The Market Ticker
Rss Icon RSS available
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Comments on All Gun-Banners MUST Be Forced To Answer This
User: Not logged on
Top Forum Top Login FAQ Register Clear Cookie
Showing Page 2 of 2  First12Last
User Info All Gun-Banners MUST Be Forced To Answer This in forum [Market-Ticker]
Supertruckertom
Posts: 1829
Incept: 2010-11-07

USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Ask some Leftist if they had the chance to whack Adolph Hitler would they have done it?
The same leftist will also say that you can't fight the government and win.
Resistance doesn't have to fight the entire government.
It only has to change the leadership.
The Leaders are the ones making the threats.
If you only get one chance to change things, make it count by starting as high up the Chain of Command as possible.
Pass over a Pawn to take a Knight or Bishop or Rook or Queen and put the King in Check.
Pawns can only attack forwards.










----------
Preparing to go Hunting.
Radiosity
Posts: 126
Incept: 2009-03-05

Sunny UK
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
"how do you propose to "walk that back"?"

Let's see... how about they kill themselves as a show of good faith? Everyone wins! Except them. Which is sort of the point.
Nevertoolate
Posts: 1518
Incept: 2007-08-26
A True American Patriot!
San Antonio de Bexar de runover with illegals, Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
KD needs to send this to Tucker Carlson. I don't know if they would give him 20 mins of airtime, but it would be interesting to see the left's response.

----------

Democracy is a conversation between 2 wolves & a sheep discussing what's for dinner. A Constitutional Republic is found when the sheep pulls out a gun & makes clear that his 2nd Amendment Right will be exercised should the wolves attempt to hold such a "vote."-KD 9-29-15
Tickerguy
Posts: 152455
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Feel free, if you know how to reach him.

----------
Winding it down.
Daroberts
Posts: 1
Incept: 2018-04-10

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
We are beginning to hear voices of those who are opposed to the private ownership of firearms propose that the Second Amendment be repealed, imagining the Federal Government to then be free to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms. This is a misguided notion uttered by those who either do not understand the intent of both the Founders and the written Constitution, or those whose intent it is to deceive the populace. In the case of former Supreme Court Justice Stevens, I suspect it is the later.
Were the Second Amendment repealed, or even if it never existed, the Federal Government would still be restricted from the purview of gun control. Well, that was the original intent of the Framers of the Constitution, and "original intent" is supposed to be the guideline when the Supreme Court (and it's lower courts) makes an "interpretation".
James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, was initially opposed to the idea of a Bill of Rights being amended to the Constitution. Not that he was opposed to the provisions of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights. Madisons view was that if a power was not specifically enumerated in the Constitution, then it was not within the purview of the new central government he and the other Founders were creating. Madison considered the addition of a bill of rights would be redundant. Madison stated, The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined...
Still, knowing a governments tendency to usurp powers not specifically denied it, the faction demanding that a bill of rights be amended to the Constitution (The Anti-Federalists) stood their ground, and The Bill of Rights was amended to the Constitution.
Today, the majority of citizens do not understand the true purpose of The Bill of Rights, and this shortcoming can be laid directly at the feet of the public education system that promotes the leftist notion of rights being dispensations from the government. Take for example, how often do you hear someone say, "The First Amendment gives me the right to say...." or "The Second Amendment gives me the right to have..."? No, neither Amendment gives you the right. According to the Founder's vision of America, you already have the right. The Amendments are actually restrictions on the new central government the Founders were creating, prohibiting it from infringing on your right to speak your mind or to keep and bear arms. In fact, the Bill of Rights could more appropriately be called "The Bill of Restrictions". Outside of protections in the realm of jurisprudence, where a citizen may find himself contested with the government, the Bill of Rights confers no rights. Instead, each of the Amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights is a restriction placed upon the government, binding and limiting it's power to those enumerated within the Constitution, and the Tenth Amendment sums it up by telling the government, "And if there is anything we have failed to mention, you are restricted from that as well."
The Bill of Rights was an additional safeguard added to the Constitution, designed to protect the inalienable rights citizens of the United States are presumed to have. It's what made America unique among countries of the world. A repeal of any of the first Ten Amendments would not change that. Those who are calling for a repeal of the Second Amendment, with the notion that the Federal Government would then be free to regulate the right to keep and bear arms, are the ones the Anti-Federalists were wary of. And they obviously were right. - DARoberts
Tickerguy
Posts: 152455
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
****ing SCALIA has opined FROM THE BENCH (read Heller) that the 2nd Amendment does not mean what it says.

When I see that ********** in Hell (he got to go first) I'm going to******his eye sockets.

----------
Winding it down.

Djloche
Posts: 3744
Incept: 2008-07-07

Vancouver, WA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
.gov will not protect you, the rule of law is over, if you think you can pick up your check book and pay a lawyer and win in court you're more than stupid.
They mean to slaughter us. Arm yourself appropriately.

----------
"The Constitution is the IDE. The 2nd Amendment is the debugger."
Whitehat
Posts: 395
Incept: 2017-06-27

The People's Republic of New York
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
being condemned by some past life transgression to spend a significant portion of life in NYS i can tell you exactly how they will pressure people. it is similar to the child support concept where licenses and other permission slips can be suspended or revoked. tax refunds are also a potential issue. not yet, but since there is a record of who and where, suspension of driver's licenses, vehicle registrations, property tax exemptions, professional licenses. you name it, they can make life difficult as well as livelihood. what they will do now is make it an attached type of offense. as much as LE seems to like their neighbors in the non-urban areas of the state, they are constantly summonsing and arresting local folk for little ****. it is considered a right of passage for many and the state police are very different than the local LE and not bonded to their community. outside of the urban LE, the state LE, have the best financial deal and are a political tool of the governor. the state LE will add the gun violation as an aggravating charge to any infraction. this can also be used to justify traffic stops and/or be a standing warrant for stop and arrest.

the only reason that this is not yet occurring is that the legislation was a piece of political theater, unenforced, both sides get played. right after the state elections, the heat will be turned up and pressure will be put on the margins of the society. oh, and BTW, most of these non-urban communities rely upon massive state funding to exist. this will be used as leverage as local LE non-compliance will cause funds to be cut or not disbursed. they will cook the lobster slowly. when something violent happens, just watch the sanctions mentioned above kick in.

----------
There are two ways to be rich: One is by acquiring much, and the other is by desiring little.
snow, seasons, distance and dirt roads: SSDD
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap" (Gal. 6:7)
Supertruckertom
Posts: 1829
Incept: 2010-11-07

USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I wonder how many Han Solos live in Rural NY?
There have been a few over the years in NYC.


----------
Preparing to go Hunting.
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
Showing Page 2 of 2  First12Last