Back To Basics: What We Must Do
The Market Ticker ® - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Posted at: 2009-08-04 07:28 by Genesis
in category Editorial
 

After three articles in four days on the FDIC, banks, and what sure looks to me like a willful refusal to enforce the law over a period of more than two years, it appears time to once again talk about what should be done in the banking and regulatory systems.

I continue to return to my "roots" in this regard: transparency good, accounting clarity good, game-playing and book-cooking bad.

In short:

  1. We must promulgate regulatory rules that require servicers to act when loans become delinquent: the rules for when a loan is "performing" and "not performing" must be standardized and applied evenly, the time delinquent before a loan goes into foreclosure (or charge-off) must be defined by regulation, and a requirement to dispose of assets acquired through foreclosure actions via either private sale or public auction must be evenly enforced.  I would suggest that any loan that is 60 days delinquent must be considered non-performing and foreclosure (or charge-off) must be initiated at or before 90 days delinquent.   Multiple banks, including some very large ones (Wells Fargo anyone?) have redefined the time a loan can be non-performing before it is called "delinquent" over the last two years, effectively "cooking their books" by creating a distorted view of loan status.
  2. Foreclosure dispositions must be true sales.  Banks must be prohibited from bidding on their own foreclosure properties at auctions; this sort of "shill bidding" is prohibited in most auction formats and there is no reason to permit it in this case.
  3. The practice of holding foreclosed inventory off the market, or of failing to act on delinquent loans must result in severe and immediate regulatory enforcement action.  Such practices severely distort the financial picture that a firm's financial statements project.
  4. Loans that are subordinate to an underwater mortgage that has defaulted must not be allowed to be carried at any material value.  There is simply no recovery value of materiality on this paper and claims that there is "no market" for this paper are false; these loans trade daily, albeit for (literal) pennies on the dollar.
  5. All off-balance sheet entities must be consolidated.  Period.  I've been over this one before; off-balance-sheet entities were the means by which ENRON was able to accumulate a horrifying liability-to-asset ratio "under the radar" and our banks have abused the SPV/SIV entities in the same fashion.  There is absolutely no reason to create such an entity except as a means of intentionally understating liabilities and leverage ratios; intent to deceive is the definition of accounting fraud.  That we still have these monstrosities accounting for more than a trillion dollars in "assets" outstanding is an outrage.
  6. Institutions that carry paper without taking a reasonable recovery value mark when those loans are delinquent (by a standardized set of rules as set forth above) must be treated as having committed accounting fraud and their executives investigated, indicted and prosecuted. 
  7. Any person involved in backdating deposits or otherwise gaming bank capital ratios must be indicted and imprisoned.  There is no excuse for "simply suspending" or "firing" people involved in such abuses as occurred with IndyMac.  If I cheat on my taxes I am exposed to indictment and imprisonment; why should those who conspire to do the same thing at a bank be walking around free while the taxpayer absorbs billions in losses?
  8. The FDIC must enforce "Prompt Corrective Action" evenly and rapidly.  The law is supposed to prevent losses to the depositor's insurance fund; it has been willfully ignored and the consequence has been horrifying losses on a repetitive basis.  Properly-enforced Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) prevents losses to the insurance fund as banks are seized before asset values fall below liabilities.  The entire purpose of a "Tier Capital Ratio" is to provide ample early warning to regulators so they can step in and close institutions before a negative net worth situation develops.  If the FDIC will not act as the law requires then Congress must add "teeth" in the form of criminal penalties to the "PCA" law and demand enforcement.

 "Too big to fail" and "bailout nation" have become a bad excuse for accounting games, willful regulatory misconduct and accounting fraud. 

We have far too many "walking dead" banks that under any reasonable interpretation of PCA should have been closed months or even years ago.  Indeed, The Market Ticker began publication precisely because of the accounting games at Washington Mutual (formerly NYSE:WM) where it was paying out dividends in excess of its cash earnings, effectively trying to claim that "capitalized interest" booked on dubious loans in a declining market were actual money.  Regulators should have demanded that WaMu suspend dividends in the spring of 2007 and seized the firm if it was unable to correct its deteriorating asset performance within months, rather than effectively allowing the bank to collapse in the fall of 2008. 

Loss ratios against asset bases being absorbed by the FDIC when banks are seized over the last two years are not an accident or a reflection of the times - these losses are occurring due to willful, deliberate malfeasance throughout our banking regulatory structure, including The Fed, OTS, OCC and the FDIC itself, all of which have adopted "extend and pretend" as an operating mantra in direct and willful contravention of the Prompt Corrective Action law.

We will not find a durable economic and financial bottom until I and everyone else can once again read a set of financial statements and expect that the numbers printed on the page actually represent the firm's financial condition.

After ENRON and the debacle from The Tech Wreck you would have thought our regulatory agencies would have learned that nothing good comes from trying to sweep insolvency under the rug; that only multiplies losses.  Instead we have not only had to suffer the insult of hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer-borne loss, but also active complicity and willful misconduct of our government that has once again sat back and watched firms with severely-deteriorating asset bases continue to claim that "everything's fine" while the fire that began with the curtains spreads to the ceiling and the room fills with smoke.

Discuss this entry (registration required to post)
 

Show The Topic Display
Market-ticker.org
Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Blogtalk 3:30 CT Mondays
Items To Look At


Discuss The Capital Markets along with daily technical analysis with our Gold Donor program.

Where We Are, Where We're Heading (2010) - The annual 2010 Ticker

Links and Blogroll
Our policy on reciprocal links: Send us an email with your information and why you think your blog or news site would make a good addition - in most cases reciprocal link requests will be granted.
Seeking Alpha Certified
TopOfBlogs
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out
Ticker Classics.

Visit the forum to discuss this and other investing-related topics; see the FAQ on the forum for information about Gold Donor status including access to our technical analysis video server.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc.  Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to.  Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media.