How The Left Hides The Sausage....
The Market Ticker - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives

Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.


Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-02-21 08:46 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 655 references Ignore this thread
How The Left Hides The Sausage....
[Comments enabled]

.....right up your ass.

The Atlantic started the "Covid Tracking Project" when they had a great villain -- Donald Trump -- who they could beat over the head.  They, along with the rest of the media, participated in hiding the Cuomo nursing home deaths, never investigating and never caring.  Ditto for those in Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.  There was not one complaint about banning drugs from being used against Covid-19, even though off-label prescriptions have been explicitly legal since the FDA was founded.

Nor was there a single complaint from any of these so-called "journalists" about the fact that myriad "non profit" entities, from Gates' evil spawn to the NIH and CDC to Vanderbilt to Johns Hopkins to many others all did not spend a single nickel running the data through a quick screen for all reasonably safe pharmaceutical and nutritional substances and then performing clinical trials with informed consent on those that might work.

And let me be clear: This is not by any means limited to The Atlantic; it stretches across the entirety of "organized journalism", all of which had a hard-on for Trump and was willing to destroy the economy, the education of children and watch your grandmother choke to death in order to "get" him.

We knew by summer that several inexpensive means of interdiction of this disease existed and did work -- specifically, HCQ + Zinc + {Z-Pak/Doxycycline}, Ivermectin and Vitamin D.  Vitamin D deficiency turns out to be wildly associated with serious and fatal Covid-19 outcomes -- and is both disturbingly common and very easy to correct.  Indeed, that association is so strong that had we put an effort into correcting that for pennies we might have prevented half or more of all the deaths with that single step alone.

We knew that certain others had failed, and for still more there was conflicting information -- for example while very high dose IV Vitamin C might work in certain cases it was not effective in reasonably-usable oral amounts.

Still other potential therapeutics continued to be studied by small and non-US groups again, which the nation with the largest medical system and biggest bunch of both political and medical *****s refused participation and slowly, over the months, the data came in on those -- now including utterly astounding efficiency for inhaled steroidsagain a treatment we knew was safe because asthma suffers had used them for decades and once again they're cheap.  How scared would you have been with an immediate and permanent 90% reduction in mortality and morbidity from this disease using that one therapy alone?  Why do you need a vaccine when you can stop 90% of the damage immediately?

Who's responsible for deliberately ignoring a 90% reduction in death with a cheap inhaler you can use at home?  How about a nearly 100% reduction in transmission to health care workers from using Ivermectin?  If none of the workers had taken the virus into nursing homes how many infections and deaths would have been avoided?

The questions around safety of the so-called "vaccines" (which are not vaccines by the actual medical definition just as calling a person with XY chromosomes a woman cannot make him a woman no matter how many times you repeat it) remain unresolved.  The VARES data says that these shots are associated with a wildly-elevated risk of death compared against everything else that is an actual vaccine and has been followed, including varicella (Chicken Pox), measles, mumps and..... the annual flu shot.  While the former are all typically given to children the latter is typically given to high-risk people every single year and yet in this last year only 20 fatalities have been associated (not caused, associated) with the seasonal flu shot.  Over 600 have been associated (but not proved caused) by the Covid-19 shots, which is 30 times the fatality rate among similar populations and thus similar risk profiles of dropping dead from unrelated causes.

Does this mean they're a "bad deal" all the way around?  Not necessarily.  Even with the risk of an adversary being able to use the "tag" to attack us and unknown intermediate and long-term risks for some people, particularly the most-seriously morbid, they might present a good risk:reward on the mathematics.  However every Health Department that can publicize the jabs as a universal nostrum is doing exactly that, parading around all those people "proud" to take the jab.  These people are ghouls; they are the very same health departments that spoke up against the use of known safe and likely effective things to interdict and stop death by Covid as it did not fit their political and ideological agenda.  For most people the jab is, like it or not, a bad deal again, simply on the math and that's ignoring the unknowns we deliberately did not investigate due to time which is never wise.

These "Health Departments" are monsters -- every single one of them and every one of their employees.

Since I'm clubbing The Atlantic over the head I would like to point out that I've found their data very useful and used it -- and thank them for collecting, processing and presenting it -- because it was at least consistently collected and presented.  That's one of the big problems with state-level data generally -- it's all over the place, especially when it comes to how its broken out, and this means that a cohesive one-stop place for all of it is indeed rather useful -- despite the shortcomings.

It's especially useful when a publication that is on a given side of some political alignment presents data that destroys the very case that their own side attempts to make -- such as claims that masking orders work.

Now The Atlantic has announced that as of March they're shutting down The Covid Tracking Project.  Why?  I argue that despite their protests otherwise the reason is that the data proves the vaccines were worthless as public health tools; they came too late to impact the path of infection which had already rolled over before the first needle went in the first arm.  As I have repeatedly pointed out and which the data has shown since this began that which you do after something happens cannot cause the thing to happen.

Yet we've seen this in said data repeatedly, particularly with mask orders after a roll-over in cases and then an increase in cases after the mask order is passed which was supposed to suppress transmission.  The data says it did either nothing or made it worse.  The poster child for this stupidity was Hawaii which saw a roughly ten fold increase in cases after passing its order.

Not a single complaint came from the media, including The Atlantic, about this wildly-obvious disconnect that repeatedly proved the measures were worthless at best.  Instead they all turned their "reporting" into something out of HG Wells Time Machine or even Orwell's 1984 in which a curve that was falling but turns and rises two weeks after a mask order is put in place is called "working", presumably because more people getting sick would be "working."  Exactly zero mainstream media outlets, including The Atlantic, took Fauci, Redfield and now the new CDC Director and President's claims in this regard and ran them through a few times with the obvious in-your-face truth using nothing more than the very data they were collecting and publicly presenting!

Not one complaint was raised about the obvious, in-your-face reality that actions taken after an event occurs cannot possibly be the cause of the event and that if you do something and the situation becomes worse you must face the fact that at best your action was almost-certainly worthless and might have caused or at least contributed to the deterioration.

Now that the data set is conclusive and proves the shots were too late and case counts were already collapsing before they were administered and, as a result, this thing is over and the jab-jab-fest only comes with potential harms for public health the lefties running it are going to shut the data source down.

Indeed this is exactly the same pattern we just saw with Johns Hopkins where a professor there was told to shut up about the fact that cases and hospitalizations have collapsed -- and right on schedule deaths are rolling over.  Why?  Because once again Orange Man Bad can't be used when Orange Man now resides in Florida and not in the White House, and any sort of look at the data proves that all we got out these "mandates" by politicians on both sides was serious, even critical harm and risk as the virus ran out of people to infect before we got a single shot into a single arm even by ignoring all of the normal safety protocols and testing requirements.

In other words on the data we should have done exactly none of it.  Use the therapeutics and nutritional supplements we have, lock employees into nursing homes so they can't take the infection into the building and, like it or not, the virus will virus but statistically harm nearly nobody.  You can defend some of the crazy in the first couple of months on lack of knowledge but that excuse expired in the summer.

Of course The Atlantic isn't saying it this way; they are instead taking a bow and claiming that there are "better" sources for what they collect and that they were originally driven from the "necessity" of producing scary graphs and figures.  Indeed, look at their own claim:

Every few months through the course of the project, we asked ourselves whether it was possible to wind down. Instead, we saw the federal government continue to publish patchy and often ill-defined data while our world-famous public health agencies remained sidelined and underfunded, their leadership seemingly inert. 

Well, what's changed in that regard?  Certainly not funding.

It wasn't who lives in the White House, was it?

After all you wouldn't want anything contradicting Biden and Harris' dick-sucking and carpet-munching by journalists for that which occurred more than a month before they took office being out there in conclusive form, right?

Oh, you can still get data, and I will still report on that which is reasonable to acquire and process, particularly for my state, but the "one place to correlate it" will be gone in another couple of weeks since it no longer serves the purpose of spreading fear among the population and in fact works directly against inculcating fear when you see the rate of transmission, hospitalization and now death plummeting like a stone.

Which it is, everywhere, mandates or no proving by conclusive standards that exactly zero of the "mitigations" did a damned thing other than screw you up the ass.  They did not prevent any illness or death.

None.

Sweden proved it early, then Florida when DeSantis told all the MaskHole jackwads that their "fines" and other actions were unenforceable as a matter of State Law yet the state had indistinguishable results from California which literally locked down the entire state and now India has proved the same thing on a national scale.

ALL of these "mitigations" were proved as FRAUDS.

Never mind the screwing applied to our kids -- which is still going on.

But it's all the Democrats fault!  Oh really?  What Party was Donald Trump in?  Who did 15 days (that turned into a year) to "slow the spread", who issued an E/O that allowed governors to close states, who let the CDC change their definition of "caused by" grossly inflating the death count, who allowed schools to be closed and who used the DPA to produce worthless ventilators at a cost of billions?  Was that all Democrats?

Didn't think so.

The real question is when -- or will -- the citizens rise and tell the government to go **** itself at all levels irrespective of political party or even make them pay for the death they caused and the imposition of mandates that served no valid public health purpose but screwed the public blind economically and socially.  Many of these same jackasses that cower in fear are literally dancing in the streets that Rush Limbaugh is dead.  May I remind you that Rush is dead because he decided to partake of pleasures that have risk associated with them and lost the bet, yet at no time did he claim that you must stop smoking cigars after he got lung cancer as a likely result of smoking them?  In other words like him or think he was a prick the point remains that he accepted the risk and when the bet turned out poorly he also accepted the consequences and made his peace with God.

Now about all you fat, diabetic hypertensive **********s who think I should hide in my house and wear a rag on my face because you intentionally ate yourself into a 300lb blob.....

Love him or hate him Rush had the integrity to deal with the results of his lifestyle choices -- and you do not.

Go to responses (registration required to post)
 

 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 2  First12Last
User Info How The Left Hides The Sausage.... in forum [Market-Ticker]
Loonster
Posts: 196
Incept: 2012-10-28

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Is there a good alternative to the covidtracking.com?
Greenacr
Posts: 211
Incept: 2016-03-15

Northern Ohio
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Yep, we all make lifestyle choices and lead imperfect lives. A choice that I made 20 years ago could come back to haunt me next year. The left lives in a world where they believe that the only choices that should have consequences are those related to opposing them.
Whitehat
Posts: 4216
Incept: 2017-06-27

Elsewhere
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
well said Karl. I give you credit for acknowledging how Limbaugh faced the consequences of his own decisions as do many others.

One thing from someone who did not choose his risk profile. We accept that this is part of life and the hand that we are dealt. If not this particular "cold", it could be any other that rings our bell for one last time. In no way do we have any right to expect others, including loved ones to modify their lives nor make any type of sacrifice or concession for any of us. Many of us have successfully not spent a single dime of anyone else's money including employee and other benefit plans to deal with what is our own problem.

Consequently, people like us harbor an extreme hatred for those who by their own choice actually cost the greater society and definitely us directly for their problems. And, we despise the decades of movements scolding us for having the temerity of not accepting irresponsible and disgusting existence with societal consequences.

In case the logic escapes a new reader, or one is not aware of all of Karl's erudite discussions regarding healthcare costs, the effect of making people not responsible for their actions did lead to this ridiculous response to a "cold." It also made the personal struggle for those of us with real conditions massively more expensive, often ruinous and painful and often deadly.

We hate you with a passion and will do whatever we can to make your lives even more miserable than you think possible. We have a strength like no other based in adversity. There are times when nothing is more convincing to an opponent than a shovel to the face.

All that we are asking is give hate a chance.

----------
smiley Gonna be a wild ride.
smiley Nuclear war is survivable.

Ameri-morons will finally learn when that one last stupid mistake unleashes consequences of compounding the previous mistakes into an epic, salient lesson. http://www.amerika.org/politics/arete-th....
Tickerguy
Posts: 171484
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Loonster - Not nearly as good of one.

It is what it is.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Franco
Posts: 143
Incept: 2009-10-06

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
There is a very strong correlation between vitamin D level and severity of covid. Roughly half the population is deficient in vitamin D. You can make your own vitamin D by being exposed to the sun (ultraviolet radiation), or you can take a supplement. It seems like if you were to take a daily dose of 1000 or 2000 or even 5000 IUs, you would get your level to where it needs to be, with little risk of raising the level to where it becomes toxic. So, having said all this, why hasnt the government been urging people to go to the pharmacy and get a supplement?
Tickerguy
Posts: 171484
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Franco - Because between that, Ivermectin and inhaled steroids (all of which are "at home" things and do not require a hospital) statistically nobody dies.

The data says exactly that; we knew this by summer and had we implemented it the death count would have plummeted to an effective zero immediately; perhaps 15,000 more people would have expired between August 2020 and now, but statistically-speaking that's a quarter to a half of those killed by the flu every year and roughly two days worth of ordinary death -- in other words, nothing.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Flappingeagle
Posts: 3986
Incept: 2011-04-14

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I look here for my Covid-19 data. http://91-divoc.com/pages/covid-visualiz....

If you scroll past the last graph you can pull up county data.

Flap

----------
Here are my predictions for everyone to see:
S&P 500 at 320, DOW at 2200, Gold $300/oz, and Corn $2/bu.
No sign that housing, equities, or farmland are in a bubble- Yellen 11/14/13
Trying to leave the Rat Race to the rats...
Chromehill
Posts: 137
Incept: 2010-03-03

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Does anyone know of studies done to determine Covid rates in people with asthma? Much like people with RA or Lupus since they are on HCQ.

Regarding Sweden, the experts like to point out that there were more Covid deaths in Sweden than Norway, Finland etc. What they do not mention is that for whatever reason, Sweden had a lower expected death rate in the years preceding Covid. Basically 2020 was not going to be a good year to be old in Sweden since the death rate would eventually return to normal with a few years of above average deaths.

----------
"Power, like the reproductive muscle, longs to be exercised, often without judgement or right" - Gerry Spence
Winston2020
Posts: 123
Incept: 2020-03-29

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I wonder if the word ever went out for nursing homes to up their vitamin D doses. Just a few of MANY studies are found below. I can't find the best study I found right after the vitamin D COVID severity link was found that was showed severely low levels and recommended -LARGE- doses in that study which was done long before COVID:

Severe vitamin D deficiency in the institutionalized elderly
September 2008

https://www.researchgate.net/publication....

SEVERE VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY, FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT AND MORTALITY IN ELDERLY NURSING HOME RESIDENTS

https://www.jarlife.net/776-severe-vitam....
Winston2020
Posts: 123
Incept: 2020-03-29

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The Atlantic also claims that Orange Man's fedgov wasn't doing a good enough job of tracking and now, miraculously timed right after senile pervert is in office, the inherently bloated and bumbling fedgov apparatus suddenly works well enough for the Atlantic to stop doing their decent job.
Winston2020
Posts: 123
Incept: 2020-03-29

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
My guess about the cause the second and larger spike:

FEBRUARY 17, 2021
Mutation in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein renders virus up to eight times more infectious

https://phys.org/news/2021-02-mutation-s....

The D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteincommonly referred to as the "G variant"likely ***emerged in early 2020 and is now is the most prevalent and dominant form of the SARS-CoV-2 virus across the United States*** and in many countries around the globe. With multiple mutations circulating, researchers have been working to understand the functional significance of these mutations and whether they meaningfully change how infectious or deadly the virus is.

In this study, the researchers introduced a virus with the D614G mutation into human lung, liver, and colon cells. They also introduced the "wild type" version of the coronavirusthe version of the virus without the mutation found early on in the pandemicinto these same cell types for comparison.

They found that the D614G variant increased transduction, or transmissibility, of the virus up to ***eight-fold*** as compared to the original virus. The researchers also found that the spike protein mutation made the virus more resistant to being cleaved or split by other proteins. This provides a possible mechanism for the variant's increased ability to infect cells, as the hardier variant resulted in a greater proportion of intact spike protein per virus.

The team's findings join a growing consensus among scientists that the D614G variant is more infectious; this was also demonstrated in studies appearing in Cell by researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory, in Nature by researchers at the University of North Carolina, and in Science by researchers at the University of Texas. However, it is still unclear whether the variant and its rapid spread have a clinical impact on COVID-19 disease progression, as several studies suggest that the D614G variant is not linked to more severe disease or hospitalization.

The researchers note that findings on the increased transmissibility of the D614G variant may influence COVID-19 vaccine development and, in particular, it may be beneficial for future booster shots to include diverse forms of the spike protein from different circulating variants. The vaccines with emergency use authorization from the FDA, as well as those under development, were created using the original spike sequence; studies are underway to understand how well these vaccines protect against the variants that emerged in the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil, all of which contain the D614G mutation. Recent work from other groups suggests that initial vaccines with the D614 form of spike can protect against the newer G614 form of spike, although more work needs to be done to understand how multiple mutations can interact with each other and impact immune response.
Cheetah9
Posts: 10
Incept: 2021-02-15

Northern Alabama
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I could send this link or even cut and paste and pass off as mine
(I wouldn't :)and my trump humping dad, stepmom, older sis, dumbass bil, and obviously my blacksheep lil sis who prays to the alter of xiden AND nothing would move them. Absolutely nothing. These are relatively smart and insightful people too; especially my dad. I gave up on them officially after xmas. I can say the same for my oldest best buddy for over 30 years now. He literally said... but Mike...It's the gov't dude telling you these facts backed by that genius fauci. OMFG! I had no words. And this dude and I grew up in the same town, basically same kind of parents, friends, etc. All I said is "well man....I just don't see things like that anymore."

We're all truly ****ed. This will not end. With over 90% compliance across the board, these things will continue. They know it works and it will continue to be exploited. BUT.... there are pockets around the country who get it. Just returned from Lowes for a few items. I saw about 25-30% maskholed up. Down from at least half and the beauty is no one hassles anyone anymore. GET OUT OF BIG CITIES! Is the only advice I can give anyone at this point who know this is all bull****.
Onelegged
Posts: 620
Incept: 2009-11-13

NW Colorado
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6Bvi_g....

YouTube will definitely take this down for being false information. So get it while you can.

This is 35 minutes long. After I watched this just now it is ABSOLUTELY clear that Fauci et. al. should be executed. I'm talking about an actual firing squad. The ghouls as Karl calls them should be drawn and quartered.

The MAJORITY of the deaths (as Karl has repeatedly stated) were preventable for pennies. Hundreds of thousands have died PURELY out of the lack of profitability of extremely effective treatments.

It continues to this very day. It is crystal clear.

These bastards must be held to account for this!!!!

----------
The light at the end of this tunnel is a train. It's gathering speed. It's also delivering your special box car. Showers are on the right...

Cheetah9
Posts: 10
Incept: 2021-02-15

Northern Alabama
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Other than Karl here, has there been any other serious minded reports on the absolute lack of regular old flu cases/deaths? I tried to bring that fact up to my dad back at xmas time but didn't move him one nanometer; chalking it up to isolation/maskholing.
It is so nuts. Seemingly intelligent people have gone completely stupid.
Onelegged
Posts: 620
Incept: 2009-11-13

NW Colorado
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Sweden is just at a different point in the curve. The others will likely catch up to them over time. This horse**** will got on for years still if the WHO et.al. have their way.

----------
The light at the end of this tunnel is a train. It's gathering speed. It's also delivering your special box car. Showers are on the right...
Memeticdefense
Posts: 23
Incept: 2018-03-26

Las Vegas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
From "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" we are moving to "No Mask, No Jabs, No Bitcoin, No Service".

The largest reddit group focused on gold has 38.6k members, the largest reddit group focused on bitcoin has 2.5 million members. Both have been around for a decade.

I'm trying to wrap my head around what it means when Nouriel Roubini gets laughed at in an interview for denouncing bitcoin (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy2oEgWn....

I can picture in my mind what the interview would be like if Karl was talking about masks and vaccines. He'd be laughed at the same way.

Onelegged
Posts: 620
Incept: 2009-11-13

NW Colorado
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Masks and six feet have stopped the flu in its tracks. A miracle from God (Fauci).

----------
The light at the end of this tunnel is a train. It's gathering speed. It's also delivering your special box car. Showers are on the right...
Tickerguy
Posts: 171484
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Them: "No jabs, no service!"

Us: "No service, you get serviced. In the ass."

Want to play that game? You won't like it. You may think it won't happen but yes, it will, and when it does the "no service" people are outnumbered by such a wild ratio that they'll have no idea where the trouble came from -- and what you deliver to them in response doesn't even have to be illegal.

Indeed it's quite a bit more-satisfying to watch someone writhe helplessly, wishing they were dead, all through entirely legal means, than to make them dead and forfeit your own life in exchange.

Among other things the first choice leaves you free to go do it again and again since there's not a single law being broken.

Consider this: A decent percentage of the 500,000 or so dead allegedly from Covid were likely left to choke on their own spit via exactly this while those who did it watched and rubbed their hands in glee, then went to the next and did it again. Has a single one of them who did it been arrested? Other than Cuomo, who got too public and "in your face" with it, what are the odds that ANY off them ever will do a single day in jail or lose a single penny of pay over any any of it?

Think about that for a while.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.
Onelegged
Posts: 620
Incept: 2009-11-13

NW Colorado
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
More and more I've been driving the extra 15 minutes each way to shop in the neighboring county just for the satisfaction of NOT putting that cursed diaper on my face. So ****ing pathetic! It's purely a movie prop. Drama.

----------
The light at the end of this tunnel is a train. It's gathering speed. It's also delivering your special box car. Showers are on the right...
Smitty
Posts: 231
Incept: 2014-09-24

SW Ohio
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Sorry if this was covered and I missed it.

Understandably, it would be instantly recognized as wrong/illegal for a shopkeeper to deny service to persons on the basis of skin color, religious faith, etc., etc.

But there are some restrictions that seem popular or acceptable, such as shops insisting No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service, dress codes at restaurants.

Is there a truly legal basis for shopkeepers to deny entry and/or service based solely on whether the person is wearing a mask/face diaper? Or any other medical device?

I have read that wearing masks/face diapers has led to getting bacterial pneumonia as well as possible 50% increase of dental problems, who gets the bill for that?

It appears there have been few actual laws, instead we have been dictated to, directed, compelled by executive political critters that are likely exceeding the powers granted them by the people.

----------
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.

-Soren Kierkegaard
Cheetah9
Posts: 10
Incept: 2021-02-15

Northern Alabama
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Smitty .... I am just an enlightened and aware redneck but those No SSS rules have been in effect for as long as I can remember...I'm pushing 48...from what I understand is they were a residual effect from the removal of jimcrow laws.

You are absolutely correct about the extended use of these face diapers! They do increase the chances of getting a bacterial infection of any kind. It's freaking common sense FFS! My kiddo is a 9th grader at a private school that has remained open but they do follow the "guidelines" and from day 1, he knows to cheat it and keep that mofo below his nose to breath and avoid possible infection from breathing in his own funk. He has listened to dad and; knock on wood, has not had any problems. I would encourage EVERYONE that are forced to wear one to do just this....whether that be you at the job or your kiddos.

Reason: misspelling
Mpoenie
Posts: 9
Incept: 2020-04-19

Austin, TX
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Karl, I do not know why you think that the Pfizer vaccine is not actually a vaccine. According to the CDC, "Vaccine: A product that stimulates a persons immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Based on the history with SARs, it is is not clear how long antibody immunity will last. I have heard it does not last that long. Long-lasting immunity is based on cytotoxic (CD8) T cells (CTLs). Generating immunity based on CTLs normally occurs when a cell becomes infected with a virus, synthesizes the viral proteins, chops up the viral proteins into peptides and presents these on the surface bound on Class 1 MHC molecules. Using an mRNA vaccine is a way of making cells make the viral protein and chop it up in the same way as if the cell were infected. The end is the same, generating an immune response that confers resistance.
Kikknback
Posts: 251
Incept: 2020-03-17

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tickerguy just wrote the opening argument with this ticker that proves beyond a Shadow of Doubt the entirety of government, the entirety of Media, and the entirety of the Medical field have participated in the GENOCIDE of the American people, with the FRAUD of all of the mandates pertaining to the Covid-19 virus.

----------
"The most grotesque act of Treason is to be born into a free Constitutional Republic, for which you did not risk your life or shed blood to create, and sit back and watch it slowly be taken from you without standing up in its defense" - me

"True Freedom can never exist, unless true Rule of LAW exists" - me
Tickerguy
Posts: 171484
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
@Mpoenie why don't you go look at a non-doctored source to fit the mRNA bull****?

Like this one that hasn't been changed:

Quote:
A vaccine trains your immune system to produce antibodies( proteins that fight disease), exactly like it would if you were exposed to the disease. But vaccines work without making us sick from the infection because vaccines typically contain pieces of dead, weakened, or lab-made substances that stimulate your immune system.

https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/qa/wh....

Note the BOLDED section. It's important.

A vaccine is a "drug" (definition: "a medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body.") but a drug is not necessarily a vaccine.

A substance that produces a synthetic, non-identical response believed to be protective to some disease is not a vaccine, it is a drug.

An mRNA injection causes your body to produce a specific set of proteins (it does not CONTAIN the protein) which the immune system then recognizes and forms antibodies.

HOWEVER, those antibodies are distinct and distinguishable from those that result from natural infection or an actual vaccine; they are NOT identical. For this reason they are not vaccines.

This is a problem for two specific reasons that are DISTINCT from the potential hazards of vaccines and drugs generally, which include (but are not limited to) potential intermediate and long-term immune system dysregulation:

1. We do not KNOW if these synthetically-produced antibodies produce sterilizing immunity. Natural infection does for the duration of the antibody titer above some threshold and some measure of protection beyond through both T and B cell recognition. Sterilizing immunity is the entire basis of public health benefit from vaccination; without it the benefit is only personal and in fact there is direct and potentially severe public health RISK from such a product. An injection that does not produce sterilizing immunity, while it may protect the person who receives it must never be widely promulgated into the population; its use is justified in small, targeted, high-risk persons, but MUST NEVER be distributed to a material concentration of the population. The reason for this is that natural selection with all viruses tends toward those mutations that produce easier transmission and/or less virulence. A mutation that transmits more easily "wins" as it gets the victim first, and one that is less-virulent is less-likely to produce revulsion by other humans toward said victim (people tend to stay away from obviously-ill individuals) which again makes that mutation "win." Non-sterilizing immunity voids the latter preference while maintaining the former and thus KILLS PEOPLE OVER TIME. Again, just to be crystal-clear: ANY PRODUCT THAT DOES NOT PRODUCE STERILIZING IMMUNITY MUST NEVER BE DISTRIBUTED ON A WIDESPREAD PROPHYLACTIC BASIS TO MATERIAL PERCENTAGES OF THE POPULATION OR THE ODDS ARE VERY HIGH THAT IT WILL KILL PEOPLE OVER TIME BY DIRECTLY PROMOTING TRANSMISSION OF MORE-VIRULENT STRAINS OF THE DISEASE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE FAIL TO BE TRANSMITTED TO OTHERS AND THUS DIE OUT. WE DID NOT TEST FOR THIS AND THE PEOPLE WHO ALLOWED SUCH WIDE DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT SAID PROOF ARE INTENTIONALLY INCITING AND PROMOTING THE RISK OF MASS-DEATH.

2. Any product that produces a distinct antibody is per-se dangerous to the person who gets the injection because you have now generated a "tag" that never exists in the natural world. If an adversary figures out how to construct a virus that is enhanced (e.g. ADE) by the presence of said tag (instead of inhibited) YOU ARE ****ED and there is nothing you can do about it. This approach has NEVER been used before for this exact reason; for literal decades bioweapons research has sought as its first and foremost goal the discover of such "tags" among proposed target populations that are not present in the attacker's population as this resolves THE problem with bioweapons -- once you release them you cannot control what happens in terms of their spread and the risk of them killing your own people is extremely high.

In general vaccines have proved to be both safe and effective measures for both personal and public-health reasons. These injections are not vaccines as they violate BOTH the cardinal rules of same; they are NOT proved to produce sterilizing immunity AND they produce a distinct antibody titer that never exists as a result of natural infection.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 1 of 2  First12Last