The Real Question For Regulators On Knight Capital
The Market Ticker ® - Commentary on The Capital Markets
Posted 2012-08-08 23:41
by Karl Denninger
in Editorial
Ignore this thread
The Real Question For Regulators On Knight Capital
 

I want to know the answer to this question:

Knight Capital Group Inc. KCG +3.27%was holding about $7 billion of stocks at one point on Wednesday last week—a far bigger figure than previously known—as a result of errant trades that forced it to seek emergency funding, according to people familiar with the matter.

One word: How?

How is it that a firm managed to amass $7 billion of net position when it had less than 10% of that in cash to put up for margin?

You can't do that -- your brokerage won't allow it. 

Are you telling me that there are no margin limits enforced against these firms, and that they don't have to prove their capital every night and then have the exchange systems limit their net exposure to the marginable amount of their capital that they have proved up?

You're kidding, right?

The exchanges really don't allow that to happen, do that?

Oh, but it appears they do, doesn't it?

We have these things called "computers" these days, and they're pretty good at counting.  It would appear that they've not been taught how to count.

We have a problem here folks, and the problem isn't at Knight Capital.

It's in the exchange system itself.

Discussion below (registration required to post)
 

Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Get Adobe Flash player





Blogtalk 3:30 CT Mondays
Items To Look At


Discuss The Capital Markets along with daily technical analysis with our Gold Donor program.

Where We Are, Where We're Heading (2013) - The annual 2013 Ticker

Links and Blogroll
Our policy on reciprocal links: Send us an email with your information and why you think your blog or news site would make a good addition - in most cases reciprocal link requests will be granted.
Seeking Alpha Certified
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out
Ticker Classics.

Visit the forum to discuss this and other investing-related topics; see the FAQ on the forum for information about Gold Donor status including access to our technical analysis video server.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media.

Submissions may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Leads on stories of current economic and political interest are always welcome. Our fax tip line is 850-897-9364; please include contact information with your transmission.

 
Comments.......
User: Not logged on
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ
User Info The Real Question For Regulators On Knight Capital in forum [Market-Ticker]
Eaglewwit
Posts: 6054
Incept: 2007-11-30
Green
SoCal
Banned
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This would help explain why the S&P is over 1400. It certainly isn't because of earnings.
Donethat
Posts: 771
Incept: 2009-04-22

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Knight seems to be already well experienced at selling what (they and or their customers) don't have and can not borrow, only a small step to buying what they can not pay for.

Once the sharpsters found they only had to settle accounts at the end of the day, then intra day positions have no meaning for them, as long as they net out before the end of the day. I hear rumblings that some hedge funds high frequency trading model is to have no overnight carry positions.

Very very crooked.
Eaglewwit
Posts: 6054
Incept: 2007-11-30
Green
SoCal
Banned
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Donethat. I have heard that too. I could not understand how there could be several HFT that did not hold overnight. The selling at the end of the day would be tremendous. Although we shouldn't be surprised by anything that happens in this crooked casino anymore.
Donethat
Posts: 771
Incept: 2009-04-22

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The analogy is the bank dollar clearing system, where the bank only cares about its end of day cash and net reserve positions? and then the DTC in NYC is doing 1.7 quadrillion a year in transfers. 6.8 trillion a business day in "security" clearances.

One small step from trading more than your capital per day to holding more than your capital ...
Debtpie
Posts: 534
Incept: 2009-12-17

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
How is it that a firm managed to amass $7 billion of net position when it had less than 10% of that in cash to put up for margin?


If we don't allow this, then the market will tumble, the economy will fold up like a cheap tent, Obama will lose the election, Hillary will be replaced and we won't get to see her do the Lesbian Rump Rub with a plump African sister ever again...now back to that video.

----------
A Leader, or an Opportunist? "A leader has the capacity of vision, the ability to see where things are headed before people in general see those things." Mitt Romney --- DebtPie's definition: a leader decides where "things" should head and "leads" us there.
Inez
Posts: 360
Incept: 2009-07-08

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
May be HFTs are trading on funny money which doesn't exist but exists in the computer's memory called RAM.
Anyways buying and selling stock at the same price makes them money for adding liquidity. So why not?

Reason: text edited
Azusgm
Posts: 2399
Incept: 2010-12-02
Green
East Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Knight is an options market maker and therefore has access to the "Madoff exemption" whereby they are allowed to naked short equities. Call it counterfeiting if you wish. I certainly do. A client can trigger this exemption by buying puts. Ostensibly to remain flat, the OMM will require the same customer to sell him the same strike call and the OMM can sell an equivalent number of shares naked short. Naked short selling by OMMs is allowed under the Madoff exemption the SEC issued several years ago. There was a locate requirement for broker-dealers, but not for OMMs.

Federal Register /Vol. 68, No. 215 /Thursday, November 6, 2003 / Proposed Rules

Quote:
The Commission is
proposing an exception from these
requirements for short sales executed by
specialists or market makers but only in
connection with bona-fide market
making activities.49 We believe a narrow
exception for market makers and
specialists engaged in bona fide market
making activities is necessary because
they may need to facilitate customer
orders in a fast moving market without
possible delays associated with
complying with the proposed ‘‘locate’’
rule. Moreover, we believe that most
specialists and market makers seek a net
‘‘flat’’ position in a security at the end
of each day and often ‘‘offset’’ short
sales with purchases such that they are
not required to make delivery under the
security settlement system.


Lame. Wouldn't be possible without the DTCC.

Why would normal retail person continue to invest or trade?



The put purchaser is at liberty to be the buyer of those newly-minted shares. If done in size, this can knock down the price of the underlying so that the client gets air shares on the cheap. The strategy is called a reverse conversion.

Seven8n2
Posts: 886
Incept: 2008-04-20
Gold
SW Virginia, USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
So, I'm confused...who was on the other side of these trades? The same computer, or other HFT's from other firms? Who was selling all the stocks that the Knight computer was buying? This is a serious question as my Dad was asking me and I can't come up with an explanation...

----------
O mia Patria, sì bella e perduta!
O membranza sì cara e fatal!
-G. Verdi
Genesis
Posts: 130713
Incept: 2007-06-26
Admin A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Well someone was selling...

But the problem is that there apparently is no actual requirement that you be able to clear what you trade at the broker level. There's supposed to be, but..... there isn't.

----------
I don't care if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me
Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.
What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?

Rvacha
Posts: 8295
Incept: 2008-10-03
Gold
Cleveland
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
Why would normal retail person continue to invest or trade?

Indeed. Everyone has trading rules and one of mine is that I never EVER trade financials regardless of what the b/s says. When was the last time we actually saw a finnie that was "clean"? I don't think the blame lies solely with the exchange system. A conscientious player wouldn't rely on an exchange to tell it when it is in trouble, it would have its own checks & balances, a circuit breaker and a kill switch. Clearly KCG had nothing. We don't even know if they have any of this now.


----------
"I suggest you panic." - Hugh Hendry
Azusgm
Posts: 2399
Incept: 2010-12-02
Green
East Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Unless the rules have changed since the SEC put out the Madoff exemption, broker dealers are to locate shares before executing a short sale and then clear in the required timely manner. Shorting is mostly done via the options and futures markets. The OMM can naked short sell into the market or to the client or a retail client's broker dealer. According to an explanation Max Keiser gave, the cheaper tactic is to use options futures which is pretty much a synthetic bet since it is a derivative based on a derivative and requires only a few pennies on the dollar for margin.

BTW, if you are going to audit the Fed, you need to audit the DTCC at the same time. But you can't. Cede & Co. is an entity that is not accountable to anyone. Cede & Co. is to the markets what the Fed is to currency and banking. The arms of Cede & Co. are supposed to be electronic clearinghouses. They are black boxes. The DTCC arm clears trades in equities. That is where air shares enter the market. It is the same "nominee" model as MERS.

Tallystick
Posts: 2229
Incept: 2009-09-20
Green

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Was there anything preventing pit traders from buying or selling intraday above their ability to post margin collateral?
Genesis
Posts: 130713
Incept: 2007-06-26
Admin A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tally, hell yes. As you trade on the floor you have to clock the ticket and trust me, the compliance people are watching.

----------
I don't care if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me
Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.
What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?
R2judge
Posts: 574
Incept: 2008-04-13
Green
Burbank CA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
A "brokerage bubble"?

One day i walked past the bank and saw an ad offering 5% down home loans. Then it became 1% down loans. A housing bubble followed.

It used to be that brokerage ads touted up to 100 dollars if you moved your account. Now i am seeing ads touting up to 600 dollars if you move your account.
Brokerages seem desperate to gain accounts, with those kinds of offers, just as at one time banks seemed desperate to find home buyers.

What is the implication for brokerages???
Genesis
Posts: 130713
Incept: 2007-06-26
Admin A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Well, as I noted in my update video last Thursday, there were persistent rumors that, if true, would have meant an INSTANT market crash.

They have (thus far) been proved to be false. That's the good news.

The bad news is that it appears there are NO exchange risk controls of materiality on these firms. That's extremely serious and although it's an entirely different risk than was rumored, it's one that if it becomes realized is utterly uncontrollable.

If there's one thing that had better get fixed NOW this is it.

----------
I don't care if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me
Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.
What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?
Mannfm11
Posts: 3539
Incept: 2009-02-28
Gold
DFW, Tx
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
What if they are trading against their customers counter position overnight? In the futures, they would never need margin, if that was the case.

----------
The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.---John Kenneth Galbraith
Genesis
Posts: 130713
Incept: 2007-06-26
Admin A True American Patriot!
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Again, netting across customers is a demonstrable evil and leads to extreme systemic risk. That has to be stopped.

----------
I don't care if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me
Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.
What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?
Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ