detailed look at the filing. As I said in my earlier post, the whole thing in Louisiana wouldnt have worked anyway if judges had enforced the law. The irony appears to be, if I understand these legal documents correctly, is that the judges are party to the suing of the banks? And yet it is the judges who enabled this rampant law breaking in the first place. Is a person who lost their home allowed to sue a judge for that loss for failing to uphold the law? 2012-04-19 11:08:03
| |||