The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Federal Reserve]

Read between the lines...

Mired in a world of low growth, low inflation and low interest rates, officials from the Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank said their efforts to bolster the economy through monetary policy may falter unless elected leaders stepped forward with bold measures. These would range from immigration reform in Japan to structural changes to boost productivity and growth in the U.S. and Europe.

And what are we talking about here?  Something like this:

In a lunch address by Princeton University economist Christopher Sims, policymakers were told that it may take a massive program, large enough even to shock taxpayers into a different, inflationary view of the future.

Understand this folks:

Inflation is exactly identical to a tax in terms of its impact on your wallet, except that it is a tax on everything, not just production.

Taxes can be avoided -- legally -- by refusing to produce.  Inflation takes that which you already earned.

It is thus much like a "property tax" in form and substance in that it is both pernicious and permanent.

"Shock taxpayers"?  Yes, such a program might well do that.

It might "shock" them enough that they start earmarking lampposts and boiling rope, and Christopher Sims might want to consider that possibility before promoting such a thing, especially considering that the part of society that bears the lion's share of such a policy are the lower economic strata as they have no surplus to invest in something that can attempt to offset the damage.

The rather-interesting congruence among the central bank wonks ought to get your attention, as it is an admission that (1) quantitative easing didn't work, (2) negative interest rates haven't worked, (3) ZIRP ("ultra low") rates haven't worked and that all of these folks have realized that they're out of policy options that can and will "stimulate" debt demand -- and thus allow yet another turn of the crank of the exponential growth of same.

Here it comes folks, and it's going to get quite messy.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection:
The Rule Of Law

Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.