Philly Fed: Negative, But "Better Than Expected"
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Sarah's Resources You Should See
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.


Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility; author(s) may have positions in securities or firms mentioned and have no duty to disclose same.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2012-09-20 10:18 by Karl Denninger
in Macro Factors , 1 references Ignore this thread
Philly Fed: Negative, But "Better Than Expected"

Look, "green sharts!"

Firms responding to the September Business Outlook Survey reported nearly flat business activity this month. The survey’s indicators for general activity and new orders both improved from last month but recorded levels near zero. Firms reported continuing declines in shipments, employment, and hours worked. Indicators for the firms’ expectations over the next six months, however, improved notably this month, although the same firms forecast continued deceleration in production growth in the fourth quarter.

You gotta love the spin, but what do the actual internals tell us?

First, expectations never declined materially -- there was a lot of oscillation, but nobody got terribly bearish -- nor did they during the collapse!  Amusing, isn't it?

On the current conditions side new orders were up slightly from declining, but shipments collapsed, down to -21.2 .vs. -11.3.  Unfilled orders decreased at a slower rate, delivery times decreased at a slower rate, and inventories dropped precipitously.  Prices paid grew at a slower rate but prices received actually decreased from increasing, which implies demand destruction and inability for force through cost increases (read: margin compression.)

Finally, employees and workweek both decrased, although at a slower rate than last month.

So why was the diffusion index only down -1.9?  Prices paid, basically, along with new orders being slightly positive.

This is an unqualified weak report, although the hopium is extreme on a forward basis, now up to 41.2 from 12.5 for general conditions.   New orders and shipments are both at ridiculously bullish levels.

If these folks are planning to spend basis on this they better be right or they will be bankrupt a year from now.