The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility. Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein. The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)
Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.
Considering sending spam? Read this first.
(Reuters) - Facebook Inc (FB.O) gave some companies, including Netflix (NFLX.O) and Airbnb, preferential access to user data in 2015 as it limited services for most others, according to company emails and presentations released by a British lawmaker.
Using a dominant market position (which Facebook has in online, social-media advertising) in concert with others with the intent or outcome of limiting competition is a felony under 15 USC Chapter 1.
Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
It is undisputed that preferential access to user data, granted to some firms and not others in similar lines of business, which appears to have been intentional on the part of Facebook and undertaken with the knowledge of and at direction by Zuckerberg himself, appears to run afoul of this law.
Dating app Badoo and Lyft were among the other companies 'whitelisted' for access to data about users' friends, the documents here showed.
Collins also alleged that Facebook took aggressive positions against competitor apps by denying them access to any user data.
Assuming these allegations are proved as factual this must be brought forward and adjudicated. There is simply no excuse for not doing so and every executive at Facesucker with knowledge and involvement must face the music.
At the point you obtain market power, which Facebook had established well before this date, this sort of preferential activity undertaken to assist one party while harming another for their and your mutual beneift is simply not permitted under US Federal Law -- period.
And it's not just a civil (you get sued) matter either -- it's not only properly the matter for a lawsuit it is also a criminal felony under which you can and damn well should be indicted and prosecuted.
Where are the handcuffs?