Fear Porn Fraud EXPOSED
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-04-06 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 1892 references Ignore this thread
Fear Porn Fraud EXPOSED
[Comments enabled]

Oh my, what happens when the fear porn folks bury the facts in an appendix?

It only works until they get caught when someone reads said appendix.  Which of course the "Woke" and fear-porn peddling media will never do.  Unfortunately for them I'm the sort of guy who stays up all night to read 1,000 page bills before they're voted on like Obamacare, and I was tipped off to this one, so I went digging -- and indeed, there it is.

On page 23 they got caught.

This is is a very large post-EUA vaccine study in Israel, which has been wildly stabbing people now for a few months.  And it contains a very sobering set of statistics if you read the appendix.

It's also notable what's not included.

So let us begin.

First, this is roughly a half million people per arm -- vaccinated and control -- or about one million people in total.  It therefore has a lot of statistical power, just on size.  That's very good news because you need large numbers to get meaningful results when the outcomes in each arm are relatively rare.

Further, Israel is somewhat unique, in that they mandate membership in a "health fund" but let you choose one.  This is the data from the largest, covering ~50% of the nation's population.  As such it's remarkably free of the sort of self-selection bias that is in a lot of studies, and because Israel has electronic records for all of them the data quality is pretty good.

They also "matched" the control and study arms, which is good too.  What this means is that as someone dropped out from one cohort for any reason, such as getting vaccinated, they had to either be replaced or their matching pair dropped. 

So let's start here:

In the absence of systematic periodic testing for SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic people in Israel, documented asymptomatic infections do not account for all asymptomatic infections, and likely cannot accurately capture vaccine effectiveness for this outcome.

No ****?

But who gives a crap about asymptomatic infection?  Nobody with a brain.  It produces only social and personal good; both personal immunity and contribution to population immunity.  There has never been an epidemic in history during which asymptomatic cases have been material in the spread of disease and this is no exception; even JAMA now admits asymptomatic transmission in the highest-contact environment outside of medical settings, households, almost never occurs (0.7% probability .vs. 18%). Do recall that literally every "public mitigation" step including masks, closing schools and businesses and more centers around the lie that people without symptoms transmit the virus efficiently yet this is now known, by published, direct study to be false just as it always has been false in the past.

In other words, just to repeat, JAMA itself now admits there is no reason whatsoever to issue any mandate against non-symptomatic people -- and there never was any reason to do so.  Such persons are less than 1/25th as likely to spread disease when in a confined space with other people for tens of hours at a time.  Every person and official promoting and issuing such "mandates" including masks, closing schools, distancing and similar deserves to be in prison right here, right now and be asset-stripped to their underwear.  They had no evidence behind their actions and the foremost medical journal in the United States has admitted this is and was the case in print.

Now let's look at the magnified infection curve for symptomatic infections.  There is a significant bend in the curve.  But notice something; only 0.9% of the unvaccinated people got infected and the spread is not the entire 0.6 -> 0.9; there was divergence right from the start which is a problem because until the person who gets the vaccine builds antibodies nothing happens.  But it did.

This strongly implies either behavioral or matching problems between the populations.

Let's continue.

Looking out the 42 days (when the study terminated) we find another oddity; there is no material bend in the curve among unvaccinated persons.  Yet we took half a million in one of the health systems alone, out of four, out of the pool!  Or did we?  The data is that we did not; we may have taken them out of "documented infections" but they're spreading the virus, which means they're mutating it too.  How do we know this?  Because that immune pressure on spread would otherwise be seen in the unvaccinated cohort to a very significant degree and it was not.

That's a problem.  In fact it's an extremely serious problem because under any reasonable interpretation it means that sterility did not occur with vaccination.

Note that Salk made the same mistake with polio.  Fortunately Sabin figured out the danger in what was being done and saved the day with OPV, which is sterilizing.  Had he not evasion and promotion of more-virulent strains may well have resulted in a "super polio" outbreak over time.  We are now deliberately ignoring that which Salk and Sabin taught us decades ago and if we get it up the chute as a result, and I remind you there is emerging anecdotal reports of it occurring alreadywe will deserve it.

An even more-interesting factor came in, however, with hospitalization.  In short the evidence is that the unvaccinated stopped getting sick enough to go to the hospital!  So why would you now get vaccinated?  After 35 days both curves flatlined and the vaccinated one was about 4-5 days in front of the unvaccinated.

Did the vaccine do anything to actually stop hospitalization or did the virus simply run out of vulnerable people?

The evidence is that it did the latter; the vulnerable got vaccinated first and the rest are not vulnerable and thus didn't wind up in the hospital.  In other words widespread vaccination beyond the vulnerable conferred no benefit.

The same thing happened a few days later with "severe" Covid-19, which is expected; a case that deteriorates takes a few days to do so.  Thus, among the unvaccinated the virus had burned itself out.  This is point #2 in support of that explanation.

And then comes the kick in the nuts: The same thing happened with death, lagged 10 days which is approximately how long it takes to die from symptom appearance.

THAT'S ALL THREE ENDPOINTS, ALL OF WHICH CONCUR.

CASE CLOSED.

There will be people who will argue this is a "stunning success" based on the narrative in the study.  They're lying and the data in the appendix conclusively proves it.

Once the vulnerable people got vaccinated, and those people went first in Israel as happened here in the US as well all further benefit to society as a whole disappeared.  The not-vulnerable who were left in the unvaccinated cohort were never at risk of dying in the first place, nor of hospitalization, so they got nothing useful from the vaccine.  All they got was risk from the shot itself.  Nobody gives a crap if you sneeze and preventing sneezing is not worth the risk from a shot.

Worse, the differential in deaths between the two over those 42 days was only 19 souls; which across a million is not a very large number, and all of those were in high risk people who, as time went on, got vaccinated.  The rest of the cohort who remained unvaccinated through the end of the 42 days had no harms from being unvaccinated as they stopped being hospitalized, getting a severe case and dying before the end of the 42 days yet they had not been jabbed.

You literally could not come up with a better argument for not vaccinating anyone other than those at significantly elevated risk than this study; it shows conclusively that the "unvaccinated" did not suffer at all if they were they not in the high risk categories; those who were "unvaccinated" and got hit with hospitalization, severe disease or death were all high risk people and as they were removed from the pool all three of those outcome stopped even though cases did not.

No, everyone should not get poked; there is no discernable benefit shown here for those not at specifically high risk.

If you take the jab voluntarily and are not at said high risk on the data you're stupid and deserve what you get.

Oh, and what else is missing?

All-cause mortality in both groups, and the study folks had that data just like they had the rest since everything is electronic.  Those 19 lives that were saved -- how many were lost in that vaccinated group .vs. the non-vaccinated over that same time and what offset against those 19 souls must be applied due to other causes of mortality that were associated with getting jabbed?

After all, dead is dead -- right?

SO WHY WASN'T THAT REPORTED WHEN, IF IT SHOWED LOWER ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY AMONG THE VACCINATED IT WOULD GREATLY SUPPORT THE SAFETY ARGUMENT?

If you're not pissed off enough by the above watch this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/RqyafQHKY9Iy/ 

Youslob has deemed it "against community rules" and removed it; facts just are, but if they damage someone's fear porn control schtick they must, of course, be censored.

Go to responses (registration required to post)
 

 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last
User Info Fear Porn Fraud EXPOSED in forum [Market-Ticker]
Smacktle
Posts: 4472
Incept: 2009-01-20

Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Does anybody care about the facts anymore? Isn't all about the feels?

----------
Don't be a slug! **** twitter.
Tickergroupie
Posts: 689
Incept: 2010-03-24

Oklahoma
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Nope. Facts are hard. "Feels", is easy. Most people want to be in the "Feels" club.
Weezie
Posts: 7323
Incept: 2008-05-19
A True American Patriot!
Caution: Congress at Work
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Abbott of Texas stepped up and is banning passports. Hope the trend continues with other governors.

----------
jihad pressure cooker tea party guns Constitution Bill of Rights play doh squiggly line prepper home garden cluster****
Thelazer
Posts: 492
Incept: 2009-05-11

Davenport, Fl
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I've about given up, I'll share this out, do what I can.

Everyone around here is busy trying to book there Vax appointment or taking there selfi's with there arm up at the drive thru stab line.
Mercury
Posts: 13
Incept: 2017-05-13

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
So now there is hard data of sufficient size that proves vaccines overall are a chimera; yet the gubbermint just pooped out trillions in COVID stimulus. This sounds like a buying opportunity smiley.
Blackcrow
Posts: 22
Incept: 2021-04-04

Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I think it will be worse that just the miniscule "improvement" buried in the appendix. This is an incredibly short follow up for such a massive experiment.

I believe this report was written by Israel AND Pfizer. Both have substantial vested interests in a "good outcome" and I will leave it at that.

There is a concept of serial passage in virus research. You passage the virus through serial animal hosts until you select the attribute you want. You never give the virus time enough to evolve naturally and do what viruses want to do which is spread around and make friends. That is why all bacterial/viral/parasitic infections attenuate through time. The host and the bug achieve equilibrium with each other.

In these mRNA vaccines, we are vaccinating people against the very part of the virus that wants to mutate, ie the spike protein. That is, we are inducing incredible immunologic pressure on the very part of the virus responsible for producing variants - we are giving it every reason to mutate. That seems an.... unwise....strategy to me.

I have emailed the vaccine leaders in every major hospital in Houston, TX with just this question and received zero reply. Crickets.

A human simply cannot produce enough neutralizing antibodies (remember that term) to clear 100% of an infection with any vaccine strategy. There were reports of variant already occurring before the first vaccine. Interesting that the variants are now increasing after the vaccination campaign, no?

So you remove 90% of virus A, attenuate an infection, but are now harboring and giving sanctuary to variant B. There will be some cross immunity to B but studies have show than you need to have polyclonal antibodies, that is antibodies to multiple epitopes of the spike, to clear virus. We are not doing that with this vaccine strategy.

We are essentially interfering with the natural evolution of a virus epidemic by promoting the mutation of the virus within a host while at the same time inducing passage within that host of virus that escaped the first immunological challenge.

So the vaccinated person may have attenuated covid infection, that is shown, but he/she is now shedding variant virus that has a completely unknown profile, hence the appearance of variants in younger or non vaccinated people, which is happening.

I think this is known to the "experts", hence the recommendation to keep wearing a mask, social distancing, etc.

This scenario, if true, plus the very real issue of ADE, is an absolute, civilization ending disaster.

Trust the Amish, there is a reason they have survived as they have for 100s of years.

Drifter
Posts: 741
Incept: 2016-02-11

Pacific Northwest
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
From the study. Notice that the Poindexters graph the two cohorts to make it look like a yuuugge difference between them. Shades of Kansas, and the fraudulent mask graph.

This study should be a "what the **** are we doing?" moment. The group think is so strong, there are few willing to say, 'stop!' So when people tout the vax is 95% successful, I just reply being unvaccinated is 94% successful. Ignoring percentages, the whole numbers are so small they don't matter. Imo.


Inline
Scottj175
Posts: 180
Incept: 2010-09-06

Vandiver, AL
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Drifter that's the problem with sharing this. Most of the ignorant you're trying to educate just see "smaller line for vaccinated so gimmie my jab".

I took sadistics...I mean statistics in college and even I have trouble picking out what Karl sees just by nature.

But like you what did really stand out to me were the tiny numbers on the vertical axis of the graphs. The actual risk of this thing is so low yet you have people running around scared like the atmosphere is full of nerve gas or something.
Njca
Posts: 75
Incept: 2018-10-16

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
As Covid-19 vaccine was being developed, Moderna shelled out more than $1M for top executives' security

As Moderna worked in overdrive to create the second Covid-19 vaccine granted emergency use authorization by the FDA, it spent more than $1.1 million on security for its top executives the overwhelming majority of which went to keeping CEO Stphane Bancel safe.

More than $1 million was spent on security costs for Bancel in 2020, according to a proxy filing published this week. CMO Tal Zaks, who in February announced that he will leave the company later this year, received $143,719 for security. The company also spent $16,380 on security for President Stephen Hoge, and $28,161 on SVP Juan Andres.

The spending increase addressed security concerns as the company pursued the development of the Covid-19 vaccine, the report said.

https://endpts.com/as-covid-19-vaccine-w....
Clyde
Posts: 101
Incept: 2009-08-19

Clinton, massachusetts
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Massachusetts is having the 3rd most "Brazil" variant infections,
mostly all on Cape Cod. Not sure of the vaccinated population down there
Note: a lot of retired people on the cape.
? Is this what could be happening there Karl.

50 on the cape.
4 in Essex county northeast most county in mass.
4 in Middlesex county , kinda of northeast central in mass.


----------
It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.

Samuel Adams
Kokobeware
Posts: 63
Incept: 2010-05-04

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
In a word, STUNNING!!!

This needs to be circulated and the "missing" data that Israel has needs to be published. There is CLEARLY no statistical reason for the jab. The data sets prove it. If this data was presented on a standalone basis asking for a vaccine for a mystery virus, those asking for the vaccine would be literally laughed off the stage. Any pharma company, looking at this raw data, would NEVER have spent a dime on a vaccine. There would be no money to be made.

The only rational conclusion after looking at this data is that a clear agenda was pushed. Any other explanation can't be argued.

STUNNING!
Blackcrow
Posts: 22
Incept: 2021-04-04

Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I don't think it matters what the numbers or facts are.

This thing has reached, or descended to, the level of a religious mania.

You simply cannot reason people out of a mindset they didn't use reason to get to in the first place. (hat tip Mark Twain)

I try to point these things out, provide articles, print out the CDC VAERS, try to get people to THINK - and people's eyes just glaze over.

I have taken the attitude of the dolphins in Douglas Adam's 4th book: "So long and thanks for all the fish".
Captainkidd
Posts: 2459
Incept: 2010-05-25

Houston, Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
But like you what did really stand out to me were the tiny numbers on the vertical axis of the graphs. The actual risk of this thing is so low yet you have people running around scared like the atmosphere is full of nerve gas or something.


The numbers are tiny...
But the stupidity of sheep is immense.
So, Conflation of the fact that "1% of the population is 3.5 MILLION PEOPLE" tossed out as a red herring to the sheep, and they're running to the train station to board the boxcars.... fighting to be first in line for their shower shot.

----------
A lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a thousand men with guns. --Mario Puzo

It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. -- Henry Ford

Reason: Punctuation
Smooth
Posts: 63
Incept: 2020-03-26

USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
TG, Thank you for posting such a comprehensive summary of this paper. As a physician, this type of stuff makes me ashamed of my profession.

I tell people that particularly if they are not elderly, the likelihood is that their risk of dying is higher if they get the experimental drugs ("vaccines")than if they do not, because although this data is available, it is deliberately being hidden.

We all know damn well that if the overall mortality of the vaccinated group in this study was lower than the non-vaccinated group, they would have screamed it from the freaking rooftops.

When I try to educate people about basic COVID facts, they just look at me like they are robots programmed by Fauci and the MSM -- I guess because that is what they really are.

Maybe 5% of all adults in this country are capable of independent critical thought, and even that WAG might be optimistic.
Purplefang
Posts: 241
Incept: 2010-03-28

Oklahoma
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Would it be too much of a stretch to call the injections worthless?
Tickerguy
Posts: 172612
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Purplefang - The data does not say they're worthless.

The data says they both have value and are dangerous.

This is generally true of EVERY drug, no matter the type. The question is ALWAYS the ratio. The problem is that due to the wild spread in lethality of Covid-19 in various population sub-groups for MOST people the shot makes NO SENSE because it is at least as dangerous as the disease itself AND you're not guaranteed to get the disease BUT IF YOU TAKE THE JAB YOU ARE GUARANTEED TO TAKE THAT RISK.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Kokobeware
Posts: 63
Incept: 2010-05-04

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@ Purple,

I'd argue that not only are they worthless, but they most likely do more harm than good and potentially significantly more harm.

Given the data from Israel, I'm at a loss how any medical professional could push this vaccine. They are either stupid / lazy, robots following protocol, too prideful to admit that they are wrong and/or in on "the agenda" and clearly evil as @#$%.

I spent 15 minutes this morning on a call with a medical pro and after reviewing the data with him he was literally speechless. His words to me ... "we are intentionally murdering people." He was sick to his stomach as he initially urged people to get the jab.
Redjack
Posts: 505
Incept: 2018-01-29

Iowa
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Interestingly enough, I just got a call to be tested to see if my antibodies are still good.

Had Covid in November, strong antibodies in January (gave plasma), and now they are wondering how many are left.

We shall see.
Slava01
Posts: 3
Incept: 2020-04-06

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
My Boss keeps asking if I will get the vaccine and I keep telling him that I don't need to as I'm not in the age or risk group. He is pressuring me to get it and ultimately said I will have a hard time getting around in the future and that I would be endangering people. Yes, like typhoon Mary....

This craziness is hitting corporate America. At this point sooner or later I will be forced to get it or possibly be fired in the future.

Never thought this would happen in the US. Just insane....
Purplefang
Posts: 241
Incept: 2010-03-28

Oklahoma
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
True, but still it seems close to worthless. I also assume they did not treat the symptomatic with ivermectin or HCQ which would have made the benefits irrelevant.

I conclude the billions wasted on the vaccines is for achieving another agenda. I can't think of a single official action that saved lives or slowed the spread. They put the BIG LIE of masks right on everybody's face and many can't see it.
Survivor
Posts: 2
Incept: 2021-03-19

UK
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I see Karl uses the words 'population immunity' in this post.

Here in the UK the term 'herd immunity' was used in the early days.

Then this was rubbished as a strategy and the whole fear + lockdown + vax mindset was inculcated.

If only we had used the term 'population immunity' we might have escaped the madness.

People don't like being described like cattle.

Words matter.
Smooth
Posts: 63
Incept: 2020-03-26

USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Just saw a healthy 39 yo woman with a history of mild asthma. Not overweight. Navy wife. Previously treated her sinusitis, now better on follow up.

In the interim, she got the first shot of the Moderna drug. Two days later she developed a severe headache and her BP at the doctor's office was 180/120. Now on two new BP drugs and it is still high. Seeing the cardiologist tomorrow.

I told her that so far there is no other reasonable explanation for this than an adverse reaction to the vaccine and that my advice would be to not get the second shot. This is not the first severe reaction I have seen.
Indianarube
Posts: 30
Incept: 2020-03-22

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Slava01 I would threaten to sue the everloving **** out of them. HIPPA says they don't need to know what treatment you have or have not had.
Kikknback
Posts: 400
Incept: 2020-03-17

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Blackcrow wrote..
In these mRNA vaccines, we are vaccinating people against the very part of the virus that wants to mutate, ie the spike protein. That is, we are inducing incredible immunologic pressure on the very part of the virus responsible for producing variants - we are giving it every reason to mutate. That seems an.... unwise....strategy to me.

I have emailed the vaccine leaders in every major hospital in Houston, TX with just this question and received zero reply. Crickets.

This scenario, if true, plus the very real issue of ADE, is an absolute, civilization ending disaster.

Kobobeware wrote..
This needs to be circulated and the "missing" data that Israel has needs to be published. There is CLEARLY no statistical reason for the jab. The data sets prove it. If this data was presented on a standalone basis asking for a vaccine for a mystery virus, those asking for the vaccine would be literally laughed off the stage. Any pharma company, looking at this raw data, would NEVER have spent a dime on a vaccine. There would be no money to be made.

Smooth wrote..
TG, Thank you for posting such a comprehensive summary of this paper. As a physician, this type of stuff makes me ashamed of my profession.

I tell people that particularly if they are not elderly, the likelihood is that their risk of dying is higher if they get the experimental drugs ("vaccines") than if they do not, because although this data is available, it is deliberately being hidden.

Kobobeware wrote..
I spent 15 minutes this morning on a call with a medical pro and after reviewing the data with him he was literally speechless. His words to me ... "we are intentionally murdering people." He was sick to his stomach as he initially urged people to get the jab.


You could post the above in a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal, and the entirety of the Government, Medical-Industrial Complex, and the Mass / Social Media would not cover one single point.

They are all guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.

On the other hand, if say a person were to run for high public office, for instance, Governor of a large state, and quote the above in their announcement, it would be pretty hard for the media to ignore it at that point.........

----------
"The most grotesque act of Treason is to be born into a free Constitutional Republic, for which you did not risk your life or shed blood to create, and sit back and watch it slowly be taken from you without standing up in its defense" - me

"True Freedom can never exist, unless true Rule of LAW exists" - me
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last