A mild cold is one thing these were people who basically said they got knocked on their ass!

Mild cold = probably OC43 and the test falsed on it.

----------

Somebody made the comment in another post a day or two ago about going Randy Weaver. That was a poor analogy cuz Ruby Ridge only happened cuz Mr. Weaver failed to appear before court because of miscommunication about the date of appearance.

The more accurate analogy is when will people go Tim McVeigh?

Tickerguy -- didn't you get wasp stings before your covid? If so, how many? Just got a bunch today deer scouting (about 5) and am wondering how long my immune system may be stressed.

thx!

@Rooster

One really needs to understand that acquiesce to the jabs has transcended the usual breakdown by politics religion and education. It more comes down to level of a persons reverence for authority. A very large number of conservatives and particularly Christian conservatives have obedience to authority as one of their highest values not so much because they were indoctrinated to do so much than that they naturally gravitate towards those kind of hierarchical institutions. My mostly super duper Christian family members ran right out to get the jabs and it was only my heathen ass that didnt trust it. Oh well none of them have died yet although a few have had COVID multiple times, one of them severely (and he and his wife are the MOST religious ones).

I on the other hand have a pleats had a natural antagonism to authority which has been so from a young age and wouldnt seem to fit considering everyone else around me. The realization over time that I am just wired different has come to my advantage! I also was drawn to reading about the dark side of history (which is most of it) on my own of which the most important lesson is the that the people in power have never given a shit about you and never will.

----------

Make building great again!

@Tsherry - often it takes hard times to separate the wheat from the chaff, doesn't it?

----------

Molon Labe
Where is Henry Bowman when you need him?
How many are willing to pledge this? We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor

Quote:

ABSTRACT
.Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer/BioNTech.
www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0131/v1
Copy and paste link above. System is not letting me hyperlink one of these in this post, even though they work when I preview.

Quote:

first degree murder
First degree murder is the intentional killing of another person by someone who has acted willfully,deliberately, or with planning. Generally, there are two types of first-degree murder: premeditated intent to kill and felony murder. This definition will focus on first-degree murder involving premeditated intent to kill.

It is important to note that the exact definition of first-degree murder depends on each state's statute, and its definition will vary by jurisdiction. Most jurisdictions define first-degree murder as cases involving premeditation and deliberation; all other intentional murders are defined as second-degree.

A premeditated intent to kill requires that the defendant had intent to kill and some willful deliberation (the defendant spent some time to reflect, deliberate, reason, or weigh their decision) to kill, rather than killing on a sudden impulse.

Prior planning and deliberation are often closely intertwined. Courts focus on the "pre" in premeditation, and generally look for evidence that the defendant deliberated and subsequently formed the intent to kill prior to the act of killing. This is justified because the defendant must have thought about the murder for a period of time and did not change their mind.

There are several factors indicating premeditation and deliberation. These include: lack of provocation from the victim, actions and words of the defendant before and after the killing, any threats from the defendant before and/or during the killing, whether the victim and the defendant had a poor history, whether there was an additional lethal attack after the victim was already helpless, evidence of brutality, and the nature and number of wounds. However, many jurisdictions concede that there is no bright, arbitrary line when premeditation begins and ends.
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_degree_murder
Copy and paste link above. System is not letting me hyperlink one of these in this post, even though they work when I preview.

Quote:

Genocide
Primary tabs
Genocide is one of the greatest crimes under international law, often called the "crime of crimes" after theNuremburg Trials. According to Article 2 of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Under most legal constructions of genocide, for example, under the statutes for the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and for Rwanda, liability for genocide extends to those who "planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution" of one or more of the aforementioned genocidal acts. In general, both public and private individuals are punishable under ICTY Art. 7(2). Leaders can be held accountable for the criminal actions of their subordinates if they knew or should have known about the actions and failed to prevent or punish them [ICTY Art. 7(3); Krstic, ICTY, Appellate Judgment 140].

Genocidal intent requires that acts must be committed against members of a group specifically because they belong to that group (Akayesu, ICTR, Trial Judgment 521), but it does not require that the acts be perpetrated solely because they belong to that group (Niyitegeka, ICTR, Trial Judgment 51-53). Genocidal intent can, "in the absence of direct explicit evidence, be inferred from" circumstantial evidence (Jelisic, ICTY, Trial Judgment 47). When proving genocidal intent based on an inference, "that inference must be the only reasonable inference available on the evidence" (Krstic, ICTY, Appellate Judgment 41).

Incitement to Commit Genocide Under Article 25(3)(e) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, a person who "directly and publicly incites others to commit genocide" has committed a crime against international law. Notably, there is no explicit requirement in this subsection of Article 25 that genocide actually be committed. Conservative interpreters might be quick to assume such a requirement, but the drafting in Art. 25(3)(b) provides that one who "orders, solicits or induces the commission of such a crime"in this context war crimes and crimes against humanityis liable only if that crime "in fact occurs or is attempted." In other words, incitement to war crimes and crimes against humanity is punishable only if the crime occurs or attempted, but incitement to genocide is punishable regardless of the crimes actually occurring or being attempted. The ICTR's Trial Judgment in Nahimana presented historical evidence that the drafters of the U.N. Genocide Convention intended that incitement convictions not require genocidal acts ( 678).

Direct incitement refers to when someone directly and publicly encourages others to commit genocide. It has to be a clear and direct call to action, rather than a vague or indirect suggestion. The level of directness is judged based on the context and audience it was intended for. Even if the incitement is not obvious to outsiders, it can still be considered direct as long as the intended audience immediately understands the message. The level of directness must be clear and unambiguous in its intended context.
[Last updated in January of 2023 by the Wex Definitions Team]
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/genocide
Copy and paste link above. System is not letting me hyperlink one of these in this post, even though they work when I preview.

Quote:

Death by Government
Chapter 2
Definition of Democide
Genocide: among other things, the killing of people by a government because of their indelible group membership (race, ethnicity, religion, language).
Politicide: the murder of any person or people by a government because of their politics or for political purposes.
Mass Murder: the indiscriminate killing of any person or people by a government.
Democide: The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder.
www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.CHAP2.HTM
Copy and paste link above. System is not letting me hyperlink one of these in this post, even though they work when I preview.

"3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls"

3.7-fold is THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY PERCENT (370%) INCREASE IN DEATHS. Since when did a 370% increase in deaths become defined as Safe and Effective?

HIPPOCRATRIC OATH:
"FIRST, MURDER THEM ALL"

@Jerry_d - easily a hundred, maybe more. I got swarmed BAD.

----------

I'm more concerned about what is coming down the track, rather than about the remnants of Covid.

The Wuhan Lab has been joined by dozens of similar labs located in strange places around the globe. Biological research is now a big business and the big money is in research that can be used against humans.

How many more unlicensed Chinese bio labs like the one discovered in California are operating in the USA?

Our leadership is lost, and the globalists are not on our side. Another more deadly virus escape or release is likely.

I think a good response would be a coordinated campaign along the lines of the "Seriously, you're not a horse" against Ivermectin. Since this is an unapproved drug the line would be "Seriously, you are not a lab rat, don't take an experimental drug, leave it to the rats."

Shame them in any way possible.

----------

We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying. - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Your wish is my command....

----------

You neglected the folksy: "y'all".

----------

Vaccination required? Not if we leave.
Now in Florida, heart rate dropping, nicer people

Fixed.

Post THIS shit all over Social Media!

----------

not to pry -- but no cellulitis? I get stung by wasps about once a year and don't react -- but I keep hearing about wasp stings lead to it(cellulitis). and while 5 is not much -- it is the most I have ever gotten. I have, of course, cleaned the areas and thrown some vinegar on -- but any tips would be appreciated :).

thx!

Nope. But it sucked, badly. I couldn't count the stings -- there were too many of them -- both legs, a few on my back, arms and armpits, etc. Yeah, not good.

----------

If you consider this objectively, how can it be anything but a huge money grab with the side effect of culling the non-critically thinking population?

----------

I don't think any of them give a fuck about ANY of it other than the money grab.

----------

I made 2 visits to my sick care PCP in summer 2022. The first visit he recommended a pneumonia shot, shingles shot, clot shot, tetanus shot, flu shot and statins. I took the tetanus 'cause I work on a farm with barbed wire and various other ways to cut. Turned him down on the others.

The second visit I actually had a bug of some kind (why I was there). They tested and said it was covid. He recommended the clot shot again, along with Paxlovid. I declined. He said "you don't go by any of my recommendations. Why are you here?"

I told him that was a good question, and I wouldn't be wasting any more of his time. Pretty sure he took me off his Christmas card list...

@ MetalQueen

You are 100% correct!

I live and grew up in west MI and my family has had a farm here since in 1839 oldest active farm in our township. West MI and especially Ottawa county which my farm borders is deeply religious; there used to be some dry townships and work on Sunday was a BIG NO NO; one of my competitors still to this day doesn't allow hunts on Sunday, which in my business, is either the 2nd or 3rd busiest day of the week. I'm constantly asked if I'm open on Sundays!

I grew up agnostic in a rural area populated with a shit ton of Catholics and Christians. After elementary school practically all my friends ended up going to parochial schools this was in the 1970's. And oh boy, did I get into some heated discussions growing up. Much love to my parents who emphasized critical thinking as they were always skeptical of phantom fears whether by government or religious authorities.

Seems appropriate: RUSH ~ FREE WILL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpOyQhgM....

Quote:

You all saw the media -- the Fauci, Walensky and Birx Dog and Pony show for over a year, exhorting you to go take the shot, Biden gets elected in November of 2020 to the backdrop of Trump running his mouth about "beautiful" vaccines so both sides of the aisle are saying the same thing and then Biden tells everyone in a somber voice that if you take the vaccine you're not going to get Covid.

By then you know damn well that plenty of people have gotten the virus and some have died (of course the media has trumpeted every single death with chyrons of the body count on the bottom of the screen every night) so you believe it and go take the shots.

The reason I never got any jabs is because it takes 10 or more years to prove the safety and efficacy of a vaccine. My critical thinking skill told me ''Why would you want to take a ''vaccine'' that hasn't been proven safe and effective?''


There are so many unknowns and variables regarding the jab that we don't know what the future long-term effects (more than 5 years) or what their severity will be.

----------

''Whenever law ends, tyranny begins'' -- John Locke, English Philosopher
The United States is a banana republic
Survivors use critical thinking, common sense and intuition

It is the equivalent of a religious revival. Our tribal evolution taking over in a totally predictable way.

I think there was more than a few nefarious premeditated actions that drove the societal response.

It's not comfortable to consider.

----------

It's justifiably immoral to deal morally with an immoral entity.

Festina lente.

I can't believe no one has posted the Carlin vid yet...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyvxt1sv....

Seen the Japanese study that purports to show that the variety of omicron sequences:
1. cannot be derived as branching from parent classes
2. display almost entirely non-synonymous mutations, the opposite of what one expects to find.
The conclusion that imposes itself is that they were independent lab critters and not part of any natural evolution/bifurcation.

Still reading, but dear host is fired-up!

Got OG rona January 2020; pretty sure got it again a few weeks ago as exactly same symptoms, incldng annoying smells. (Mix of exhaust and caramel.) But 3 days vs 3 months.

Knew it was invitable as virus gonna virus. It's how nature works.
What I find fascinating is no cold or flu e wcil RASV ... like having super-immune system.

By the way ... I avoid those whom I know are vaxxed. Why? Because I don't have a death wish.

Work hubby is vaxxed - have told hi repeatedly I would be proud to do is eulogy. He is not amused.

Rockin' out to RUSH while brewing a 2 Hearted clone and this track played... One can dream can't he?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekoxIb85....