To The GOP: Cut It Out Or Be Destroyed
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2013-03-15 10:26 by Karl Denninger
in Politics , 1 references Ignore this thread
To The GOP: Cut It Out Or Be Destroyed

Well now what do we have here?

Conservatives believe seniors could shop for health insurance, as they do for groceries, to drive down prices. The states, freed from excessive federal oversight, could similarly drive down costs.

That’s absolute fantasy.

Seniors would confront large insurance companies armed with too little information, and limited choices or monopolies when they purchase drugs and hospital care. That's not a fair fight--like individuals with bows and arrows vs. B-52s.

Already, large employers operate in a similar market space—free to negotiate with health insurance companies—and even they have not been able to harness rising health insurance premiums.

The reason this problem exists is that government has intentionally provided health insurance companies and health providers monopoly protections that allow them to literally screw anyone they wish, while barring the market from correcting these practices, by conferring legal protection against both market forces and long-standing anti-monopoly laws such as the Sherman, Clayton and Robinson-Patman acts.

There is no other way that an antivenom that costs $100 per dose to manufacture in Mexico is sold for well north of $30,000 a dose in a hospital in the United States.  But that is, in fact, what has been documented to have happened.

I have repeatedly, through the last several years, outlined exactly this problem and proposed solutions.  Both featured prominently as the key element in Leverage, which you can order off the sidebar at the right and which was published in 2011.  Recently, in response to a Wall Street Journal OpEd which claimed that they didn't see a path forward or identification of the real issues, I provided a condensed set of both problems and recommendations.

Now Fox News is publishing articles like the above; the Kool-Aid has worn off even among the right-wing faithful.

To the GOP: Stop protecting these jackals in the US Medical system.  If you don't act now you are and will be held responsible -- individually, jointly and severably -- for the upcoming and inevitable destruction of the United States Federal Budget and our economy.