The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets

This is one of the most-outrageous videos of cop "action" I've ever seen -- and I've seen a lot of them.

The suspect being pursued apparently did shoot at cops with an AK-47, which is certainly reason to defend oneself.  Further, the cops eventually shot the suspect (which he most-certainly had coming!)  

That's not the problem.  

The problem is how said "officer" did that.

Let's count up the sins:

1. The officer in the video is firing from a moving vehicle.  There is no possible way to have reasonable awareness of what is beyond your target while firing in this fashion.  That might be acceptable in a war zone under certain circumstances but it is never acceptable in a civilian situation where uninvolved parties are likely to be within a reasonable distance of the engagement.

2. The officer is also firing through his windshield!  This will alter the path of the bullet, and since the impact with the (slanted) double-pane laminated windshield glass occurs right at the muzzle deflection of the round by even a single degree will result in a nearly-certain miss.  Note that 1 MOA (sometimes in slang called "one minute of *******") is an error of 1 inch at 100 yards.  One degree is 60 times that; in other words an error in the point of impact of five feet.  Even at just 100' of distance there is no chance of being "on target" when firing through such a barrier in this fashion; this means all of those rounds were effectively fired wildly without being aimed.

3. The movement in the gun inherent in firing unbraced from a moving vehicle means you cannot possibly aim fire with any sort of accuracy in the first place.

The results bear all of #1-3 out -- despite all this shooting the bad guy was not shot during that exchange as none of the rounds were in fact aimed (because that is factually impossible due to #1 - 3 above.)  The chase was terminated when the cops rammed the bad guy's car and forced it off the road into a gas station; at that point with the vehicle at rest they were able to accurately target and stop the suspect.

The real world is not a video game.  In the real world every round you fire continues once it leaves your weapon until it strikes something and comes to rest.  If you miss your target then that "something" has the possibility of being an innocent person who had nothing to do with the original reason you were shooting.

It is flatly unacceptable to shoot a firearm wildly and with reckless disregard for the safety of everyone within a half-mile or more of your location, and that's exactly what this officer did.

Felony charges against the officer are not only warranted they are essential to redress the outrageously dangerous and intentional misuse of his firearm.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

I have maintained for quite some time that the network of "sensors" and cameras showing up all over our freeways (including here in NW Florida) are not, as claimed, simply about traffic monitoring but in fact have a second, far-more-nefarious purpose -- tying them into automated vehicle recognition software that allows the government to track anyone in real time no matter where they go.

Looks like I was right.

The Justice Department has acknowledged constructing a database to track the movements of millions of vehicles across the U.S. in real time. 

The program, whose existence was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, is primarily overseen by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to combat drug trafficking near the U.S.-Mexico border. However, government emails indicate that the agency has been working to expand the database throughout the United States over the past several years. 

This may be Constitutional but the question really ought to be whether we want to live in such a nation, and whether we are going to put up with this sort of crap.

It is not the use today of such technologies, it is what they enable over time, and the fact that it takes very little in the way of a government shift for this to go from being used to, for example, find people who abduct kids or run drugs to a 100% surveillance state where you cannot go anywhere without being monitored, tied into a "pre-crime" system of analysis that harasses people without cause and in direct violation of your rights.

This is already happening -- there are reports of people traveling in states that do not honor CCW permits, for example, being pulled over for no reason other than an automated scan of their plate by a cop's vehicle flags them as having a CCW permit in another state and having their vehicle torn apart looking for the (non-existent) gun.

By the way...

Even now, John Filippidis has no idea how the officer learned about his concealed-carry permit, and the MTAP isn’t saying.

I'll tell you how -- if you have a CWP it shows up when your driver license record is run, and that's tied to your vehicle registration, of course.  Cops in many jurisdictions have automated license-plate scanning cameras in their cars and as such it is a good bet that the MTAP officer had the fact that this guy had a CWP pop up on his screen unprompted.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Amusing price action, really.

Amazon had earnings and their shares popped materially, now trading back to where they were around the beginning of December.  Between the day's change and after-hours the stock is up roughly 13%.

Here's the problem -- revenue was light due (largely) to FX.  There are plenty of people ignoring the FX, which is probably where the pop is coming from.  However -- net sales were really only up in North America.

The other problem is that free cash flow decreased against year-ago figures, and so did net income.

Further, first-quarter guidance is pretty awful.

How someone manages to sell you a stock for nearly $350/share when the company only manages to come up with $591 million in operating income on $29.3 billion in gross sales simply astounds.  I mean, really, a 2% operating margin merits a P/E of somewhere around 700 (assuming they manage break-even the other three quarters to come -- which is probably optimistic!)

No, that's not a bubble.

As for Google, watch the birdie.  You can't short a stock that refuses to decline into a no-bull**** revenue and earnings miss, but if there's a company out there that does advertising, including mobile, better than anyone else it's Google.

The bird is chirping in your ear folks; flush the damn wax out and pay attention lest you start crying about being "surprised" in another few months....

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

From a journal dealing with the actual practice of nursing -- you know, the people who actually take care of 90% of the job when you get sick enough to require help?

Flu results in "about 250,000 to 500,000 yearly deaths" worldwide, Wikipedia tells us. "The typical estimate is 36,000 [deaths] a year in the United States," reports NBC, citing the Centers for Disease Control. "Somewhere between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians a year die of influenza and its related complications", according to the Public Health Agency of Canada, adding that "Those numbers are controversial because they are estimates."

"Controversial" is an understatement, and not just in Canada, and not just because the numbers are estimates. The numbers differ wildly from the sober tallies recorded on death certificates -- by law every certificate must show a cause -- and reported by the official agencies that collect and keep vital statistics.

According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year -- fewer than deaths from ulcers (2,977), hernias (1,832) and pregnancy and childbirth (825), and a far cry from the big killers such as heart disease (597,689) and cancers (574,743). The story is similar in Canada, where unlikely killers likewise dwarf Statistics Canada's count of flu deaths.

In other words the claimed death risk from flu is a scam.

But it's even worse than the reported actual numbers -- you see, cause of death is often wrong.  It's especially wrong when "flu" is involved because, as is explained, few people who get the flu, even if they die from it, are tested to be sure it really is the flu!

So many people who die from the "flu" really had a heart attack and, while they were sick at the time it might not have been the flu they had -- they might have a common cold virus, for example.

So how does this happen?

Read the article for the process, but the simple answer is this: The CDC invented the "threat" for the purpose of selling flu vaccines.  In other words, the government intentionally lied (and continues to lie) about the risk of dying from the flu for the purpose of industry profit.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

This sort of "story"*****es me off.

HERSHEY, Pa. (AP) — Speaker John Boehner credited a controversial government surveillance program on Thursday for helping uncover an alleged plot by an Ohio man to bomb the U.S. Capitol and kill government officials.

At a news conference at a retreat of Republican lawmakers, Boehner singled out FISA, an acronym for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows the FBI to obtain search warrants and communications intercepts in intelligence cases.

Oh please.

Let's look at the specifics of this particular bust, shall we?

First, the man was arrested when he purchased a gun and ammunition after discussing using it to shoot people at the Capitol.  Ok, fair enough, if you stop there.

But -- the accused had been "arranged" to meet (twice) with an FBI agent by another man who had criminal exposure on an unrelated case.  In other words, he didn't come to the FBI's attention organically, he was steered there.  And, of course, there's the usual trotted-out "connection" to Islamic terrorism (even though nobody will say that out loud in Obama's circle.)

There's a problem though -- the Cincinnati Enquirer tried to find someone who had seen him at the alleged mosque where he had been attending after his "recent" conversion to Islam.  They couldn't find anyone, never mind that the mosque in question is typically attended by African immigrants who speak no (or nearly no) English.  You don't think a white, 20 year old guy would stick out like a sore thumb at such a place, do you?

Second, this is a guy who is 20, unemployed, lives at home and spends his days playing video games.  There's no evidence that he has any sort of military training, knows how to use a firearm (even at a rudimentary level) or has any sort of skill when it comes to tactical thought -- well, ok, other than perhaps from playing Doom online.

And of course Boehner, quivering in fear, parades out how "effective" the FBI has been.


This guy sounds like a nut who was enticed to "make a name" for himself, but who had utterly no idea how to do so, lacked any sort of specific skillset enabling him to do so, and had he traveled to Washington DC with his weapon (which, I note, he didn't get to attempt) I suspect he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn at 20 yards.

Indeed it would not surprise me at all if he has never fired a gun in his life and couldn't even figure out how to load and charge said rifle absent active help by an FBI agent!

This isn't an anomaly either; the FBI in 2011 arrested, charged and ultimately obtained a conviction of three men who they tried to goad into committing terrorism -- going so far as to concoct the plot themselves and then, when that was insufficient they actually tried to bribe one of them with a quarter of a million dollars right after he became unemployed.  

While they did draw a big sentence the judge wrote an utterly scathing opinion of the government's acts, documenting that it was the government that concocted the scheme, decided where it would take place (to enhance the penalties available) and provided literally everything to be used in the so-called "attack."  Indeed, the judge said the defendant was "incapable of committing an act of terrorism on his own."  

Oh, and then they bribed one of the defendants after learning that he was destitute.

When you can't find people willing to commit suicide to attack our nation you have to invent some in order to keep your "funding" going.

What's outrageous is that we, as citizens, continue to tolerate this crap.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.