It is possible the document was intentionally doctored as a red herring to keep
suspicious folks busy. Maybe the information is correct, but intentionally made to look forged.
Because the main argument that shows he's not eligible is where it ask about the nationality of each parent.
One thing can be done, the senators who are not willing to remove a fraudulent president shoudl be recalled if their states have that procedure.
Or get several million americans so mad they all show up in DC at the same time.
Thanks for your hard work Karl.

Nbpundit

personally- I think anything is possible but I find this highly unprobable — do you really think that Obama would want to put out a questionable document when the momentum was really growing that he was not born here? Seems it would add to the dissenter's camp- not his.

I really do think there are a lot less supporters of him now that people realize. I think team Obama are scared.

Further- someone on here a many posts ago, mentioned that Obama seemed 'relieved/surpised' in the presser about the BC— I too read him that way. like: "OMG— glad we got something"

I think this is far from over....

The cut and paste really got me going. There are three identical "A" Letters in Hawaii and Department of Health. That was pointed out in a link, that also included the check boxes. I went looking and found three identical "u" letters in three different words. Again, what are the odds?

Check it out and see if you can find some more identical twins/triplets.

Quote:

"Marksf pic is worth a look, seems to show the 't' might be consistently misaligned to the upper right."

Mr. Denninger claimed in his video today that there could be no "kerning" (as he identified it) on a typed document, and yet in all three of of the documents I looked at, there were similar instances of what appeared to be "kerning".

And the "t" characters were unmistakably similar in their misalignment across the documents.

I looks to me like Mr. Denninger has been shooting from the hip a lot this week on this particular issue, and forgetting to unfasten the strap. I hope those toes heal up quick.

Here's what I mean:

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?getima....
.

Vegas: "I think team Obama are scared."

Yep.

Same tactics used of getting the agit-prop activists out of the woodwork, that has been so noticeable (and ineffective) here with the Climategate scandal.

Remember, at the start of Climategate, these agit-prop activists were also swearing blind the issue would be dead within a week.

Well, your MSM buddies couldn't kill that off in a week for you, could they dickheads?

People up to no good are now ****ting themselves.

Marksf

So the t is bent on the Obama typewriter - what is your point?

Also, there is no kerning on the twins COLB - just terribly out of focus.

Finally how do you explain the IDENTICAL pixelation on so many Obama letters plus no halo?

You cant so I would imagine "checkmate".

Must have been a different thread, but someone claimed the identical looking pixelation is not so identical when you continue to blow them up more?

Steelpiston: They're not 100% identical, there are literally two pixels that are different. Earlier I showed how a similar document could produce two checkboxes with near identical pixelation using ClearScan in Adobe though so.. *shrugs*

Steel, there's two (separate and distinct) issues:

1. Pixelation under the mask.

2. Pixelation in the masked layer.

#2 is identical (that is, pixelation in the extracted layer.) It is extraordinarily unlikely that an actual photographic scan of a document would produce two identically-compressed images of things that "look the same" in the original scan. It is even more extraordinary if you find three or more.

The problem again is probability stacking. Let's say that it's a 1-in-4 probability that the two boxes would "optimize" to the exact same representation. Let's also say there are nine other "one in four" probability events in the document.

The probability of all of these elements stacking is 1 in 1 million (0.25 ^ 10)

This pixel match business is probably the most compelling evidence to date. Everything else, while it had reasonable alternative explanations, becomes corroborating evidence now.

(Oh noes! Now Desert Cat is wearing a tinfoil hat too!)

Take a piece of paper. Put it in an electric typewriter if you can find one (so that it will exert essentially uniform pressure with each strike). Hit a single character key numerous times. I would suggest # or ^ or + or = since those are as similar as can be easily done to replicate the check boxes utilized on 1961-era Hawaiian birth certificates.

Type six to ten versions of that key.

Scan it into a PDF (as most people can at work these days).

When you blow it up to 800% or 1600%, you will not find any two of the characters with anything like the same pixel arrangement, much less any two that are identical copies as can be seen on http://obamasgarden.files.wordpress.com/.... or the u's in Sqmo's post above.

There is a reason that even in capital cases the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" not "beyond any highly improbable made-up excuse, the odds of which are astronomical". The latter standard can never be met, although it is the standard being employed by the various graspers-at-straws who keep posting in defense of Obama.

I'd say blow them up as big as you want and see for yourself. Anyone can do it with Acrobat reader. Here are two identical i letters. They are identical, not different by one or two pixels. One is from caucasian and the other is from africa. Just open two windows, zoom in and see for yourself.

Found this and have no idea if valid............

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2011/04/....

Matt Taibbi? Has he got balls big enough to take this on? He took on the big banks. And as much as RS would hate the message they'd love the sales.

A problem with Obama Sr's and Stanley Dunham's timeline?
http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2011/04/....

Quote:

Matt Taibbi? Has he got balls big enough to take this on?

At a left-leaning publication? Not a chance. Nobody on the Left has the balls to take this one on. If they did, they wouldn't be on the Left.

re: Kerning verses Worn out manual typewriter

I sent a retired professor (economics) friend of mine the Ticker and video on the Kerning. Here is his response below. He is a Libertarian mainly and has no use for Obama. He is circa 80 in age I believe.

Dan Kurt

"These paranoid idiots are embarrassing. His “technical” comments on the typewriter reflect borderline insanity. Unlike myself, this fool has most likely never used a pre-WWII Underwood manual typewriter, let alone have any idea how it works. It probably never dawned on him that those old mechanical typewriters wear out, and one of the most common problems was the strike keys becoming misaligned. I can still remember trying to bend them back in shape, a task that was virtually impossible because they were made out of spring steel. BO’s birth certificate was prepared on a manual typewriter which is obvious by the difference in the intensity of the letters. How well I remember that common problem on my dad’s old typewriter. BO was born in Hawaii. There exists a multitude of factual and circumstantial evidence to support such a conclusion to everyone but those holding an entrenched belief otherwise. What is far more unknown are his early years of development. Relationships, schooling, and funding are practically an empty slate on him. But ultimately none of this matters since the unwashed masses will surely reelect him in 2012, especially if he uses the demise of bin Laden to bring home the troops from Afghanistan. Unless the economy collapses before the election, or someone appears on the Republican ticket unknown today, BO will win by a landslide. Yes, it’s that bad so don’t shoot the messenger!" by the Professor

Name calling = instantly discredited.

I OWNED an old olivetti underwood given to me by my aunt. It was considerably older than me.

I'm gonna rip him to pieces later this evening.

Dan Kurt
funny— I didn't know that an economics professor were type specialist

I learned to type on something that looks just like this

have a close look at those strike pads
see how they sit so tightly together
see how the Cap is above the lower case

Noone has commented on my recreation of "pixel identical" checkboxes, nor on the fact that in the PDFs created using OCR ClearScan there are "pixel identical" letter glyphs as well.

I learned to type on a manual also.

What's the null hypotheses for determining whether the apparent kerning is caused by mechanical causes?

Quote:

What's the null hypotheses for determining whether the apparent kerning is caused by mechanical causes?

It's not kerning, otherwise the text would drift between it and an actual typewritten document.

I'll post this again... but I don't know why I bother.

I'll show you tonite. Stay tuned.