Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context)||
User: Not logged on
|User Info||America Has Been Lobotomized; entered at 2012-03-06 11:54:00|
Registered: 2008-05-19 Caution: Congress at Work
Here's what*****es me off about the who "debate" - that the strawman (no pun intended) argument of "the Republicans are at war with women and want to deny access" is blantently untrue.|
There is no restriction on ACCESS, just a restriction on who pays for it.
I do agree with Micron, though, for a typically healthy woman there is no reason to go 2x per year for an exam, as many doctors require. Just your yearly or bi-annual exam is more than sufficient if you have low risk factors (under 35, non-smoker, consistent partner).
However, if used to treat a bona-fide condition, it should be covered given that the condition is unexpected and unplanned, the key ingredients to the purpose of insurance.