BlackBerry's stock has been hammered post-earnings, and with reasonable cause.
Thorsten has a habit of sandbagging that I have repeatedly noted, and which caused me to stop looking for something bad to come when he did it in the last two quarters. But this time he did it and the news was genuinely worse than expected, missing the lower end of shipment guidance on the BB10 devices by 300,000 units.
The stock got pounded as people entirely ignored or worse, factually misreported, where the cash build came from.
Specifically I can't count the number of research "reports" that have claimed the firm got a "one time" tax benefit from R&D credit. But this presumes the company was under US tax law, and it's not -- it's a Canadian company.
That credit is recurring, provided the firm continues to invest in R&D, and it always has at a rate double or more that of Samsung or Apple as a percentage of sales.
So no, it's not a "one time" benefit, it's an every quarter benefit, provided I'm reading the law right (and I'm reasonably sure I am.)
But this doesn't change the market's perception. And it's not helping that the carriers in the United States are now actively obstructing user perception of the devices, particularly the Z10.
I speak specifically of Verizon, although AT&T is responsible for this as well.
BlackBerry restricts software updates to carrier-endorsed things. Contrast this with Apple, which refuses to allow carriers to "approve" their IOS updates (and thus everyone gets them at once) or Samsung, which has the carriers push OTA updates but makes manual updates available over KIES on a PC if you want them.
This, incidentally, is how I have official Samsung 4.2 Android firmware on a SGS-II. I loaded it from my PC.
But Verizon, in particular, still (as of this morning) shows 10.0.9.xx firmware as "official" for the BlackBerry Z10. This is an outrage -- 10.0.9 was outdated on the day of the launch, with T-Mobile and AT&T both shipping 10.0.10. AT&T for its part has refused to release a 10.1.x firmware version -- of the major US carriers only T-Mobile has done so.
Why does this matter? Because 10.0.9 was very nearly an engineering prototype version and was (and is) full of bugs. 10.0.10 had problems too, but less-severe ones.
10.1 is stable and contains a number of additional features, including remote file access and HDR mode for the camera, but 90% of the US market has no official support or availability for it. It is also faster and has materially-lower power consumption.
The entirety of Canada has it as does nearly all of Europe!
How do you sell into your largest market when the carriers are actively obstructing a rapidly-improving and evolving operating environment?
Now this will be cited, I'm sure, as a reason to dump BlackBerry shares even more than they are now.
It doesn't have to be.
But BlackBerry, unless it intends to abandon the US market, in which case you may as well write them off as a public company in the US market, can and must, right now, hit below the belt.
It can do so in 30 seconds.
All they have to do is change BlackBerry Link so as to permit one to choose a firmware load of either the official carrier version or the latest BlackBerry-approved version at the user's option.
A 30 second change they could push right now.
They also need to start diverting attention to the carrier (T-Mobile US) that is supporting them and away from those who are intentionally trashing their reputation (Verizon, specifically, and AT&T as well.)
I know the excuses -- "the carrier wants to make sure the firmware is of high quality."
Ok, I give you that. But then get it done and put the resources behind it.
Or shut the hell up.
It's not hard for a user to update their device themselves. But most people won't and nobody should have to. Especially in a world of subsidized phones where you, as a contract customer, are paying $1,000 or more over 2 years for the device.
The firm is out of time here. Wall Street has given up and this isn't Wall Street's fault. It's BlackBerry's. They have refused to get out in front of the market with their strengths, they're running advertising that is "feel good" instead of showcasing the very real and powerful differences that makes the product better than any of their competitors and they're allowing carriers to ship four-plus month old firmware that has been twice superseded with both new features and significant bug fixes.
I said before the earnings "no thanks" on taking a position into earnings as the IV was ridiculous. That has now collapsed but the skew remains in the options market and it is heavily-weighted on the bearish side.
BlackBerry can be ridiculously successful as the third phone makers serving a "niche" market of ~10% of the marketplace. They will print money in that position with 10% penetration.
But they're going to wind up with 0% penetration if they don't get in front of the intentional destruction of their brand now taking place in the US carrier marketplace.
Yes, the company has a large cash hoard and is building it even into their rollout of BB10 but it cannot take 25% stock declines followed by 3, 4 or 5% daily drops for long before developer and end user support disappears.
IF MANAGEMENT DOES NOT IMMEDIATELY, AS IN RIGHT NOW -- TODAY, CUT THE CRAP THEN THE BOARD MUST STEP IN AND DO SO.
The board, given its history, won't. It sat back while the dual-CEO cluster**** went on for years.
Note that Sprint faced extinction a couple of years ago in exactly the same sort of way. They woke the hell up, allowed high-end phones on their prepaid business, and now are both stable and got bought. They "broke the glass" and got it done and those who bought at the time of the turn were richly rewarded.
BlackBerry has a superior device and technology that nobody knows about and that is being intentionally crippled by two of the largest US cell companies who are not releasing software updates that resolve the known issues and add critical features.
They either kick those firms in the balls, right here and now and in public or they may as well close their offices and go home.
Where We Are, Where We're Heading (2013) - The annual 2013 Ticker
The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.
Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out Ticker Classics.
Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.
The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.
Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.