The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.
Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.
The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)
Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.
Considering sending spam? Read this first.
Publication date September 11th, prior to Redfield's testimony before Congress.
He committed perjury and there is proof. His own agency's report documents that masks have no statistical benefit.
Note that unlike the other data in this report this table has no CI bands displayed. The reason is obvious when you look at it; the two associations that are statistically-significant are being in close contact with a known case (duh) and having a family member who was the close case. Interestingly enough what is also borne out in the data is that people who are friends are negatively associated (in other words you're probably not getting it from someone asymptomatically as your friends stay away from you when they know they're sick) and the same negative association is present for work colleagues.
But the screaming data is at the bottom. 70.6% of the people who got the bug always wore cloth face coverings (or better) in the 14 days prior, .vs. only 74.2% who did not get the bug, and there was only one tick difference between those who "often" wore a mask.
This is statistical non-confirmation folks and while this is an observational study and thus cannot prove causation observational studies can disprove a thesis. In this case exactly that occurred: It disproved the effectiveness of masks.
This is in fact the CDC's own weekly report folks and it was issued five days before Redfield testified before the Senate.
He LIED, knowingly. His own agency produced and published this report five days before his testimony.
Lock that SOB up for perjury and drop all mask mandates. They're worthless based on the CDC's own statistical data.