Barry Turns On The Light
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2014-09-12 07:30 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 111 references Ignore this thread
Barry Turns On The Light

And what does he see?  Why, half an answer.  But the rest, well, we'll get to that.

Yesterday, we looked at why bankers weren't busted for crimes committed during the financial crisis. Political corruption, prosecutorial malfeasance, rewritten legislation and cowardice on the part of government officials were among the many reasons.

But I saved the biggest reason so many financial felons escaped justice for today: They dumped the cost of their criminal activities on you, the shareholder (never mind the taxpayer).

Corporate executives theoretically work for the owners of the company, namely, the shareholders. But there is an agency problem in that owners can't closely manage and object to the actions of these executives. Collective owners, such as mutual funds, seem to have no interest in doing so.

Ever wonder why?  That's not hard to figure out -- if you're a mutual fund and you start clamoring for prosecutions what happens to the value of the shares in the firms you hold?  Well, duh!  So, you see, the more they steal (the companies you hold stock in) the more money you make.  Since we can't prosecute (or sue) the mutual fund manager as he has no responsibility, fiduciary or otherwise, to stop theft (unless it's happening to his shares) what do you think is going to happen?

What we end up with is a management class that works for itself instead of on behalf of the owners of the publicly traded banks. Many of these executives committed crimes; got big bonuses for doing so; and paid huge fines using shareholder assets (i.e., company cash), helping them avoid prosecution.

As for claims like those of white-collar crime defense attorney Mark F. Pomerantz, that “the executives running companies like Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan were not committing criminal acts,” they simply are implausible if not laughable.

Oh, it's laughable.  And outrageous.

But have you ever wondered why?

Well, let's think about it for a minute.  Where are the biggest swindles?  They're in health care and deficit spending.  Lawless behavior of that sort of course begets more of it, and so now you have a problem -- I swindle you, you swindle Joe, Joe swindles Steve and Steve, who has nothing to start with, gets buttfucked.

Who wants to see it stop?

Not I or Joe.  Steve, on the other hand, would probably like to shoot Joe, but he doesn't even know that I ripped both Steve and Joe off.  That's because we don't teach that in school, or anywhere else.  In fact, Barry doesn't talk about that either.

So who's going to call "BS!" on the entire charade?  Good question.

I know where that hasn't come from yet -- Washington DC, Wall Street or the various punditry and media channels.

It's long past time for that to change.