The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Employment]
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection(s):
Don't Do It Lennar -- Talk To Me Instead

Display list of topics

Sarah's Resources You Should See
Sarah's Blog Buy Sarah's Pictures
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2018-06-01 09:06 by Karl Denninger
in Employment , 237 references
[Comments enabled]  

Screams the Bureau of Lies and Scams....

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 223,000 in May, and the unemployment rate edged down to 3.8 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment continued to trend up in several industries, including retail trade, health care, and construction.

Eh, this isn't anywhere near as good as you think it is.

The unadjusted May number is +661.  For context this is pretty much right up the middle for a May; last year was an outlier in that it was only +145, but the previous year was +519, before that was +762, prior to that was +631, etc.

 

The truth of this figure is shown here; the blue is month-by-month but the red is your annualized figure -- and it's not particularly impressive.  Of course Trump wants to make hay about it, which is not surprising.

But let's the cut the crap; the not-in-labor-force number stands at 95,689 (that's 95.7 million) and that figure as a percentage of the workforce hasn't come down at all.

 

In numerical terms it continues to rise, but before you say "but there are more people" the correct view is how this works out in percentage terms.  In other words are people coming back into the workforce  or not?  The answer is clearly no; there has been exactly zero movement downward in that NILF percentage since Trump's election and in fact there has been no material change since 2015; it has all been the usual seasonal wobble and nothing more in either direction.

Of course Cramer keeps saying "oh it's all very strong."  Uh, no it's not.  Strength is defined by the people who can work and are in the labor force actually working.  Getting a 3.9% unemployment rate by having 96 million people giving up  and the not-in-labor force number at historic highs, refusing to move downward is not a "strong labor market."

To claim otherwise is fake news.

 

The internals are even worse.  

I have long written about all of the "job growth" since 2008 being McJobs.  This month that "expansion" was truly outrageous; the employment participation rate rose an astounding eight ticks for those with less than a high school diploma (the very definition of "unskilled"), five ticks for those with a diploma only, it was down two ticks for those with an associates (in other words net-net an associates degree actually had negative value) and utterly flat (less than one tick movement) for those with a bachelors or better (which makes that a negative value too, especially considering it's $100k+ cost nowdays!)

These "created" jobs are, in short, statistically all sub-$20/hour positions.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)