This is a nasty box to be in.
If the equity market guys start doing their thinking with more than a shoe-sized IQ they will quickly focus on the P/E/G ratio for the S&P 500, which now stands against estimated earnings growth for the third quarter at eight. Even if profit growth doubles current estimates the P/E/G ratio will stand at FOUR.
For a perspective of balance, historical PEG ratios between one and two are considered "reasonable".
This implies that the S&P 500 should, assuming a double of estimated profit growth from estimates, be trading right now at about 750, or DOWN 50% FROM HERE!
Now that obviously is beyond bearish and into the realm of an outright equity market collapse. Yet without profit growth there is no reason to buy equities at all!
How long does it take before that fifty percent cut in earnings estimates sinks in to the guys riding the short bus - that'd be Equity Traders?
I don't know the answer to that question but I've never seen the S&P 500 trade with a P/E/G ratio of FOUR for any material length of time. Even during the Internet bubble we didn't get there because estimated earnings growth was so much higher.
This looks like big trouble to me, but heh, that's fundamental analysis and we know that doesn't matter any more right?
Feh. Fundamentals always win in the end.
Oh, they fixed the mortgage mess with tighter underwriting yes? Wrong:
"Subprime mortgage bonds created in the first half contain loans that are defaulting at the fastest rate ever, data in a Moody's Investors Service report shows."
Are we EVER going to see meaningful regulation out of Washington aimed at these clowns?
And guess what else is new? Richard Fisher has finally acknowledged what we all know - that inflation statistics ignoring food and energy is an act of fraud. And who is Richard Fisher?
He is one of the Fed Governors - President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas!
Now read this very carefully folks, and let's see if you can discern more than the average government-school educated idiot in our nation:
"Charlie Bean, the chief economist of the Bank of England who is on the Advisory Board of the Dallas Fed's Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute, posed an interesting question after noting that globalization not only delivers freighters full of inexpensive electronics, toys and apparel to consumers in the U.S. and Europe but also puts upward pressure on the prices of energy and other commodities. What sense does it make, the real Mr. Bean asks, to exclude the food and energy price increases from our inflation gauges while incorporating the price declines on the other goods that we buy?"
"People, including economists living in married bliss in East Texas, do not stop eating or air-conditioning their homes when food and energy prices jump. Excluding them suggests a disregard for the impact on real people. I empathize and sympathize. Keep in mind, however, that the price indexes a central banker uses to frame, craft and evaluate monetary policy need not be the same as the ideal index used for measuring the cost of living. Indeed, there are macroeconomic models suggesting that if wages are stickier than prices, a central bank would do well to focus on an index of wages rather than prices. I just can't imagine central bankers lasting very long in their jobs if they continually announced to the public their desire to hold down wage growth."
You mean that the idea of exporting inflation to our trading partners, especially when we do it by pushing marnufacturing offshore to artificially-cheap sources of labor, ultimately comes back to us in the form of higher inflation in commodities as their demand expands exponentially?
And what's even better did I not just see an admission in that second quote that The Fed doesn't give a flying **** if every person in this country eats REAL inflation and thus a REAL declining standard of living SO LONG AS THEY CAN LIE ABOUT THE RATE OF INFLATION AND THEREBY SUPPORT ARTIFICIALLY LOW INTEREST RATES AND INDEXED ENTITLEMENT PAYMENTS?
Go read that again - IT IS A RAW ADMISSION that The Fed is in fact "managing the numbers" so as to force down standards of living by intentionally understating inflation!
Gee, haven't I and others been saying this for quite some time?
Now guess what? Marketwatch picked up on the first quote - but not the second.
Because for the mainstream media to talk about the second means that the mainstream media would have to issue a formal indictment against The Fed, essentially accusing them not of "accidentally" screwing Grandma (with her Social Security check) but rather orchestrating an INTENTIONAL butt**** of every senior citizen and working person in the nation!
I didn't make this up or extrapolate it from the data guys - this is what Fisher actually said!
Ok guys, time to start faxing and sending things to Congress again, this time pointing out that The Federal Reserve has just admitted that it is intentionally violating its mandate given by Congress!
Special prosecutor anyone?
Get off your butt or get the government you deserve.Here's your evening technical!
Where We Are, Where We're Heading (2013) - The annual 2013 Ticker
The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.
The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.
Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out Ticker Classics.
Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.
Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media.
Submissions may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.
Leads on stories of current economic and political interest are always welcome. Our fax tip line is 850-897-9364; please include contact information with your transmission.